World History

Class Participation Rubric 

Course Expectations


Below are articles / sites / resources, or prompts based on class conversations, that either connect to our current unit, previous units, or to relevant current events connections; read / view / consider, and then respond in the “enter a reply” box at the bottom of the page; participation on this site can help to enhance your class participation scores for the course, either helping to boost less vocal participation during “synchronous” class time, or adding to that participation as a kind of “extra credit” to your class participation average; thoughtful responses to others’ contributions, and/or replying to questions posed to you by others’ replies will also serve to earn class participation points

Avoid responses that just summarize or define a topic – keep focus on your thoughts / impressions / connections… I wanna see that you both read it, and thought ab0ut it too…


So you now know the historical / family roots of my first, middle, and last names – tell us the history / genealogy of any part of your name??? Share what you know, or what you can find out…

PYOT from a peer: Watch this video on what would’ve happened to our world if we didn’t go through the Great Depression. What are your thoughts?

What do you think – does this guy have a point?  He’s talking about our home you know… is he off base? on track? Share your thoughts

Could it happen here? Check out these competing articles concerning whether America COULD be, or WILL NOT be vulnerable to a “fascist takeover” – your thoughts? (ps – both these articles are intentionally a few years old – think about recent events (since start of 2020 for example) and how they might factor into your opinions)

Connected to the above, check out this article on “a night at the Garden”… a topic too many Americans might be too quick to forget or ignore? share your thoughts   

PYOT from a peer: As we’ve learned about the roaring 20’s and the feeling of freedom that came with it, is it possible that the roaring 20s 2.0 will take place after covid? Check out this article and explore the different ideas. What are your thoughts? 

PYOT from a peer: Read the article about Marie Curie and her tragic death. What do you find interesting? Why do you think she was so devoted to science that she endangered her life for it?

Following up on previous topics regarding students’ civil liberties in a school “environment”, take a look at this case poised to come before SCOTUS, and let me know your thoughts

PYOT from a peer: Read the intro and first couple of pages of the book “All Quiet on the Western Front” by Erich Remarque. What do you think life was like before they were allowed to rest? Why do you think that they are so happy to get food? If you were a soldier during this time what would be the one thing that you would bring with you to the battlefield? Why?

Check out these links for a deeper dive into the abstract art scene and styles of the 1920’s and 1930’s – what stands out to you and how do you think different works of art / artists / art styles reflect the times?

Take a look at the timelinechronology links which include some lesser-discussed topics and themes of the “interwar” period – do a deeper dive on any links within regarding topics that inspire, and share your thoughts on how it represents a transition or change happening in this period, and/or how it reflects this time in world history

Check out this web article with Google Earth visual representations of human impact on our climate and planet – what are your thoughts?  

PYOT from a peer: After learning about the different techniques used in propaganda (see slides Unit 12 / link in earlier propaganda post), which technique do you believe is the most effective?  Can you provide an example?

PYOT from a peer: Check out this article explaining how the Great Depression led to the creation of many of our favorite hobbies, and how the current pandemic is doing the same. Is there anything that you find really interesting?

Check out the early slides of the U 13 slides presentation (check out notes in lecture boxes too) and tell me which of the mind-bending / change-inducing scientific, artistic, and/or social cultural changes in the 1920’s were the the most transformative in bending peeps’ minds to new knowledges or realities – feel free to add any others you find thru individual research too

PYOT from AiBe: The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand played a HUGE role in the start of WW1. Do some extra research about him, what do you think about him as a person? Do you think the war would have happened if he hadn’t been killed? 

PYOT from AdBa: As we have learned in class, rats were a big deal in WW1 especially in the trenches. Read this article  and share your thoughts. Anything interesting? Surprising?

PYOTs from KE:***

Connected to a few WordPress topics, what was with so many dogs in WW1? Why do we see them in the pictures during this time? Read this article to find out. What did you find as interesting or surprising? Your thoughts on what you found?

Read about the truce the soccer game made for soldiers on Christmas… What did you find? Thoughts? How did it create a peaceful truce?***

PYOTs from SM:***

Connecting to unit 12 and some in class discussions, read this article about April 6th 1917 the date The US joined WW1. Share your thoughts on any of the questions. Did the US declaring war againt Germany help with anything? How was this a major turing point of the better and the worse? What was surprising or interesting to you? Do you think it was good that the US joined the war?

What happened to the titanic on April 15th, 1912? Read this article all about the Titanic. Share your thoughts on any of the following questions. How was the creation of the Titanic a major event? How did the crash of the Titanic change ships we go on today and history? What are your thoughts on the rescuing of the people? What are your thoughts on all of the investigations? Did anything stand out to you?***

PYOT from a peer: Check out this video on how Stubby the dog became a Sargent in WW1. What stands out as interesting or surprising? Do you think they should give more medals to dogs that helped during the war?

PYOT from a peer: Take a look at these links about technological innovations during the 1st World War – what stands out to you as interesting a/o surprising? 

Check out this link (and many links within…) regarding how the 1st World War changed life for many women Great Britain 

PYOT(s) from AO:***

Continuing our conversation about Rasputin, do a little bit of research on the origins of the song. What sticks out to you? What do you find interesting? Do you think the song matches how we talked about him? Thoughts?

Continuing our conversation from class, are there any other turning points in history that you can think of? If so, explain why and what impacts it had on society.***

Revisit our last assignment from WW1 unit (topic of discussion and group work during class…) – and/or this article on the many major, lasting effects of the 1st World War; which do you think is the most important in shaping the world today? Explain your choice:

Take a look at this site’s collection of pics from WW1 – which images stand out to you and why?

Check out JG’s CC vid on World War 1 – what does he highlight as the major causes of the war, the main reasons why it ends the way it does, and what the lasting effects of the war are on the world:

Check out the links within this site’s collection of veterans’ stories from the 1st World War – what stories stand out to you and why?  

Check out this link to the status / plans for  The National WW1 Memorial– what thoughts / impressions do you have, especially regarding why this memorial is so much later in the making / establishing in a city so full of war memorials… why so long for this one?

Perhaps the worst of the war was the Battle of the Somme – on the battlefield anyways; or perhaps the worst of the war was the horrific Armenian genocide (check out other links within…)- man’s inhumanity to man, and a terrible precursor of much more to follow in the 20th century… or maybe the worst of the war was its role in the global flu pandemic – so much loss… respond to each or all of these topics regarding war and its many horrors, then tell us something at the end of your reply that makes us feel better?!?  Perhaps a positive story of love / courage / bravery and service that came out of the 1st World War?  Those stories do exist… peeps often overlook them… so yeah – respond to any of the worsts being worst, and or provide a feel good story from this really not good time…

Revisit our class discussions in unit 12 around propaganda – pick any of the techniques we focused on, and provide modern-day examples of organized efforts to convince YOU to do (or not do) something: find examples from (1) the US federal government, (2) a private organization, and/or (3) Nashoba that reflect use of a technique – include info on format / delivery of the message (and a link if applicable?), and how convincing (or not) it is; also consider and discuss if propaganda is always bad, or how sometimes it might be a good thing?  Answer any and all of the prev Qs as inspired

Check out this article on the “she-soldiers” of the 1st World War – what stands out from their stories, and why do you think they, and most any, info on “heroes” and “heroines” from WW1 is not well known:

Revisit the video linked at the start the WW1 unit – could the outbreak of war been avoided in the summer of 1914?  Which peeps in the video could have done more (or less) to lessen tensions?  Who stands out from the video as the most interesting / disturbing / perplexing / likeable peeps and why?

Here’s the story of one lady from WW1 who is well-known: what do you find interesting and/or surprising about Mata Hari?

PYOT from a peer: Check out this new article about a death tunnel from WWI that was just discovered in France. What do you find interesting? Is there anything that stood out to you?

PYOT from SM:  Check out this article on the cargo ship that hit the Francis Scott Key bridge on 3/26. Share your thoughts on how this event connects to our discussions of Industrial Revolutions and how/why our infrastructure might be a bit fragile in places??  Where do you see this issue going in the future?

So… follow me for a bit – You are the sole survivor of a horrible mid-Pacific blimp accident (stay with me on this one…) and you are falling out of the sky but can direct your faulty parachute towards only one of two islands – Marxist/Communist Island, and Social Darwinist Island (see where I’m going with this?) – tell me which one you would choose, and describe why: (ie why you think one of these two extreme views is least bad than the other – “lesser of two evils” kinda thing…) – feel free to get creative / descriptive with this, but keep focus on your arguments why one of those two systems would be preferable to the other 

The annual “World Happiness” report is out… America lost ground – but one group of Americans expressed greater levels of satisfaction than others; why do you think this was the case?  What contrasts the “happiest” nations from the US and why might most Americans be getting less “happy”? Share your thoughts on any of these Qs

PYOT from BA: Read this article on the proposed TikTok ban. What are your thoughts on the ban? Do you think it is a good or bad idea? Why do you feel as you do? 

PYOT(s) from AdBa:

As we are entering the 6th industrial revolution there is a lot of new technology. Check out the link, and express your thoughts about the technology you see and its implications. 

International Women’s day is March 8th. Read this link about the history of this day. Is there anything interesting with the history?

PYOT(s) from MZ:

What are your thoughts on how 12 of the first 18 presidents owned slaves? Should we still honor and recognize these influential people, even though they didn’t see a problem with slavery? How about some other American leaders who owned slaves?

What would your life be like if you were a child laborer in the Industrial Revolution? What are the negative impacts of being one?

PYOT from SM: From the in-class discussion about growth mindset and fixed mindset consider the following questions: Would you say you have more of a fixed mindset or a growth mindset? Why? If you have more of a fixed mindset what can you do to have more of an open/growth mindset?

PYOT(s) from AiBe:

(disclaimer – Mr. Sak does not condone setting aside your morals…) Set aside your morals and create an argument either for or against imperialism. Explain why it was beneficial/why it wasn’t. Explain how it helped/ was unhelpful for both parties involved. (suggestion – good convo on this could be a helpful thing in prepping for the U11 exam essay?  just sayin…)

Compare Socialism and Capitalism. Why is one “better” than the other? Explain.

Take a look at some of the early 20th-century inventions. Did anything stand out to you or surprise you? Why?

Voting for the next president is starting to happen! Do some research on the history of voting. Did anything surprise you? Did you expect some events to happen earlier / later?

Haiti was the first black nation to gain its independence, however is also a struggling nation. Do some research on Haiti, what do you think are some reasons for it’s struggle? Why? 

During class, we discussed what type of economy America has. Add onto the discussion, give more examples of what type of economy America has. Why do you think this? 

President Biden just gave his State of the Union yesterday. Do some research on the history of the state of the union. Did you see anything interesting?

3/11 is National COVID-19 Day. Do some extra research on the impact of Covid 19 on not just America, but the whole world. As well as the origin of Covid.  How do you think covid will have impacted the future??

Harriet Tubman Day is on March 10th. Do some extra research on a female abolitionist, Harriet Tubman. What did you find?

PYOT from KE: Read about the working conditions of mill girls in Lowell, as well as the accidents and negligence that occurred. What stands out to you as interesting a/o surprising?

Take a look at any of these links that discuss Victorian era   styles and   social   expectations – what stands out? what aspects of this still influence society today? what aspects have been left behind, happily and/or unfortunately?

PYOT from AO: Out of all the technology that you use, what do you think is the most important and effective one? What would be different about your lifestyle and routine if you didn’t have it? Why?

PYOT from CA: Is climate change the greatest threat facing the world right now? Check out this article about climate change. Should it be taken more seriously, or less seriously, why?

PYOT from a peer: Share your thoughts on some of Gandhi’s controversial and outdated opinions. Did you know about them before reading this article? What do you think this says about society? Do you think that Gandhi contributed enough “good” to overshadow the “bad?” (look for Sak response to this… and feel free to respond to that too…)

PYOT from a peer: Check out this article about some of the composers that were part of the romanticism movement. Do you recognize any of them or their pieces? Is there anything that you find interesting, or anything that surprises you?

PYOT from a peer: Check out this article about the Willow Project. What are your thoughts about this huge controversy? Who does it benefit / who does it hurt? What actions should / could be taken by us people?

PYOT from a peer: Check out this link on The 7 Most Dangerous Technology Trends, and share thoughts on what technology sounds useful and improves everyday life, and what could really be easily used to harm us. Which of the 7 was surprising to you, which was predictable, and why? 

Check out  these  articles  and tell me what you think – should these statues come down?  What should / could we do with images and monuments that reflect imperial heritages of European / American cultures?

Based on our conversations of nationalism, ethnic identities, and homogeneous and heterogenous societies, check out this article on the most / least “diverse” societies in the world – what facts or trends are interesting or surprising to you? What do we learn from any of this info? What might peeps “miss-learn” or assume incorrectly based of this info? 

Check out this article on the challenges of combating climate change while we’re dependent on fossil fuels – why is this problem so hard to address?  What are some steps going forward to address? 

PYOT from a peer: Take a look at more facts on Karl Marx. Are there any facts that you find surprising or interesting?

Tech 🙂 / Tech 😦  [written / visual / performance? the format’s up to you…] Create a shiny, happy vision that describes in detail a “technological heaven” 100 years from now where human life has been made joyful, healthy, and safe thanks to advanced technology; AND/OR also create a nightmarish apocalyptic vision that describes in detail a “technological hell” 100 years from now where human life is nasty, brutal, unhealthy and endangered as run-away tech threatens human existence:

PYOT from AO (and Sak…) We have been talking about robots in class. What are your thoughts on the development? Does this scare you? Why / Why not? How about thoughts on this?? Is this cool?  How about this?  Consider those examples, and ideas shared in this article, and craft a response that describes where technology has taken us, and where we’re going with it???

PYOT from ZM / AO / SM: Take a look at this link  and the differences between Catholic and Orthodox Easter/ what are some things you noticed? additional link on Greek/Orthodox Easter for more info … ALSO, with Easter coming up, where did Easter egg hunts come from? What caused them to start happening? Take a look at these amazing easter eggs from around the world. Which one is the most interesting? What one do you like the most? For what egg was technology the most important? For what egg was technology not that important? Share your thoughts on this, or any of the previous prompts:

PYOT(s) from AiBe:

The French Revolution started because of many different political ideologies and beliefs. If you were alive, where would you stand on the French Political spectrum? Why? 

Spring is coming up soon! What do you think about the origins of early Easter? Is it what you expected?

Napoleon played a key role during the French Revolution. What do you think about the backstory of Napoleon? As well as, where would you rank him on the Political Spectrum? 

The “Fish Wives” were responsible for the March on Versailles. Is there anything interesting about them? Why were they known as “Fish Wives?

PYOT(s) from MZ:

What do you think about the commercialization of   holidays in the US? Do you think it’s a problem like these two articles? Or do you like it and can you find an article in favor of it?

If you had to be one person in the French Revolution, who would you pick and why? Would you be a major role player in the revolution? What would your social class or political views be? What would your chances of being beheaded be, and what position in history could avoid that?

Your thoughts about strange lesser-known events in history? 

PYOT from AO: Since St. Patrick’s Day is coming soon, how did the phrase, “luck of the Irish” come about? What did you find interesting? Your thoughts?

PYOT from SM: Focus on the people we have already covered in unit 10 – do the nicknames given to Kings and Queens make sense? Are any of these wrong? If so, why are they wrong? Do any of the nicknames fit the person perfectly? What are your thoughts?

Your thoughts on the not-so-sweet origins of Valentines Day?

PYOT from MZ: Find and read an article about some big “What If’ ____ didn’t happen?” in history and comment how your life would be like now. For example, “What if the French never entered the American Revolutionary War?” or “What if we were colonized by ancient China” etc… be sure to include link to the article in your response

(a previous post revisited and modified): Wealth and Poverty – take a look at both sites, traveling through any links of your choice within (check out some of the topics / categories / deeper dives…) and offer your comparing / contrasting thoughts; not looking for any specific response – just what stands out to you as interesting, surprising, or what you think the stats within tell us about our world today… I’ll offer some thoughts periodically and replies to them invited and welcomed!  Also consider consider number form the previous in comparison to Massachusetts’ towns ranked by income   … see #’s 60, 113, 255 – and compare to a national average income … reasons for the comparisons of our towns to others in the state? to the national average? 

Check out some of the lesser known but interesting (often strangely so…) facts from the French Revolution – what stands out to you as most interesting? moist disturbing?  most reflective of what’s happening in French revolutionary society? Each and any of those Qs, or from any other angles that catch your attention: 

Some interesting information on the connection between Madame Tussaud and the French Revolution – what are your thoughts on “death masks“, and what does her story tell use about that era?

Take a look at this web article (and  embedded links too?) discussing the French Revolution’s legacy regarding slavery – how might this connect to JG’s arguments contrasting the value of the ideas of the French and American revolutions?

Check out the life and works of renowned French revolutionary painter Jacques Louis David – what do both his art, and the trajectory of his life story, tell us about the era of the French Revolution? 

A not-so-epic battle – check out these   two musical takes on the French Revolution – rate your fav / least fav based upon their incorporation of information, and style of delivery: 

Check out this excerpted section of the Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen – what are your thoughts on the stated goals of the National Assembly?  How do they compare /contrast to goals expressed by American revolutionaries in their Declaration of Independence and Constitution?

Kind of out there a bit, and a reach at times, but check out this interesting article that compares France entering the Revolution, and the US entering the coronavirus pandemic – do you buy any of its suggested connections or parallels? Any points the author makes that you agree / disagree with? Explain your thoughts:

An interesting PYOT choice from a peer – Check out more information on the fashion of Queen Marie Antoinette. Is there anything that you find interesting, or anything that surprises you?

View JG’s linked CC vid on the French Revolution, and respond to one of his suggested main ideas – that the French Revolution was far more influential in the impact of its ideas on the world than the American Revolution was – agree? disagree? Explain your thoughts:

Create a cartoon/storyboard/google slides?? (other options could work – ask me if not sure) of a conversation (or perhaps argument??) between members of the 1st, 2nd and 3rd estates as they discuss what is happening in France in 1789, and what should be done – make sure to capture their different beliefs and interests – take a pic of your work and upload to Google Drive and share the link;  for reference, take a look at this, and this for a more detailed view of the 3rd estate, with links to more detailed stuff on 1st and 2nd estates too

PYOT(s) from ZM:

Check out this link on Alexander Hamilton – What are some things you noticed about him? How did he change history, was he really as important as the musical makes him out to be?

Read the first few pages of this excerpt of Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan. share your thoughts. Is there anything you recognize from governments/societies we have learned about this year? 

PYOT from LR (assist MS): Check out and share your thought on peeps’ from this unit and their love of  cats  and  dogs  – feel free to weigh in on your preference as well

PYOT(s) from LR:

Review linked materials and think about the lifestyles of the American colonists  vs the lifestyles of the British back in England. Which one would you prefer and why?

Share your thoughts on some of the notable women of the American revolutionary war

What are your thoughts on the origins and customs of Groundhog Day

What are your thoughts / what do you notice / why do you think Henry   VIII had so many wives?

Watch the linked JG / CC video on some topics from and changes wrought by the American Revolution –  reflect and respond to his idea that the American Revolution “wasn’t that revolutionary” (aka didn’t change much socially for many), or just respond with any particular thoughts or impressions your were left with concerning JG’s choices of focus topics and themes: 

PYOT(s) from KE: 

Read about the roles of “wet nurses” and their lives, how they became one, and their important role in the Royal family with this link, and the horrifying history of them with this link.

Read this article about the weirdest people in history. Who were the weirdest in your opinion? Any thoughts on their ways? Things that you found crazy weird? 

PYOT from ZM: Pick a current event from the news, provide a link to an article you read and talk about why you think this event is important. Provide opposing views from how the event reported? Why did you pick to write about it, how do you think this event will impact history, short term and long?

Share your thoughts on the “Potato King” – what are your thoughts, Tots? (…sorry)

PYOT from a peer: Check out this article regarding how Ivan the Terrible got his name. What stands out, and do you think Ivan deserved the nickname he got?

PYOT from a peer: Read this article about Jane Grey – what stands out to you? Maybe also check out this article on what would have happened if she had kept the throne. Any other ideas on scenarios that could have occurred if Jane had remained queen, or any overall thoughts?

In the continuing effort to make sure Her-stories don’t get lost in the teaching of HIStory, check out these bad-ass ladies, and possibly talk about how and why herstories still get underemphasized today

Revisit slides 36-55 of unit 9 slides presentation, perhaps taking a look at vid links and proposed questions on slides 34 and 39, and tell me your thoughts – did Russia benefit from the reigns of Ivan and Peter? Or was Russia worse off as a result? Explain your thoughts:

Peruse the U9 assignment (terms 1,2, and 3, and Q1), and the unit presentation (slides 26-32 of unit presentation in particular) that connect to the thoughts expressed in class regarding the Hobbes/Locke debate, and provide your thoughts, with examples to support: who is right? Hobbes (people need leaders to keep them in line) or Locke (peeps can work it out / democracy can work); provide examples from world history we’ve already covered, examples from this unit, or any examples you can think of regarding history we’ve yet to cover, or current events topics, to support either (or both) views regarding which path leads to the most orderly and successful societies (avoid repeating ones already discussed / seen on the Hobbes vs Locke debate doc – unless you’re adding an ex to provide more context to ones already there – that’s fine) – don’t forget linked resources on the unit materials posting on GooCla specific to this topic as well) – another way to respond is to focus on a more specific aspect (such as MB offers via “PYOT”) – do you agree with Locke’s idea of “natural rights”? Are people “born with rights” that others are bound to respect? 

Check out the JG / CC video on the English Civil War – what stands out to you about what changes, and what doesn’t, in the in the turbulent 17th century in England?

A deeper dive into a very busy dude… what are your thoughts on the many jobs / rivalries / monumental issues and events that Charles V was involved in – which do you think kept him up nights the most?  Is he a good or bad guy?  Respond as inspired

Check out (and fill out your own copy as directed) of this political spectrum activity to explain / identify the different spectrum labels and their meanings by providing examples; AND/OR take my little goofy polspect quiz on slide 11, AND/OR the several links to other polspect quizzes on slide12 of Unit 9 presentation; what are your thoughts on any of your results?  did they support or surprise what you thought you’d see as results?

Check out this JG / CC video on the rise and decline of Spanish power in the 15th-17th centuries – outline some of the reasons for both, and/or describe what stands out to you from the story of Spain’s central role in shaping the “Atlantic World”:

PYOT from SM: Would you rather live life as a doctor, a banker or a pirate? Explain? How is life better? What are the pros and cons?

PYOT from ZM: Search up your birthday and write about any important events or holiday that happened on that day. How much importance did that event have on modern society? Is it a well known event/holiday or not? Why do you think that might be?

Connected to the 1st post on this site (1st chronologically / last vertically…) what do we think about this kind of shizzle going on?  Why does it persist?  What can / should be done?

PYOT from SG: Which focus theme do you think is most attached to Columbus discovering the Americas and what followed (the Columbian Exchange, the spread of disease, conquering of Native Americans, etc. – revisit Unit 8 stuff too)?

Describe how this find helps to expand our knowledge of the origins of Africans taken to the Americas in the “African Diaspora” – share your thoughts 

Take a look at the 1st 11 “Maps that explain America” and tell me what stands out to you regarding the roots and influences on the Americas both before and after European exploration and colonization:

Check out this link regarding the encomienda system developed by the Spanish in their American colonies – describe why it gets so brutal, and why even attempts by some Spanish monarchs had limited success in reforming it

Effects of the start of the “Columbian Exchange” – what stands out to you in regards to this article on the unique significance of the CE on the course of human history 

PYOT from a peer: As we learn more about the Columbian Exchange, we learn more and more about the many different foods that were exchanged in the process. What is one food product that was brought to the Americas due to the Columbian Exchange that you’re thankful for?

Check out this JG CC video on the trans-Atlantic slave trade – what three facts stood out / were surprising to you? what amongst the plethora of horrible information in here was the most horrible?  what about trans-Atlantic African slavery is unique in the history of human slavery?  any of the above Qs, or others that occur to you, are game for a response to one of JG’s more important vids… I think anyways…

Check out this link (and many sub-links within?) on  the history of, dismantling of, and “neo” rise of mercantilism in world economics and trade – what facts and/or trends stand out to you as interesting regarding how this process shaped our history, and shapes our present 

History and numbers of the slave trade – what stands out to you regarding the impact and growth of slavery in the Americas / the future US?

Mexican leader demands apology from Spain / The Pope regarding conquistador conquests – your thoughts?

From our in class (starting Wed 12/13) discussions of the meaning of the term “significant“, take a look at the A&E Channel’s compilation of the “most    significant    people     of     the    last     1,000 years”, we’ll view them across several weeks in class, the top ten are linked:  10-9   8   7-6  5-4   3-2    1.  Offer a response that shares what you think regarding any of the following: did they get their ordering right or wrong? who should be (who isn’t) or shouldn’t be (who is) on the list of the top 5 / 10 / 25?  who’s overrated? who’s underrated? which Focus Themes do you think seem to apply most frequently to the largest number of these peeps? (i.e. which FT is most important in making individuals “most significant”?  Or, respond with any thoughts or impressions you have from this list?

Humanist “self inventory” activity – referring back to our Unit 7 discussions of “humanism” and its approach to changing society by improving individuals: make a list of all the “labels” that apply to you (“conservative”? “liberal”? “jock”? “nerd”? “extrovert”?  “shy”?… try to come up with at least 10 – Once you’ve done that, decide which 3 of those labels comes closest to the heart of who “you” really are?  So, based on the 10 (especially 3) labels you’ve identified, if you were going to plan a life-long course of study / skills development based on those 3 labels, what would it look like???  Describe…

Think back to our Unit 7 assignment on / class discussions regarding the ideas of Niccolo Machiavelli – Is he right that leaders have too much responsibility to be limited by things like morality or ethics?  Do the “ends justify the means”?  Is success all that matters?  Do you see leaders around you using “Machiavellian” tactics?  Respond to any of the previous Qs…

Check out your peers’ “Sell Your City” presentations, and respond with a reply that either / or 1) identifies which group “sold their city” the best (can’t choose your own) explaining why you think so; 2) shares any thoughts or questions any of the presentations raised for you; 3) shares which city (could be your own) you’d least like to move to, explaining why (not because of the quality of the presentations, but due to any of the facts / info about those cities that seem least appealing)

BAGHDAD    HANGZHOU    CONSTANTINOPLE    KYOTO      KILWA     TULA          CAHOKIA        JERUSALEM     VENICE         LONDON

From all of the advice you gave in your U3 write-ups, from any of our U3 discussions on “virtues” and “community”, what do you think was one particular piece of guidance that would, if practiced, make our Nashoba Regional High School culture a better and more healthy and productive place for all?  Could be from any 1 faith / belief, or even better an idea shared by many if not all?  Up to you – respond as inspired…

“PYOT”: What you got?!?  Do you have an interesting thought / question regarding current events in the world today?  Want to engage your peeps in conversation on it?  Propose a post to me, and if I green light it, it’ll go up on the site, and we’ll see what conversation transpires (points for proposing a post, for responding to your own topic, and for replying to others’ responses to your post); there’s a lot going on, and I want to give you all a chance to drive the conversation; I look forward to finding out what conversations may occur…

Focus Themes: – any you think that I’m missing?  Any really important drivers of peoples’ actions that aren’t covered in my list of 12?  explain:

Modern day slavery – what can / should be done?

Responses

  1. Read the intro and first couple of pages of the book “All Quiet on the Western Front” by Erich Remarque. What do you think life was like before they were allowed to rest? Why do you think that they are so happy to get food? If you were a soldier during this time what would be the one thing that you would bring with you to the battlefield? Why?

    I can completely understand why they were so happy to finally rest a little bit and eat some food, because the sounds of guns shooting and see your friends die is probably a lot traumatizing and must leave your mind destroyed, so having a time, even if is short, just to give a break and eat must be almost like a miracle to them, also probably the only thing that made them go to the fronts was the proud of fighting for their country, feeling that being a fighter patriotic was what a real man would do.

  2. Check out this web article with Google Earth visual representations of human impact on our climate and planet – what are your thoughts?

      I was really not that suprise me  looking at the impact humans have on our planet and climate because I already knew about urbanization, cutting down trees and the effects of humans using the earth’s resources. What did stand out to me was just seeing Dubia get “built” over the years. It is crazy to see how much of an impact humans have had on earth , especially within the last 30-40 years as mass production and the population on earth grows. This post really makes me wonder what the earth will look like in another 5, 10, 20 years and more. I really like looking at comparisons from different years and the changes so I personally think it is cool that Google Earth has a timeline feature. What does concern me slightly is the effects humans have on the climate and the melting of glaciers as they are very important to the world. 

  3. Read the article about Marie Curie and her tragic death. What do you find interesting? Why do you think she was so devoted to science that she endangered her life for it?

    I think it’s incredible to see that he dedicated much part of his life to science and to discover chemistry and physics problems that helped a lot the modern science to learn more about atoms and microscopic world, is tragic to see that she was killed by what she was learning and doing experiments for years, but she was a great woman for that women, that is what matters.

  4. The Battle of Somme (and Verdum) was the most brutal of the battles in WW1 where there were easily over a million deaths, shared by French and German soldiers. This war is a prime example of just how bad war can get, and the silliness of war. I say this because after 1 million people are dead, what do you do next? You can’t disregard it but you are forced to. The war would end eventually, and that would be 1 million lives to waste during trench warfare. I watched Hacksaw Ridge, and it was an inspiring story on a Desmond Doss (WW2), an unarmed army medic was persisted through hardships in order to save as many lives as he can, even if he knew they were going to die. His story emphasized the power of teamwork, loyalty, and trust during such scary times and how these virtues can lead to victory.

  5. I think the best propaganda type depends on what you’re trying to advertise. If you’re trying to make the opposition look bad, then obviously name calling would be the way to go in order to establish a link between the enemies and something nasty. If it was a commercial and you were trying to advertise a product, perhaps transfer, glittering generalities, or maybe even bandwagon would work. If forced to choose one for an advertisement purpose, I would say transfer because it’s straightforward but not too boring. In general I think an effective propaganda technique is glittering generalities because it sends the message quite easily, and you don’t need a lot of people in order to successfully execute this technique unlike bandwagon or card stacking.

  6. After reading about the death of Marie Curie, I find it interesting and much more meaningful that she died from radiation, proving how she was exposed long before her death and took the burden of becoming sickly in order to pursue and advance research in her field. Not only did she help open new ideas in science, she also helped push forward the role of women in the workforce and the strength of women in academical roles. Perhaps making women more well known drived her research in one way or another, or she simply had a strong love for what she was doing.

  7. What happened to the Titanic on April 15th, 1912? Read this article all about the Titanic. Share your thoughts on any of the following questions. How was the creation of the Titanic a major event? How did the crash of the Titanic change ships we go on today and history? What are your thoughts on the rescuing of the people? What are your thoughts on all of the investigations? Did anything stand out to you?***

    How was the creation of the Titanic a major event?

    • It was one of the first “cruise” ships of the world that could actually take people from place to place in a comfortable space. 
    • It used a relatively new wireless radio
    • The sinking reshaped many things for safety, radios and precautions 

    How did the crash of the Titanic change ships we go on today and history?

    • The crash of the Titanic caused new safety equipment and protocols to be implemented. Like there has to be enough lifeboats for 75% of the passengers and crew and other boats for the rest of the passengers and crew. I personally think that  it is good that they have enough boats/rafts to hold everyone on the ship and more because it is not fair for people not to have a raft to get off a sinking ship. 
    •  Also lifeboats need regular inspections and there needs to be regular drills to help prevent something like this from happening again. In my opinion this is just smart because safety is very important if you are sailing across the ocean and there are no ships near. 
    • Now ships have been redesigned to have a stronger bulkhead and to have double hulls for more safety on board. 
    • Also after this incident it is required to have a 24 hour radio system in order to stay in contact with other ships and any coastal radio station again to improve the safety of the trip. 
    • Lastyl there is also an international ice portal which would send out alerts to any sea vessels traveling to Europe, Canada, and the US if there is an iceberg nearby. This is an amazing idea in my opinion because by the time the ship saw the iceberg and hit it, it was too late.

    What are your thoughts on all of the investigations?

    • I think that having all of the investigations were good and I think it is good that there were investigations because it affected many people and killed many people too. Overall all of the investigations were good because it allowed for new safety ideas to be implemented. 

    Did anything stand out to you?

    • The  maiden voyage of the Titanic was on route to New York City from Southampton, England. This just seems like a trip that is a little too long for a maiden voyage because you don’t really know that much about it and what could go wrong. Also going across the ocean by plane is a little scary nevermind the maiden voyage of a new ship. 
    • Another thing that stands out to me is the amount of things this sparked for stories, films and even more. There have been so many movies about the Titanic sinking or this related to it which is not surprising but it stands out because how many times can you make a movie about/related to the sinking?
    • The Titanic had a lot of safety equipment like 16 doors so that if/when the hull gets breached they could keep water out of the rest of the ship. Also the Titanic had a system and liner so that it was “unsinkable” no matter what happened. I think that some of these ideas were very smart but this incident showed that their “unsinkable” technology does not alway work.
    • Even before the Titanic got near the place it sank it almost had a collision. That is very interesting and stood out to me because maybe that was a sign that this trip would not go as great as they hoped for. Also it took a long time to maunover away from the near collision which means the steering of the ship was not great either. So that might have been another factor to the sinking of the Titanic. Another major sign could have been that the seas were very quiet that day. 
    • The ship sent out distress signals to other ships and many ships tried to get to the scene but they were too far away to get there in time. This stood out to me because I did not realize that there were other ships in a vicinity of it and the Titanic was able to send out messages to other ships that were far away. 
    • When the ship was sinking it was moving at about 30 mph. That is very fast to be sinking but also not that fast if the bottom of water was so far down. 
    • The communication on the ship was not that great as the 3rd class passengers were mostly unaware of what was happening and what to do which is very scary to think about. 
  8. Check out these links for a deeper dive into the abstract art scene and styles of the 1920’s and 1930’s – what stands out to you and how do you think different works of art / artists / art styles reflect the times?

    What I think is the most interesting thing of these type of arts is that people tend to make arts based on their reality, like a person from Africa will make a different art than a people that comes from the American Continent, a person who is passing through high inflation will make a different art compared to someone who is earning a lot of money. That is the cool and interesting part of this type of art.

  9. Take a look at the timeline /  chronology links which include some lesser-discussed topics and themes of the “interwar” period – do a deeper dive on any links within regarding topics that inspire, and share your thoughts on how it represents a transition or change happening in this period, and/or how it reflects this time in world history

    It’s nine years of a lot of changes and it’s surprising how many important things happened like the New Deal of Franklin D. Roosevelt, Adolf Hitler taking the power of Germany, The atomic bomb and it represents in a great way that even in a small period of 20 years between WWI and WWII, you can have incredible and enormous changes, even the small ones have their own importance like Christ The Redeemer that today is one of the most known statues in the world and is the Brazil today Postcard.

  10. After watching Google Earth’s adaptation of Earth’s changing environment due to human interference, I wasn’t surprised but I admit it was interesting. Humans are just animals on the planet, and it’s interesting the level of control and impact they have on simple terrain, which you would think is solid and undisturbed. However, this should open the eyes of people to the direction and just how much influence we can have on the Earth… soon making it uninhabitable OR much more industrialized if we continue with this path

  11. The Night at the Garden was time where thousands of American citizens joined together under unison to applaud the Nazi Regime, especially in support or terminating the minorities in their country completely. I find this kind of crazy because this is what America is the opposite of today and was developing to become ethnically diverse back then. Although this wasn’t a good look for the U.S., I think it’s important to recognize this history instead of ignoring it or we won’t learn from our previous mistakes.

  12. I read the article about a person debating whether the U.S. is worth visiting anymore. I believe that he is on the right track. He described how America is becoming more dangerous by the day, with growing hate, gun use, discrimination, etc. However, there are still the good parts of America with welcoming citizens. Despite this, I believe that it’s clear that the U.S. is becoming more dangerous even after COVID. The author doesn’t make the U.S. seem that bad, making the article quite fair. He provides pros and cons to America, making it seem as if unbiased while still opening the eyes of American citizens.

  13. Check out this web article with Google Earth visual representations of human impact on our climate and planet – what are your thoughts?

    I think that its kinda incredible to see how decade by decade humans shape the planet in small scales and not only in land, but also theres a bad side of all of this that is the heating of the planet due to the greenhouse gases, but it still incredible.

  14. After learning about the different techniques used in propaganda (see slides Unit 12 / link in earlier propaganda post), which technique do you believe is the most effective?  Can you provide an example?

    It’s kinda hard to say what’s the most effective one, but if I could tell what’s the most effective one for me is the name calling, because it is much easier to make people feel disgusted with your enemy than make people like you by who you are. For example: If you have a political enemy that makes some polemic speeches sometimes, if you call that politician fascist, homophobic, sexist Etc, a lot of people are gonna believe you and vote for you because don’t want that other politician to be elected.

  15. After reading the article about the origins of the song Rasputin, I agree that it follows the same reasoning as us in class. The lyrics were clever and accurately perceived him for who he was. This has a big deal to do with historiography and how information was passed down. Rasputin was able to quickly gain power and influence in Russia, as described in the song. The song could’ve done better on just how mysterious-looking he was. The song described him as big and strong with a terror/fear aura. I think there are better ways to describe his figure.

    • Also something that stood out to me was the fact that they were stating these facts like “Lover of the Russian queen” which appears as if true but wasn’t really confirmed. I think that this effectively adds suspense around him knowing that there are these different claims/gossips spreading around today and back in Russia during that time period.

  16. When reading about the Archduke Franz Ferdinand, I realized that he had a pretty normal life. When his cousin died, he was furthered into the line of succession. He joined the military at one point to do some service and eventually went to visit the people in Sarajevo, a Austria-Hungarian province. I guess the Serbs wanted some feeling of nationalism, but I don’t believe that Franz Ferdinand did anything particular to anger them. I believe the war would’ve still played out if his assassination didn’t happen. It might’ve not played out the same, but tension was already rising throughout the entirety of Europe. It only takes on death or one event for the world war to begin. When WW1 started, the spider-web of European allied powers became involved, and this was the basis for such a devastating war.

  17. It’s cool how the Great Depression created a variety of new hobbies for people to enjoy. I realized that these hobbies were more human and relating with the nature. I recognized that the COVID pandemic did the opposite, and it makes sense. With the growing industrialization of communication/phones, it’s clear that the pandemic would only draw users closer to their phones and not the outdoors. I believe that we are headed into a direction of an isolated society where no event is needed in order to induce these “new hobbies”

  18. The right page of All Quiet on the Western Front revealed what life was like when war wasn’t happening. The soldiers were resting in some places far from the action. Although this technically was supposed to be a peaceful time, it’s clear that these soldiers were still facing hardships in life like having to endure rations and scarce food. However, food was a symbol of humanity and a time for them to claim their sanity since it’s obvious that you can’t really eat in battle. Eating was like a way to reset. If I were to go into battle, I would most likely bring a picture of my family in order to have something to remember them by. In war, the fact that I would end so many lives would make me completely disregard the connection between a body and it’s own conscious.

  19. Check out this link (and many links within…) regarding how the 1st World War changed life for many women Great Britain.

    – Before the war, women weren’t looked as a first choice for work because there were men, but men left for the war multiple jobs opens up for women. There was about a total of 2 million women that got employed and not just in jobs within the home but Jobs like working in Factory’s or cleaning chimneys. Something fun that happened during this time, was a football was given to women who were working in the factories so that they could enjoy something in these unhealthy living conditions. In the North East they weren’t able to make enough teams, but they did eventually come to a tournament  the Munitionettes Cup. Women also starting voicing themselves more at this time. Emmeline Pankhurst was one big voice, but what she voiced was a bit strange and not what you would think. She wanted people to know that men should join the army because this would benefit women.

  20. I think Stubby has a heroic story. As a stray, Stubby bonded with soldiers of the 102nd Infantry Regiment, becoming their mascot. When the unit shipped out to France, Stubby went away on the transport ship. Once officially a war dog, Stubby served on the front lines, participating in 17 battles. He used his senses to warn his unit of gas attacks and incoming artillery shells. Stubby even caught a German spy. He also provided comfort to the wounded, Which I find so cute!

  21. Continuing our conversation from class, are there any other turning points in history that you can think of? If so, explain why and what impacts it had on society.***

    I think that covid was a very big Turning Point in history. it impacted every single person in the world in some way. Some people got very sick and died and the population dropped very big. mostly everyone in the world today has lived through covid and it was terrible for most people. everything was online, you couldn’t see anyone, and everything was out of stock. I just think things like this should not happen again. I know you can’t prevent it from happening but it was really bad and I did not like it. I also had a big impact on society because the economy was all messed up and people were not working.

    • I agree. The COVID-19 pandemic was a significant turning point in modern history. It brought about a shift in social norms and events. Traditional gatherings were replaced with virtual meetups, and masks became a part of everyday attire. The pandemic also created trends like remote work and online shopping, as people adapted to lockdowns and social distancing measures. During this time, people found themselves with more time alone, leading to self-reflection and a reevaluation of priorities. However, this period was also a great tragedy, with many facing loss, hardship, and mental health struggles due to the virus and its ripple effects on society.

  22. International Women’s day is March 8th. Read this link about the history of this day. Is there anything interesting with the history?

    I think it is very interesting that women have come a long way since 1908 from being unable to vote to Being able to vote and having so many more opportunities and freedom. If you think about it, women have just recently been equal to men. it has just been over a hundred years which is not that long. Something else that I found interesting was that in 1908 16,000 women marched through the streets because they wanted to vote and looking back at it I mean they must have done something if women can now vote and everyone has equal rights. I also think it’s interesting that it’s all over the world where women are trying to be accepted, not just in america. 

  23. PYOT from AdBa: As we have learned in class, rats were a big deal in WW1 especially in the trenches. Read this article  and share your thoughts. Anything interesting? Surprising?

    This was actually disgusting, how horrible the conditions were in the trenches that there were rats the sizes of cats that fed on human flesh. It makes sense why a bunch of soldiers had PTSD from the war, especially when one soldier was describing another soldier that they found dead with their face eaten off by a rat. It must have been a very traumatic thing for the soldiers in the trenches to be living like that 24/7 for years or until they were killed.

    • I agree with you it does sound very gross and I can also assume it had a big affect on the soldiers afterwards. Especially with the rats but I do understand why it was like that it makes sense because they were outside and people died and the rats had things to feed on which is why they got so big. I also think one of the many reasons for sickness were the rats.

    • Although it is obviously war, I feel like people did realize how much this can really affect a person. Seeing your friends die, and cat seized rats feasting on them. A lack of food yet you use too much energy and the constant sounds of cries and gunshots can really alter how one views the world. So it would make sense for them to suffer with PTSD which is sad because it affects some people so much yet they don’t get help for it and they have to suffer with it.

  24. Continuing our conversation from class, are there any other turning points in history that you can think of? If so, explain why and what impacts it had on society.***

    I think COVID was a huge turning point in history a long with the world wars. COVID changed the academic and daily life of so many, killed many, and shut down small businesses. Some peoples lives were drastically changed, and I think most of us are lucky the only thing it did change was our education system for a while. Ever since COVID things haven’t been the same, some people still wear masks, they are most afraid of germs, being isolated really messed with peoples mental health because they couldn’t see their friends or family, and lastly, small buisnesses shut down and changed the life of many people who owned them. Overall if you think about the way things are done and the way we behave is so different since before the spread of the pandemic.

    • I agree, it had a lot of mental effects on people. A lot more people are scared of germs and sicknesses. I think it changed the way we thought and made decisions based on that experience.

    • I agree. In the aspect of the workforce, certain occupations gradually went completely remote as COVID worsened. Now, as COVID goes down, some jobs are having trouble with getting their workers back in the office since they prefer working at home. The fact that working at home was looked down upon but is now heavily preferred shows the impact of COVID. The economy itself is still recovering from COVID. Also, the fact that there may need to be annual vaccines just like the flu shows that COVID will have a long-lasting impact on society. According to the CDC, about 0.09% of the world’s population died from COVID. It may seem like a small number but when considering that this is the entire world, it actually becomes a pretty big number considering it was under one sole cause.

  25. PYOT from a peer: Take a look at these links about technological innovations during the 1st World War – what stands out to you as interesting a/o surprising? 

    Some technological innovations and inventions that surprised me were: trench coats were first on the article, and it funny that things people used for function, now use for fashion. Back then the trench coats were super thick and durable. Not only did they keep them warm, but they were water-proof, featured flaps and hooks for weapons and supplies. This is so cool because they were like the 2 in 1 shampoo kinda thing where it serves multiple functions. Nowadays they are popular fashionable wear for men and women alike.

    Another thing that surprised me was blood banks. They discovered the different blood types and how to preserve and refrigerate them, and once they did Captain Oswald Robertson, a U.S. Army doctor consulting with the British Army, established the first blood bank in 1917 on the Western Front. The idea was that they had blood available super close to wounded patients. This is so genius because if soldiers lost a lot of blood, the blood banks could save their lives.

    Sanitary pads were also created originally not for women, but Red Cross nurses found another function for them because they were crafted from processed wood pulp that was five times more absorbent than cotton. These were to stop blood loss but it also served a purpose for the nurse women. This also is an invention we have used ever since.

    THis next one really surprised me because it was Kleenex. They were made for gas mask filters, but then the company launched it as disposable makeup removers, and disposable tissues which was huge because it stopped the use of handkerchief usage which prevented the spread of germs.

  26.  Check out this video on how Stubby the dog became a Sargent in WW1. What stands out as interesting or surprising? Do you think they should give more medals to dogs that helped during the war?

    I think that stubby was honestly a hero. He did such important jobs for those soldiers, and by choice, because it really shines how dogs personalities are too good for humans. He started out as a stray dog that just wanted to be loved and appreciated, and called a good boy, and he really stuck up to that point because he did do some amazing things. It just really amazes me how much these animals did to help people during the war, and how their impact made as much of one as the soldiers risking their lives did. I also think that should have totally given out more medals to dogs that helped in the war. If they could have given every single dog that contributed a medal, they should have..

    • I agree with you Hannah, Stubby was a hero who started off as a stray dog. It is really cute in my opinion how loved he was once he got and owner and soldiers started to meet him. It is so cool how he got trained to salute anyone and how he got trained in war to help detect poison gas. I think he should have got more medals than he did because he contributed so much to help in war. He risked his life everyday to help save other people which is not necessary but amazing that he did it.

  27. Read about the truce the soccer game made for soldiers on Christmas… What did you find? Thoughts? How did it create a peaceful truce?***

    I think that the one soldier that started this all was very brave for going out into no man’s land. I found that it Brought soldiers together and it was a great break from the harsh war that was going on. The article connected it to the soldiers playing like kids and a kids game and I think that’s a good thing because they are acting like kids and kids are really fighting in the war so they are just forgetting about everything which definitely helped a lot. I think that the one man that started it all should receive a lot of credit and everyone that joined was very brave because they for sure got in trouble by their leaders and you never know something could have happened at any point. 

    • I never thought about how brave that man had to be to try and speak up about a truce. Now that I am thinking about it, I agree because it must have been so risky to take a chance and try to call for peace, not knowing whether he would be killed, or agreed with. I also think its sweet and super cool that they got to feel like kids again. It’s nice to know they had a break and had fun, and must have boosted their mental health a bit during a rough time.

      • I agree! It was a better way to spend their holiday than fighting. Why do you think they continued to fight even though they obviously didn’t want to (hence the truce) and it was affecting basically everyone?

  28. Connected to a few WordPress topics, what was with so many dogs in WW1? Why do we see them in the pictures during this time? Read this article to find out. What did you find as interesting or surprising? Your thoughts on what you found?

    The dogs in ww1 were used as many things, including but not limited to:

    Messenger dogs

    dogs that hauled weapons around on carts

    dogs that helped locate wounded soldiers

    rat killing dogs

    I think it is really sweet that they had the dogs, they built morale among the soldiers, however I worry that these dogs were in danger constantly, and they were probably malnourished because of the war. No one had enough money or resources to feed themselves, let alone a dog.

    • I find it pretty cool as well that they used these dogs. I think that it can be sad in some cases, I agree with you, putting them in danger and possibility of death. The benefits do seem to outweigh the negatives though. Its nice to see what the dogs can do and how they can help in these kind of situations.

    • That’s a good point. Although dogs were very useful in the war, they probably didn’t have enough food for the dogs if they barely had enough food for the people. I think this is an example of total war because all of a society’s resources went towards supporting the war including dogs. Instead of just being happy house pets, the soldiers utilized dogs to help them in the war.

      • I agree, it is an example of the total war because of the complete mobilization of the countries resources that dogs probably didn’t work/last for long. How do you think they tried the dogs so quickly to be able to be a productive help during the war?

  29. Read about the truce the soccer game made for soldiers on Christmas… What did you find? Thoughts? How did it create a peaceful truce?***

    My initial thoughts was that it was interesting that people could put aside something so bloody and find the good to have some peace and serenity during Christmas.Its just so crazy to me that soccer could bring people together, and these men who are fighting for their countries, could have some fun. I feel like both sides just wanted a break, neither wanted to fight and die on Christmas, so they agreed to have some fun. This is just so iconic. I found the quote from Ernie Williams to be super heartfelt and interesting, he says: “No referee; we didn’t need a referee for that kind of game. … There was no score, no tally at all — it was simply a melee.” This is just super nice and its kind of refreshing to know that they were happy that night. The men shared cigars, chocolate, and of course, by its name, a game of soccer during this truce. Another thing I found that was nice and funny was that they took their coats off and some set them up as goal posts. To continue the quote from Ernie Williams, with Peter Hart, they say: “No referee; we didn’t need a referee for that kind of game. It was like playing as a kid in the streets, kicking the ball about and the referee being the policeman and chasing you off. There was no score, no tally at all — it was simply a melee.” This is so sweet to hear that with all the anxiety and brutality war brought to these poor hardworking men, risking their lives, they got to feel like a kid again. This overall created a peaceful truce just from the men being able to conjoin together as one, and honestly, that’s how it should have stayed, and all gone down to.

  30. Connected to a few WordPress topics, what was with so many dogs in WW1? Why do we see them in the pictures during this time? Read this article to find out. What did you find as interesting or surprising? Your thoughts on what you found?

    There were so many dogs in World War I because they helped with carrying things around. They also brought messages from Soldier to soldier. I think that that was very clever of them. and the dogs must be really smart to do that. I think it is crazy that there were over 2,000 dogs being used in the war just in the western part. and all around there is 16 million. I think it was also interesting that dogs were trained to find wounded soldiers. It connects to dogs that are trained today to help people with their own problems. One last thing that I found interesting was that the dogs chased the rats out of the trenches. It was a very smart idea and it kept the soldier safe from big rat attacks and diseases.

    • I also think it was genius that the dogs chased rats out of the trenches. It must have been kind of fun for them. I also agree that the dogs must have had to be super well trained and intelligent to do such risky and trusting jobs. It also connects to a reason how the war shaped today with service dogs.

      • I agree, because of the dogs trustworthiness and loyalty during the war, we probably trusted them more to actually help people who need it. That’s a good example of how ww1 shaped the modern world with service dogs.

  31. PYOT from AdBa: As we have learned in class, rats were a big deal in WW1 especially in the trenches. Read this article  and share your thoughts. Anything interesting? Surprising?

    I think it is crazy that the rats got so big, I figured there was sort of a max size the rats could grow to, such as the case with other organisms like humans and cats and dogs, but apparently not. I can’t even imagine seeing a dog sized rat just roaming around in the streets, that’s crazy to me. I feel really bad for the soldiers who had to deal with these rats, while obviously this wasn’t the worst thing they had to deal with, rats are awful.

    • I agree. Giant rats do not seem like a fun animal to be around. Imagine all of the diseases the giant rats carry around. That’s disgusting. I also feel bad for the soldiers who also had to deal with these creatures on top of being miserable in their trenches.

  32. PYOT from AdBa: As we have learned in class, rats were a big deal in WW1 especially in the trenches. Read this article  and share your thoughts. Anything interesting? Surprising?

    I found it interesting how big rats would get, it says that they could get to the shape of a cat. I know if I see a normal sized rat I’m freaked out, but if I saw a cat sized rat I’d literally have to leave. I also found it interesting that soldiers would casually live with them. I imagined all the diseases that a person could get from a rat. A couple units ago we learned that the black death was carried by rats. This probably relates to how the influenza spread so much the rat probably spread them throughout the miles long trenches. I found it disgusting that they would feed off of the dead soldiers flesh. This would actually be really upsetting if I had a relative in the war who was killed and couldn’t’ get a proper burial because a rat had already the person. I also found it interesting that soldiers would casually live with them

  33. Read about the truce the soccer game made for soldiers on Christmas… What did you find? Thoughts? How did it create a peaceful truce?***

    I found that during the time of what was called the “bloodiest fight” of 1914, it was interesting that the soldiers could put things aside for a night and have some fun. My thoughts on this was that its great to see that during such a serious battle where people were so against eachother, humanity still shined through and brought people together. It created a peaceful truce because the men just decided to put things aside on Christmas and enjoy something fun, and create a peaceful truce, even if it was just for a little bit.

  34. Take a look at this site’s collection of pics from WW1 – which images stand out to you and why?

    Image 1 stoop out to me because of all the destruction of the land around the soldiers. This really stood out to me because, while I knew that war results in a lot of destruction in the and, I never really put a visual to how bad it was. In this image there were no fully standing trees, just big trunks, a lot of mus and wasteland for what looked to be miles. Like I said I am not necessarily shocked by it but having a picture to put to the destruction is actually rather moving.

    Additionally image 21 stood out to me, as it was a little dog dressed as a German soldier. I thought this was interesting after doing the post about dogs involvement in the war, and while this little dog definitely was not on the battlefield it very well could have been an emotional support dog, or just a family pet. Either way it was adorable and connected to what I had read about with the dogs involvement in the war.

    Lastly image 30 stood out to me as it was 6 soldiers carrying their friend on a stretcher through knee deep mud. This reminded me that while those soldiers were there to fight, and ultimately kill, that doesn’t mean they lost their morality. These people were still compassionate and had made connections to others on the fields with them. It speaks a great deal that these 6 soldiers were willing to all step off the battlefield to help their one friend even though there were millions killed or injured.

  35. Read about the truce the soccer game made for soldiers on Christmas… What did you find? Thoughts? How did it create a peaceful truce?***

    I found this truce very interesting. First the German soldier came out without getting shot and then a British soldier also came out without getting shot which doesn’t seem a lot but I know if I was fighting I wouldn’t be able to know the difference between an enemy charging me or if it is a sign of peace. However I think this is a good story, it shows how even though soldiers are fighting against each other they probably have more things in common than their family’s back at home since they are experience a war that their family’s never will. I did however think it was upsetting that they started to fight each other after Christmas. I think the story would go a lot better if it ended the whole war.

    • I agree, why do you think the opposing team didn’t use the temporary truce as a way to get ahead in the war?

    • I think that it’s interesting the fact that they didn’t quickly just shoot when seeing the other person revealing himself. This means that in the split second they had mutual trust for each other or just finally didn’t have to kill one another when given the opportunity. I think that this split second response is what made this day so great. The German soldier could have simply plotted some master scheme in order to take control by force. The British simply could have fired up on him like the countless others they had. I agree with Zoe on the fact that this would be a nice way to end the war but still acted as a way to show that the war was coming to an end. Like, this obviously can’t go on forever when your own soldiers begin to abstain.

  36. . World War I was a turning point for many women in various aspects of life. Employment opportunities expanded as women stepped into roles that were once occupied by men who went to fight. They worked in factories, on farms, and even in transport. This shift challenged traditional gender roles and showed that women could perform many of the same jobs as men. In sports, like football, women’s teams gained popularity as they played in matches to raise money. Politically, women’s contributions during the war helped accelerate the suffrage movement. Their work proved they were capable of handling responsibilities previously reserved for men, supporting the argument for equal voting rights. In many countries, women gained the right to vote shortly after the war ended. The war’s impact on women was profound, influencing employment, sports, and politics, and reshaping society’s views on women’s capabilities and rights.

    • I agree the war caused a major step forward for women that was not even imagined before that time. However part of this unit explained that after the war it basically went backward because men just took back their old jobs or the women could get the wages decreased. However some countries did think the women helped the society so much that they gave them the right to vote. I wonder what would have happened if there was never a war and how society would look like if women were never given the opportunity to do things that were expected that men would only be able to do.

      • They really should have kept their jobs because they were able to “prove” themselves although they didn’t have to and considering the circumstances they were running their jobs and countries under war circumstances. With everything being mobilized and rationed and yet they were still able to keep their counties a float (most of them at least). So I think they deserved to keep them and it was literally not fair.

  37.  I think that the U.S didn’t really have to join the way and that it wasn’t necessary. Beside the u-boats from Germany, the war wasn’t really something America had to care for. They didn’t have any conflicts so they didn’t have anything to fight for therefore it wasn’t their problem. I think America was also already helping its allies enough by giving them supplies and resources. America really would have been better off if they didn’t join the war along with the civilians. The economy would  have been better and less people would have died. 

    • I think It was actually better that they did because there investment in the war aided its end. While it would have ended eventually, the soldiers they provided, along with weapons and money really aided the allies into getting an upper hand and winning the war. The US was invested in the war financially and feared our economy collapsing if they did not assist in winning the war. Additionally with Germany reaching out to Mexico on our border, the US feared that could be problematic if the war did not end. Overall I think it was probably for the best that America stepped in.

      • I agree, Zoe. Since the U.S. was already providing loans to European powers, they wanted to make sure that they were going to benefit and get their money back. If these certain powers lost in the war, the U.S. would be in a net loss and the U.S.’s economy would definitely feel the impact. As the U.S. shifted to being the leading industrial power in the world, they had a profound influence on the battlefield. With their revolutionized weapons and advanced machinery, they were a major threat to enemies and acted as a catalyst to ending the war. Without the U.S., the war could have gone on for much longer. From another viewpoint, it could have been good for the U.S. to completely stay uninvolved in European affairs unless the affairs because to impact them.

    • I agree I think the decision was very rushed and not very planned out. Of course the Germans didn’t hit the American boat on purpose and it shouldn’t have had to make the US immediately join the war. I think all the war did was cost the US a lot of money and even more lives than just getting hit by a U boat. I think it also shapes how WW2 happened if the Americans didn’t join. There probably wouldn’t be as big of a tension between the Americans and the Germans if they didn’t have a war in their past.

  38. During World War I, dogs were trained to carry messages, medical supplies, and even help lay down telegraph wires in really tough spots where humans had a hard time getting through. They could move through the trenches and no-man’s land, under heavy fire. Some dogs were carrying important resources. I think It’s pretty cool how brave and smart these dogs had to be. The fact that dogs can understand complex tasks like this is interesting to think about. They’re not just following simple commands; they’re actually interpreting situations and making decisions. Studies have shown that dogs can understand more than just words—they get our tone of voice, body language, and emotions too. They’ve evolved alongside humans for thousands of years. I think that’s really cool!

  39. Take a look at this site’s collection of pics from WW1 – which images stand out to you and why?

    Number 12: At first when I looked at the picture I ddin’t realize what the picture really was, I actually thought it was fireworks to celebrate the end of the war but it turns out its alchually the multiple crossfire’s betweeen the two trenches. When you looka t the photo the it doesn’t look like a lot of of bright lines, but if you think about it that photo was taken in a second of a years long crossfire. It made me realize how dangerous war really is and we should appreciate every soilder that has fought for our country

    Number 14: The pictures showed people getting hanged. Before reading the caption I thought it was maybe an execution of the Central Powers leaders. However it was actually everyday Serbian citizens. This shocked me because they were getting executed for being Serbian, they could have done nothing to the Austrians but they were still killed. This seems like a really horrible thing to do and hope that nothing like this ever happens again.

    Number 17: The picture shows people in gas masks practicing if they ever get hit with poisonous gasses. I always feel like gas masks are really scary in many movies people that wear gas masks are usually a “murderer”. However these were probably seen as a miracle to soldiers during a gas attack while today they are seen as more of a silly costume.

    Number 30: The picture shows soldiers carrying a stretcher of probably a dead person. Their expressions look very blank which leads me to believe that their almost used to carrying stretchers. Which shows how many lives are really lost in war. One of the soldiers has a gas mask showing how common poisonous gas was. The outfits also had a little red cross showing that they are some type of medics. However they look like they’re equipped to go to war showing how everyone is involved in war.

    • For picture #30, the fact that they are expressionless says something. Death is obviously regarded as sad and demands grief, but clearly so much death has ruined their sanity and emotional intelligence. This picture is an example why soldiers have underlying mental conditions like PTSD and depression after the war. The impact of war has been far too much to get out, they are going to have to live with it. I agree on the fact though that the more something happens the less excited or open one is going to be. When it’s something serious like mass death, though, it’s clear that the impact is more serious and long-lasting

  40. Connected to a few WordPress topics, what was with so many dogs in WW1? Why do we see them in the pictures during this time? Read this article to find out. What did you find as interesting or surprising? Your thoughts on what you found?

    Dogs had important jobs in WW1, for example many dogs were messengers, delivering their messages under a hail of fire. They also hauled machine guns and supply carts. The Imperial War Museums believes over 16 million total animals were in service during World War 1. They were also used as first aid animals, locating wounded soldiers. Something I thought was surprising was that they used the dogs as pest control for the rats in the trenches. I think these roles that dogs had show how smart and tough they are. It’s really impressive they could learn to do this stuff in such a short amount of time and then be able to go into the war and do what they had been taught. Overall, I think this act of giving dogs jobs was very smart and was an efficient way to use animals to their advantage.

    • I agree, it really was impressive how they were able to do such things in such a short amount of time!

  41. Origin of my name: Lisa is a short form of Elizabeth, which has Hebrew origins (Elisheva) “El” meaning “God” and “sheba” meaning “oath” or “seven”. It means “God is my oath” or “God’s promise.” The name became really popular in the 1960s and ’70s.

    • Do you think that your name is a part of you that influences your religion? Was it made in order to influence your faith?

  42. PYOT from a peer: Check out this new article about a death tunnel from WWI that was just discovered in France. What do you find interesting? Is there anything that stood out to you?

    This article really just shows how horrible war is. Like who ever came up with “hey we have a disagreement so lets send out a bunch of people and see who murders the most”? There were hundreds of soldiers that got trapped in this sealed off death tunnel, and they slowly suffocated to death for almost a week. Some committed suicide, others asked their comrades to kill them. It’s very creepy, especially since we know all of this because of the chilling journal entries that they left behind. Only three men survived this. This relates to what a video we watch in class, which talked about how war was changed from WW1, as people no longer viewed it as a heroic thing to do after this. It also makes sense that a lot of people had PTSD from this.

    • I think its weird that people thought killing others was heroic in the first place. Like why do you want to be proud of killing as many people as you can? That’s just cruel. While ww1 was obviously very harmful and devastating, at least it taught people a lesson that war is just horrible and not a heroic thing to do yet somehow they ended up in a second world war right after.

  43. Here’s the story of one lady from WW1 who is well-known: what do you find interesting and/or surprising about Mata Hari?:

    -Marta Hari was the worlds most famous female spy. She started her life with the capitals of Europe right “at her feet,” everyone liked her and she had lots of fun with it. This only lasted so long, because she would soon find herself in jail not to many years later. Hari acted as a German spy, finding out German secrets from allies all with sleeping with them. She was supposedly blamed in newspapers for the death of many soldiers. Its interesting that she had a husband in the Dutch East Indies, which did not work out. This would mean that she had multiple relations in the countries of Europe. Being a scapegoat with loose morals during the war got her support after she passed but not everyone can be liked by everybody. She was eventually sacrifice because France needed a new spy, but she was definitely the greatest of her time.

  44. Here’s the story of one lady from WW1 who is well-known: what do you find interesting and/or surprising about Mata Hari?

    It honestly sounds like something out of a movie, I would have never have thought someone could have a life this crazy. I did think it was very unfair to Mata Hari, though. She was a double agent, but instead of both sides thanking her for helping them, both sides wanted to get rid of her for helping the other side. She was also a scapegoat that the French blamed for some losses they had in the war. She also was brutally executed, and her body was donated to science, but her head was found missing and presumed to be stolen. It’s very sad how she started out as this very popular, young, and successful person but had a very tragic end to her life.

    • Even the first part of her successful life is kinda sad because she was only successful because she used her body to please men which is not right. That’s all men wanted from women like her and then she became a spy because the men wanted her to so basically her whole life consisted of trying to please men which didn’t even work out in the end since she got executed.

  45. PYOT from a peer: Take a look at these links about technological innovations during the 1st World War – what stands out to you as interesting a/o surprising? 

    I looked at the article “12 Technological Advancements of World War I” and the one I found the most interesting was the “interrupter gear.” I found this interesting because it seemed like an invention really ahead of its time and if it was built wrong would take a plane out of flight and kill the people in it. It was very smart and was a good example of how smart they needed to be for simple things like this were our just trying to be able to shoot a gun from a plane. It was really beneficial for both sides and made airplanes very useful in the war.

    Another advancement that was very important was air traffic control. Before this pilots would be on their own in the air and were unable to receive and radio transmission beside things like flags or lamps. By 1916 they could receive a radio telegraph from over 140 miles away and by 1917 a human voice was transmitted. This was such an important advancement because it meant traffic control could actually talk to their pilots and were able to give orders and commands to tell the pilot what to do or where to go. 

    I also found the invention of flamethrowers interesting because it seems like it would be considered a war crime to use these to mass kill people. You are physically burning them alive which they can feel and is like torture. I would not want to be killed like this and it seems very disturbing especially seeing people in the trenches after they had been burned. Also it says there were hollow points in the trenches to hide in if there was a grenade or explosive, but these flamethrowers could “neutralize” enemy soldiers in these spaces and kill them which is very scary and disturbing. They may have not even seen a flamethrower before but that would be the last thing they see before they die. Overall, I think this was a very disturbing advance and is used for better reasons today than like it was in the war.

  46. PYOT from AdBa: As we have learned in class, rats were a big deal in WW1 especially in the trenches. Read this article and share your thoughts. Anything interesting? Surprising?

    I thought this was super gross, and overall I think it would be terrifying to be living in trenches with rats as big as cats or even small dogs. I mean obviously fighting the war is much more terrifying and the soldiers probably saw the rats as more of an annoyance in comparison but its still crazy. Also the rats must have decreased the living conditions a lot considering that they are the dead bodies, probably ate their food supplies, bring diseases in, and then they produce a crazy amount of offspring which doesn’t help at all. Overall it would just be really awful to have to deal with those

    • I agree. The giant rats sound horrible to be around. I would be absolutely disgusted if I had to deal with everything the soldiers had to deal with in the wars. Being stuck in the trenches with rats on top of all the dead bodies seems very annoying.

  47. What happened to the titanic on April 15th, 1912? Read this article all about the Titanic. Share your thoughts on any of the following questions. How was the creation of the Titanic a major event? How did the crash of the Titanic change ships we go on today and history? What are your thoughts on the rescuing of the people? What are your thoughts on all of the investigations? Did anything stand out to you?***

    On April 15th 1912 the Titanic hit an iceberg. At the time the Titanic was the one of the coolest things a person could go on it was not just a boat it was like a luxury resort on the water, however it only sailed once. What I found interesting it that back then people said the TItanic was “unsinkable” but now people know the TItanic as the ship that did sink. One of the articles also said how the TItanic almost collided at the very beginning of its voyage, I know if I was the captain I would stop the boat immediately and turn around however the boat kept going which could have easily prevented the tragedy. The article also said how the Titanic was manufactured with other similar boats like the Lusitania. The Lusitania was the ship that was sunk by a German U boat which was part of the reason the US joined the war. It seemed like the boats were both unintentionally built to sink. The article says how boats even today are designed to prevent sinking just like the Titanic. In a way I also think the TItanic impacts our lives today, I know whenever I’m on a boat especially larger ones, I’m terrified that it’s going to sink just like the Titanic.

    • Those two really have their similarities. I’m also pretty sure that because of the Titanic, all boats were required to have the same number of passengers as lifeboats on the ship because on the Titanic there was only a few and so they prioritized the rich and women/children.

  48. Check out this article on the “she-soldiers” of the 1st World War – what stands out from their stories, and why do you think they, and most any, info on “heroes” and “heroines” from WW1 is not well known:

    Something I thought was really interesting and kinda relates to what we talked about in class was how one female fighter, Moreau, took up arms, but since she wasn’t technically a German soldier, she was seen as a murderer instead of a heroine (due to propaganda). It’s very interesting how thin the line is between a murder and a war hero. Another interesting way propaganda didn’t help out she-soldiers is how Russia used it to shame men into enlisting.

    • That’s an awesome point, and I agree, the line between hero and murderer is very thin and all in perspective. She was probably a lot of peoples hero still, but its honestly really sad that just because of her gender she is deemed a murdered for doing the same thing as most of the male population of the time.

    • I agree! It crazy how when hundreds of men kill hundreds its seen as a heroic act but when a woman kills a few (in war) its murder. I find it hard to believe that people still had little respect for women during the war expecially considering the fact they were running the countries due to all the men fighting in the war.

    • I agree. I think it’s sad that women were seen as a murderer when a man doing the same thing would’ve been seen as hero. No matter what the women do, it’s always the wrong thing. Propaganda played a huge role in this time period. The government could use it to convince so many people to think and do so many things.

  49. Connected to a few WordPress topics, what was with so many dogs in WW1? Why do we see them in the pictures during this time? Read this article to find out. What did you find as interesting or surprising? Your thoughts on what you found?

    I thought this was super interesting, and that it was cool how many jobs the dogs really had. It must have been a great help to have them be able to deliver messages and even help with Aiding soldiers because that means more men could be out there fighting the war. It also probably really helped peoples hygiene and health by getting rid of a lot of the rats. I feel like this definitely lead the way to more modern day police dogs, and even therapy dogs, because it showed us how helpful they an really be in everyday life.

    • I agree. Dogs were super useful in ww1 and they still are today. I just think it’s sad because in ww1 the dogs were at a way higher risk of being killed.

  50. PYOT from a peer: Check out this new article about a death tunnel from WWI that was just discovered in France. What do you find interesting? Is there anything that stood out to you?

    I found it very interesting that both German and French governments decided that it was better for them to ignore the death tunnel. I know it might cost money but I would want to know what the tunnel is and possibly help people identify more of their relatives. The article also said how the person who found the tunnel is not given the credit for discovering the tunnel because it was an illegal action and will influence more people to just dig up public places. Which I can agree with but that shouldn’t have to interfere with whether or not a person found a WW1 relic. I also found it weird that the tunnel wasn’t found until now, it is about a century old. How has no one ever found this especially since it’s a path that many dog walkers use, I know my dog likes to dig around how could not one dog dig this up over a hundred years. I also found it surprising what was inside of tunnel. During the war the Germans had a long trench with hundreds of soldiers and weapons that weren’t visible to the French army’s open eye which caused Germany to win lots of battles. After a while however the French finally found both entrances of the tunnels and blockaded both sides and blew up parts of tunnels producing even more explosions from the trenches weapons. One part I found very disturbing was that remaining people in the trench had no way out they either died of starvation, lack of oxygen, or had another soldier kill them. I know that deaths do happen over the course of war but this seems a little over the top that soldiers literally waited to die over the course of a couple days. Which now is miles of a mass grave.

  51. Connecting to unit 12 and some in class discussions, read this article about April 6th 1917 the date The US joined WW1. Share your thoughts on any of the questions. Did the US declaring war againt Germany help with anything? How was this a major turing point of the better and the worse? What was surprising or interesting to you? Do you think it was good that the US joined the war?

    Something that the US declaring war with Germany helped with is the morale of the country and showing we have the power to defend ourselves when they try to attack or kill us. This was a major turning point for the better because it gave the US many things like technological advances, women achieved the right to vote, and it made the defeat of Germany possible. This was also a major turning point for the worse though as the federal government had taken over the economy, raised taxes, and carelessly spent our money. There was also lots of hate towards German-Americans as they were seen as disloyal and should not be in this country. So, the joining of the war was seen as good and bad as it has some great outcomes but also some consequences. I think it was good that the US joined the war because it shows we have the power to fight in war and it was the only way for the defeat of Germany who would’ve won if it wasn’t for the US.

  52. So you now know the historical / family roots of my firstmiddle, and last names – tell us the history / genealogy of any part of your name??? Share what you know, or what you can find out…

    My first and middle names both don’t have any history or anything like that, but when put together they do mean “beautiful life” which is pretty neat. I did some research on my last name and found that only 25 people in the world who share my last name, most in Massachusetts, but some in Virginia, South Carolina and a few in Pakistan. I thought this was super cool because I had no Idea that my name might have roots in Pakistan. I also am going to assume (as the article would not know) that all of us 25 are probably related by blood in some way, just considering how uncommon it is. This lined up with when I was looking into the first people recorded with my last name because one of the first people shares my Grandfathers first name, and it is a family name so it makes sense. I couldn’t really find much on the origins of the name but I know my family is Italian…

  53. So you now know the historical / family roots of my firstmiddle, and last names – tell us the history / genealogy of any part of your name??? Share what you know, or what you can find out…

    My full name is William John Clark and I asked my mom this question and she told me that I got my first name from her grandfather whose name was William Thomas Jones. She told me that he lived to the age pf 93 and he actually fought in WW2 for the British army. I thought that was sort of interesting because we are going over WW1 and for him to be a solder is kind of convenient. I get my middle name from my dads side of the family, the middle name John is sort of just a family name because my dad and my grandfather both had the middle name John so my dad just gave me the middle name as well. Almost the same thing is with the last name Clark. It is sort of just a family name from my dads side of the family that has obviously been passed down over time and now it has made its way into my last name.

  54. PYOT from a peer: Take a look at these links about technological innovations during the 1st World War – what stands out to you as interesting a/o surprising? 

    As we know WW1 was a large time for several different large technological innovations for all around the world. Some examples of this is the innovation of the Poison Gas. Poison Gas was created in the middle of WW1 and was used to kill about 100,000 solders and it is was and is still seen as one of the most deadly weapons. The invention on poison gas was so bad it was actually banned from being used in war from then and this is called Geneva Protocol, in 1925 they banned the use of chemical and bacteriological weapons in war. For a certain type of weapon and the use of it to be banned in war really shows how bad the invention of poison gas truly was and how large of a threat it was. Another invention that was created was called Depth Charges. Depth charges were invented because the use of German U-boats against Allied ships. They sank millions of tons of cargo and killed tens of thousands of sailors and civilians, because of this the Allies had figure out a way to combat this problem. They then basically created an underwater bomb that could be lobbed from the deck of a ship using a catapult or chute and they named this the depth charge. The depth charge was a huge invention for the Allied forces because without them they would have lost much more resources and man power. Finally the invention of the tank was a very large part of WW1. Tanks nowadays are probably on the the first things that you think about devices for war and the world could be so much different if the invention of tanks very happened. In WW1 the tanks were so powerful because they made it easier for solders to invade and cross over different terrain so they could cover more ground in a shorter amount of time. Also, with heavy guns in the tank it was not only good for movement it was also good for being able to take down the other solders. Overall, I feel like these are the largest inventions in WW1 that are still used to this day.

    • In my opinion the most important technological innovation in this list would be tanks. At first I was thinking of poison gas because of how lethal it is, however can’t this just be solved by wearing masks? I also also thinking of how far these poison gas canisters could be launched. It kills many enemies at a time, proving it’s efficiency. However, tanks are in a completely different ballpark. They connected the idea of durable weapons with transportation over terrain that would be thought of impossible. You can’t really overcome a tank unless you build a big wall or big hole, and who is really going to do that?

  55. Check out this link (and many links within…) regarding how the 1st World War changed life for many women Great Britain 

    I think the newer involvement of women in the work force is one of the few good things that came out of the war. I think that because the men were gone and the women needed to take the jobs, it helped society realize that they could do almost everything just as well as the men could, if not better. I think a lot of people felt that the women could only really manage taking care of the children and house duties etc but really that want true, and the war helped everyone realize that they could manage the household and work. This definitely helped in the steps to make gender role more equal, which would only pick up more and more after the war.

    • I agree with you. People realized that women were actually capable of doing all of the jobs men could do which changed society’s view on them completely. It’s really sad that there needed to be a war so women would not be seen only for their bodies and that they didn’t have any other chances to prove them wrong until that point.

      • I find it interesting that a war, which has a negative connotation, actually has the possibility of producing something good. The war was a starting point for the growth of the role of women in the workforce.

  56. PYOT from a peer: Check out this new article about a death tunnel from WWI that was just discovered in France. What do you find interesting? Is there anything that stood out to you?

    During the war, this tunnel was bombed on each end causing the people inside to be trapped with no way out. This sounds horrible to have happened to and as I read the article I figured out that eventually all of the solders were running out of oxygen and the ways that they died was that they either had to run out of oxygen or the solder would have to ask for their other fellow comrades to end his life by themselves. As I read this I realized how horrible this sounds and I can just imagine if I was one of those solders and I was friends with all of the other solders and we all new we were going to die and I had to kill my friends I know I would never get over that. Another thing that I thought was very interesting was that the bone of the solders were still preserved and were able to salvaged. For example it said that they found the forearm bone of one of the solders and I thought this was interesting because I thought they would have decayed from all of the time that has gone by. Overall, I feel like this is a horrible way to die and even thought it happened so much longer ago I feel bad for the solders that we trapped in that tunnel.

  57. Read about the truce the soccer game made for soldiers on Christmas… What did you find? Thoughts? How did it create a peaceful truce?

    The Christmas truce was on the first Christmas of the war. I think it is awesome that two sides that are fighting a war can still recognize the other people as human beings and go over to have fun. The Germans came out of their trenches first, without weapons, and walked over to meet the British in the middle. They wished each other merry Christmas. They shared chocolates and cigars with each other. They talked and played games of soccer. I think that it is really cool that those two sides could put their differences aside for a day and just enjoy Christmas. Even though it only lasted a few hours, it still had a big impact on the soldiers and gave them each a morale boost. Some of the soldiers didn’t want to leave the trenches and thought that this get together was a horrible idea. Adolf Hitler was one of them. A couple hundred people took part in the soccer games. This truce showed humanity and decency in one of the darkest times in our history. People all the way down the trenches on both sides got a break from the miserable life that came with the war and the trench warfare. Everyone was enjoying themselves. The people fighting knew that the war was important and worth fighting, but they also recognized that their enemies were people too. I think it must have been hard to go back to fighting the next day after making friends with the enemies. It must have been hard to try to kill them again.

    • I agree with you. This truce shows that the men were not just heartless killing machines, but real people who needed a break from the miserable situation they were put in. Even though this was an awesome act of human decency, I imagine this made it way harder to kill their enemies who they just became friends with. If they started to care about their friends on the other side while shooting them, there must have been a lot more mental strain put on them. Even if this made it harder for the people fighting in that war, I think it’s a good thing that they did it to prove that humans don’t have to always kill one another all the time and that the soldiers know their enemies are human too.

  58. Connected to a few WordPress topics, what was with so many dogs in WW1? Why do we see them in the pictures during this time? Read this article to find out. What did you find as interesting or surprising? Your thoughts on what you found?

    I was surprised how many dogs were used during the war. There were over 2000 dogs in service on the western front. The dogs who served had so many jobs. They could deliver messages in the middle of battles, haul carts with supplies or machine guns, find wounded, deliver first aid kits to the wounded, or be rat dogs and hunt rats in the trenches. The dogs are trained to find wounded people, and they have first aid kits attached to them to help the people when they find them. The rats in the trenches were a big nuisance, so it’s pretty smart to use dogs to hunt them. It must be sad to work with dogs during the war too though, because it could be so easy for them to die by getting caught in gunfire, a bomb, or poison gas. The dogs that worked with the soldiers often provided support emotionally for them, and the soldiers liked the dogs. There is a picture of a dog in a mask being held up by a soldier in a gas mask. It is surrounded by other soldiers with gas masks, which I think means that the soldiers did love the dogs that worked with them.

    • It seems that it was very smart to use dogs in war because of their many purposes. I think the emotional support that they provide for the soldiers is just as important as delivering messages or doing other physical jobs because the men’s job was to kill people so they must’ve seen some brutal violence on the battle fields which definitely put a ton of mental strain on them. Dogs would’ve helped to release some of that stress so the soldiers were less sad and traumatized in battle, although it would even more sad to see your dog get shot or killed any other way.

      • I agree, especially considering PTSD was not a recognized condition at the time of WW1. The emotional support from the dogs probably was the only real help the soldiers were getting in and out of the war so its super impactful that they were able to help

  59. Take a look at this site’s collection of pics from WW1 – which images stand out to you and why?

    Picture 1: I feel like this really stood out to me because it shows how devistating the war was on the wildlife in that part of the world. I can image that in that photo it used to be a nice forest with a ton of animals living in it and now it is just a group of dead wildlife that has been destroyed from all of the acts of war between the 2 countries.

    Picture 6: I thought this was interesting because it is a photo of solders in new uniforms leaving Berlin, Germany, heading for the front lines. Girls and women along the way greet and hand flowers to them because either it was a sign of respect or it could be a family member giving them these last flowers because they do not know if he is going to make it or if they are ever going to see him again. In a way these solders were being sent way to war just to die and almost be forgotten so for these mothers it was a very emotional moment for them.

    Picture 11: I found this to be interesting because it is a photo of all of the men at Christmas time celebrating and being all happy with each other and I know that we have gone over in class about what the solders did during Christmas but at the same time after Christmas they would still have to go back and start fighting again so those smiles and laughter was going to be very short lived. I also wonder because I lot of veterans had PTSD so I wonder if this short moment of happyeness between them could have been one of the most common memory’s for them.

    Picture 26: This photo is showing how the English had to move around and live in these trench’s and by looking at this life style to seems to be horrible because I couldn’t even think about not being able to stand up straight without there being a risk that you might end up getting shot and killed. Just by looking at this photo I feel like it really opened and gave me something to imagine when we have the discussions on how terrible the lives of these solders truly were.

    Picture 37: This photo is more of a arial shot of all of the trenches and this photo really shows how large and complex the trenches where for the solders to command. In this photo it also shows all of the thousands of craters left by mortars, artillery, and the detonation of underground mines. All of these craters show me how deadly it was to be in those trenches and how many different things that are able to kill you and the sheer amount of those large forms of attacks were sent to kill the other side.

  60. So you now know the historical / family roots of my firstmiddle, and last names – tell us the history / genealogy of any part of your name??? Share what you know, or what you can find out…

    My name Lily came from the flower. Flower names for girls became popular around the late 1800’s and early 1900’s, but specifically, the name Lily became popular in the 2000’s. My mom chose the name Lily for me because it’s her favorite flower. The name represents innocence and purity. Lily is also like the miniature version of Elizabeth which is my middle name, but I don’t think my parents were thinking about that when naming me. Elizabeth was the name of my great-grandmother. My last name Robinson is a very basic and common name. My first, middle and last names are all common, so I don’t have a very unique name at all.

  61. PYOT from a peer: Check out this new article about a death tunnel from WWI that was just discovered in France. What do you find interesting? Is there anything that stood out to you?

    I thought it was pretty interesting how the tunnel was found like Pompeii under ash and nothing had moved. I also thought it was interesting how Alain Malinowski told authorities that he had found a tunnel that he carefully measured but they didn’t believe him or didn’t decide to act on the information for 10 years. I would get it if they put off the project for a few months because the government probably has a lot of important stuff to do, but 10 years is a long time. Since the government never did anything, his son forced the government to give them their attention and illegally opened the tunnel himself. They found bodies of people’s ancestors but obviously, the government didn’t care about that too much or they didn’t care about history and what people could discover. 

    • I also thought it was interesting, you would think they would be more eager about something that important. I feel as though something like this should get a lot more recognition, and especially that the government should care more about all the people who’s ancestors they just found.

  62. So you now know the historical / family roots of my firstmiddle, and last names – tell us the history / genealogy of any part of your name??? Share what you know, or what you can find out…

    Addison:

    Addison is an Old English given name whose meaning is “son of Adam”. Originally in the 1600’s it was mostly a masculine name but nearing the 1990’s is became more of a feminine name. The name is associated with strength, leadership, and authority.

    Mae:

    Mae has British roots. The origin says it means goddess of spring growth; relating to the start or beginning of the spring season. My parents gave me this name after my grandmother’s middle name on my mom’s side.

    Bandini:

    The last name Bandini’s origins are found in a region in Italy called Tuscany. In Italy, Bandini was a patronymic or plural form of the personal name Bandino a pet form of Bando (see Bandi). It is not a very popular surname so there is not a lot of info but all of the origins of Bandini families are Italian.

  63. So you now know the historical / family roots of my first, middle, and last names – tell us the history / genealogy of any part of your name??? Share what you know, or what you can find out…

    The name Lily comes from the flower. Naming girls after flowers became popular in the late 1800’s and early 1900’s but specifically the name Lily became popular in the 2000’s. My mom wanted to name me Lily because it’s her favorite flower. The name is associated with innocence and purity. I also learned that Lily was used as a miniature version of the name Elizabeth. I don’t think My parents were thinking about that when they thought of my middle name, but it’s just a cool fact. My middle name is Elizabeth because that was the name of my great-grandmother. My last name, Robinson, is a very basic and common last name. My first, middle, and last name are all very common so I don’t have a unique name at all.

  64. Here’s the story of one lady from WW1 who is well-known: what do you find interesting and/or surprising about Mata Hari?

    I thought it was interesting that she tried to use her skills of seduction to her advantage to get information out of other people but sadly for her, it didn’t work out in the end because she was executed for being a double agent. It also surprised me that the women were trusted with the job of being a spy since a lot of people thought women weren’t that smart. Mata Hari became a spy because offering her body was not enough to please the men which makes me sad because this proves that women had to do anything the men wanted if they wanted to succeed in their society. She made a living off of using her body and when she tried to please the men by getting information, she wound up dead.

    • When reading this I also thought about how George Washington had a very similar technique in the 1700’s when they were fighting Britain. He employed women as spies and messengers as they were less suspicious and it was easier for them to go unnoticed, which is I think why them, and Mata Hari were trusted with the job. I agree that It is quite sad how women felt their bodies were their only bargaining chip, and its really sad how this was the only thing they thought to use, and that I’d didn’t even work all the time.

  65. Take a look at these links about technological innovations during the 1st World War – what stands out to you as interesting a/o surprising

    I think one of the most important technological innovations from the first world war was the tanks. These seemed really important in the front lines of war. In the areas of the no man’s land, there was a bunch of barbed wire and dead bodies and you wouldn’t want to go their unless you were attacking. When you go into no man’s land you expose yourself and the enemy can just use a machine gun and wipe you out. But with this new technology, the tank was born. A big vehicle like that seems intimidating if your side only has small fire arms vs. huge tanks. These tanks were even able to plow through all of the barbed wire in the no man’s land. When the war was just looking like a trench war, with people hiding in the trenches and using rifles, this became to easy for the enemy to come. But if you have a large tank on your side, it easy to pass to the other end and into the enemies territory. These seemed really vital and I see them in a lot of World War 1 pictures so they most have been a huge factor in the front line of war.

    • I agree that tanks were the most advanced technological innovation. There were lots of innovation but it seems that the tank came out to be the most successful. Tanks were able to bulldoze off of land and still keep the people inside safe and somewhat comfortable. Not only were tanks used for WW1 but they were continued in WW2 and still used today. They are proven to be one of the most helpful things during an active battle. I know I’d like to stay in a tank that is out in the open or stuck inside a trench that was constantly flooded and rat infested.

  66. As we have learned in class, rats were a big deal in WW1 especially in the trenches. Read this article  and share your thoughts. Anything interesting? Surprising?

    I think it’s funny how rats were such a big thing. It’s gross to think that what attracted all the rats in the trenches is all the dead bodies and food scraps piled at the bottom of the trenches. The rats grew to these insane sizes because of all the corpses and food that were available to them in the trenches. Often, The rats would steal food out of the pockets of sleeping soldiers. All of this combined made the rats sometimes as big as cats. This is really interesting to me because normally when you think of a rat nowadays, you think of little rodents who just like to eat cheese but in those times, they were big gross creatures who eat human flesh and eyeballs. I was really surprised to find out that they could grow up to the size of a cat. When it got mentioned that they got big, I was just expecting a little fat rat but they were actually huge. They would terrify me if I had to like in the trenched with them.

  67. Check out this link (and many links within…) regarding how the 1st World War changed life for many women Great Britain 

    The war changed life and history for women because when the men had to go to war, they needed people to do the jobs. The only ones left to take over were women. This gave them a huge opportunity to show that they were capable of doing “mans jobs”. When the men came back, they couldn’t deny the women to do these sorts of jobs. This was a huge advancement in history for women.

  68. Take a look at this site’s collection of pics from WW1 – which images stand out to you and why?

    Picture number 4 stands out to me because its a picture of Assassin Gavrilo Princip (left) and his victim Archduke Franz Ferdinand. This is kind of creepy how they put the killer and the killed next to eachother in an image.

  69. PYOT from a peer: Check out this new article about a death tunnel from WWI that was just discovered in France. What do you find interesting? Is there anything that stood out to you?

    During the war, this tunnel was bombed on each end causing the people inside to be trapped with no way out. One thing that shocked me was that as they started to run out of oxygen, and people began suffering, they either died from running out of air or they asked a friend to end their life for them to end the suffering. I can’t imagine being in a position where I knew I was going to die and it just came down to the decision of suffering or ending it all right then and there. If I had to choose, I would probably want to be put out of my misery and killed by one of my friends. It sounds so disturbing to say that but it honestly sounds better than running out of air to breathe. 

    • Yeah, I feel like having to kill your fellow solder or be killed by them could one of the worst ways I would would ever want to die. At the same time I think running out of oxygen is equally as bad so I feel like either way it was a terrible situation for the solders and I feel bad for them.

  70. Connected to a few WordPress topics, what was with so many dogs in WW1? Why do we see them in the pictures during this time? Read this article to find out. What did you find as interesting or surprising? Your thoughts on what you found?

    I didn’t know that dogs served a variety of tasks in the World War. I knew that there were stray dogs in the area but I didn’t know how many tasks they performed. The things they did suurprised me like how they hauled machine guns, served as messengers, and hauled supply carts. This is so insane because all these jobs are so dangerous for dogs and I cant imagine how hard it must have been for them. Dogs also were trained to find dead soldier bodies based off scent, and if a soldier was injured they were trained to go to get help. This is so important and just teaches me how great of a rold they played for the war. to be honest I don’t think things would have gone the way they did.

    • I agree, I had no idea how many dogs there were and how many dogs had different roles in the war. Even though you named a lot of different roles that the different types of dogs had to take on at a time and to think that their are still more roles that these dogs had to complete was crazy. How do you think the war would have changed if we didn’t have dogs help up complete different missions that would have been much more difficult for humans to complete?

    • I agree I think its impressive how well trained they were that they could go to war and survive by themselves. I think in a way the war was good for dogs. Since many of these dogs are strays they would probably starve or get put down however they were actually going to get treated well in the war. This is also another example of an innovation that is still used today. Militaries today still use dogs today maybe not for some of the labor but they still use them for helping injured soldiers and definitely save a lot of lives.

  71. PYOT from a peer: Check out this video on how Stubby the dog became a Sargent in WW1. What stands out as interesting or surprising? Do you think they should give more medals to dogs that helped during the war?

    I think it is amazing that a dog could be this much of a help in war. Throughout the war he did things like identifying the smell of gas to warn the people around him to prepare themselves for it. He also could identify if someone didn’t quite fit in with the crowd, for example a German spy. If I was in the war I would definitely want Stubby to be on my side! I do think dogs should be recognized for just being in the war. Especially dogs like stubby because it wouldn’t have been the same without him. I also find it cool that he got to rank up to sergeant just like the humans. I wonder if he knew that he was being rewarded for being such a good boy!

    • I agree with you. I wonder if he was doing it also to please the soldiers or because he knew he had an important job to do.

  72. PYOT from AdBa: As we have learned in class, rats were a big deal in WW1 especially in the trenches. Read this article  and share your thoughts. Anything interesting? Surprising?

    After reading this article I hate rats even more. I cant imagine being someone in the trenches with rats the size of small dogs. Some things that surprised me were: -rats can reproduce 880 offspring in a year. – rats would eat the dead bodies buried in the trenches.- the rats were as big as cats

    This was overall so disgusting.

  73. Check out the links within this site’s collection of veterans’ stories from the 1st World War – what stories stand out to you and why?  

    In one of the videos, there are videos showing the soldiers leaving the trenches to move to a different location. There are a ton of bombs and gunshots being thrown at them and some of them get hit. What really stood out to me was that the ones that didn’t get hit had to keep going even if they saw someone get shot right in front of them. I can’t imagine having to watch my friends die right before my eyes and continue on trying to protect myself. It’s amazing that some of these people are brave enough to talk about it after the fact even though it was a very traumatizing event. 

  74. Harriet Tubman Day is on March 10th. Do some extra research on a female abolitionist, Harriet Tubman. What did you find?

    What I knew before about Harriet Tubman was that she was a slave and she later escaped and was a huge help to the underground railroad. It said that she helped about 70 enslaved people to be free in the north through her system which was the underground railroad. I had no idea that she helped 70 people which is incredibly impressive. From what I knew before it was very hard to escape from the plantation that they were at and that was just for one person. So to have to do that 70 times takes a lot of dedication and a lot of bravery because if they were discovered there could’ve been many major consequences. The article also said that the pain of the separation from her family never left her and I could never imagine that happening to me. I am so close with my family and if they were taken away from me or we were separated, I don’t think I would ever get over it especially if I never got to see them ever again.

  75. Check out this article on the “she-soldiers” of the 1st World War – what stands out from their stories, and why do you think they, and most any, info on “heroes” and “heroines” from WW1 is not well known:

    Woman were really trying to prove themselves back in WW1 and their were a groups of woman all over Europe trying to be able to stand up with the men and trying to make themselves known among the ranks. Although some countries have more chances to the woman then other woman were still Involved. One example of this is that in England that asked for them to have a greater role in WW1. One woman who was named Ane Dieulafoy petitioned the government to create a women’s auxiliary corps in England. However, in the manpower crisis of 1917, were such corps founded, and then only to perform non-combatant roles such as domestic and clerical work. So this is still showing how woman were still not given a chance to fight in England. But in other places like the Western Front, individual women were caught up in the action of war. One example of this is Emilienne Moreau was a 17-year old who killed German soldiers while helping British members of the 9th Black Watch during the Battle of Loos. She was awarded many medals for this act and was called a heroine I think that much info of hero’s or heroines are not well known is because of gender stereotypes during that period of time. Men were seen to be the soldiers who fought bravely on the front lines and died for their country. Women were expected to stay behind the front lines and assist the war effort without fighting. So it was just not ever very fair to woman in the first place.

  76. Check out this link (and many links within…) regarding how the 1st World War changed life for many women Great Britain 

    Employment for women drastically changed because when the men were called to war they had to take over the jobs for them. This was huge because women were not thought to be able to do anything a man could and this really have the woman a time to show what they can do. It was said that their were over 2 million different jobs that woman filled in for men which I think is great. The next thing I found that changed for women came as a huge surprise for me and I did not expect at all. Apparently women started to play football that was watched and spectated by many because it was recommended for women to do this to counter the unhealthy conditions when they work in a factory. Another huge one was politics and a ton of woman took over in the politics and tried to help as much as they possibly could. Overall the war gave women many opportunities and at this time period woman were not seen as equal to men is this chance for woman was big for them to try and take advantage of.

    • What I find surprising is the fact that these women possibly may have had little training, or at least they slid into their positions smoothly. The war was a necessary event in order to prove that women are capable of working rigorous jobs alongside men.

  77. PYOT from a peer: Check out this video on how Stubby the dog became a Sargent in WW1. What stands out as interesting or surprising? Do you think they should give more medals to dogs that helped during the war?

    As I had just done another WordPress that was about the importance of dogs in WW1 so I am aware of how useful that dogs are in wars already. What Stubby did was amazing and I took more interest when the video was explaining about how he noticed a gas attack and he managed to save all of his fellow solders and get them to wake up in time from them to evacuate and get out of that part of the trenches safely. The other thing that the video had stated was that he ended up snuffing out several German spies and I don’t know that exact amount but for the dog to be made the rank in the military of Sargent in must have had to be more then just a few. I found his story very interesting and I was also interesting and awesome that the U.S.A. did actually gave thought to this dog and did not just ignore his accomplishments in the military because he was just a dog and I don’t think that he really needed more medals because by the looking at his vest it seemed to have enough and just for a dog it seems like a lot but it is still amazing for the amount of medals he has earned.

  78. Connected to a few WordPress topics, what was with so many dogs in WW1? Why do we see them in the pictures during this time? Read this article to find out. What did you find as interesting or surprising? Your thoughts on what you found?

    Dogs in WW1 had a ton of uses and were used is so many different way it was almost crazy. Some of the uses for the dogs were that The French, among others, also used small dogs as rat catchers in the trenches. We all have heard about how terrible the rats were in the trenches so I feel like it is a super smart idea for the solders to train the dogs to kill as many rats as they can. Another use for dogs were how Stretcher-bearers ran out onto the battlefields to dress wounds and carry the wounded to aid stations, and French first aid dogs were to go onto battlefields and locate wounded soldiers. They were trained to either stay with the injured until human aid arrived or to bring back evidence of the wounded soldier. These to dogs helped thousands of solders and were a huge part of the medical core for WW1. One last use of dogs was that they hauled machine gun and supply carts. They also served as messengers, often delivering their missives under a hail of fire. This shows that in WW1 dogs were able to increase the speed that letters and general communication were able to get back to the government so they could make changes better and dogs increase the communication in WW1 by a lot of different ways. In WW1 I was surprised by the amount of work that dogs did and the impact that they had in the war. I was also wondering how the war would have been different without dogs. Even though this was also not in the article I was wondering if the solders ever used the dogs as support animals?

    • I wonder if any one country discovered the huge benefit of dogs and spread it throughout the war. The expanded usage of dogs definitely played a role in the war and shows humans that dogs are capable of much more than we think.

  79. During class, we discussed what type of economy America has. Add onto the discussion, give more examples of what type of economy America has. Why do you think this? 

    America has a very mixed economy. There is a balance between private and public enterprise which is also known as socialism and capitalism. This allows for competition while also providing protections and benefits for all of the citizens. I think that this definitely comes with challenges but it is also very good for our economy. The challenges include people disagreeing on things and fighting over who/what idea is better. However it is also a good thing because we get a lot of different views and ideas. It expands people’s freedoms to believe in what they want to believe in instead of not having a say in anything that is done with the country. 

  80. Here’s the story of one lady from WW1 who is well-known: what do you find interesting and/or surprising about Mata Hari?

    Mata Hari was a Dutch exotic dancer and a courtesan who ended up becoming a spy during the war. Her full name was margaretha geertruida zelle. While gathering information from other countries, she got caught by the French and was accused of being a double agent. Her strategy for spying was to charm the soldiers and get on their good side to get information out of them. This worked for a little while but wasn’t good in the long run. She also created her own style of dance!

  81. Read about the truce the soccer game made for soldiers on Christmas… What did you find? Thoughts? How did it create a peaceful truce?***

    I think that this soccer game was a very kind and peaceful thing to do. The war was a very dark time so for all of the soldiers to have enough trust in each other is very shocking because I feel like would not trust that one side would just start shooting in the middle of the match. I understand how some people in the higher up positions would be mad or upset about this because the soldiers are not doing their jobs, but everyone needs to have some happiness during this and live a little which is what this soccer game did for them. At the same time I feel like this game was also almost a bad thing because as we had discussed in class it almost made the solders like each other more then before so when they had to go back to fighting they almost did not what or have that same motivation that they had before to win and kill the others so it almost made the killing harder on the minds on the solders then it already was to begin with.

  82. PYOT from AdBa: As we have learned in class, rats were a big deal in WW1 especially in the trenches. Read this article  and share your thoughts. Anything interesting? Surprising?

    The most interesting thing I found was that the rats could grow up to the size of cats. Just thinking about that makes me feel uncomfortable and I couldn’t even imagine having to live with these things roaming around and even getting into the place you sleep. I would be traumatized from this but if I were in the war it would probably be the least of my worries. I also couldn’t imagine watching my dead friends getting eaten by these rats. It is just so terrible that people had to go through this and continue to be able to fight for their side. 

  83. Here’s the story of one lady from WW1 who is well-known: what do you find interesting and/or surprising about Mata Hari?

    I found it really cool that she was a spy, It is not usual for woman to be viewed as important during wars and most of the credit do go to men but she actually had quite a large impact and was able to be a successful spy for some time before she was found to be a double agent and was thought to have died because she was being used as a scapegoat for someone else. The way she got her information was that she collected secrets of the allied Allied officers who she slept with, and then passed them on to her paymaster, leading to several newspaper claims about her being responsible for sending thousands of Allied soldiers to their deaths. So she had a smart way for getting the secrets from the important officers of the Allied forces and managed to be responsible for the lost of attacks that they had won.

  84. Take a look at this site’s collection of pics from WW1 – which images stand out to you and why?

    Picture 9

    This picture shows the process of making the steel hats that the soldiers wore during the war. This process seems like it is very hard and tedious and the fact that there was one of those hats for every soldier is crazy to me. It must have taken so long to have enough made and also a lot of people too pitch in to this.

    Picture 12

    At first glance this picture looked like it could be something nice like fireworks. But, further looking at it and reading the description made me realize that it wasnt that at all. Even though it may seem like a pretty picture, it has a much deeper meaning. 

    Picture 37 

    This bird shot view really brings in a better perspective of how long the trenches were in the western front. I wonder how long it took for these to be fully built! I think it would be really cool to see these in person to understand what it was really like. 

  85. PYOT from AdBa: As we have learned in class, rats were a big deal in WW1 especially in the trenches. Read this article  and share your thoughts. Anything interesting? Surprising?

    I thought this article was very interesting and I found a group of points that were made to be very interesting. One of those points were that some of the rats got to be the size of cats. I was pretty sure that we had discussed this a little bit in class but I never really thought much of it but after reading more about it I found that the rats were a larger threat to the soldiers than I had thought because they were able to kill the soldiers and take food from the soldiers. Another point of this is that I did not even think that it was possible for a single rat to become that large but I guess that when a group of animals have unlimited food they will become larger then they normally are. Another point I found to be interesting was that it was said that a rat was able to kill a wounded solider. I feel like this really shows how large and powerful that rats were at that point in history. I found it interesting on the amount of rats that were actually in the trenches, it was said that in a single year a rat was able to produce about 880 offspring. That means that their was most likely over a million rats in the trenches with the soldiers.

  86. Read about the truce the soccer game made for soldiers on Christmas… What did you find? Thoughts? How did it create a peaceful truce?

    I found out that on the first Christmas of the war, unarmed German troops came out of their trenches towards the British side to shake hands and exchange greetings. I think this was the right thing to do especially as the war had turned into a stalemate and no one was winning or losing. Both sides had been fighting non stop with little food, no sleep, and running out of ammunition. It was a time for rest and a peaceful truce that didn’t cause harm to anyone. I thought it was cool how they used their coats and hats to be able to play soccer. It shows how no one is actually there because they want to kill other people but they are forced to and they feel they have no other choice, which they really don’t. Overall, this was a peaceful truce that showed each side how they can be friendly but are forced to fight for their country and freedom even thought they may not want to.

    • I understand how this could be viewed as a good things but at the same time I think that I would be worse on the mental state of the solder knowing that they wound need to go back out and try and kill the people that they had just got along with.

  87. What happened to the titanic on April 15th, 1912? Read this article all about the Titanic. Share your thoughts on any of the following questions. How was the creation of the Titanic a major event? How did the crash of the Titanic change ships we go on today and history? What are your thoughts on the rescuing of the people? What are your thoughts on all of the investigations? Did anything stand out to you?***

    It was really interesting to see that two ships were constructed with the Titanic. I thought that the Titanic was the only one like it back then. It was also interesting that those three ships were made because of competition. The ships were supposed to be built because they wanted them to be known for comfort. The Lusitania, which we talked about in class, was the rival ship. I found it cool how I could connect our unit to the Titanic. I found it sad how once people were in the water, the people who were on the lifeboats wouldn’t go back to get them because they thought the boat would get overcrowded. They didn’t have enough lifeboats for everyone. After that, they added more lifeboats to help all the people in case another boat that large sank. I also thought it was sad how most of the 3rd class people died because they gave the rich people priority, but also because the 3rd class rooms were so far from the place where they loaded the lifeboats. There were lots of laws passed after the Titanic sunk that affected how people on boats would sail. Another thing I find interesting but also sad is how if the Titanic never tried to swerve then the ship wouldn’t have sunk because the front was strong enough to break the iceberg, but the side was not. Also, if the ship didn’t try to turn while going slow it would’ve been able to get around the iceberg at normal speed.

  88. PYOT from AdBa: As we have learned in class, rats were a big deal in WW1 especially in the trenches. Read this article  and share your thoughts. Anything interesting? Surprising?

    Something interesting I found after reading this article was that rats could grow up to the size of cats and that they were so big they could eat a wounded man if he couldn’t defend himself. I found this interesting but also very disturbing because just having to imagine that is very nasty and seems like it would be a major source of PTSD for the soldiers. Something else that surprised me was the fact that just one rat can produce 880 offspring in a year. This seems really crazy and if those offspring had more offspring there must have been so many rats everywhere. Something really disturbing I read was that at night the soldiers could hear the rats trying to rattle tins over for food. They also mentioned how the rats were “fearless” which shows the overpopulation of them and why they were so dominant. Overall, I would not want to experience trench warfare and it seems like something that would be very disturbing for most people and lead to PTSD later on in life.

  89. PYOT from AdBa: As we have learned in class, rats were a big deal in WW1 especially in the trenches. Read this article  and share your thoughts. Anything interesting? Surprising?

    To me the rats are absolutely disgusting especially because they can become the size of small dogs. With all the dead bodies in the trenches they attracted the rats. It is kind of scary for those men to know that rats are eating humans and they have to live around something that eats their soldiers and men. Something I found surprising was the fact that rats can produce 880 offspring in a year. Another thing that I found surprising and absolutely disgusting was that one man wrote that he pulled back bed sheets one day to find two rats fighting over a severed hand. Again, its just crazy how these people lived so close to something that feasted on them. Lastly, something I found surprising was that the way that rats are the dead bodies was they started eating out the eyes, then tunnelled their way into the corpse body to eat. This is just so horrifying.

  90. During the Christmas Truce of 1914, amidst the horrors of World War l, there was a remarkable event known as the “soccer miracle.” It was a spontaneous ceasefire where soldiers from opposing sides laid down their weapons and came together to play a friendly game of soccer in the no mans land. The soldiers who were tired of constant fighting and loss of life, saw this as an opportunity to experience a moment of peace and humanity. They set aside their differences and engaged in a shared passion for the game. It was a remarkable display of unity and comradely in the midst of a brutal conflict.The Soccer Miracle serves as a powerful reminder of the inherent goodness within humanity. Despite being in the midst of war, the soldiers demonstrated compassion, empathy, and a desire for peace. It shows that even in the darkest times, people have the capacity to come together, set aside their differences, and choose acts of kindness and goodwill. This event highlights the resilience and strength of the human spirit. It shows that it is never too late to do the right thing and make a positive impact. The soldiers involved in the Soccer Miracle chose to prioritize their shared humanity over the divisions imposed by war. It serves as an example to the power of compassion and the potential for positive change, even in the most challenging circumstances. It is indeed tragic that the war continued and peace was short-lived. The solders experienced a glimpse of what life could be like without conflict, where they could interact as fellow human beings rather than enemies. The fact that the was persisted despite the brief moments of peace the devastating nature of the conflict. It highlights the complexities of war, the political and strategic factors that perpetuated it, and the immense toll it took on countless lives. I think that the Christmas Truce is a reminded of the uselessness of war and the longing for peace that exists within all of it us. It serves as a potential example of the importance of seeking peaceful resolutions and finding common ground, even in the most dire circumstances. In conclusion, the Soccer Miracle during World War l demonstrates the capacity for humanity to rise about conflict and embrace unity and peace. It reminds us of the inherent goodness within people and the potential for positive change even in times of despair.

  91. The trenches of WW1 were a brutal environment, not just because of the constant threat of enemy fire, but also due to the appalling living conditions that soldiers had to live through, along with rats. The rats during those times were as large as cats and the dead bodies were a surplus supply of food for them. The trench rats became a symbol of the filth and despair of trench warfare. Soldiers would sleep with their hands over their faces to protect themselves from being bitten. Rats crawling over them as they tried to rest would eat their rations and break the silence at night. I think the war conditions in general were inhumane and moral. It was the conditions that made men feel less human. I think it’s terrible that they had to endure this.

    • It’s crazy what these soldiers had to deal with only so nation’s could be considered “better” than their “peers”. Militarism, Alliances and Imperialism all talk about how nations were racing for domination. Then when you actually look at it, people had to deal with sleeping in dirt occupied by rats. It makes me realize how lucky we are to be in a place at the right time compared to others that are being relocated by force, away from their home they have grown up in all their life.

  92. Check out JG’s CC vid on World War 1 – what does he highlight as the major causes of the war, the main reasons why it ends the way it does, and what the lasting effects of the war are on the world:

    Causes:

    1. The assassination of Franz Ferdinand
    2. System of alliances – drags all major powers into the war
    3. The Schiefflin plan – Germany enters Belgium which causes it’s ally, Great Britain, to enter the war
    4. Cultural belief that war was good for nations

    Why it ends the way it does:

    1. The Treaty of Versailles was unfair and about revenge
    2. Russian revolutions and civil wars

    Lasting effects:

    1. America becomes a major role player on the world stage and economy improved
    2. Set the stage for WW2
    3. Dissolved ottoman empire and changes borders in Europe
    4. War is not a heroic act anymore
  93. Take a look at this site’s collection of pics from WW1 – which images stand out to you and why?

    All of these pictures were really eye opening, cause we talked about the war and death in class but seeing pictures kinda made me realized that it actually happened. Some of the pictures make it seem apocalyptic, with the battlefields all destroyed and warped and trees all blown apart. It also humanizes the soldiers, seeing what they went through and seeing how many people died. My favorite photo was of the British entering France after four years of German occupation. I liked it because it showed the soldiers face on with out and masks and they were all smiling and laughing, it makes you realize that they were real people getting killed in the war.

    • I agree, the photos also opened my eyes but were also disturbing. It makes me realize that these aren’t just drawn photos like from years before… these real people in battles that were real. This was especially obvious when looking at pictures of the terrain after war. The picture with a destroyed forest reminded me not only of how hard they are fighting, but how they are also destroying everything in their path. A picture of A-H hanging Serbians and taking a picture of it was kinda weird because they’re taking pride in something that is inhuman. It kind of got me mad watching these soldiers with dirt on their face with the actual leaders sitting at home with their fancy uniforms maintaining safety. This was what war really is. These soldiers are stripped of their identity and are used as pawns like in a game of chess. I guess that these people tried to compensate by having some fun, like how dogs came into play. At the end of the day, I agree that it makes me realize that these were real people in real battles.

  94. PYOT from a peer: Take a look at these links about technological innovations during the 1st World War – what stands out to you as interesting a/o surprising? 

    What was interesting to me was how I always envisioned most of these inventions and products as very recent things, such as Kleenexes, Pilates, zippers, and especially drones. These seem very modern, and not something that you would see in World War 1 in the early 1900s. This also applies to Blood banks and transfusions, because I thought that this kind of advanced medical practice was a much more modern thing.

    With the trench coats, I don’t know why I didn’t make the connection before between the coats and the trench warfare that they were named after. They seem very practical for war. It also makes sense that daylight savings was invented during war time, as originally it was introduced to save more coal by having an extra hour of daylight. It doesn’t make sense to keep it now though, because we’re not at war and don’t need to ration coal anymore.

    With the second link, all the technology really impressed me. Some things that I thought couldn’t have possibly been invented or used back then were actually used during the war, such as pilot less drones.

    • I agree with you. A lot of these inventions from the first link I would’ve thought were modern things, but they were invented 100 years ago. I would not expect drones to be used in ww1. Besides things like pilates and zippers, all of the advancements in weapons probably made the most impact. Because of militarism, all of the countries wanted to make bigger and better weapons which advanced a bunch of technology, but people used it to kill a bunch of other people which was obviously not good. Weapons like tanks, poison gas, u-boats, and lots of different guns were used to kill so many people during the war.

  95. PYOT from a peer: Check out this video on how Stubby the dog became a Sargent in WW1. What stands out as interesting or surprising? Do you think they should give more medals to dogs that helped during the war?

    I think it was interesting how Stubby became famous, when there must have been lots of other dogs who saved lives like him. He did a bunch of heroic things, but there were also hundreds of thousands of other dogs serving in the war as well, and they must have saved lives too. I wonder if they got medals as well. I also wonder how Stubby identified an enemy German spy. Maybe he smelled different from the other soldiers? I think he deserved the medals, but other dogs should have gotten some too.

    • I agree with you. Stubby helped a lot in the war just like a bunch of other dogs. I think they probably would’ve gotten medals too, but this video focuses more on Stubby because he was the first dog to do so. I also found it really funny that Stubby was allowed to remain on the ship because he could salute the other soldiers. Stubby’s success probably inspired more soldiers to want to own dogs in the war.

  96. Revisit our class discussions in unit 12 around propaganda – pick any of the techniques we focused on, and provide modern-day examples of organized efforts to convince YOU to do (or not do) something

    I found a link to a modern day version of propaganda https://www.etsy.com/listing/79012900/twitter-propaganda-poster-version-2

    This photo is an example of bandwagon. The words that are used are trying to convince everyone to use Twitter. they are sort of peer pressuring people to tweet. The actual picture with the whale suggests that if more people tweet, the more help you are doing. They are trying to convince you that if everyone tweets, everything will be okay. Now every time someone tweets, they will think of that whale being saved by the little Birdy from Twitter.

    Another example is this photo https://e110fa19mbhp.home.blog/2019/12/04/taylor-swifts-diet-coke-advertisement/

    This photo uses testimonial propaganda. By using such a famous person like Taylor Swift, Coke is getting a lot of attention. Even though I am sure Taylor has nothing to do with Coke, they use her fame to get attention from everyone. Also as you can see in the picture, they are saying that if you enter than you can get Taylor related prizes. This is just using her fame to Coke’s advantage.

    • I think that the first example also uses transfer and glittering generalities. For transfer I believe that they convey the natural want of humans to work together to complete a heavy goal. They associate people working together with the general outcome of success. I believe that the entire picture references glittering generalities, again based on success because they are connecting the positive impact of teamwork and people tweeting. This would motivate people to tweet more because it clearly is doing something good.

      I agree that the second one references a a testimonial, which kinda relates to bandwagon because if Taylor Swift is doing it all Swifties would probably want to “fit in” with her. Glittering generalities is also used at the top left when it says “Stay Extraordinary”, connecting drinking coke to a positive outcome.

  97. Connected to a few WordPress topics, what was with so many dogs in WW1? Why do we see them in the pictures during this time? Read this article to find out. What did you find as interesting or surprising? Your thoughts on what you found?

    I think that is surprising to see that were so many dogs in the fronts, even if is sad to know that probably some them died in the war, they were important to save soldiers and to give information to the generals, but is certain that these are the most brave dogs that ive seen.

  98. Read about the truce the soccer game made for soldiers on Christmas… What did you find? Thoughts? How did it create a peaceful truce?

    The fact that they did that soccer game being enemies is just fantastic for me, because shows that even in a brutal and violent scenario like war, you can have peace for a brief time and also shows that the soldiers still have humanity inside them and do not only think in fight.

    • I 100% agree with you, Henrique. I feel like this was such a positive thing to do in such a hard time. It just goes to show how they all had the similar mindset that they just wanted to be happy and were tired of war. Especially since it was a holiday. I really respect them for going against their commanders and leaders, to just do something happy for once in such a depressing war.

  99. Connecting to unit 12 and some in class discussions, read this article about April 6th 1917 the date The US joined WW1. Share your thoughts on any of the questions. Did the US declaring war againt Germany help with anything? How was this a major turing point of the better and the worse? What was surprising or interesting to you? Do you think it was good that the US joined the war?

    I think that the entering of the U.S in the WWI was extreme important for the final result of the war, because the central powers were resisting against the allies at that time, even if they were being attacked by two fronts, so even considering that Russia would get out the war a little bit later that i think that the enter of the U.S in the war was almost a miracle for the allies.

  100. What happened to the titanic on April 15th, 1912? Read this article all about the Titanic. Share your thoughts on any of the following questions. How was the creation of the Titanic a major event? How did the crash of the Titanic change ships we go on today and history? What are your thoughts on the rescuing of the people? What are your thoughts on all of the investigations? Did anything stand out to you?

    I think that, even if the wreck of Titanic was something tragicto happen, i think the event was very important to show to the people and companys that you need to have good security systems and dont save money for that, because human lives cant be in game when you have trasportationd. I think that they could give more money and attention to the safety of the passengers.

  101. So you now know the historical / family roots of my first, middle, and last names – tell us the history / genealogy of any part of your name??? Share what you know, or what you can find out…

    My dads side of the family used to live in Lithuania during the time of ww2. Our last name used to be Vaitkaitis but they were told that they had to change because it sounded too German. They ended up just shortening it to Vait until they moved into the US. When they moved to the US they changed it to what it is now, which is White! I’m technically only ⅛ Lithuanian, my dad is ¼, and my grandpa is ½. My moms side of the family is from Brazil. My great grandma grew up in Brazil but then ended up moving to the US to have my grandma (I call her Vovó because that is brazilian for grandma). I have my great grandma’s first name as my middle name.  I am also ⅛ brazilian! 

  102. Connected to a few WordPress topics, what was with so many dogs in WW1? Why do we see them in the pictures during this time? Read this article to find out. What did you find as interesting or surprising? Your thoughts on what you found?

    I find it cool that they relied on dogs to do things for them. They can’t always be trustworthy and to trust them in war is on another level! Even though it’s sad, I think it is smart to have dogs do things for the soldiers that would potentially put them in danger. We would rather have a dog die than a soldier if you get what I mean. I find it funny that they had designated dogs to catch rats in the trenches. It is just weird to think about because that is something that would never happen now. I wonder why they chose dogs over cats for that job since cats are more known for chasing things like rats. Dogs were probably good to have around for the soldiers because they are under so much stress and dogs definitely helped reduce the stress and take their mind off war for a second. 

  103. So you now know the historical / family roots of my firstmiddle, and last names – tell us the history / genealogy of any part of your name??? Share what you know, or what you can find out…

    When I was researching I found out that my last name Solimeno is actually Americanized. The original name was Solimine when people would immigrate to US it was too hard to pronounce but personally I think it’s just as hard to say Solimeno from my own experience of everyone pronouncing my name wrong. There was also a ton of family member that I knew but some went back to the 1800s when immigration was thing. That made me remember my family myth. It has been said that my great great great grandpa was an orphan who travelled to America for a better life, but people say that he’s actually the “lost prince of Italy”. Since my great great great grandpa was an orphan it’s hard to track down any of my ancestors because it only comes back to him and I can’t go any further in time.

  104. So you now know the historical / family roots of my first, middle, and last names – tell us the history / genealogy of any part of your name??? Share what you know, or what you can find out…

    My dads side of the family used to live in Lithuania during the time of ww2. Our last name used to be Vaitkaitis but they were told that they had to change because it sounded too German. They ended up just shortening it to Vait until they moved into the US. When they moved to the US they changed it to what it is now, which is White! I’m technically only ⅛ Lithuanian, my dad is ¼, and my grandpa is ½. My moms side of the family is from Brazil. My great grandma grew up in Brazil but then ended up moving to the US to have my grandma (I call her Vovó because that is Brazilian for grandma). I have my great grandma’s first name as my middle name.  I am also ⅛ Brazilian! 

  105. PYOT from a peer: Check out this video on how Stubby the dog became a Sargent in WW1. What stands out as interesting or surprising? Do you think they should give more medals to dogs that helped during the war?

    Stubby was found wandering around troops as they were training. Robert connroy, took him in and started teaching him tricks. One of the tricks that he taught Stubby was to salut. I found this super surprising and interesting because its so unreal how can a dog salut.When it was time to leave he hid stubby in his coat and when stubby was found, he saluted to the officer and was allowed to board the ship. This was also crazy how troops allowed this as long as they were official and respected. What if stubby didn’t have the training required? They let him go otherwise as long as he was saluting. One day Germans attacked them with toxic gas bombs and Stubby recognized the scent before he started barking to alert the troops. It saved their lives and he earned his first military rank in the process and became an official member of the army. Another surprising thing that stubby did was identify enemy spies. He identified a German spy and when the soldiers took off his German war cross they gave it to stubby. Stubby was promoted to the rank of Sargent. Its funny to me how stubby ranks up like the rest of them and they treat him with equal importance as humans. His job was as rewarded as the rest. Its also crazy how stubby knew what an enemy spy looked like or what they did. He didn’t really know that Germans were against them, and maybe he is told to search for scents or certain behaviors but I cant think of how he may identify a spy. He became the first dog in history to achieve the military rank. Eventually when the allies won stubby was decorated with so many medals that they made him a suede coat to place them on. Overall stubby is super cute and highly deserving.

  106. Check out this link (and many links within…) regarding how the 1st World War changed life for many women Great Britain 

    I knew that women had to take the jobs of men after they left for the war, but it surprised me that they also started playing football to replace them men. It was encouraged to counter unhealthy factory conditions. What I wonder is how they did at first in the factories, as most women probably never had gotten any training for the types of jobs they took over. I also didn’t know, but it makes sense they also started to be heard more in politics. A famous suffragette started encouraging men to join armed forces.

    • I get that women had to take over the men’s jobs, but I wouldn’t think that they would also start to play football too. By taking over the men’s jobs in society, the women gained more recognition for their abilities which was definitely a good thing that came out of a horrible war. Also never being trained in the jobs they had to take over just proved that women were even more capable of working jobs than men ever thought.

  107. What happened to the titanic on April 15th, 1912? Read this article all about the Titanic. Share your thoughts on any of the following questions. How was the creation of the Titanic a major event? How did the crash of the Titanic change ships we go on today and history? What are your thoughts on the rescuing of the people? What are your thoughts on all of the investigations? Did anything stand out to you?

    I didn’t know that there were two other ships like the titanic made, the Olympic and the Britannic (is that why it’s called Britannica??) and I also didn’t know that it was made because it’s rival ship maker built the Lusitania, which was talked about it class. Interesting how both rival ships sunk. I also didn’t know that it’s maiden voyage nearly began with a collision, when a docked ship swerved into it’s path. If they hadn’t gotten out of the way and had crashed into the other ship, it might have saved the 1,500 lives that were lost, as the ship’s journey would have been cancelled at the dock. This also could have been prevented if this ship hit the ice berg head on, but the captain turned and exposed all of the ship’s side compartments to be hit by the iceberg.

    • What stands out to me is the historiography behind the Titanic sinking. Rumor said that the Titanic hit an iceberg and sink. This promotes the idea that the Titanic was built weakly and couldn’t withstand a crash. This isn’t the case. It was later figured out that a fire weakened the metal, causing the impact to have more damage on the ship. It’s weird that people put out there the idea of the Titanic being weak when it was the first in it’s class. The Titanic was the first ship of that nature, a very large passenger liner… allowing huge groups of people being carried overseas. One would think that a person would build a ship to be “stronger” after seeing what happened after the Titanic, but I think that the important thing is making sure that there are more accessible and resourceful safety equipment/light boats. You can’t just get rid of a fire. With the fire there, the trajectory the ship was on made the ending situation unavoidable. There were definitely not enough lifeboats for people to be rescued on… especially considering the sheer size of the ship and the number of passengers. This easy precaution could help solve unavoidable events.

  108. Read about the truce the soccer game made for soldiers on Christmas… What did you find? Thoughts? How did it create a peaceful truce?

    I never knew before that Adolf Hitler was there for the Christmas Day Truce. It’s pretty in character though that he refused to get out of the trenches and fraternize with the enemy. I think it must have been hard for the soldiers to go back to killing each other the next day, because they must have become friends with each other while they were talking and played soccer with each other. I also thought it was interesting how the article compared sports and war to each other, and it makes sense, because both are competitive, are directed by leaders, and require teamwork and discipline.

  109. Connected to a few WordPress topics, what was with so many dogs in WW1? Why do we see them in the pictures during this time? Read this article to find out. What did you find as interesting or surprising? Your thoughts on what you found?

    I was surprised by the amount of dogs that were used in World War I. I’ve heard of a couple famous ones before, so I thought dogs in war was a pretty rare thing and that there were only a couple of them, but actually dogs were in high demand and did jobs during the war. I wonder how many dogs were killed during the war, and I also thought that the gas mask on the dog in the picture was very unnerving, but it makes sense.

  110. So you now know the historical / family roots of my first, middle, and last names – tell us the history / genealogy of any part of your name??? Share what you know, or what you can find out…

    So I was told that my first name was from a college roommate named Mara, but my parents wanted to be different and decided to add a U in there. For all of my siblings middle names my parents named us after relatives, so my middle name is my grandmother’s maiden name. And then for my last name I was always told that Zirker meant “sugar” or “sugar-maker” in German (cause we’re german), but after doing someone research it’s actually “Zucker” that means sugar in German. Idk if it got changed somewhere along the line, or something like that.

  111. Read about the truce the soccer game made for soldiers on Christmas… What did you find? Thoughts? How did it create a peaceful truce?***

    I think that this soccer game was a very kind and peaceful thing to do. To come together and just have fun while in the middle of all of this is a good way to lighten the mood and not make everything so depressing. The war was a very dark time so for all of the soldiers to have enough trust in each other is very shocking. I understand how some people would be mad or upset about this because the soldiers are not doing their jobs but I think that it is okay. They need to have some happiness during this and live a little which is what this soccer game did for them.

    • By chance do think that this match could also have been a bad things for the soldiers. As we had discussed in class it almost made the other solders feel more connected to each other on a personal level because of this game and because of this it might have put more of a mental strain on the solder then there already was. Also, I feel like If I was at war and we all stopped and played a game of football for a day and I made a good friend from the other army and I would have to go back to the trenches and try to kill him all over again, I feel like that would be sort of difficult to wrap your mind around and you would feel much worse.

      • That’s a good point and I didn’t think of it. If I spent a whole day competing against people, I think I would start to take a liking to some of them. Then later during the war if I would be able to recognize the person/people that I was friendly with I would hesitate to take shots at them and I might not even have it in me to kill them. I also think that it would distract me from my original task and it would take me some time to get back locked in on the war.

        • I agree, and this is what war is like. Becoming friends with your enemy emphasizes the fact that it’s hard to kill other humans that have their own life. And what is the point of it? Soldiers risk their life and the generals/presidents are sitting in their palace at home planning mobilization of even more troops.

  112. In the continuing effort to make sure Her-stories don’t get lost in the teaching of HIStory, check out these bad-ass ladies, and possibly talk about how and why herstories still get underemphasized today

    As I read I learned about how strong of a woman Queen Tamar is. All odds were against her when there were twice as many opposing soldiers than there were for her army. She destroyed them very quickly. I think it is very empowering how she can so easily destroy another enemy with such ease and back then women were not as supported as they are now. She upgraded her country so much by expanding borders and creating large architectural buildings. She also helped make the country unique which helped them to be well known. I think that this is very smart and it would help a lot, also doing this mainly by herself is very impressive and shows a lot of leadership.

  113. PYOT from a peer: Check out this video on how Stubby the dog became a Sargent in WW1. What stands out as interesting or surprising? Do you think they should give more medals to dogs that helped during the war?

    Stubby was found roaming the campus watching the troops train. When it was time to leave a soldier named Robert Convoy hid him in his coat and If I heard this correctly then he was discovered, but Stubby saluted and was allowed to board the ship. This is super surpriseing to me because first of all, how can a dog salut? Second, its just interesting that they let him go simply because he showed one sign of respect. Like what would happen if stubby didn’t have any training? When Germans launched more toxic gas waste Stubby recognized the smell and barked, awaking the sleeping troops and alerting them which ended up saving their lives. After that Stubby became an official member of the army. Another thing that was interesting and surprising was that Stubby identified an enemy spy and when they got the enemy they took off its German war cross and gave it to Stubby. For this Stubby was promoted Sargent. Its funny how Stubby ranks up and up. He became the first dog in history to achieve the military rank. Eventually they won the war and stubby got so many medals that they made him a suede coat to place them on. This is so cute.

  114. So you now know the historical / family roots of my first, middle, and last names – tell us the history / genealogy of any part of your name??? Share what you know, or what you can find out…

    My first name – Sloane

    What it means –  in irish it mean warrior 

    Why my parents chose this name– my parents chose my name by looking for a rare and unique name  and this was the one that stood out to them. 

    History about it – Sloane is the name of an ancient Irish clan once called Ó Sluaghadháin and was given an English spelling of Sloane. Sloan was a more popular masculine name but Sloane became more popular. The name Sloane was not that popular but from 2009-2020 it gained popularity from the 1000th most popular girls name to the 188 most popular girls name.  

    My middle name – Elizabeth

    What it means – from the hebrew bible it means “my God is bountiful” and is often perceived as strong, resilient

    Why my parents chose this name – they chose Elizabeth because it is an Irish name and it sounded good. 

    History about it – the name Elizabeth originally came from the Hebrew bible and comes from the Hebrew words  of shava (oath) and el (God). Also the name Elizabeth has been popular through generations and its variations like Eliza and Isabella. I do not understand most of the nicknames though. How is Babette and Bettina a nickname for Elizabeth?

    My last name – Maher

    What it means – In Arabic it means “skillful, talented or expert.” but it is an Irish name. In irish it means “kindly, noble, majestic’

    History about it – Maher is a variation of the name Meagher and located in the modern town of Roscrea in north Tipperary the came the “original’ maher’s. 

  115. Take a look at this site’s collection of pics from WW1 – which images stand out to you and why?

    Picture 26 really stood out to me because they have to be very careful of where they go. They also have to be secretive about it and be ducking so they don’t get killed.

    Picture 44 also stood out because they are helping a dog in the dog hospital while there is a war going on.

    • I agree, photo 44 really stood out to me because it just shows how important dogs were the Germans and anyone in war as they had many purposes like clearing out rats in trenches and being therapy like animals for soldier. It was also very wholesome just seeing soldiers take care of the dogs. Also the fact that they had time to help the dogs shows even more how important they were.

      • I feel like the fact that there were dog proves that they acted as a coping mechanism for soldiers during such an inhumane and horrific time. Based on it’s nickname “man’s best friend”, dogs could’ve been used militarily but also as a way to maintain one’s sanity.

  116. Check out this video on how Stubby the dog became a Sargent in WW1. What stands out as interesting or surprising? Do you think they should give more medals to dogs that helped during the war?

    This dog deserves every medal that exists because it’s so incredible to see that a dog like Stubby saved the lives of so many soldiers and have not died in the war, there’s not much to say about it, it’s just cute and encouraging to see that.

    • I agree, Stubby did some incredible things during WW1, he started off as just a stray dog to then getting promoted to being Sargent. What he did was amazing and I love how he learned how to solute soldiers too. What he did was more than the average dog probably did during WW1.

  117. Take a look at these links about technological innovations during the 1st World War – what stands out to you as interesting a/o surprising? 

    For me what stands out being surprising is that a considerable part of the technologies that killed people in the first World War were used to make our lives easier decades after, which kinda comproves that the phrase “everything has a good side” is right, because at least that war technology bring something good to humanity.

  118. Read about the truce the soccer game made for soldiers on Christmas… What did you find? Thoughts? How did it create a peaceful truce?***

    I find it really interesting how everyon involved just emediatlyturned. One second they were trying to kill each other and then the next they are having a friendly game of soccer. Its funny how such a simple child’s game can bring people together in such horrible times. It wasn’t even a competitive game. There were no refs and no score they were all there to just let lose and have fun on Christmas. Although to some it was a peaceful truce, some people didn’t want to go. They were scared their commanders would punish or discipline them if they tried to make friends with the enemy. This soccer truce also brought into light that the enemy are also just people. They aren’t just some lifeless person trying to kill you, but rather a real human with feelings just like everyone else. This game recognized that at the end of the day, everyone is in some way similar to each other.

    • I agree. The fact that pickup soccer had so many people playing and was organized to an extent that actually made it productive proves the strong emotions of the people. These people didn’t want to be fighting in the war, they had better things to be doing or people to be with. Playing soccer with the enemy team only shows that they’re all regular people that are being used as pawns as the government. They represent a meaningless statistic of # of troops and # dead.

  119. Connected to a few WordPress topics, what was with so many dogs in WW1? Why do we see them in the pictures during this time? Read this article to find out. What did you find as interesting or surprising? Your thoughts on what you found?

    Honesty I find this really interesting because it was kind of smart. Dogs are really smart so they are a good animal to use. The fact that the dogs can sniff and find injured people on the battle field is incredible and really helpful as well. They would have med kits on their back and honestly were really helpful and may have saved some lives by finding them and helping them. Another really important job the dogs had were rat catchers. As we have learned, the increase of rats and the size of them became a huge problem. By having dogs with you they were able to catch some of them. Although it is sad that they were in the battle field most of the time and I bet a lot of them died, I think it was a good idea to have them there for mayn reasons.

  120. Continuing our conversation about Rasputin, do a little bit of research on the origins of the song. What sticks out to you? What do you find interesting? Do you think the song matches how we talked about him? Thoughts?

    I think it’s kinda mysterious that they let a guy like Rasputin have contact with the royal family, but it’s also creepy to think that the Russian queen put so much trust on that guy, and I think that is understandable that’s the Russian population have so much distrust on him, because he was no one that was from the royal family, the decaying conditions of Russia and also because he was just a guy from anywhere that gave advice to the queen (that they also didn’t like). I think the song catches that part of Rasputin , that he was unpopular to most part of the people, but for the rich and royal people of the Moscow capital, he was a great guy.

  121. PYOT from a peer: Take a look at these links about technological innovations during the 1st World War – what stands out to you as interesting a/o surprising? 

    What stood out to me that was interesting or surprising

    • Daylight savings
      • I would not have expected that Europe was actually the first to have daylight savings in order to have an extra hour of daylight during war time. Then after the US adopted the idea. I always thought that the US was the first country to come up with daylight savings. 
    • Blood Banks
      • I also would have never thought that there were blood banks during war back then. It is a very smart idea to have all types of blood in case it is necessary. I don’t know why I thought that blood banks were not a thing back then
    • Kleenex/tissues
      • It is just really interesting that it was during WW1 when the first kleenex was created and very smart as an alternative to handkerchiefs. 
    • Stainless Steel
      • I honestly never realized how many things were created during WW1, even stainless steel was first used during ww1 for british guns because they were less susceptible to having issues with heat and friction. 
    • Drones/pilotless drones
      • I totally thought drones were more of a late 20th century early 21st century thing but I was wrong again. It is very surprising that there were drones back then because they are not the easiest thing to use. But pilotless drones seem even more advanced and not like a thing used in 1914ish. I just think it is insane to know that this type of technology existed back then. 
    • Flame throwers
      • For this one what is surprising is that this was not exactly the first type of flame thrower as byzantines and cheese used weapons similar in medieval times but this was the first modern flamethrower. I think that this is a good creation to use in war because of how it can go in tanks or be hand held. 
    • Poison Gas
      • I feel like it is very risky to use poison gas for basically the first time during a war because what if it does not work? What if it works so well that it kills the person who is using it? It is very interesting that poison gas was not really explored before ww1
    • Tracer bullets
      • In my opinion this one is the most interesting/surprising because at night it was hard to see where you were shooting so the British decided to make tracer bullets which emitted a small amount of flame to leave a trail. This is very smart and just a cool invention to make war a little bit easier. 
    • Hydrophones
      • It was used to locate a U-boat, and was actually created by a canadian invention to help locate the icebergs following the titanic’s disaster. This is just really cool and shows how advanced they were with some things. 
    • Trench warfare
      • it was only introduced during ww1 and there was not a lot known about it except it would probably work, but it also did cause a lot of deaths and some of the worst battles. 
    • Machine guns
      • I would have thought that machine guns would have been created before that due to other wars and fighting in places like France and the US. 
  122. Revisit our last assignment from WW1 unit (topic of discussion and group work during class…) – and/or this article on the many major, lasting effects of the 1st World War; which do you think is the most important in shaping the world today? Explain your choice:

    I think that the most important effect that the first world war caused was probably the World War 2, because the WWII was the biggest war and the most bloody one that ever happened and also the fact that the WWI was the biggest reason why the U.S became the most powerful country of the 20th century.

    • I agree I think that this had a huge butterfly effect and caused the most of the second world war. The second world war was definitely one of the most gruesome battles and deadly. Without the first world war I’m not sure the second one would have happened or at least the effects of it would be a lotttt smaller. It is interesting how one thing could cause something this dramatic.

      • I agree that WW1 had a lot to do with WW2. If WW1 never happened, then that means that there wouldn’t be a single life lost in the subsequent WW2. It’s interesting how one war could create another war when it’s assumed that the end of a war marks the absolute end of the conflict. However, in context, it makes sense that Germany was still mad about having to pay reparations, giving them the motivation to attack once again.

  123. Revisit our class discussions in unit 12 around propaganda – pick any of the techniques we focused on, and provide modern-day examples of organized efforts to convince YOU to do (or not do) something

    The Obama hope poster shown in this link

    (link) is a example of modern day propaganda in government.

    This is an example of glittering generalities because the poster is titled with one word “hope” that is a positive word often associated with a brighter future. That word in combination with the red and blue, colors associated with American patriotism, show glittering generalities because it combines a word with a positive meaning with colors of patriotism.

    • I agree that a motif of hope combined with the colors of American Patriotism give the full package to American. I think that it’s important to understand the context of why the president was saying hope. Based on the world, was something bad happening that the U.S. has to persevere through? Was it just in general? What other words could be used in place of hope in order to give off the same message? “Change”? I feel like simple propaganda where the world is sweet and short is much ore effective.

  124. Connected to a few WordPress topics, what was with so many dogs in WW1? Why do we see them in the pictures during this time? Read this article to find out. What did you find as interesting or surprising? Your thoughts on what you found?

    What I found the most interesting/surprising

    • Dogs actually had a very important role in European armies during WW1, they would pull machine guns and supply carts, deliver messages to others, and even more.
      • I would never have expected that dogs had that big of a role during WW1 even though they are not humans. 
    • There was more than 2000 dogs who were believed to help serve in the Western Front at one time and there was believed to be over 16 million total animals that helped to serve during WW1
      • That is just a huge number of animals that were said to be helping during WW1. If I had to guess how many animals helped I would never get 16 million. 
    • Dogs would help and assist the wounded people. Like in France first aid dogs were selected carefully then trained over the span of months in order to help locate wounded soldiers and had training on if they would stay with the bonded person or try and bring back evidence of a wounded soldier. Most dogs even had a first aid kit on their backs to help the wounded.
      • It is just crazy to think about dogs having such an important role in a world war and people would trust them. I am not saying dogs can not be trusted but with all of the distractions that could be around that makes their job even harder. I personally love the idea of dogs helping people because I love dogs but I don’t exactly love the idea that dogs probably got killed in battle. 
    • Small dogs were also used as rat catchers in trenches
      • This was more interesting than surprising to me because it was a really smart idea and is something dogs can easily do just by their natural instincts. 
    • Dogs were used to help soldiers feel more at home
      • I just love this idea as dogs are great companions and during war feeling like you are at home can do a lot. I personally know that when I want to be calmer and just in a better mood I like to hang out with my dog.

    Overall I think the idea of having dogs in the picture during WW1 was a good idea because of all of the things they could do to help and you did not have to pay them or really force them to do work. 

  125. Take a look at this site’s collection of pics from WW1 – which images stand out to you and why?

    The first picture that really stuck out to me was the one where the horse was getting transported. There were many parts to this picture that were strange, like the cows in the water. It looks like they are getting tended to or maybe getting moved. I also noticed that everyone is wearing the same or at least similar looking clothes. The people wearing these clothes are observing what is happening and not doing much; they are just there watching. Another picture is the one numbered 30 where soldiers are carrying out a body through mud. This is a very sad picture because of the body that’s being carried. The soldiers carrying the body don’t even seem phased or disturbed at all. While carrying this body which must be heavy, they are also trudging through thick mud. It is up to their knees so I can’t imagine that it is easy to get through. Some of the soldiers are looking forward so there is probably something that they are going towards. Overall it is a very depressing picture.

  126. PYOT from a peer: Check out this video on how Stubby the dog became a Sargeant in WW1. What stands out as interesting or surprising? Do you think they should give more medals to dogs that helped during the war?

    I think it is surprising to me that this dog not only was snuggled in to the army and survived world war 1 but he helped save many wounded soldiers and saved many lives and showed constant bravery during the entire war, he got so much medals for his work and is truly a amazing dog I think we should give medals to dogs in the war because many dogs can save the lives of people and are braver than many soldiers I think if soldiers can get medals, so can they.

    • Yeah, when thinking about his life his projectory of life was not even close to what happened. He was a stray living on a collage campus to becoming a hero and a sargeant. I also think that he deserves all of the medals and even more than he got because he was never told to do any of this, he just did it and was a brave sole.

  127. Connected to a few WordPress topics, what was with so many dogs in WW1? Why do we see them in the pictures during this time? Read this article to find out. What did you find as interesting or surprising? Your thoughts on what you found?

    I found it really interesting that there were so many dogs in WW1. They called the dogs “mans best friend during war”. I found out that dogs played an important military role and served a variety of tasks like hauling machine guns and supply carts, delivered messages, and doing all of this under range of fire. Its crazy that they pulled machine guns and to me that’s crazy. There is a picture underneath showing dogs with carts of guns attached to them, and first off they look super heavy, not to mention how dangerous this was. I also find it cool that they actually did serve a huge purpose and not all the dogs were strays.It was surprising that more than 2,000 dogs were in service in the western front, and over 16 million total worked during WW1. Dogs were used to track down wounded and dead bodies. I found it super cool and interesting that French first aid dogs were carefully selected based off the dogs personality and training abilities. They were trained to either stay with the wounded until a human aid arrived or to bring back evidence of a wounded soldier. Many carried first aid packs for the wounded soldier to use for immediate care. Another thing that dogs did that I found was super funny and must have been extremely helpful were rat catchers. These dogs caught and killed the rats that overpopulated the trenches. Underneath that is an image of soldiers in gas masks, holding a small dog that was also wearing a gas mask. It was super surprising that they had the animals wear gas masks too, and I wonder if they were effective. Its also cute because they made a miniature version of a gas mask to fit the small dog. Another extremely popular occurence of dogs during the war was to calm the soldiers and create a sense of home during a war atmosphere. The dogs created bonds with the soldiers and helped their mental stability. At the end of the day, dogs played so many important roles in WW1, whether it was a dangerous task or simply to be emotional support. Without dogs the war could have gone down differently.

  128. Check out this link (and many links within…) regarding how the 1st World War changed life for many women Great Britain 

    Employment for women drastically changed because when the men were called to war they had to take over the jobs for them. This was huge because women were not thought to be able to do anything a man could, but when there was no choice but to allow woman to take over some of the “male” jobs, they had the opportunity to prove their worth and show they COULD do the jobs men could. I found it interesting and crazy that estimated 2 million women took over mens jobs because that is a lot. The next thing I found that changed for women came as a huge surprise for me. Apparently women started to play football that was watched by many/ spectated because it was recommended for women to do this to counter the unhealthy conditions when they work in a factory. Another huge one was politics.Overall the war gave women many oppurtunities.

  129. Take a look at this site’s collection of pics from WW1 – which images stand out to you and why?

    it’s good to see that we have some photos of these rare moments in history, but I think it’s interesting to see the contrast in some photos like when you have 9 kings of Europe in a reunion while the soldiers are in the battlefield giving their life’s to their countries and dying, also it’s curious to see that the soldiers still had a symbol of humanity inside them with the photo of a dog clothed as a German soldier, which is cute,, but also remembers me that dogs participated in the war, which it’s not great.

    • I completely agree, Henrique. I feel that it is great that we have these photos depicting what the world and especially the soldiers went through, but it is also interesting to see everything else going on in the world at that time, kinda disregarding the war. I agree about the dog thing, some things may look good in pictures/without context, but when you really look into it, it can be a lot worse than it looks.

  130. Check out the links within this site’s collection of veterans’ stories from the 1st World War – what stories stand out to you and why? 

    I think it’s great to see that these heroes from the WWI lived a long life, it’s traumatizing to have to experience a war and see friends and even parents die depending on the case, but at least these soldiers today are well recognized by the bravery of fighting in one of the biggest and most bloody wars that ever happened on history.

  131. Continuing our conversation from class, are there any other turning points in history that you can think of? If so, explain why and what impacts it had on society.***

    I thought that COVID was a huge turning point in history on so many levels. The first I can think of is education for many. We had to do remote learning for a long time, and it didn’t really effect the younger generations, but it certainly affected the older ones. It sort of changed life for me when I was in 6th and 7th grade. If it had even a minor change on my education and the way that I learned I cant imagine what it was like for those in college. I feel like doing remote in highschool would be ok at first, because I have time to do the work at home the entire day, but also if I needed a visual representation then it would be extremely hard to do that. I personally am a visual learner so it helps to be in person. Many people had to miss a year of school that Is super important the older you are. The second way that this impacted history was small businesses.. Many shut down which made times really tough for some people. This changed lives of some. Another is the way we did things/ the procedures of daily things. Grocery shopping was pickup for a long time,, or many people got it delivered. We had to stay 6 ft away from people, and when we were allowed to go back into schools stores, and sports we had to wear masks. I hated the masks and was one of those people that had it below the nose unconsciously. This was important for health conditions of some people, especially the elderly, but eventually it became excessive and really inconvenient. I had to wear them during soccer games, basketball games, and other sports that were outdoors. When it became optional many people still refused to take it off. Lastly, this really took a mental tole on some people because they had to stop social life with friends and family for a long time. I think its weird how we didn’t treat the really bad flu pandemic the same in 2009, which is the year I was born, but we did a whole lot for COVID. People stayed away from others during the flu outbreak but we didn’t wear masks, not many small businesses didn’t shut down, and other things. Overall this definitely made a dent on society.

  132. Take a look at this site’s collection of pics from WW1 – which images stand out to you and why?

    A few images that stood out to me was the dog dressed as a German soldier. This was just very cute and funny because it had its own mini set of gear, and even a helmet. There was also a small fake gun laid in front of him. It also showed me that during this serious time they could still have fun and loved their pets. Another that stood out to me kkind of relates to the first one. It is the Unloading of the Pill Box demolishers. This one stood out to me because they are unloading these humongous shells that weighed 1,400 pounds and the craters from explosion created 15ft deep and 15 yards across. This wasnt the only part that stood out, it was mostly because there is a dog sitting on one that they are unloading. It was funny because they just had those animals roaming around them as they unload dangerous things, and the dog is just sitting calmly on the shell. The men are also unfased but smiling. The next one I found interesting was the Belgian Soldiers with their bicycles in France. This stood out to me because at first it looked like there was no seat for the humans and just a bike for the guns which is super weird, but its just the angle of the photo. I didn’t know if maybe that was their weird way of carrying it. But regardless, It was equally as weird that they rode bikes with guns right underneath them, almost supporting them as the body of the bike. Another image that stood out to me was the Unloading of a horse in Turkey. It caught my eye because they lifted the horse out of a boat and into the sky to drop them on the dock. This kind of made me sad because at that time they thought of them as “equipment” and not animals with feelings. I understand that they did need them as material for the war for transportation and they were important, but It is still kind of sad that the life of a horse was like that. Obviously they probably didn’t mind but it seemed like they might be confused. Another one that stood out was the one where German men and horses were equipped with masks as they passed through the contaminated woods of the poison gas. This was crazy that they even put masks on the horses, over their mouth and nose. It is cool how they thought of them enough to create something like that, but it really doesn’t do anything because its just a piece of fabric that the toxins can just pass through. It might have had some effect because they did use them so it must have served a small purpose. The next was when the British entered France in October 1918 after four years of German Occupation. This stood out because they looked so happy and relieved, like they were living again. They also have a child in the picture, a young boy who looks excited and is walking amoungst the troops. It is cool because it must have been a brother, cousin, or just a kid inspired by one of the soldiers.The one beneath this was a picture of a ship painted in Dazzle camouflage. At first I didn’t think this acted as a camouflage at all, because the design was actually bright and stood out with patterns. But its cooler than that and serves an interesting purpose because it made it difficult for enemies to estimate the range, speed, and heading of the ship to make it harder to target. Save the best for last. The last one stood out to me and really touched me because it was the picture of a German Dog hospital treating wounded dispatch dogs. This was so cool and sweet because these kind men during an extremely dangerous and hard time thought of these animals and were willing to help and heal them. It’s so sweet and nice of them to make time for extra priorities. It also showed that they had interest in other things.

  133. PYOT from a peer: Check out this video on how Stubby the dog became a Sargeant in WW1. What stands out as interesting or surprising? Do you think they should give more medals to dogs that helped during the war?

    Interesting/surprising- 

    • Participated in 17 battles in Europe
      • There were over 30 battles during WW1 and he participated in 17 battles. That is just such a large amount of battles to think about and not get killed. 
    • He was a stray dog born as a cross between pitbull and boston terrier and found in the Yale campus in 1917
      • It is really surprising that he started off as a stray dog with a not so great life but then became a sergeant and had a very important role and life. 
    • He got unofficially adopted by a person in the military and got trained cool tricks like being able to solute
      • It is so cute and wholesome that he got discovered by a person in the military and got trained in this cute trick. This is not that surprising but it is surprising that the dog ended up learning how to do it on command. 
    • The only reason why Stubby was allowed on the ship was when he was found he soluted an officer
      • This is just amazing and so funny that he got snuck onto the ship but then got found and shouted at the officer. This is just so cute to think that him saluting an officer is the only reason why he could stay on the ship. 
    • Stubby had his own gas mask and could help save people from another gas attack and did. Saving many people and going up a rank.
      • What I really want to know is if it was a human gas mask or not. It is so surprising that Stubby would actually wear the gas mask and could identify the scent of it. Meaning he would alert anyone about a gas attack coming and protect them. He actually ended up saving many people with his ability and ranked up which is so cute and surprising. 
    • He helped identify anime spies and got promoted to sergeant
      • This is very interesting but also really a very good thing to be able to do. As it can save many many people. 
  134. Take a look at this site’s collection of pics from WW1 – which images stand out to you and why?

    All of the photos stood out to me a little but these are the ones that stood out to me the most.

    1. In the photo it just shows how destroyed land and their battlefield  became during WW 1. I knew that there was a lot of damage done to the woods and land but never realized that in some places there are just dead looking trees sticking out of the ground. It is just sad to see so much land get destroyed so much. 

    7. In this photo there are a couple of Belgian soldiers on their bikes in Belgium. This photo stood out to me because I feel like it just shows how important having troops on some mode of transportation is. As long as they can fight and move, that is good.

    10. In this photo there is a belgian soldier in what looks like a factory building ready to shoot out the window. This photo stood out to me because it just can show that soldiers were hiding out anywhere trying to take advantage of positioning to fight. The higher you are, the better viewpoint to see soldiers in trenches and the harder for someone to find you. 

    11. This photo is of German soldiers celebrating Christmas despite being at war. This photo stood out to me because they still took the time to celebrate christmas. I feel like if you are at war you would not take the time to celebrate a holiday like christmas because getting what you want is “more important’ 

    12. This is a photo of a battle at night with what looks like a lit up water fountain but I am assuming it is a photo of all of the gun shots. This photo stood out to me because it looks cool and unusual but also shows that even at night battle does not stop. 

    18. This is a photo of a horse unloading in Turkey by getting “hung”. This photo stood out to me because I never realized that horses were used during battle. It makes sense but never clicked for me. 

    20. This is a photo of British soldiers on motorcycles, which is another example of countries trying to get as many people on some type of transportation to be able to move quickly. This photo stood out to me because it looks like they are on a beach-like setting. 

    21. This is a photo of a dog dressed as a German soldier. This photo is just cute and when I was the dog I just had to stop and look at it. 

    22. In this photo soldiers are unloading huge 1400 lbs explosives. This photo stood out to me due to the sheer size of the explosives and the dog that is just chilling on it. I never realized how many dogs there were in battle. I would personally be terrified to be sitting on an explosive or even being near one. 

    26. In this photo it is British soldiers in a trench. This did not specifically stand out to be but it connects to the 4/1 homework assignment just showing how the trenches were getting used. 

    31. This is a photo of German soldiers practicing how to use a flamethrower. This did not necessarily stand out but it is interesting. If you are at war, is practiving with a flamethrower the best idea? Couldn’t you get killed easier if they know where you are?

    34. In this photo there is a tank just rolling through a town and near a house. This stood out to me because there looks to be no damage to the area except that there is a tank rolling through it. 

    39. This is a photo of a man riding 2 horses and all of them have gas masks. What stood out to me is that the horses also have gas masks. This makes me question how the masks are made for the horses and if they are made out of the same material as the ones for humans. 

    40. In this photo there are German soldiers fleeing from a gas attack. This photo is just weird to look at seeing soldiers running from a fog. 

    44. In this photo there a german dog hospital that is treating wounded from battle. This photo stood out to me due to care. It looks like they are putting in to helping them. Also I just love dogs so much so it stood out to me. 

    • I agree with you Sloane! Its funny how many images that stood out to you also stood out to me. To start, the one of the dog dressed as a German soldier because it was really cute and funny. Another one that I agree with you about is the soldiers unloading the heavy shells and the dog just chilling on one of them. I also didn’t know how many dogs were in and around the battle, but I can imagine that if a stray was roaming near the soldiers they would feed it and pet it and stuff to distract themselves. Another one I agree with you stood out was the German soldiers wearing the gas masks, and the fact that the horses had gas masks too. I cant imagine that they would ever be effective, but I also didn’t know that they made them for the horses. The last one was my favorite where the German Dog hospital was being used to treat wounded dogs. I thought the same about how they put in the care into the animals during a time of war, where I would expect they neglected these sorts of jobs.

      • Yeah, I choose the photos based off of if they are funny, interesting, something out of the ordinary, or something that shows something I did not know before. The dog dressed as a German soldier was just so cute to see but also kind of sad if you think about how it could have died in battle. The people with the giant shells was just insane, they acted like it was nothing and their was no chance it could explode and kill many people. I feel like it is almost kind of sad if you think about all of the dogs during battle and how most of them were probably strays and got caught in everything that was happening. I also do not even understand how the gas masks were actually effective and how the one for the horse worked. Same thing with Stubby the dog, I really want to know how the gas masks would save them because there ability to smell things was better.

  135. PYOT from SM:  Check out this article on the cargo ship that hit the Francis Scott Key bridge on 3/26. Share your thoughts on how this event connects to our discussions of Industrial Revolutions and how/why our infrastructure might be a bit fragile in places??  Where do you see this issue going in the future?

    This definitely connects to the industrial revolution revolution because of the transport of goods by boat and even by bridge. Knowing that the boat lost power can also show that technology is not perfect and can have flaws. I really want to know what is going to happen to the company that owns Dali because of the huge impact it is going to have on the east coast. It is slightly scary knowing that the ship lost its power only after 4 minutes of being at sail then got its power back but then lost it again and started smoking. So there were definitely maintenance issues that did not get addressed. I feel like this could be connected to the fact that people overlook issues that are happening in order to get a profit and hopefully get done what they need to get done. It just seems like something that comes with industrialization is not addressing issues like the boat or even trains and then derailing because the “issue” is not big enough yet. I feel like with the first ever boat getting created in 8200- 7600 bc and the first ever cargo ship being created in 1766 there would be more systems to prevent what happened to the Keys bridge and Dali. Safety is a big priority for many people and they do not want anything bad to happen. Another thing that concerns me is the SAME ship had a minor incident in 2016 meaning that could have been a slight cause. Some reasons for how/why our infrastructure might be a bit fragile in places is because the bridge (interstate 695) is an important highway and so is the port for any type of transportation and moving goods. The bridge stretches 1.6 miles and was used by 12 million people in 2023. In 55 years there were 35 major bridge collapses work wide due to ship collisions and the Keys bridge might be one of the worst. Shutting down ship traffic to the Baltimore port which is a major port for at least months but probably years. The loss of the bridge is going to cause many issues and nightmares for the east coast as the port is so popular and the same with the bridge. Prices of food and suppliers are probably going to greatly increase and probably federal taxes to rebuild it. I see many issues coming also because people are going to hord supplies like during covid because of all of the media and things scaring people.  

  136. Check out this link to the status / plans for  The National WW1 Memorial– what thoughts / impressions do you have, especially regarding why this memorial is so much later in the making / establishing in a city so full of war memorials… why so long for this one?

    It can be many reasons why they took that long, they can have forgot to do, they could be lazy, but what matters is that now we have the Memorial of the WWI, but it still crazy to see that that memorial took so long to be made.

  137. Here’s the story of one lady from WW1 who is well-known: what do you find interesting and/or surprising about Mata Hari?

    I found it really cool that she was a spy, and its interesting how the most successful were the women because during the war, women were not expected to have a role in the warfare, and they didn’t expect them to do anything because it was what the “men” did. She had many “lovers” that played important roles in the war, so she could get information.

  138. PYOT from a peer: Check out this new article about a death tunnel from WWI that was just discovered in France. What do you find interesting? Is there anything that stood out to you?

    Its surprising to me that the bodies can still be recognized after all those years. I would have thought they decomposed but there were so many, it kind of makes sense that some may still be distinct with the bones. It is also cool how they still found remains of the items they used in bad condition, but could still be identified.

  139. Perhaps the worst of the war was the Battle of the Somme – on the battlefield anyways; or perhaps the worst of the war was the horrific Armenian genocide (check out other links within…)- man’s inhumanity to man, and a terrible precursor of much more to follow in the 20th century… or maybe the worst of the war was its role in the global flu pandemic – so much loss… respond to each or all of these topics regarding war and its many horrors, then tell us something at the end of your reply that makes us feel better?!?  Perhaps a positive story of love / courage / bravery and service that came out of the 1st World War?  Those stories do exist… peeps often overlook them… so yeah – respond to any of the worsts being worst, and or provide a feel good story from this really not good time…

    I think probably the Armenian Genocide was the worst thing event from the first World War, because it was by literally no reason, they exterminated the Armenians basically because the Ottomans didn’t like the Armenians that were a minority, they said that the Armenians were trying to help the allies, but that doesn’t make much sense considering that they were a minority and because the Armenians doesn’t had much reason to do this.

  140. Take a look at this site’s collection of pics from WW1 – which images stand out to you and why?

    The first photo shown, is a photo of five soldiers walking across a bridge with a bunch of broken trees. As I am looking at this photo, it just goes to show how much damage was done. Personally, all of these images are sad but it really puts it in perspective how bad it is and it is heartbreaking. The fact that that deep in the woods looks like that is devastating.

    The next photo that stuck out to me was where the soldiers were holding back a crowd as they were trying to push through to a building it looks like. Its depicting people being held back by the police after the assassination of the archduke Francis Ferdinand and his wife Sophia. This is just a really sad image and it really just shows the violence that was going on. 

    The last photo that stuck out was the photo where the German soldiers are all celebrating Christmas on a field. I think this is a beautiful image because it just goes to show that even with all of the war going on and the constant international issues, they are still making time to celebrate and find joy in things and it is really heartwarming to see that they were able to take some time to themselves and be happy and maybe forget about the war for a minute.

    All of these photos were great and meaningful, these ones just stuck out to me the most.

  141. Continuing our conversation about Rasputin, do a little bit of research on the origins of the song. What sticks out to you? What do you find interesting? Do you think the song matches how we talked about him? Thoughts?

    As soon as I heard Rasputin’s name in class I immediately thought of the Disney movie “Anastasia”, a childhood classic for me that was about the supposed lost daughter of Czar Nicholas II. The movie definitely was not historically accurate when it came to the part about Rasputin being a wizard, and I think the claims about Rasputin’s death are not true as well, just trying to make him seem evil and supernatural. It was interesting to learn that he died, because the movie made it seem like Rasputin was still alive after the Russian revolution and murder of the Romanov family.

  142. Revisit our class discussions in unit 12 around propaganda – pick any of the techniques we focused on, and provide modern-day examples of organized efforts to convince YOU to do (or not do) something: find examples from (1) the US federal government, (2) a private organization, and/or (3) Nashoba that reflect use of a technique – include info on format / delivery of the message (and a link if applicable?), and how convincing (or not) it is; also consider and discuss if propaganda is always bad, or how sometimes it might be a good thing?  Answer any and all of the prev Qs as inspired

    Testimonial Propaganda: There are many reasons that a famous person can show their political opinion or support a politician campaign like Personal opinion and interests like money from politicians, we can easily give examples like Leonardo DiCaprio and Samuel L. Jackson that supported Joe’s Biden campaign in 2020 or Kanye West that support Donald Trump, even if this is not so much effective on bringing new votes to the candidates, this can show some kind of credibility, and not only for politics, but also this type of propaganda is very effective for private company’s marketing, because personal opinions don’t affect that company’s as in politics.

  143. Check out this article on the “she-soldiers” of the 1st World War – what stands out from their stories, and why do you think they, and most any, info on “heroes” and “heroines” from WW1 is not well known:

    I think that it’s great to see that there is these brave women’s that had the courage to participate in the war, even indirectly they made progress to the war to end, and I think it’s nice to see that because it’s not every women that would be capable to enter in a war, maybe they are not well known because there was much more men than women fighting in the war, but they are still great woman.

  144. what do you find interesting and/or surprising about Mata Hari?

    It’s very interesting to see that she was a spy, considering that she was someone who slept with a lot of people and that is something very dangerous to do, but also Mata is good example that you shouldn’t trust in people that you don’t really know much about, especially if you are someone who has really important informations that can’t be revealed, because I’m pretty sure that if this officers and other people that made sex with him know that she was a spy, they wouldn’t even think to make sex.

  145.  Check out this new article about a death tunnel from WWI that was just discovered in France. What do you find interesting? Is there anything that stood out to you?

    I think it is crazy to see that there are still dead bodies that we haven’t found from the battle fronts and there are probably more of them spread across Europe, I also think about how the parents of this soldiers at the time that they dissipated, the fear of having lost someone and don’t know were they are, having hope that they maybe are still alive, but also knowing that that’s probably not the case.

  146. PYOT from SM:  Check out this article on the cargo ship that hit the Francis Scott Key bridge on 3/26. Share your thoughts on how this event connects to our discussions of Industrial Revolutions and how/why our infrastructure might be a bit fragile in places??  Where do you see this issue going in the future?

    My firsts thought is just how tragic this is. I’ve always wondered what would happen if a big bridge collapsed as I was crossing it, and like how the cars would all fall under the water, and crush us with the bridge. I know so many big bridges all over the world collapse all the time but still. It’s just wild how like my fears came true. I think that it relates to our talk about industry because all that material on that ship was crushed, not all of it but a ton. Also, people rely on the bridge to get to the other side, for food and water and other places like their home. I see this issue to be a huge deal in the future because it will take forever to find the missing people, recover the survivors, find the dead bodies in the water, and rebuild a 1.6 mile long bridge. It wont happen overnight and that’s a long time for people to be stuck on either side.

    • Yeah, I am also pretty sure there is 6 confirmed deaths from people working on the bridge. I always had a little fear that a bridge would collapes when I was on it but by fear is a little bit more now after knowing what happened. Also the bridge was one of the most used and important bridge in the US and the port that the ship left from was also a very popular and used port meaning that the east coast will be having some issues soon. What concerns be about the ship is it got in an accident hitting something in 2016 and in 2022 when it had an inspection there was multiple issues found I am pretty sure. The effects of one bridge collapsing is going to cause a lot of issues.

      • I also hear that it wasn’t the first time the same ship has had a collision with something, which is kind of scary. This was so unexpected and I feel like since it will take forever to re build it will cause issues like you said.

  147. International Women’s day is March 8th. Read this link about the history of this day. Is there anything interesting with the history?

    I thought it was interesting how the first international womens day was in 1909, and they originally observed it on the last sunday of February, but then it changed to March 8th in 1914. I wonder why it changed and why they even picked this day in the first place.

  148. Spring is coming up soon! What do you think about the origins of early Easter? Is it what you expected?

    Easter is a religious holiday celebrating the resurrection of Jesus Christ. This is what I expected, however I was curious about where the other traditions came from, such as the Easter bunny and the egg hunts. It turns out the painted eggs became a thing because the church prohibited people in the 12th century to eat eggs during easter, but the chickens were still obviously laying eggs so they painted them. The Easter bunny doesn’t really have a backstory, it just emerged somewhere in the 17th century and has been a big part of American Easter culture ever since. Apparently in some other countries, they have other animals. Switzerland has a cuckoo, (like a chicken) and Westphalia has a fox. This was interesting to me, I never thought that there could be different animals other than the bunny.

  149. Take a look at some of the early 20th-century inventions. Did anything stand out to you or surprise you? Why?

    I made a list of some of my favorite inventions on the list, and some inventions that seemed interesting or weird to me.

    In 1947, the first mobile phone was invented. This is crazy to me because I thought that mobile phones were a more modern thing. I wonder how big they were.

    In 1939, the first working helicopter was invented. I never really thought about when helicopters were invented, I knew planes were invented around the 1900s-1910s, but I never really thought of helicopters.

    In 1937, the first jet engine was built. I feel like jet engines were invented more recently, and the more I think about them the more I realize how much they have impacted our society. For example, commercial airplanes are insanely fast, especially compared to what we had before jet engines.

    In 1927, the iron lung was invented. I know 1927 wasn’t recent, but this makes me think of how quickly medicine has developed over recent years. I feel like medical practices just started getting better in the mid 1900s.

    In 1921, the first robot was built. I thought this was cool, and after some further research I found out that this guy didn’t actually build a real robot, he just invented the idea of a humanoid machine.

    In 1916, stainless steel was invented. I feel like this has just always been around, it feels weird that stuff like this was invented and not discovered.

    In 1910, the first talking motion picture was demonstrated. This was cool to me, as movies are so influential in today’s society and it started so early.

    In 1903, the first gas motored and manned airplane is invented by the wright brothers. One of the most influential inventions of all time, in my opinion.

    In 1902, the air conditioner is invented. I always take this for granted, I cannot imagiane life without it.

  150. PYOT from a peer: Take a look at more facts on Karl Marx. Are there any facts that you find surprising or interesting?

    -Karl Marx was “The Father of Communism” and he lived a good life but was taken out of his country. Karl Marx started out at 19 to have the passion for writing. He tried to write a novel because he was a smart student, but while in this process he found his passion of philosophy, this meant he never finished his novel. Secondly he was a man to speak his mind, so he tried to run a Cologne Newspaper and he did quite well. He brought high sales, ideas and found himself in charge sometimes. But Marks newspaper was seen as very good to some, and a bit to much to others. The newspaper was requested to be taken down by the Russians. Lastly “Marx believed that humanity’s core conflict rages between the ruling class, or bourgeoisie, that controls the means of production such as factories, farms and mines, and the working class, or proletariat, which is forced to sell their labor”(article). He wasn’t a man who was afraid to take cash from the industrial class when needed.

  151. PYOT from a peer: Check out this article about some of the composers that were part of the romanticism movement. Do you recognize any of them or their pieces? Is there anything that you find interesting, or anything that surprises you?

    My favorite composer on the list is probably Tchaikovsky, his music is super beautiful and it is really fun to play. My favorite thing from him is his Nutcracker ballet, it’s iconic and it sounds lovely.

    One person I didn’t recognize on the list was Richard Wagner, I learned that he is known primarily for oprahs, which I am not very familiar with. I thought it was cool that he used theme songs/music for characters in oprah.

  152. What would your life be like if you were a child laborer in the Industrial Revolution? What are the negative impacts of being one?

    -Your life as a child laborer would be very busy. The main reason your would be working is so that you could be getting extra income for your family, but you wouldn’t be making all that much. Kids would get paid even less than adults which is why they were often hired over adults, along with being smaller which gave you the ability to do jobs adults couldn’t do. Long hours of work would be your daily routine and limited training would be taught so common injury’s of loosing limbs were not uncommon. There were similar jobs like “selling newspapers and sweeping the chimney” but it didn’t matter, the pay was never high. A negative impact is that you probably didn’t get to go to school (until 1852 in Massachusetts) so you wouldn’t be getting a good education.

  153. I feel like the TikTok ban can be both a good or bad thing. I think it could be a bad thing because a lot of songs I have never heard are on TikTok and I find myself to like it so it does help singers. I also learn new things from TikTok that have really helped me like new recipes to cook and more. I also think it is a good thing because I am always on TikTok I am on it for hours on end. as much as I love TikTok if it does get banned I could find myself more focused on school work and not doing at the last minute because I was scrolling on TikTok.

  154. What would your life be like if you were a child laborer in the Industrial Revolution? What are the negative impacts of being one?

    It would be terrible, with long working hours and almost no pay. Because children were young, they did not know how to operate the heavy machinery and it was common for them to lose their limbs. I personally love operating big machines, I think it’s fun. But I don’t know about 19th century machines, they seem really dangerous so if I was a laborer in the industrial revolution I would definitely not enjoy it.

    Not only is being a laborer dangerous, but you don’t get an education. While school isn’t very fun, it opens a lot of doors for different opportunities to go into different careers. When you work in a factory all day, you are kind of stuck there for the rest of your life, I imagine it’s hard to get out of there, especially with the low wages.

    • You bring up a good point. Child laborers are kind of stuck working in the factories all of their lives because they don’t get an education for a better job and they get paid so little that they need to keep working in factories to live. The government would probably think this is a good thing because they have lifelong workers that are making them lots of money while paying the least, but having to work in a factory your whole life sounds awful.

  155. Out of all the technology that you use, what do you think is the most important and effective one? What would be different about your lifestyle and routine if you didn’t have it? Why?

    I think the most important technology is my phone. I do a ,out of things on my phone I talk to people over text or FaceTime, I watch videos, I learn new things from different apps on the phone. I think my lifestyle would be very different I wake up in the morning and check my phone. My phone helps me communicate more and when I am not with people I can always still communicate with them. I think it would be very very hard to live without my phone because I am always on it.

    • I agree with you, my phone is definitely the most important piece of technology I use. I feel like the internet is also super impactful when it comes to our everyday lives. You can use it across multiple devices, you can talk to people, you can access literally anything in seconds, you can learn so many new things, and I feel like now that we have gotten used to it we definitely take it for granted. My life would be greatly impacted mainly because I would not be able to find information as easily as I could without the internet. While the internet does have a lot of unreliable sources, it has a ton of resources, so it is pretty easy to find information and have a bunch of sources to back it up as well. It is harder to do that in a library, where it can take 10x the amount of time that it would. I feel like I’m always looking up random stuff that I probably could not do if I didn’t have the internet, for example the other day I wanted to know how printers worked, so I looked it up and I learned it in about 10 seconds. If I had tried to do that at a library, I would have to find a specific chapter in a specific book, and it would take me time to walk to the library and I would probably just lose interest by then. The internet helps me learn random things like that.

  156. I think personally I have a fixed mindset. A fixed mindset is not a very good thing to have. A lot of the time I will say I cant do this, or I don’t want to do this. This is a very fixed mindset because I am saying I cant do something just because it is hard. To have a more opened mindset I will have to try and tell myself I can do this and will encourage myself to do things that are hard even if I don’t like to do it.

  157. PYOT from SM: From the in-class discussion about growth mindset and fixed mindset consider the following questions: Would you say you have more of a fixed mindset or a growth mindset? Why? If you have more of a fixed mindset what can you do to have more of an open/growth mindset?

    I would say I have more of a growth mindset, I learned once that your brain can learn literally anything, it just takes some people a longer time than others. Ever since I learned that fact I’ve believed I can learn anything and I’ve had a growth mindset in most situations.

    If someone has a fixed mindset, they can start developing a growth mindset by doing things they didn’t think they could do. You could probably start small, for example spending some time to do a difficult puzzle. Then keep doing small tasks, and learning from your mistakes. And giving up is a fixed mindset so don’t do that.

  158. If I was a child laborer during the industrial revolution my life would have been incredibly challenging. Children during that time often worked long hours in some serious conditions. With very little pay and absolutely no access to education. The negative impacts of being a child laborer include physical and emotional harm, stunted growth, and limited opportunities for a better future, and also a loss of childhood.

  159. Take a look at some of the early 20th-century inventions. Did anything stand out to you or surprise you? Why?

    While reading this article and a couple things stood out to me one of them was the air conditioner. I know it seems like a pretty advanced thing to be invented in 1902, but I feel like it took a lot longer to invent than I expected. I honestly thought once the electrical fan came out people would want a more high powered type fan. I know that if I went without air conditioning during the summer I would actually die so I feel like more people would want to experience a cooler summer. Another invention I thought was pretty cool was the zeppelin. I never really understood how it worked or how it didn’t work. I know it was a big balloon basically but it also carried tons of passengers including their bags and just the equipment attached to itself. In my opinion I don’t understand how basically a big balloon would be able to float and carry whatever was inside of it. I also don’t understand how it could just explode I know there was plenty of gas inside of it that when mixed together with the air from the sky caused it to destroy itself. Although I think we moved on from zeppelins too quickly. Imagine if one of them never exploded do you think we would still use planes today especially if we had been using zeppelins for years?

  160. PYOT from BA: Read this article on the proposed TikTok ban. What are your thoughts on the ban? Do you think it is a good or bad idea? Why do you feel as you do? 

    I honestly don’t mind it, I’m not really on TikTok a lot, and I have seen a lot of videos of creators expressing how they don’t really mind as well. I personally like my privacy, and seeing as TikTok was declared a “National Security Threat” it’s probably smart to ban it.

    The ban might be bad for a lot of people, however. For example, people who make their money from TikTok. And the people who are addicted to it. I’m guessing their probably just going to move to Instagram.

    I thought China’s response to the bill being passed was really funny, the foreign ministry claimed that the bill they passed was an “act of bullying” and that just sounds really immature, especially coming from someone as official as the foreign minister.

    • I agree, personally I’m on TikTok a lot longer than a average person. I feel that this ban will honestly benefit me in some ways. It usually takes some forever for me to get things done because if I’m bored I usually just go on Tik Tok. This also applies to my school work it takes me a lot longer than usual I get surprised how many hours it actually takes me to do my schoolwork and probably more than double of that time Im usually on my phone especially on TikTok. However I agree just because I’m on TikTok for so long I don’t think it’s going to stop me from using a different app.

  161. Compare Socialism and Capitalism. Why is one “better” than the other? Explain.

    According to the article, in a Capitalist society, supply and demand determines the prices of goods and services without much government intervention. On the contrary, in Socialist societies the government controls the production, the prices, and the distribution of goods and services.

    At first glance it seems that a capitalist society is better because there is less control from the government. However, in a socialist society, more control from the government price-wise means that more people can have access to different resources, such as healthcare and education, which may not be possible for them in a capitalist society, where prices rise and drop freely. However, in a socialist society, because the people in it already have their basic needs provided for, they get lazy and the economic growth goes down.

    In a capitalist society, a lot of power is put into the hands of corporations, rather than the government, to keep the economy going and to control the means of production. When big companies get lots of power, they raise prices. This is unfair to some people who don’t make a lot of money. Basically, in the end, a purely capitalist society ends up with an extreme amount of inequality.

    I personally think that a socialist society is a lot better than a capitalist society, mainly because it is a lot more fair due to the pricing of basic goods. Even though socialism has its negatives, I think the positives outweigh it, especially when compared to a capitalist society.

  162. PYOT from SM: From the in-class discussion about growth mindset and fixed mindset consider the following questions: Would you say you have more of a fixed mindset or a growth mindset? Why? If you have more of a fixed mindset what can you do to have more of an open/growth mindset?

    I would say I have a bit of both but probably more of a growth mindset. I feel like my mindset is more that I set a very big goal or standard and I am fixed in the way that like I have to meet it one way or the other, but think I wont be able to the whole time. I have more of a growth mindset in the way that I will keep pushing myself to meet that goal no matter what.

    For example if I am running a race I will have a goal of like a 7 minute for my mile splits and go into the race with the mindset of like “that so fast there is no way I’m maintaining that for 3 miles” and throughout the race I could have like the its to fast or too hard thoughts but I will just put my head down and keep running anyways because I think like deep down I know I can do it if I really push myself.

    • This is a great way to put it. I also set very high goals for myself and think negatively throughout the whole process but still end up reaching that goal. This mostly happens in school because I always say I’m going to fail everything when I really know that I’ll probably do good on it.

      • That happens to me as well, I will think that I will do poorly on the assignment that I am working on the whole time, and this will either cause me to finish it but regret turning it in, or just not even finish it at all due to a fixed mindset. I feel like a lot of people, especially me, need to work on growth and fixed mindsets in school.

  163. As we are entering the 6th industrial revolution there is a lot of new technology. Check out the link, and express your thoughts about the technology you see and its implications. 

    My thoughts on the new technology we are creating are kind of iffy, I think the ideas are pretty cool but like some of the stuff scares me a bit. I feel like with all of the big jumps we are taking from the technology we have today can be dangerous. For example the ai poweredrobots kind of freak me out because what if they just start to go crazy on us and attack us. I think it is a cool idea in theroy but i’m not sure if i would ever want to be near one.  

    • I completely agree, Bella. As it is great to see the advances that are being made and the positives that go along with it, sometimes the negatives outweigh the positives. I think that the amount of information this technology can acquire is absurd and it should be somethins that we should be cautious of.

    • I completely agree because ai powered robots could end up like taking over. It’s really scary to think about but something for people to know while they are making these. As I think they are trying to do it for the better it will end up being for the worse.

  164. Compare Socialism and Capitalism. Why is one “better” than the other? Explain.

    Both capitalism and socialism are distinct economic systems with unique perspectives and methods of operation. Private ownership is the cornerstone of capitalism. This implies that entrepreneurs are free to control their own market. In socialism, the government or the community at large owns the means of production. Socialism encourages community ownership, while capitalism encourages a more individualistic outlook. Because there is no safety net, capitalism is more likely to fail even though it may appear beneficial because of its independence. Because socialism has that feeling of a safety net, it is less likely to fail. Having said that, I believe socialism to be superior to capitalism because it is always pleasant to have assistance from others while
    Things aren’t going well because capitalism doesn’t allow for it.

  165. Take a look at some of the early 20th-century inventions. Did anything stand out to you or surprise you? Why? 

    Something that surprised me was how the jet engine was invented in 1937. This surprised me because I feel like it was very ahead of its time and one of the most important inventions on the list. Also it seems like it was very well timed as it was just before World War 2 and was probably one of the most significant things that shaped the war. Another invention that surprised me was fortune cookies. Yes this wasn’t one of the life changing inventions but I thought it was pretty cool because it’s kind of random and seems like a more traditional thing than anything. I also thought the invention of the Model T in 1908 was very interesting too. This was one of the more life changing ones and was one of the inventions that pretty much changed the world of transportation and started the production of cars. I thought it was interesting because it replicated a horse-drawn carriage and it could do more work than a horse with less chances of something bad going wrong. Overall, I thought all of the inventions were important but these were some of the ones that really interested me and surprised me.

  166. What do you think about the commercialization of holidays in the US? Do you think it’s a problem like these two articles? Or do you like it and can you find an article in favor of it?

    I feel like the commercialization of holidays is both good and bad. A lot of holidays have become almost like a money hole, where its more about buying things, whether its gifts decorations or both which is not only mad for our budgets but also taking away from the original purpose of the holiday and stripping it of some of that authenticity. Its honestly very disappointing to know that some of our favorite holidays are just another way for big companies to make a lot of money.

    One thing I like about the commercialization is that it gets me more into the spirit of the holiday, while sometimes its a bit too early I still enjoy walking into the stores and seeing a bunch of holiday themed foods and decorations.

    • I agree on your reasoning for why commercialization of holidays is bad. It’s clear that U.S. economy revolves around holidays. For example, Black Friday and Cyber Monday. There are Christmas sales. Halloween stores that sell costumes and candy generate billions. Everything about the world now is about being the best and making the most money, the value of happiness and authenticity is clearly decreasing, especially seen through the U.S. report of happiness.

    • I agree with you commercialization has heavily impacted how our holidays are celebrated. I wonder what would happen if we didn’t get presents during christmas. Honestly I really like the different holidays with commercialization and don’t know if I would like them as much if they didn’t include commercialization. In my opinion, I always find it really fun to go for Christmas gift shopping.

  167. What are your thoughts on how 12 of the first 18 presidents owned slaves? Should we still honor and recognize these influential people, even though they didn’t see a problem with slavery? How about some other American leaders who owned slaves?

    I feel like this is a very debatable topic, because yes, it is incredibly wrong and just generally like we all know at this period in time how terrible of a concept this is but around their time period it was normal and a lot of people were still warming up to the fact that no, they shouldn’t have slaves. I feel like generally speaking a lot of world leaders who owned slaves probably just grew up with that as the normal, and we can’t really fault them for continuing a trend they are used to.

    These leaders brought many great things to our societies and I think those contributions should still be honored and recognized but I also think that more awareness should be brought to the fact that they were slave owners because that was still an important part of their time period and their everyday life.

    • I agree with you, even though slavery is very wrong we shouldn’t remove important figures from our history or dishonor them because they owned them. Especially because, like you said, that was the norm for the time. I feel like just because one person did a bad thing once does not mean we should view them as a bad person, they just made the wrong choice. However, slavery is pretty big, and I also agree that it should be brought to more attention and we should recognize the bad things our leaders did as well as the good.

  168. What would your life be like if you were a child laborer in the Industrial Revolution? What are the negative impacts of being one?

    If you were a child laborer you would be expected to work for 12-14 hours a day and get paid a very low wage. While having to work heavy machinery that has lots of moving parts which is why many children lost fingers and even limbs. Some children also had to work in places like coal mines inhaling dangerous chemicals and causing lung diseases at such a young age. This is very bad as the children are so young and shouldn’t have to be experiencing such things like this till they are older and have a better education on how to be safe. But if you think about why they did this it was to support their families which shows how little people were played back then. Also the article says “since they were smaller, could more easily fit between machines and into tighter spaces.” which shows how little concern they had for the children and just wanted the most production they could get out of them. Overall I think being a child laborer would be horrible and dangerous as you are putting yourself in a place with people who are more worried about trying to make money than your own safety.

    • I think it would be very scary working in an environment where you could loose a finger or an arm. I do not think it was safe at all for the conditions that I would be working in and the low pay for the many hours of work. So I completely agree with you.

  169. PYOT from a peer: Check out this article about the Willow Project. What are your thoughts about this huge controversy? Who does it benefit / who does it hurt? What actions should / could be taken by us people?

    I think it’s a good idea in general to be getting this oil out. but if I were the person living near this I would not want it to happen because I would be concerned about the oil supply and the environmental effects it would have. there’d also be many people where I live just all the time even though it’s for a good cause I just think it would annoy me. Something else that is bad about it is that it could make the climate warmer and ruin animals habitats around it. I just don’t think it’s the best if you’re thinking of it environmentally wise but the idea of getting the oil out is great. It’s just either side you look at it there’s pros and cons. I think people that live in the area should try and fight if they don’t really want it to happening and if there are other people in the area that want it to happen try and prove to others why it should happen because it is going to and will not be stopped.

    • I agree with you on how bad this project is for our environment. I feel like the people commencing it don’t really seem to care about the environment and really just want to make money. This is bad as it shows we don’t have much control over people like this and we can’t just stop it because so many people aren’t realizing what is actually going to happen if we put all these fossil fuels into the atmosphere. I also think the government should pay more attention to the cons of it instead of the pros which I feel like they aren’t really doing.

  170. As we are entering the 6th industrial revolution there is a lot of new technology. Check out the link, and express your thoughts about the technology you see and its implications.

    Something that I found interesting was that AI is being used in most of the Manufacturing.  One of the things that stood out to me was that AI was being used in healthcare and surgeries. I think that could be very scary because just what if something goes wrong in your trusting a robot. Also something wrong with that is that there would no longer be positions or jobs for surgeon spots so those people wouldn’t be employed or learn about that stuff if a robot was just doing it. Something else I found interesting was that in agriculture people are trying to reuse as much Waste as possible and I think that’s good for the environment to use something that they usually throw away again and put it to a good use. Lastly, I think that The way people are thinking about education is cool and that also has to do with AI.  AI can customize learning for different people and different ways they learn so that could help people learn better and get a better understanding of things. but also AI could help people too much and basically do the work for them so it’s kind of like cheating and the person isn’t really learning anything so that could also be an issue.

  171. PYOT from BA: Read this article on the proposed TikTok ban. What are your thoughts on the ban? Do you think it is a good or bad idea? Why do you feel as you do?

    While reading this article I mostly found reasons for tik tok being banned as a good thing. I think it would be a good thing because personally I don’t even have it and it doesn’t affect me not having it so if it’s a problem you could easily live without it. and many people are addicted to it and just find themselves constantly scrolling  when they could be doing much better things. I also think that the band could assure everyone’s safety for reasons I read. Even though nothing could happen, it’s better to be safe than sorry. One thing I thought about was the people whose job is tik tok and what would happen to them because they get paid a lot and if the whole app gets banned their whole entire job is gone and they don’t get paid.

    • I completely agree with the points you make, and similar to what you said the TikTok ban would not personally affect me, the only thing I was worried about is the political and economic changes in our society that may follow it. Being on bad terms with China could potentially be very harmful for the US in the future, but I guess that just depends on how they take it.

  172. Take a look at some of the early 20th-century inventions. Did anything stand out to you or surprise you? Why?

    One thing that stood out to me was the polygraph lie detector test being invented in 1902. I think this definitely improved a lot of crimes and investigations and was a big advantage for that workforce. Another thing that stood out to me was that a 1949 cake mix was invented. I think this is interesting because I just thought someone would think of this idea before 1949 because it’s basically just all the ingredients to make a cake but it was a great idea of the person who invented it because every time I make a cake I use cake mix. One last thing that stood out to me was the fortune cookie being invented in 1918. It stood out to me because whenever I eat fortune cookies I think of it being an ancient thing from ancient Chinese civilizations when I get my fortune but it was really just invented 100 years ago.

  173. (disclaimer – Mr. Sak does not condone setting aside your morals…) Set aside your morals and create an argument either for or against imperialism. Explain why it was beneficial/why it wasn’t. Explain how it helped/ was unhelpful for both parties involved. (suggestion – good convo on this could be a helpful thing in prepping for the U11 exam essay? just sayin…)

    If I were to completely disregard any moral standard I have, I would say that imperialism was honestly really beneficial. All though it was very degrading, it allowed for so much culture diffusion. Without imperialism many countries wouldnt have started to immagrate to america. Which wouldnt make us as nearly as diverse as we are today.

    • I agree with you, I think imperialism has impacted who we are today from tens of years ago. I honestly think if imperialism was used in a good sense people all over the world would benefit. I think if countries were to take land from the natives that lived there. The natives should get a say and get equal opportunities that the people that are coming in are getting. They could even possibly get an opportunity to become a ruler in the immigrant society.

    • I agree. America is really diverse and it is definitely because of imperialism. It really helped America become what it is today and that’s is really good because being more diverse is better for us.

  174. What are your thoughts on how 12 of the first 18 presidents owned slaves? Should we still honor and recognize these influential people, even though they didn’t see a problem with slavery? How about some other American leaders who owned slaves?

    I think that they should still be honored. Even though what they did was terrible, and I’m obviously not trying to enforce it. But during that time slavery was a regular thing, and most people were desensitized to the whole idea of slavery. But we shouldn’t purposely ignore all the great they did while president. For example, George Washington owned many slaves during his life. But we shouldn’t ignore that he single-handedly led the Americans to freedom.

    • I agree with you. I think that they were still our nations presidents and probably did many good things even though they did own slaves. I think it was not thought of a bad thing at the time and the presidents still had other accomplishments.

  175. PYOT from BA: Read this article on the proposed TikTok ban. What are your thoughts on the ban? Do you think it is a good or bad idea? Why do you feel as you do? 

    After reading the article I do believe that the TikTok ban would not be such a bad thing after all. I don’t want to speak for others but realistically everyone around me has used TikTok and I am sure others will agree that it is definitely an addictive app. With that being said, I think people could use some time away from the app, myself included, and see what happens. I am assuming most of what will happen will be positive. Aside from the fact that the TikTok ban will help to stop the TikTok addiction, I also believe that the ban will help better protect everyone’s information and make sure that we are safe.

    • I agree with you Maddy. I definitely find myself scrolling a little too much sometimes. But I don’t think banning tiktok will really do anything about the addiction. I think for the first few days, maybe weeks, people would stay off their phone more. But after those few weeks I think people would just flood to other alternatives, like Instagram reels and any other replacement. I do think that instagram is a better alternative because its not stealing your info, But Im not really looking forward to the potential band.

      • I agree Hannah, when I thought about the ban I thought it was a good idea because not as many people would be addicted to it or on their phones all the time but lets be real for a moment, there will probably be another app similar to TikTok made if TikTok does get banned.

  176. The annual “World Happiness” report is out… America lost ground – but one group of Americans expressed greater levels of satisfaction than others; why do you think this was the case?  What contrasts the “happiest” nations from the US and why might most Americans be getting less “happy”? Share your thoughts on any of these Qs

    I believe that Americans are becoming more & more unhappy because of technology. It was said that most of the people who had lower scores on their happiness ladder were younger than older adults. I think this is because people who are younger are able to better understand how technology works and because of this they’re spending more time using it. Due to  overuse of technology you will see altered relationships and a negative change in your mental health. 

    • I agree with you Maddy, I think that if you look back a few years there is such a big difference in teenagers due to technology and social media. I think that now a days young people are getting to caught up on technology and not living in the moment, this could be another reason that leads to more unhappy people.

    • I always thought that America was stereotyped to be the “greatest nation in the world” but I feel like this survey shows something else. I guess that greatness always comes with a consequence, and can a nation truly consider themself to be the best if their citizens aren’t happy? Rich and sad vs. poor-average and happy? America has failed if it’s clearly focused on military and political power in the world rather than it’s own citizens. Although the Tiktok ban could help decrease levels of anxiety, technically it’s still for America’s political benefit of not revealing government information.

    • I see where you’re coming from, but I don’t think that is necessarily where all of the unhappiness comes from. Personally I think COVID had a massive impact on students now and it’s usually blamed on phones. But during COVID we had very little in person social contact and now that were fully back in school we need to “make-up” all that social time. Which is why I think that grades have dropped.

  177. The annual “World Happiness” report is out… America lost ground – but one group of Americans expressed greater levels of satisfaction than others; why do you think this was the case?  What contrasts the “happiest” nations from the US and why might most Americans be getting less “happy”? Share your thoughts on any of these Qs

    I think one group of Americans expressed greater levels of happiness more than others because of age difference. Older people felt happier than younger people. I think this is expected nowadays because life as a teenager is extremely stressful. Social media and phones take the highest tole. It causes PHOMO, depression, and anxiety because of the cyber bullying, comparing yourself, and social hierarchy. The world adults grew up in is so different from todays, and because they didn’t have technology, they are smarter, healthier, and have better social skills. And they don’t have the stress of having a phone at this age. I think besides social media and technology, the overall atmosphere of life nowadays is overwhelming and depressing.

    • I agree with you social media use definitely plays a big part in happiness. However all ages have access to social media and older people seem to doing just fine. I think it is more about the pressures put upon younger people now. In the report it says how people in Scandinavia are a lot happier and they also have the same access to social media that us Americans do. I think that the pressures in these societies are very different from each other. In America it seems like people make a lot of decisions on their own and do everything by themselves for al lot of people they need support and this is one main component that is crucial in a scandinavians life.

  178. So… follow me for a bit – You are the sole survivor of a horrible mid-Pacific blimp accident (stay with me on this one…) and you are falling out of the sky but can direct your faulty parachute towards only one of two islands – Marxist/Communist Island, and Social Darwinist Island (see where I’m going with this?) – tell me which one you would choose, and describe why: (ie why you think one of these two extreme views is least bad than the other – “lesser of two evils” kinda thing…) – feel free to get creative / descriptive with this, but keep focus on your arguments why one of those two systems would be preferable to the other 

    If I was falling towards one of these two islands I would rather fall onto the Marxist/Communist island. I would want this because it directs distribution based on the needs of others, and if I fell there they would give me stuff because I didn’t have anything. There is also no social hierarchy so there isn’t a “poorer” side and a “wealthier” side. I guess im leaning towards this instead of Social Darwinist island because they believe in “survival of the fittest” so those who are more successful are higher class, and those who are not as fortunate are lower class. They also try to justify imperialism, racism, and social inequality which should NOT be justified by any means.

  179. (disclaimer – Mr. Sak does not condone setting aside your morals…) Set aside your morals and create an argument either for or against imperialism. Explain why it was beneficial/why it wasn’t. Explain how it helped/ was unhelpful for both parties involved. (suggestion – good convo on this could be a helpful thing in prepping for the U11 exam essay? just sayin…)

    So setting aside my morals, I’m pro-imperialism because I think it’s beneficial for both parties in the long term. The larger country gets money and better trade from the land in the country and the smaller country becomes more technological advanced in the long term. In the short term, like in India, workers starve to death, but overall for the country they are helped along in their own industrial revolution and it also spreads along cultures and tech between the two countries. It’s also just kinda a natural thing, survival of the fittest, you’re gonna get taken over in war if you’re a small country.

  180. PYOT from a peer: Share your thoughts on some of Gandhi’s controversial and outdated opinions. Did you know about them before reading this article? What do you think this says about society? Do you think that Gandhi contributed enough “good” to overshadow the “bad?” (look for Sak response to this… and feel free to respond to that too…)

    It’s really interesting to read about notable figures in history ’cause it gives more insight into their personalities and what their life was like besides their major accomplishments that we learn about in class. In this case, this was a bad thing, and kinda ruined the image of Gandhi for me. It said he did a bunch of weird and sexist things, and one time he had his niece sleep naked next to him so he could control his desires. Like what??? That’s so weird and gross and shows that he already had those pedo feelings for his niece if he had to control his urges. So now I have a bad image of him, even if he did help free India. This connects to the PYOT about presidents owning slaves. They were great people, but nobodies perfect and people in leadership position are gonna make mistakes and be imperfect.

  181. The annual “World Happiness” report is out… America lost ground – but one group of Americans expressed greater levels of satisfaction than others; why do you think this was the case?  What contrasts the “happiest” nations from the US and why might most Americans be getting less “happy”? Share your thoughts on any of these Qs

    This article says that younger people are less happy than older people. This isn’t a huge shock to me at all given the society we live in. 

    Older people don’t have as much to worry about then younger people because they aren’t growing up in this society. Older people are either retired or working in a job that they have been doing for a good amount of time so they have down what they do pretty good if you know what I mean. They also usually don’t compare themselves to other people because that’s just not what they do since they don’t use social media. A big thing is climate change. The older people are the ones who have caused this mess and don’t care enough to fix it.

    Younger people are now left with this mess as their future and since the older generations aren’t doing anything about it, it is our job to fix it. It’s hard when you have to worry about what your future will look like in the sense of having a safe world. People don’t know if they should have children or not because they don’t want them to have to live in an unsafe environment. I could be wrong but I don’t think old people had to question if their kids would grow up in a safe environment! 

  182. As we are entering the 6th industrial revolution there is a lot of new technology. Check out the link, and express your thoughts about the technology you see and its implications. 

    One of the biggest emerging technologies is probably AI. I think that this is a good and a bad thing. The reason I think it will be good is for learning. For school I use AI occasionally and I find it much easier to learn then having to look something up on google because for AI you don’t have to go through articles and websites to find what you want, instead it is just given to you. It is much more efficient than google. One reason I think AI is bad is that it could possibly take over our lives. As it advances, AI is becoming more intelligent and is starting to be able to do things that normal people do like have conversations and have personalities. This means that people could lose jobs which would make it harder for people to make money meaning there will be more homeless people and no one wants that! I think that AI is something that we should keep but I think there should be restrictions on what it can do. 

    • I totally agree with you about the restrictions. Sometimes when I see or use AI, it kind of freaks me out. The conversations are crazy and how it can comprehend and then respond to you. This reminds me of the book I am reading in ELA called Fahrenheit 451. In this book, the world is taken over by AI like technology. As you can see from the book, everyone loses their jobs and nobody’s happy. So I totally agree that it is kind of scary. On the other hand I also agree with why you think it is a good thing. I admit, sometimes I like to reference AI for school work because it is very helpful.

      • That book seems very interesting! I’ll have to read it someday. I didn’t mention how it might make people unhappy in my comment above but I think that is a great point! I think it’s kind of a cause and effect situation for example someone losing their job because a robot could do it would personally make me very unhappy.

  183. PYOT from BA: Read this article on the proposed TikTok ban. What are your thoughts on the ban? Do you think it is a good or bad idea? Why do you feel as you do? 

    I think the ban is bad Idea because it’s how lots of people are making a living and making money. If we stop using this app then it could change a lot of peoples lives and cause them to stop doing this thing they want to do and live off of. A lot of people enjoy it and would have to switch away from it. I also think it’s not that reasonable as they only “claim” it is stealing personal information but after reading the article it doesn’t seem like they have a lot of evidence to support this and don’t really have the best reasons to ban it. I also think if they were to sell it, it would not be the same and would still affect people just as the ban of it would, maybe even worse. But some good reasons to ban it besides information stealing is, like all social medias, spreading hate and fake news quickly which is bad for everyone as most people believe it and then spread it more. Overall, the ban of it would have a lot of pros but also a lot of cons so I don’t think one side is better than the other.

    • Don’t you think that for all of the people that are making a living off of TikTok already have other social media platform with probably close to the same amount of followers so if TikTok gets banned do you think that those creators would just be able to switch their platform and be all good and still be able to make their earnings from the other platform for content.

  184. The annual “World Happiness” report is out… America lost ground – but one group of Americans expressed greater levels of satisfaction than others; why do you think this was the case?  What contrasts the “happiest” nations from the US and why might most Americans be getting less “happy”? Share your thoughts on any of these Qs

    I think the case for older adults being more happy than younger ones is because they don’t have many prioties or stress especially if they are retired. They don’t have to go school or work, which is one the main things that younger adults struggle with. It takes up most your day and isn’t usually that enjoyable. They also don’t have to raise kids or pay off their monthly expenses which can cause stress and anxiety. This is 24/7 while older adults can just have their day to enjoy not having to worry about these things, which must be the reason for their high rates of happiness compared to young adults. Especially if they are healthy, finacially stable, and have strong social connections like the article mentioned. 

    I think one of the biggest reasons for U.S. getting less happy is social media. I think this is very big because first of all social media is a very large thing in the U.S. and used by most younger adults. There is lots of bad stuff and hate that can bring people down even though it’s just over technology and not even real. Also many younger people are put down with natural things like climate change and the willow project. These things really effect people as it is what our world is coming too and we are going to live through it unlike most of the older adults. Overall, I don’t think it is particularly just the U.S. where younger adults are “less happy,” as everyone around the world also has to deal with these problems.

  185. The annual “World Happiness” report is out… America lost ground – but one group of Americans expressed greater levels of satisfaction than others; why do you think this was the case?  What contrasts the “happiest” nations from the US and why might most Americans be getting less “happy”? Share your thoughts on any of these Qs

    I think that the people over 60 or the ones whose happiness is higher than the younger generation ages 30 and below because of their views on the world, importance to society and economic stability. People who are on the older side are more financially stable as most of them are retired, are not paying mortgages anymore and do not have children in the house. Also all of climate change and what is happening in the world matters less towards their generation and more towards the younger generation. A thing that was not mentioned in the article but I feel like since older people are retired they can travel more and do the things they want to do vs. the younger generation has to work all of the time and has less time off. The happiest nation in Finland is probably the highest due to what it does for its country and having the people get a lot of social support and having healthier lifestyles. Just looking at some stats of the difference of fast food restaurants in Finland vs. the US is surprising. The reason why I looked this up is because of the healthier lifestyles in finland. There are about 525(2024) total fast food restaurants in Finland vs  201,865 (2023) in the US. I looked up the size of the US in square miles and did some calculations. On average there are 50 fast food restaurants per 1000 sq. miles in the US vs. 4 fast food restaurants per 1000 sq. mile. That is just a little stat on a healthy lifestyle that shows a big difference and possibly the reason why the US has a lover World Happiness. I think that Americans tend to be less happy due to all of the stress they have, their less healthy lifestyle, less balanced life and the same thing as with the older generation vs younger generation. It was crazy that the US dropped so much but it does make sense as life is a lot different in different places. 

  186. PYOT from SM: From the in-class discussion about growth mindset and fixed mindset consider the following questions: Would you say you have more of a fixed mindset or a growth mindset? Why? If you have more of a fixed mindset what can you do to have more of an open/growth mindset?

    I would say I have a growth mindset but also a little bit of a fixed mindset too. I know that you can always learn stuff and grow, and I don’t usually give up after one try and think I can’t do something. I have a fixed mindset because I always think negatively, but somehow I end up persevering and get stuff done. I would probably be more happy if I just had trust in my abilities to do good but I guess I have a fixed mindset on that too.

    • Yeah, I would also say I have both but mostly a fixed mindset. I always want to learn and grow too as it can help me in life and be a better person but when things are more negative. Then I definitely have more of a fixed mindset as when I start thinking negatively about something. Let’s just say I do not like to think about changing my mind. I also doubt my self a lot and don’t believe in my self too which is an issue. I feel like it is almost good to have both a fixed and a growth mindset as you should form your own opinion and believe them but you also should want to learn and listen/be open to others thoughts and ideas.

      • I agree with you, I like to pretend I have a growth mindset but the more I think about the more I realize I have a fixed mindset. One of the big qualities about a fixed mindset is that you’re born with certain abilities and can’t do them despite everything you try to do. I honestly see myself thinking about this every time I get a quiz or test grade that I’m not happy with. I usually just say for example “I’m not good at math I never have so I shouldn’t care if I’m not going to get better at it”. However I don’t think I have a strictly fixed mindset. I do think that you can try to work better at something I just think some people are born with abilities and don’t have to work as hard for it as some others. So why would you try to get better at something if you already know you’re not going to be as good as a person born with that type of ability.

  187. What would your life be like if you were a child laborer in the Industrial Revolution? What are the negative impacts of being one?

    Being a child laborer in the Industrial Revolution is not the ideal lifestyle for children. They worked in a very dangerous environment with a bunch of machines for 12-14 hours a day, and they were barely paid anything. It’s crazy just how much the government only cared about making money that they were willing to risk children’s lives and make them work all day. I think history just proves how selfish and mean people are.

    • Being a child laborer was definitely not a great job and most of the time your parents would want you to do it so they could get a little bit more money. The whole working condition sound so bad and the amount of hours they had to work was un-believable. I can’t believe that child labor was such a big thing and still is in some parts of the world now a days. Also the fact that not even the factory owners cared about the condition just shows how much people only wanted the money and work done for them. It is so cruel and wrong to do.

  188. So… follow me for a bit – You are the sole survivor of a horrible mid-Pacific blimp accident (stay with me on this one…) and you are falling out of the sky but can direct your faulty parachute towards only one of two islands – Marxist/Communist Island, and Social Darwinist Island (see where I’m going with this?) – tell me which one you would choose, and describe why: (ie why you think one of these two extreme views is least bad than the other – “lesser of two evils” kinda thing…) – feel free to get creative / descriptive with this, but keep focus on your arguments why one of those two systems would be preferable to the other 

    I would rather land on the Social Darwinist Island because I feel like if I was on the Communist Island, all of my hard work would have to be shared with others. Everybody would just want to benefit from others who actually do work because in the end, everybody is equal and the benefits from one person’s hard work would be shared equally. The people who are actually doing the hard work would not feel like doing anymore work because everyone gets the same outcome anyways so nobody would want to do any work. I just feel like this island would not do very well if nobody wanted to work. I would rather have it be fend for yourself because then all of my hard work just goes to me and not other people who didn’t work as hard. Also with this mindset, everybody strives to do better because that’s the only way to support yourself. You’ve got to work hard because no one else will do it for you. If everybody is focused on improving themselves, then their economy would work better than the Communist’s economy which would crash.

    • I understand the fact that the lack of motivation to do work if you’re just going to end up having to share it can lead to societal collapse, however I believe that this is much safer. As you land on the island it’s guaranteed that you’re going to be offered with vital resources in order for you to live. If you’re going completely blind into a social Darwinism society, you’re guaranteed failure. It’s hard to build yourself up with absolutely 0 support. I believe landing in a communistic society is a much safer way out if you care about living and not just wasting your hard work.

      • I was thinking that a communist society would just collapse and not be the safer way to go because nobody would want to work and their economy would ultimately fail. While it might seem like a nice idea at first, this type of society could never work with humans. Everybody would be working and sharing everything until a few people realize that they can never become more successful and they get tired of doing a bunch of work so they start to do less work but they still get benefits from other people. People would start doing less and less work and there’s no way one person is going to want to work so hard to provide for everyone else who isn’t doing anything so they would stop working too and this kind of society would ultimately fail.

  189. The negative impacts of being a child laborer were being forced to work in dangerous conditions for long hours, physical injurers, and health issues. It was said that many kids didn’t receive proper education and missed out on their childhood because they had to work to support their family.

    • I totally agree. The poor children that had to deal with these awful working conditions. Children must have been way stronger than how kids like us are today. I know I definitely couldn’t last. It’s also really sad because they had to provide for their family because most women weren’t allowed to work yet. To think about the fact that the owners of the factories only carried if their workers were able to work. That sounds so selfish to not even care about the conditions and only care about the money.

  190. International Women’s day is March 8th. Read this link about the history of this day. Is there anything interesting with the history?

    International women’s day is a day when people celebrate women’s achievements and is a call for gender equality. Early 20th century is when the roots of this holiday began. Women in Europe and the US began asking for better working conditions, voting rights, and a raise in pay. These women influenced other women around the world to begin advocating for themselves. 

    I think it is great that we still celebrate this day because I feel like it is still a problem in our world today. I also think that people need to know more about this to be able to fully understand. Also I think it is great that the women back then had the bravery to stand up for themselves because if it weren’t for them we wouldn’t be where we are today!!

  191. PYOT from BA: Read this article on the proposed TikTok ban. What are your thoughts on the ban? Do you think it is a good or bad idea? Why do you feel as you do? 

    Personally I think the possible ban is very stupid. I feel like we don’t have enough proof that the owners of tiktok are trying to steal our information and people are just saying these things because they would rather deal with this made up “problem” than work on things that actually matter. What I’m trying to say is that the government has better things to do than try and ban an app. Also if the app were to be banned, it would have a huge impact on people’s lives. Over the years, so many people have begun to use tiktok for marketing purposes. For example, the music industry is huge on tiktok and so many new artists use the app to spread their music to people around the world. Small businesses and influencers also use the app for marketing. I think the reason that people mostly market on tiktok is because the viewing age is younger. Other apps like instagram and facebook have an older viewing age so less people would be interested in the things people are selling since the products are aimed towards the younger audience. 

    • I agree. I think this ban is kinda stupid. Banning TikTok will ruin people’s lives who rely on the platform to make a living. Just ban government officials from using the app or something, not everybody. Then, they should move on to bigger, more important problems like the planet dying so climate change doesn’t get worse.

      • I agree with you on how the ban will ruin people’s lives and how they should just ban government officials from using the app or something like that, but you also need to think about how TikTok could be potentially stealing personal information. Even though there wasn’t much data to support this in the article it could still be a very big problem and I think that’s why the government is so concerned about this. But your right about how they should probably move on to bigger problems instead of investing so much money and time on something like this. Yes this is kind of important but they should just make a justified decision and start working towards more important things. 

      • Good point! I didn’t think about just banning government officials. That would be a good solution to this problem and a quick one. Zach did also make a good point on how they could be stealing our personal info but if you think about it we really aren’t given them much info. And you can control how much of your life is put on the app. For example, influencers would give out more info on their lives then any of us would.

  192. Voting for the next president is starting to happen! Do some research on the history of voting. Did anything surprise you? Did you expect some events to happen earlier / later?

    This article was really surprising to me, as I didn’t know that challenges to voting are still being made even in the 21st century. According to the article there were problems with voting up until 2018, which is so much more recent than I was expecting. I did know about Women’s suffrage and Jim Crow laws that prevented women and African-Americans from voting, but I didn’t know that after it became legal for black citizens to vote, in the 1960s southern states began to place for barriers on voting. Relating to our Unit that were in right now, I thought it was interesting how both Russia and the United States had a “Bloody Sunday”.

  193. Haiti was the first black nation to gain its independence, however is also a struggling nation. Do some research on Haiti, what do you think are some reasons for it’s struggle? Why?

    So I’ve learned that a big reason why Haiti is struggling so much is because of the violent and powerful gangs there. Kenya is leading a multinational force to fight the gangs there, but I feel that it should be easy for huge powerful countries to put down a poor country’s gang fights. The first thing that I looked for was what the United States was doing to help Haiti, and in the introduction it said that “While the Joe Biden administration has ruled out sending U.S. troops to the island, it has pledged to provide financial support”. Which I guess is better than nothing, but in a previous WordPress post a couple of months ago I outlined the reasons why large imperial countries such as the United States should help out developing countries and there were a lot of good reasons. Trump and Biden are also making things worse, according to the article. It says that the USA has a rocky relationship with Haiti since Trump and Biden have deported thousands of Haitians while the island grows steadily. more violent and dangerous. I feel like the United States could be doing more to help Haiti out.

  194. What surprised me was how the first traffic signal was invented in 1923. This is surprising because the first automobiles were made in the late 1800s. So I thought that the roads were already established or organized. I wonder how the road was maneuvered if people were going to different places and there were not yield signs or even go signs, there must have been a lot of crashes.

    • This reminds me about how one time I read about how there were only two cars in the whole state of Ohio around this time period, but they still manage to crash into each other and cause a car wreck. This definitely could have been avoided if road systems were put into place before then.

      • That’s very interesting, I didn’t know that happened. I think it’s odd that after the only two cars crashed in the state, the citizens didn’t try to figure out what could prevent this because they were soon to become popular and it would happen more often. Why do you think this is?

        • I think they didn’t do anything to prevent the crash because they didn’t think cars would become that popular or so widespread, so they probably thought it would be a waste to spend money on traffic systems. Also, the crash probably happened because there was no drivers Ed or anything like that.

  195. Check out more information on the fashion of Queen Marie Antoinette. Is there anything that you find interesting, or anything that surprises you?

    I think that Marie Antoinette’s fashion style is important. She was a huge trendsetter with bold and extravagant pieces that were set the stage for European fashion. She wasn’t scared of what other people thought about her and just dressed how she wanted to. Her fashion choices were important because they emphasized her status and influence. Her fashion legacy is even still apparent today

    • I find this really interesting because even though Marie Antoinette was hated so much, people wanted to dress like her. I would think that if she was hated and different from everyone else, then people would try to avoid copying her fashion.

    • I agree, I feel that it was important as well. She did have to set an example for people, but kinda went above and beyond expectation as well as maybe going a little bit too far in the process. She was a little bit too worried about herself because she was so caught up in her wealth that she was unaware of all of the poverty and starvation around her. There are definitely pros and cons to this queen’s style.

    • I agree, I feel that it was important as well. She did have to set an example for people, but kinda went above and beyond expectation as well as maybe going a little bit too far in the process. She was a little bit too worried about herself because she was so caught up in her wealth that she was unaware of all of the poverty and starvation around her. There are definitely pros and cons to this queen’s style.

  196. Capitalism is about private ownership and the free market where businesses and property are privately owned, and altered based on competition in the market. While, socialism emphasizes collective ownership and the idea that resources should be distributed based on each person’s needs. I think that a mix of both would be good. For example, a society where no one is necessarily struggling and all have basic needs and those that need more help are helped. But it also wouldn’t be exactly fair to take hard earned riches from people who built their way up.

    • It reminds me about the tax debate going on based on equality or equity. Equality reflects a capitalistic society where everyone is own their own and is expected to pay what is due no matter their financial status. Equity reflects people paying taxes based on their financial status, with the rich paying more tax money than the poor, however they are paying the same portion of their balance. Either way, I agree that a mix between both would be better than one or the other.

      • I agree too, some people are less fortunate then others and it would be such a big struggle pay what is due with what little they have while others it wont even make much of a difference in their bank balance. Even though others earned there money it would still lead to a better society if everyone just helped those in need, that doesn’t really mean giving it all away.

  197. So… follow me for a bit – You are the sole survivor of a horrible mid-Pacific blimp accident (stay with me on this one…) and you are falling out of the sky but can direct your faulty parachute towards only one of two islands – Marxist/Communist Island, and Social Darwinist Island (see where I’m going with this?) – tell me which one you would choose, and describe why: (ie why you think one of these two extreme views is least bad than the other – “lesser of two evils” kinda thing…) – feel free to get creative / descriptive with this, but keep focus on your arguments why one of those two systems would be preferable to the other

    I definitely would choose to fall on the Marxist/communist island. I know that sounds bad, but let me explain. So I’m assuming when Mr. Sak says Marxist/communist island he means the actual perfect communist society that Karl Marx describes, and not the dictatorships that form in real life. Second, one of the political views favor people who are richer and one favor people who are poorer, and I was thinking that if I just fell out of a exploding blimp and landed on an island with nothing I wouldn’t be treated well at all on the Social Darwinist island since I would be poor. But if I feel on the Marxist island I would be given chances to prove myself and work for things.

    • nope… I mean the “real” versions of the systems? Warts and all – the Q is, which would have the worst warts??

      • That definitely changes my answer then. I wouldn’t want to live on an island with a dictator that made me share all the resources I found with people I don’t know. If I lived on the social Darwinism island, sure they wouldn’t help me and would just leave me poor, but that means if I have/find valuable things/places on the island that I get to keep them and don’t have to share them with other people. I’d prefer survival of the fittest over sharing things you worked for with other people.

        • I agree with you. I would rather get all of the benefits from my own hard work than have to share it with other people who might not work as hard. They should work for themselves to earn their own stuff.

  198. PYOT from BA: Read this article on the proposed TikTok ban. What are your thoughts on the ban? Do you think it is a good or bad idea? Why do you feel as you do? 

    I think this ban definitely has its pros and cons, though in the end I think it might end up being a bad decision, especially politically and economically.

    The pros side would include things like, improved mental health, decreased unemployed rates, improved physical health (maybe), better focus for kids in school, less false info spreading, and, of course, the reason TikTok was banned, less security risk.

    Cons: political knowledge decrease(people get a lot of info from tiktok) lots of influencers loosing jobs, musicians and small businesses losing publicity and profits, big economic changes is america and china, big future political changes (voters often get influenced by online sources), and a lot of political tension between American and China.

    I think the political tension is going to cause a lot of problems in the future. China is it happy about the TikTok ban at all because of how popular is is in the US and how much money they are losing in its ban. This can definitely course a lot of unrest in the future between America and China and I’m sure China would be a lot less willing to help us out, sell products to us, and just generally cooperate. Also if China stops selling as much or any of some of our high demand goods from them it could cause a huge problem with the economy in America.

    So, overall while the TikTok ban may immediately benefit the people who just use it to scroll, it will greatly harm the economic and political side of our society which, in my opinion, definitely outweighs the good.

    • I agree with you. I think that banning TikTok might not be the best idea. It will definitely cause problems with China’s relationship with the US which will hurt the economy. People are mostly worried about the fact that the Chinese government can access american’s personal information, but they’ve done nothing with it so far. If anything, they should just ban anybody who is working for the government from using TikTok. Not everybody in the country because they don’t care if they know where this one random citizen lives. The Chinese government won’t care about American citizen’s personal life information. Just don’t let government people who know actually important information use the platform.

  199. Check out this article on the challenges of combating climate change while we’re dependent on fossil fuels – why is this problem so hard to address?  What are some steps going forward to address? 

    PYOT from CA: Is climate change the greatest threat facing the world right now? Check out this article about climate change. Should it be taken more seriously, or less seriously, why?

    Climate change is such a hard problem to address because the fossil fuels that hurt our environment are also fundamental to our lives. Humans need fossil fuels to function in our daily lives. Without them, life would be much much harder. We can’t take away fossil fuels if we rely so heavily on them. The article says that Democrats will drastically reduce our fossil fuel independence, but they haven’t been doing much of anything. Biden approved the Willow project which would add 9.2 million metric tons of pollution a year. They say they will reduce carbon emissions but all they’re doing is adding to the problem. Climate change is an issue that should definitely be taken more seriously. It affects everybody. Because of extreme weather conditions like heat waves, storms, fires, and floods, people have gotten sick or died. We’re rapidly killing the planet and harming people and nature and nobody’s really doing much about it. They’re too busy trying to ban tiktok.

    • I agree, and I feel like you see more and more every day about floods, fires, and just the deterioration of our planet. It’s a super tricky issue to deal with but there is still so much that could be done, that just isn’t being done.

      Things like solar panels or having a white roof instead of black could make a huge difference in the rapid climate change but not that many people have those. I think making these options more public or even them being a requirement would do so much for our environment, but there is a clear lack of effort at making these changes. Other things like renewable energy do exist, which would be a big change to society and would probably have to happen gradually. Now I know that there are some efforts to make that change but I just feel like its not enough. Our society seems to be too scared to let go of fossil fuels because they make so much money, and are the easier choice but if we don’t soon then our planet is just going to keep dying right before our eyes.

      • I totally agree. The government needs to make solar panels way more accessible and cheaper for people. All they’re worried about is money, but it shouldn’t matter how much money we spend if it keeps the planet we live on alive. People in power are doing way too little about this global crisis.

  200. The annual “World Happiness” report is out… America lost ground – but one group of Americans expressed greater levels of satisfaction than others; why do you think this was the case? What contrasts the “happiest” nations from the US and why might most Americans be getting less “happy”? Share your thoughts on any of these Q

    When reading this article I can’t say I was shocked at all that the adolescents and young adults were the least happy. I think this is definitely due to a lot of pressure regarding schooling (middle high and college) and for those in their late 20’s to early 30’s just in general trying to figure life and family out. I also feel like there is a lot of pressure on people our age not just with getting good grades and going to a good college, but also a lot of social and political pressures too. As the article said younger people are more aware than ever of the climate change crisis, and how it will affect our generation and our children’s generation which can be incredibly stressful to feel the pressure of reversing that on our shoulders. I guess the impending feeling of doom for our planet just isn’t that comforting.

    Another big influence to this I would have to say is social media and technology. Generations before ours, like out parents didn’t grow up with phones, TikTok, or more public social standard like us. There are hundreds of studies that say that using scrolling on social media or just using technology excessively is really really bad for our mental and physical health. platforms like tiktok have introduces a new level of social expectations, false information, and standards people our age have to deal with, in which nobody before us really ever had to worry about. Obviously there were always some social standards and what was considered ‘cool’ but I just think it has never really been like this before.

    Im not going to say americs is the only one with this problem because it really does happen all around the world, but I just think that it could be affecting america more

    • I agree that it was pretty predictable that adolescents and young adults were the least happy. There is so much pressure to do good in school and to do good in life when you’re in this age group because it’s like your whole future depends on what happens in high school/college. Also lots of people feel unhappy when homework keeps piling on. It’s not very comforting knowing that half of the things you learn in school will be useless but you need to learn about it just so you can get a good job just so you can work the rest of your life. Social media also adds to the unhappiness because of all the social pressures.

  201. PYOT from BA: Read this article on the proposed TikTok ban. What are your thoughts on the ban? Do you think it is a good or bad idea? Why do you feel as you do? 

    I feel that it would be a good thing as it does indeed pose a real threat for Americans. A number of mental problems have been linked to TikTok such as depression, eating disorders and even self harm. I think that it is better to ban TikTok as it will be safer for online security and also because TikTok to me isn’t even that good and not very useful.

    • I agree. It’s proven that social media is the basis of most mental problems in young people such as depression, anxiety, and body dysmorphia. Although it may seem more beneficial to our society, (mentally and security wise) a lot of small business thrive on the app and there’s so many communities for people to connect and share similar interests. It may not be useful to some, but it may be extremely useful to others.

      • So many people rely on Tiktok to make a living and I don’t think the app poses a real threat to our country. If they just banned government officials and anybody who works for the government from using that app, that would be sufficient enough because I don’t think the Chinese government cares about a random US citizen’s personal info. There are way bigger problems that the government could be dealing with than this stupid ban.

  202. I’d say I have more of a growth mindset because I’m not really one to give up after trying once. I try to preserve but I guess sometimes I do give up. To have more of a growth mindset I’d say I need to maybe break up my goal into smaller tasks so its more manageable and seems like less work.

  203. I think we should still recognize the influential people who owned slaves. Even though we know it isn’t right now, people still thought it was okay and was the norm. Even though it was accepted at the time doesn’t make it right but we should still acknowledge what those people did for us because they shaped history and some even lead us to where we are today.

    • I agree. Even if influential people did own slaves, it doesn’t mean we should just forget about them if they helped people get where we are today. People should still be conscious that not everything they did was good and beneficial but I think all people that have done good things have also probably done some not so honorable things too. If we used that logic, then we wouldn’t be recognizing anybody.

  204. Imperialism is the practice of extending a nation’s power and influence through colonization, use of military force, etc. Imperialism can lead to the erosion of cultural identities. When an imperial power forces its own rule on a smaller nation, it does so with little care for the existing traditions and social structures. This can result in the suppression of local languages, customs, and ways of life. The impact of cultural loss is bad as it takes away the unique heritage and history that define a people and a nation. It loses unique perspectives and knowledge. Second, imperialism is often degrading to the people within the colonized nations. Its by asserting superiority, The imperial powers view themselves as more civilized or advanced, justifying their actions as helpful because they believe they are “better” than them examples are in the “white mans burden”. This is dehumanizing and can lead to a widespread discrimination and exploitation. To conclude, I believe that imperialism is generally unfair and inhumane.

    • I agree. The way that the imperial powers treat other countries under their control is very cruel and unnecessary. I feel like if European countries just shared their knowledge of their improved technology with others without taking over, then the whole world could’ve advanced without the cost of people being treated horribly. Imperial powers were only thinking about themselves and using the belief they are “better” as an excuse to completely take over and force their “better” culture on others. If they were actually trying to help others, they wouldn’t have treated them so horribly and they wouldn’t have taken over. Advanced technology still could’ve been shared with others without imperialism.

      • I agree on the fact that if imperial powers were to share their knowledge that the entire world would benefit, but it’s important to keep in mind that these imperial powers are truly driven due to hunger for power, and thus they want to have an edge over their colonies and dominions. Leaders of imperial powers were driven by obtaining extended geopolitical power when they should be focused on spreading their own Western ideas and speeding up the process of modernization.

  205. What would your life be like if you were a child laborer in the Industrial Revolution? What are the negative impacts of being one?

    If I was in child labor I would still go to school, but I would probably have to skip a lot of it to go to a job that doesn’t pay me what I’m worth. Not only would I be broke, I would also be an amputee.

    • Can you please expand. I would like to know how that really affected you emotionally. Would you be fine with working and going to school because you are getting paid, or would you get really said and constantly not want to go to work? Also how would you feel about all the injures? From my understanding, if a child gets injured they are just thrown out to be replaced. Would you be extra cautious around the factories you work in?

  206. What would your life be like if you were a child laborer in the Industrial Revolution? What are the negative impacts of being one?

    I think being a child laborer would be very difficult and tiring. You have to work 12-14 hours a day I used to think being at school for 7 hours was long but this is basically double the time and it was long laborious work with barely any brakes. Kids also wouldn’t get paid as much and there was a lot of danger with the machines that they would be working on. Most of the kids would lose a finger or even limbs and this was considered normal and the bosses didn’t even compensate them. If they got injured most of the time it would be blamed on the kids even though the machines were known to be unpredictable. After hearing all these stories I know I would never want to work as a child laborer especially if the conditions were unpredictable and the pay was extremely low.

    • Why do you think those little kids still went to work considering the dangerous risks during that time?

      • In my opinion, I think they had to work especially to provide for their families. At this time, the women had to stay home so they could provide for their family financial wise. I feel that even the husband working may not give them enough money to survive even for families with more children. By the kids also working, they can also provide for the family to make sure there is food on the table everyday. Although the child labor seemed difficult, I don’t really think the kids had a choice. They couldn’t just do whatever they wanted that made them happy back then

  207. The annual “World Happiness” report is out… America lost ground – but one group of Americans expressed greater levels of satisfaction than others; why do you think this was the case?  What contrasts the “happiest” nations from the US and why might most Americans be getting less “happy”? Share your thoughts on any of these Qs

    I think that people who are about 60-70 years old are more happy because they lived most of their lives and they already are satisfied with it with enough money, living with the people they love, and young people usually are entering in the work market now that can be very stressing sometimes, there is also the fact that this new generations are more sensible than the older ones, so I think is important to consider that. There is also the fact that some countries like the Scandinavian countries that are more happy, and it can have a lot of reasons for that like: this countries have a more old population, liberty in some cases, family issues and a lot, but U.S still a happy countries, so I don’t think that’s a real problem.

    • I agree, I think there’s a lot more to stress about when you’re younger so that can really affect how you view things. When you’re younger there’s a lot more changes and things happen fast it can be a little overwhelming.

  208. Check out more information on the fashion of Queen Marie Antoinette. Is there anything that you find interesting, or anything that surprises you?

    I think Marie Antoinette’s fashion choice is very… interesting. But I suppose as a queen like herself, it would be fun to have your own style that stands out. I thought it was interesting how some new recent lines in fashion have taken inspiration from her. With the very tall wigs, sculptural hoop skirts over trouser-inspired corsets, and the pastel colors it was all very unique. I think she really made a big impact if we still talk about and take inspiration from her style even 3 centuries later. I think it’s important to note how she wouldn’t have made such a huge foot-print in history if it weren’t for all of the money she had to spend on stuff like fashion. She loved to drown herself in luxuries like jewelry, wigs, and gowns for fun.

  209. PYOT from BA: Read this article on the proposed TikTok ban. What are your thoughts on the ban? Do you think it is a good or bad idea? Why do you feel as you do? 

    I hate to admit this but I do understand the concern for the ban. One thing that I found interesting is how the votes for yes were almost even between Republicans and Democrats. I understand why they feel that the Chinese government is taking too much information. I also think it is fair that if someone in the United States buys it than there will me no ban. Although I will be sad if it gets banned, I understand that its for the benefit of our countries safety and security. On the other hand, the article stated that roughly 170 people in the US use tik tok. And a lot of people do tik tok as their work and that is how they get their money. I have heard of people quitting their day job to be committed to being an influencer on tik tok. So if this law does pass and Tik Tok gets banned, a lot of people will be losing their job and they will have to come up with another way to get income. Overall, this bill is just creating a really big mess and best casinario someone buys the app from the US so we can all stay happy.

  210. The older generation may be happier due to the fact that they have more life experience. As an older individual, you’ve most likely experienced a lot more of life, the bad, sad, happy, and meaningful experiences. Those experiences build character and mindsets, they can make or break you. They also influence the choices and decisions people make along with their mindset. The older generation may be happier because of more stability, and the fact that they know what ever happens, good or bad will pass. They’ve most likely learned how to handle their emotions and difficult people best to them. While the younger generations minds are being filled with social media as they watch videos they won’t remember minutes later. On social media, they’re exposed to so much information that they may not be ready for, it could scare them and make them worry about things they shouldn’t that could even possibly be misinformation.

    • I agree. I feel like the communication revolution inside of the industrial revolution took a huge backfire as social media came into play. Although social media was a way to help connect different parts of the world, it soon became a place where people were comparing one to another. I agree on the fact that it’s a cheap source of dopamine, and it doesn’t last. This creates that addictive and depressive state that most young people today find themselves in. As we dive deeper into the industrial revolution reaching the 3rd and 4th, this happiness is going to become a distant memory. Only when things were authentic in the past were people happy, but the changes are becoming more clear and there isn’t a lot of effort going into stopping this.

      • I agree! Why do you think things were a lot more authentic in the past hence leading to more happiness?

        I think this is because life was more simpler and genuine. No one really cared about who was posting online and how great their life is compared to others. Without technology and social media, people were more present in the moment, enjoying the little things.

        • I agree that the older days were centralized around a motif of simplicity. Although the communication revolution connected people from around the world, it clearly had a huge backfire. The idea of being bored is still part of living in the moment, however will fill this “bored” time with social media.

          • I agree, social media connected people from all around the world but “disconnected” people from those around them.

  211. The annual “World Happiness” report is out… America lost ground – but one group of Americans expressed greater levels of satisfaction than others; why do you think this was the case?  What contrasts the “happiest” nations from the US and why might most Americans be getting less “happy”? Share your thoughts on any of these Qs

    To be honest, none of the information in the article was very surprising to me. It makes a lot of sense that the top countries in terms of happiness are countries like Finland who have high levels of social equality. I also wasn’t surprised to find that the least happy group in the US was the younger generations around their 20s, as that is a very stressful time in your life from major life decisions, college dept, school, work, adjusting to a more individual lifestyle, etc. It also made a lot of sense to me that the happiest group in America was the older, 60+ generation. I read somewhere that people get happier as they get older, as they lose unhappy and retain happy memories as they age. Another factor is that life is more stable and consistent as you get older. On the topic of nationalism (since we’re talking about it in class), it makes me feel a lot less pride for our country knowing that we rank low in happiness despite being told that we are the most free and have most rights in the world.

    • When I read this article nothing really stood out to me as I new that Northern Europe had “happier” people than other places and people in the US are not the most happy. Also the fact that the younger generation are less happy than the older generations makes complete sense as the younger people have more expenses to pay for, and are working very often because they are not as financially stable.

  212. Haiti was the first black nation to gain its independence, however is also a struggling nation. Do some research on Haiti, what do you think are some reasons for it’s struggle? Why? 

    As much as I think Haiti has been helped I feel like it always goes backwards no matter what. The United Nations has tried to help Haiti but it seems like the economy only got worse. Weather is one of the biggest driving factors in the economy. People usually don’t live in nice houses because it will most likely be a waste of money if a natural disaster hits. This also causes people to live in poverty due to the damages that are constantly having to be repaired. Instead of using money for something that helps Haiti stand with the other countries they have to continue to use it for repair damages. People also don’t have enough food for their family’s and most people aren’t physically healthy. If there isn’t enough food for everyone people are either killed to get food or people will steal others food. This increases the crime rate influencing how likely a tourist will visit. I know if I was visiting a country with a high crime rate I wouldn’t feel comfortable of safe or wouldn’t even go on a trip. The article says how the country’s economy relies on tourists so the less tourist there are means they aren’t getting any income causing the economy to suffer more than it already has. It’s really upsetting to see how much Haiti is suffering this kinda relates to the idea of imperialism that was talked about in class. I think this is a very extreme side of imperialism and can show how much a society is affected by imperialism even centuries later.

  213. PYOT from BA: Read this article on the proposed TikTok ban. What are your thoughts on the ban? Do you think it is a good or bad idea? Why do you feel as you do?

    It’s hard to say either I totally agree or I don’t agree at all for a topic like this. My first instinct is that yes, I think it should be banned, as honestly we spend way too much time on social media. But also if it’s banned people will just turn to other social media platforms. One of the reasons people are against this is because it censors free speech. But the reason that it is being banned is to protect Americans from their information being stolen by the Chinese government, which has laws that could force TikTok’s company to hand over our information. There are a lot of other problems with this though. If banned, it will impacts hundreds of thousands of Americans who use the app as a source of income, resulting in billions of dollars lost. This will impact the economy, not just the creators. Also, there is not much of a market for the app (that the us accepts) and experts say that it probably won’t be able to sell.

    It’s hard to definitively choose a side on this issue, but overall I think it will be good that it is banned.

  214. Compare Socialism and Capitalism. Why is one “better” than the other? Explain.

    Socialism and capitalism are two different economic systems that both have a different way of seeing and doing things. Capitalism is based on private ownership. This means that business owners have the freedom to own their own market. As for socialism, production is owned by the government or community as a whole. Capitalism promotes more of an individual mindset and socialism promotes collective ownership. While capitalism may seem good because of the independence, it has a higher likelihood of failing because there is no safety net. Socialism isn’t as likely to fail because there is that sense of a safety net. So with that being said, I think socialism is better than capitalism because it is always nice to have the help of others when things aren’t going well and with capitalism you don’t have that. 

    • That makes a lot of sense, especially since the happiest countries in the world tend to lean more towards a socialist economy and government where about half of your income goes to taxes, but then there is free healthcare, daycare, etc. for everyone. That kinda proves that socialism is better for everyone as a whole.

  215. What are your thoughts on how 12 of the first 18 presidents owned slaves? Should we still honor and recognize these influential people, even though they didn’t see a problem with slavery? How about some other American leaders who owned slaves?

    In my opinion, we should still honor and recognize these people. This may sound like an excuse, but the times were different and it was normal, and slaves weren’t seen as humans. I feel that thee presidents would want to do what is best for people and if they really considered slaves as people, they wouldn’t have treats them the way they did. I feel that there was a little bit of entitlement in there though. They felt that they deserved to have somebody doing the work for them rather than doing it themselves or paying somebody to do it for them. Also, back then they relied on farmers a lot more because they grew so much crops because they didn’t have factories like we do today processing food or people actually doing these things for a job in order to make a living. Even though I obviously feel like this does make these presidents look bad, you can’t really judge something this important and controversial out of context.

    • I agree with this. These people did amazing things and were amazing people that shaped the country we live in now, so its hard when you find out that they owned slaves. It definitely was just socially acceptable back then and what they grew up knowing, even though it was wrong, and there were still many notable American leaders who were abolitionists and fought against slavery and racism. I still think that they should be celebrated and honored, because I feel that if they had lived in the time we live in now they would have found slavery as horrible and wrong as we find it.

      • I agree that these figures should still be acknowledged. Especially based on the ideology that slaves weren’t human, it wasn’t even considered a big deal for big figures to own many slaves, almost like how royal families now have butlers, personal drivers, and maids. Some of the slaves were still treated like humans by some owners as well. Now that we have reached the consensus that slavery is amoral, it doesn’t change the impact that the person made on history.

  216. PYOT from BA: Read this article on the proposed TikTok ban. What are your thoughts on the ban? Do you think it is a good or bad idea? Why do you feel as you do? 

    I think the ban will be more of a bad thing than a good thing. Many people use Tik Tok as a way to express themselves and reach a widespread community. If Tik Tok gets banned it almost seems like a step backwards in time were people aren’t as connected. Some people also make their living off of Tik Tok without it people would have to start over. Although I think there is a simple solution that could fix the problem. If a company in the US maybe even the US government bought Tik Tok it would no longer be controlled by China.

    • I agree, Natalie. Off of what you said about the US buying the company is tat the US could try to make one for America and try to put everything back where it was, for example, give them back their followers and status if this makes sense. This way, people could still use TikTok (or another name) for its benefits, rather than it being a constant threat to the security of our government.

      • I agree with both of you. The way there was a shift from vine, to musically, to tik tok. I think that making a new American app could definitely work if it has worked in the past. This way, everyone can not have their information stolen, but also people can keep up with their fame and everyday people can keep scrolling.

  217. PYOT from SM: From the in-class discussion about growth mindset and fixed mindset consider the following questions: Would you say you have more of a fixed mindset or a growth mindset? Why? If you have more of a fixed mindset what can you do to have more of an open/growth mindset?

    I personally think I have a fixed mindset. When I am trying to do something and I constantly fail I start to think negatively and that creates a fixed mindset for me. I think it is because after multiple tries and not succeeding it starts to feel impossible to achieve the goal I had set. I think something I could to do build a better growth mindset would be just like stopping for a minute and taking time to regroup before trying the task again. I think another big thing in having a growth mindset is knowing your worth and truly believing in yourself. Having a good support system like close family and close friends is something that can drive you to do better in the goals that you are trying to reach    

  218. What would your life be like if you were a child laborer in the Industrial Revolution? What are the negative impacts of being one?

    Life as a child laborer means you didn’t go to school. Instead you worked in mines, factories, and other dangerous jobs that adults do because younger children can squeeze into smaller spaces, and do more things with their size. The working conditions were extremely dangerous, as you can imagine, because they worked grueling long hours, and in dangerous machinery. It was common for a child to lose a finger, or a limb because you didn’t get trained on how to use the machines. Kids who worked in coal mines developed lung diseases and get sick from the toxic chemicals they have to handle. Those are all negative impacts, and they 100% rule out the good impacts. Basically, the only thing that’s going for the kids from doing this is to pay for their family. They don’t get to use it for education, at least, the vast majority did not. Overall, life as a child laborer was tiring, dangerous, and abusive.

    • I agree, child labor was horrible. Another thing I thought about was how detrimental this must have been to the society as a whole. Yes, it was good for the economy, but when you have a whole generation of children who grew up like that and are illiterate and uneducated, its horrible for the whole country and negatively impacts the future. Uneducated kids I think is the worst impact out of all of this because it creates so many issues and problems in a society when its citizens are uneducated.

  219. International Women’s day is March 8th. Read this link about the history of this day. Is there anything interesting with the history?

    I think that everything I read was what I had expected with the history. It was originally in protest for shorter working hours for women, more pay, and voting rights. The only thing there that surprises me is the fact that women for a long time were angry because men and others underestimated what they could do, and wanted to be treated equal as men, but asking for lower hours is what they fought against before unless I’m wrong. Either way I think this is a hugely important day in history that should continue to be known and celebrated.

  220. International Women’s day is March 8th. Read this link about the history of this day. Is there anything interesting with the history?

    I think something very interesting is that even with all of the trials and tribulations the women never gave up because they felt so strongly about their rights. In 1917 I would say everything started for women fighting for their rights and I found it interesting how it took them so long to reach a milestone. Long after they started to rally for bread and peace, International Women’s Day was marked down for the first time in 1975. I’m very surprised how long it took them to give women some credit and appreciate them for one day. 

    • I agree with you Bella. I think its crazy just how hard women had to protest and fight to be seen in order to be treated equally.

    • I agree, Bella. It did take them so long to accomplish their goal as well as they went through so much trouble, but in their eyes it was worth it. This shows so much about their character and we wouldn’t be where we are today without these courageous women. I’m so glad we get to have this day to appreciate them!

  221. PYOT from BA: Read this article on the proposed TikTok ban. What are your thoughts on the ban? Do you think it is a good or bad idea? Why do you feel as you do?

    This is a very unpopular opinion, but I completely agree with the ban and I really hope it passes. I think that it is a security threat to us and an easy way for the Chinese Government to steal our data and information, which can cause a HUGE problem. I don’t have TikTok, and I wont be allowed to get it unless it becomes an American owned company or a US company. I have all other social media, but this is just one that I cant have. Therefore, I understand that I don’t have the same perspective as those who do, but I also personally think that people our age are addicted to it, and its kinda stupid. It’s entertaining, don’t get me wrong, but its like, just people dancing to trending songs and maybe you learn a few things here and there but you can never believe anything you see on the internet, so yea, its still stupid in my mind. The creator of Tiktok didn’t deny that they spy on us through the app, which is even more of a reason to ban it. I don’t think people realize how dangerous it is. I also think people are really dumb if they think they “need” TikTok and don’t care if their information is stolen. I think that all social media is bad, but its not bad in small measures, and it certainly isn’t a threat to our privacy. So I definitely think TikTok should be banned. 100% and nobody can change my opinion, and I know so many people will disagree, but most can actually open their eyes and realize its dangerous, stupid, and gives you false information. Stick to Instagram reels people.

    • I see what your saying Kate, I think the reason so many people are upset about TikTok being banned because a lot of people have gotten attached to it. I think we also have to think about the people who have built small businesses through this platform and the people who have made a living and rely on TikTok for money. If TikTok gets banned all these people will no longer have work, or platforms they have built throughout a long period of time. I completely agree that this is a security problem and that is very serious but, I don’t believe that it is seriouse enough to ban it. I think if we took more security precautions it would be an easier way to deal with this instead of banning the app.

      • I never thought about all the people that make their money off the app, and I agree with you. I think that while we should think of their work through this app, we should also think about our nations security as a whole, which is why I think it should just become an American owned company and then we wont have to worry as well as the people that build their lives off of it can still continue to do that.

        • Yes I agree, I think that the best option is to just sell the company to America. This would be the best option because many people who are rely on the app will be ok and so these people can still live their lives.

          • I agree with both of you. It’s quite important to the people who solely rely on Tiktok for their income, but it’s definitely more important to put an entire nation on top of it. If they are already able to access user data, how far are they going to be able to get as the years pass? Also, I feel like making some sort of agreement to limit the amount of data they can get is kinda hard because social media apps like this life and make a lot of money by using and selling your data. Thankfully there are other platforms that do the same thing while not being considered a national security threat.

  222. PYOT from SM: From the in-class discussion about growth mindset and fixed mindset consider the following questions: Would you say you have more of a fixed mindset or a growth mindset? Why? If you have more of a fixed mindset what can you do to have more of an open/growth mindset?

    I would probably say that I have more of a fixed mindset, which I need to work on. Its hard for me to stay motivated for something, and eventually I just feel like there is no point. I never quit and if I fail something I always try again, but I don’t ever catch myself thinking I can do MUCH better or I can improve so much. I think I need to work on my motivation. I lose it just as quickly as I get it. I think once I become more motivated and have the energy to succeed then I will think more positively.

  223. Compare Socialism and Capitalism. Why is one “better” than the other? Explain.

    In my opinion capitalism is a lot better. I feel that capitalism might not benefit every single person in a country’s economy like socialism but I think there are many more opportunities for individuals. In a capitalist society you have a lot more freedom to own businesses and profit from it. A capitalist society also makes sure everyone works for what they have. I know if I worked in a socialist community I would be less likely to work hard if I was working for a whole nation instead of myself and people I actually know. I think a capitalist society also gives people to compete with each other a little bit, which I think benefits how hard people are going to want to work to one of their goals.

    • But doesn’t this competitive nature of the economy drive arguments whereas a socialist economy is uniform and everyone is getting what they need.

  224. PYOT from SM: From the in-class discussion about growth mindset and fixed mindset, consider the following questions. Would you say you have more of a fixed mindset or a growth mindset? Why? If you have more of a fixed mindset what can you do to have more of an open/growth mindset?

    I personally would say that I have a growth mindset. I tend to set high goals for myself and work really hard to achieve them. For example, I am really passionate about soccer, so I do everything in my power to get better and be well prepared for the season in the fall to perform my best. I like to see my results, so setting goals just helps me get there rather than working at nothing. Also, I am very hard on myself at school and am always pushing myself to do better on tests and exams, as well as all of my other work. I feel that I am open to critiquing as well. For example, if a coach is telling me a change, I work my hardest to apply it to improve performance. When a teacher gives me tips on how to do better in class, I take advantage of that as well as any other opportunities that I am given. If you have a fixed mindset, the best thing that I can suggest to open your mindset is to just think of what you could do, and imagine how that would make you feel. I think that the end result is so worth the effort!

  225. I think that it’s good AI is helping us use energy a lot smarter. It can predict when we need more power and when we need less, so we end up wasting less. It can help us manage renewable energy sources like solar and wind to make the most use out of them. This would mean less dependence on fossil fuels which really impact our environment. With AI, we can find new ways to save energy that we haven’t discovered yet!

  226. Read this article on the proposed TikTok ban. What are your thoughts on the ban? Do you think it is a good or bad idea? Why do you feel as you do? 

    I dont like the idea because i think liberty is one of most important principles of life, so for economy and so for civil liberties, the gov shouldnt say what social media you can acess, and they shouldnt prohibit the company to act on the US because is making bad for some people, because if someone is getting addicted to TikTok or other Social Media, that problem is from the person, not the company and also if this Social Media is disrespecting the users privacy, than the users most protest about it or just stop using it

  227. As we are entering the 6th industrial revolution there is a lot of new technology. Check out the link, and express your thoughts about the technology you see and its implications.

    I think is great to see that AI technology is gonna change and make a lot of systems like Healthcare and Transportation a lot better and safer for humans, i dont think that they are gonna dominate us as some people say, obviously there is gonna have consequences, but i think the benefits of it will be much better than the consequences, so thats my opinion about it.

  228. PYOT from ZM / AO / SM: Take a look at this link  and the differences between Catholic and Orthodox Easter/ what are some things you noticed? additional link on Greek/Orthodox Easter for more info … ALSO, with Easter coming up, where did Easter egg hunts come from? What caused them to start happening? Take a look at these amazing easter eggs from around the world. Which one is the most interesting? What one do you like the most? For what egg was technology the most important? For what egg was technology not that important? Share your thoughts on this, or any of the previous prompts:

    I am responding to where Easter egg hunting came from, and the amazing Easter egg prompts.

    To start, I did not expect the origins of Easter egg hunting to come from Germany of all places. I found it interesting that it dates back to the 16th century where men used to hide them for children and women to find, and people believed one day a woman found an empty tomb, which lead to the story of resurrection. Another thing that I wonder if why we use eggs and rabbits, when rabbits don’t lay eggs, they give birth. And I guess chicks and chickens are also well known to be a cute Easter animal but the bunny is the main one, because of the whole Easter bunny thing.

    Moving on to the amazing Easter eggs from around the world, I found multiple to be very interesting. I thought the Easter eggs in Greece were weird because at first it looked like tomato’s around bread, but they are just died blood red to resemble eternal life after death. They were also called Paschalino Avgo. Another one that I thought was really interesting was the eggs in Germany, called Osterei eggs. Instead of hiding them to find, they put them all on a single tree and overflow it with eggs. My favorite egg is the ones in Slovenia because they are delicate and simple. Instead of dying them they clean out the inside and carve the shell and they are called Vekonocne vajicko.

  229. PYOT from a peer: Check out this link on The 7 Most Dangerous Technology Trends, and share thoughts on what technology sounds useful and improves everyday life, and what could really be easily used to harm us. Which of the 7 was surprising to you, which was predictable, and why? 

    Some of the trends that surprised me were the “Smart dust”, “Ransomware, AI and Bot-enabled Blackmailing and Hacking”, “Fake News Bots”. Some that were predictable ones were “Spying Home device” “AI cloning” and “Facial recognition”. The only one that I think is useful is facial recognition. While its debatable, I feel like it might be safer and more secure than a pass code. If you think about how a hacker can try every combination possible and eventually, maybe, get it right, but it would be really hard to replicate facial features and dimensions. I feel like it makes iphones and other devices safer. Some that I think could easily harm us are the Ai cloning, because it can look so realistic and I have seen some reels of like, celebrities being mimicked by Ai and their voices to say things that they didn’t say, and it can really get someone in trouble. The Spying Home device is just scary because creeps can hack childrens Alexa, which they have many times, and have conversations with vulnerable children, and get personal information like home address, and other things. Smart dust is something I had never heard of but apparently its the size of a grain of salt, and it has sensors, communication systems, and cameras. It’s scary to think somebody can easily stalk you just by putting super tiny, unoticible grains of salt on your floor, and nobody will ever notice it. Its amazing how we even have something like that. The cameras is even worse. Lastly, Fake News bots can be really troubling because it can falsely inform people and cause a bunch of chaos. Older people especially that are more gullible. Overall I think that these devices are becoming scarier and there are so many ways to invade people privacy.

    • Personally I’m between facial recognition and a password. Facial recognition requires only a picture of the person most likely and therefore it would be easy to hack into the devices of big named people. A password is more complex but can be recorded down and memorized. What about a thumb print?

      I agree on your part about fake news. This entire country runs on news in order to connect different states together, informing them on what is happening. Miscommunication would be a huge factor in the impact, which could lead to disputes and fighting. This would take a really big toll in the U.S. As AI becomes smarter, these new fake websites will begin to look more and more real.

      • I Think the facial recognition can be dangerous but not as bad as it seems. My brother and I were testing this out and we found out that if you have a picture of the person the facial recognition will not work. For the facial recognition you have to be look directly at the phone or what ever you are using so it “scan” your eyes and know it is you. I think thumb prints can be more dangrous because someone can easily use your thumb to unlock whatever you are trying to unlock.

        • I agree. I feel like effectiveness of a type of password can be measured by the level of difficulty to get it. I now understand that a written out password is the most difficult because really only you know it. Getting a thumb print of sufficient-enough face picture is basically visible to everyone since it’s what they see when they see you.

  230. Check out this article on the challenges of combating climate change while we’re dependent on fossil fuels – why is this problem so hard to address?  What are some steps going forward to address? 

    The problem is so hard to address because we need the harmful fossil fuels to do important things for us. It’s super hard to eliminate them because the chemical makeup of the fuels make them good at doing a lot of things like making plastics. Some steps that we can follow to better clean the air and help with climate change for the environment and animals are: “going green” or using electrical cars, reusable products, eating less meat and dairy, reduce energy use at home, cut consumption waste, and recycle. Everybody knows that it would take the whole worlds help at once to make a drastic change, and it wont be fixed for many years but it is a problem we should try to be better about to fix.

    • I agree that it’s hard to go against something that you know is helping you. I also agree that our focus should be looking to reduce atmospheric and land pollution. Using reusable things is a big part of this. Using green energy is smart, especially solar panels because we are never going to run out of sunlight. All there needs is for one person to take the chance, and I think that it will be surprising the world will change.

  231. PYOT from a peer: Take a look at more facts on Karl Marx. Are there any facts that you find surprising or interesting?

    I didn’t know much at all about Karl Marx. Something I found surprising and interesting as well as impressive is that he wrote a novel at age 19. I also found it surprising that he ran a cologne newspaper which is kind of random but I guess interesting.

  232. PYOT from AO (and Sak…) We have been talking about robots in class. What are your thoughts on the development? Does this scare you? Why / Why not? How about thoughts on this?? Is this cool?

    My opinion before reading these articles is that robots are a bad idea. I think that technology is great the way it is now, and if we advance it too far it might be irreversible. We started out developing things to make life easier because the tech we made did things we couldn’t do or things that was dangerous or hard for us to do, but now we make things because we are lazy and want everything to be done for us. I think its completely unessecary to create robots to do easy everyday jobs for humans, because eventually when they can do everything, how will we make money? Will we need school anymore because they can tell us everything we need to know? It makes me think maybe we shouldn’t develop robots that can think for themselves because if they are smarter,, and we program them to have higher knowledge, then they could absolutely dominate us and take over the world. I know it sounds stupid but I feel like that’s the road we are headed down with robots. So yes. It scares me. When I looked at the robot dog article, my first thought wasn’t to be afraid, but with the description that it patrols New York city, it sounds much worse. My brother goes to school at Fenn and they actually have one of those in the tech room to study and observe. I don’t really understand why police are making robot police dogs in replacement of a real dog, and I understand it may have more knowledge and ability than a real dog, but again, its a replacement. Overall I think that the technology development is getting dangerously close to being too good for use to stop. Eventually.

    • I completely agree. The impacts can already be seen now as robots are taking man-made jobs, such as the assembly line. Cars today are being made by machines, not a large group of people. Thus, I expect that the number of jobs open will go down over time, especially in certain occupations. I agree that this is something to worry about and too much advancement will be our downfall.

  233. International Women’s Day is March 8th. Read this link about the history of this day. Is there anything interesting with the history?

    I think that this day is actually very important and I am glad that it is a thing. I am very happy that all of the women that put up a fight and earned their rights after being not allowed to do so many different things, aren’t going unnoticed. I find it interesting, but at the same time, it makes sense, that women’s suffrage is a big topic brought up. I think that, as I said before, I am very glad these things don’t go unnoticed. But not just to men. I am glad that women know of the history and are grateful for their rights rather than just thinking that they have always had them and always will. I also find it really interesting how invested these women get in their passions. When I really think about it, I just feel like it is so cool the measures these women would go to and even though the change may not have been immediate, it still happened and even though most if not all are dead, that should be something they are very proud of. Another thing that I find interesting is that this day used to be celebrated on February 28. After being changed a couple of times, it ended up being on March 8. This made me wonder if this is how March became women’s history month. So I did a little bit of research and found out that March is WHM in order to correspond to International Women’s day. I find this really cool.

  234. International Women’s day is March 8th. Read this link about the history of this day. Is there anything interesting with the history?

    I think it’s good to see that the Women’s international day it’s here for more than 100 years and I think it’s nice to see how things has changed for women in the 20th century and are still changing, and also it’s interesting to see that in other countries there’s different stories about that day that are interesting to look it.

  235. What would your life be like if you were a child laborer in the Industrial Revolution? What are the negative impacts of being one?

    It would be a complicated life, considering that work in these industries can be extremely dangerous for health and the mental state of children, like you could lose your arm in an accident and your boss wouldn’t care, and also is exhausting do that like 12 hours a day and receive a misery of money is not for child.

  236. Spring is coming up soon! What do you think about the origins of early Easter? Is it what you expected?

    I knew that Easter celebrates the Resurrection of Jesus Christ on the third day after  Crucifixion. Something that surprised me was that the new modern Easter celebrations have little to do with Christian Resurrection. I wonder how candy and a bunny became what you think of first when you hear Easter instead of what it was originally celebrated for.

    • It doesn’t surprise me that the celebration of Easter has swerved off of track with Christian ideals. Most holidays today steer away from the hard tradition and instead the most fun spots, which makes me feel like humanity is becoming weaker. For Halloween, we focus on getting candy, not scaring away spirits. For Valentines day there was a complete turn around of the celebration. I don’t see the resemblance of a bunny and chocolate egg, but cultural diffusion is always happening and things are constantly changing.

  237. PYOT from SM: Would you rather live life as a doctor, a banker or a pirate? Explain? How is life better? What are the pros and cons?

    I would rather be a pirate because it seems fun. You would be able to go to islands all of the time and be out on the ocean. It could be dangerous though like dieses, other pirates, and the police.

  238. PYOT from BA: Read this article on the proposed TikTok ban. What are your thoughts on the ban? Do you think it is a good or bad idea? Why do you feel as you do?

    I don’t really watch the news but I have glanced over while my parents were watching and this was all over the news so I overheard some things about this bill. Personally I don’t use TikTok but instead I would use sites like Instagram if I were to watch reels so this ban would not affect me on a personal level. I do know that a lot of people do watch TikTok and it is a very popular app but I feel that if all you do on this app is watch videos I feel that they should not really have a say in what the U.S. governments does with the app because nowadays their are so many different apps that could be used. The only people that should have a slight say in what happens to TikTok is the creators where they use TikTok as a form of income. But at the same time as I said before there are so many other apps where they can put their platform out into other apps so it should not affect these creators a crazy amount in their income. I feel like this Ban is also a good idea because its not going to affect the U.S. too much and a lot of different people say that because TikTok was created by the Chinese and it is believed that the Chinese is stealing the data and information of the users from the U.S. and since the U.S. and China are not really friends this is seen as a bad thing for the U.S.

  239. Spring is coming up soon! What do you think about the origins of early Easter? Is it what you expected?

    It Is very religious, and about Jesus. I thought that there would be more about a big Easter bunny that lays eggs around the yard.

  240. PYOT from a peer: Take a look at more facts on Karl Marx. Are there any facts that you find surprising or interesting?

    He is called the father of Communism. There was also the book Animal Farm that was made by his ideas. He was a writer, at the age of 19 he wrote a novel. He ran a newspaper. He tried to run another newspaper.

  241. PYOT from a peer: Check out this article about some of the composers that were part of the romanticism movement. Do you recognize any of them or their pieces? Is there anything that you find interesting, or anything that surprises you?

    The only piece that I recognized from this list was Nocturne Op. 9 No. 2 by Frédéric Chopin, I’ve heard this piece a lot on social media platforms. I think this was the most “romantic” piece because it is pretty slow and I feel like it gives off a romantic dinner date type of vibe whereas the other songs are pretty fast or upbeat. I think this piece stands out above the others because it just seems like the slowest and most romantic song. 

  242. PYOT from KE: Read about the working conditions of mill girls in Lowell, as well as the accidents and negligence that occurred. What stands out to you as interesting a/o surprising?

    What stood out to me/was surprising

    • Despite females being some of the hardest working employees in the mill and factories they were also the most exploited.
      • I would feel like if they were exploited into doing this then why did they work so hard? Like was there a really harsh punishment if they did not work hard?
    • The conditions and how long they would work is really similar to child laborers. With 12 hours days and working in very dangerous situations
      • This does sort of make sense because they are both forced to do this job and to work. 
    • Despite all of the poor building structure, dangerous machinery and crowded rooms with many accidents they worked at their own risk
      • This does not make total sense but does at the same time and is interesting. They are forced to do this job so then they can help provide and they are “willing’ to work. It makes sense that they are at their own risk because if they get injured the mill does not want to have to pay for what happened. Also wouldn’t the mill/factory want to seem better than it is by saying they have some amount of protection to the people working there?
    • Mill owners were widely known to ignore horrible conditions and overcrowding of mills.
      • I would feel like mill owners would at least try to make the conditions a little bit better because people started to realize that all mills are a bad place and the conditions were really bad. If they want the most people working then improving the conditions and realizing some of the issues would probably benefit everyone. 
    • The mills often would not report the full amount of tragedies
      • This one is very interesting but makes a lot of sense. If they want the place to look safer and that people do not get severely injured often than not reporting all of the fatalities would do that.
  243. PYOT from MZ: What would your life be like if you were a child laborer in the Industrial Revolution? What are the negative impacts of being one?

    Life as a child laborer was not great. You would get put to work so your family would get some money to benefit them, there were not a lot of laws protecting children from becoming child laborers. Also a reason why child labor was common is that they did not have to be paid that much, were smaller so they could easily fit between machines and go in small places. There was also a limited amount of education due to the amount of children who had to work. To add to the bad life of being a child laborer is  the conditions they had to work in were very dangerous and they had to work long grueling hours around high powered machinery. Also it was very common for children to lose a limb or a finger due to them not getting trained that much and being kids. To add to what already seems a bad life as a child laborer imagine you are a child laborer who is working in a coal mine. They did not need a lot of experience, there was poor ventilation causing many people to develop lung disease and sometimes they had to work around dangerous chemicals causing them to get sick from all of the toxic fumes. This is just so scary to think that children had to work in these conditions and work so their families would have more money since money was very tight for people. Also the fact that they were popular because they were small enough to fit into factories and around machinery. 

    Negative impacts of being one

    • Poor conditions – working around machinery that is high voltage or chemicals
    • No laws protecting children
    • small wages
    • limited education 
    • the possibility of having limbs cut off

    I would really not like having to be a child laborer, the length of their normal work day was 12-14 hours. The average American works for 8 hours a day and around the world the average person works for about 7 hours a day. This just shows how much more kids had to work. Also they were horrible for the amount of time they put in and the harm they did to their body. 

  244. PYOT from SM: From the in-class discussion about growth mindset and fixed mindset consider the following questions: Would you say you have more of a fixed mindset or a growth mindset? Why? If you have more of a fixed mindset what can you do to have more of an open/growth mindset?

    I would definitely say that I have more of a fixed mindset which can be an issue sometimes. I think that doing sports and school makes my fixed mindset worse because I always say in my head  “I can’t win/ do this” I also say in my head “I will never get better/be able to do this” which is very problematic because when I say it I actually do not get better or win. But when I say ‘I can do this” I will actually do better. It is just insane to see how much your mindset affects what you can do. I just doubt myself too much. I can definitely get more of a growth mindset if I try and think about what my thoughts do. I can also believe in myself more. 

  245. PYOT from BA: Read this article on the proposed TikTok ban. What are your thoughts on the ban? Do you think it is a good or bad idea? Why do you feel as you do? 

    I was honestly shocked to find out that this was proposed. I find it very interesting that Joe Biden said that he would sign this bill if it came to his desk though because I feel like he could really use that app to his advantage, but I do understand that they are taking precautions. It does make a lot of sense that this could be a security threat by the Chinese because they own it and they can see a lot of things that happen in the US on there. I honestly don’t have tiktok, so I don’t really have any strong feelings either way. Like it can be a good thing for easy entertainment and to make fun videos, but I completely understand that the United States’ security is so much more important than a silly little dance. I think that it is a good idea just because it would possibly make us safer, but also I feel like the reaction to this by society won’t be the best. They might be stubborn about it because tik tok is something that they enjoy using. So many people have tik tok and are addicted to it so it will be interesting to see how this plays out.

    • I think that “banning” Tiktok is a necessary step by the U.S. Government. It’s not that the government is trying to be annoying and controlling the input of it’s citizens, but I think that it’s necessary because they have the reasonable belief that leads them to take action. However, Tiktok does benefit people in the sense of expressing a business or your own persona. But then again, there are other platforms of social media that aren’t accused of stealing data.

      • I agree, Fennell. I don’t feel that the government would ban sucha. popular, widely used, app that could potentially be very beneficial when used in the right ways, especially for no reason. It is clearly a serious matter if it has gotten to this. I feel that TikTok and Instagram are probably the two most popular so I can definitely see people trying to justify not banning it because other apps aren’t facing any “threats” while TikTok is.

        • Agreed, and this is exactly why the government has people to represent their thoughts from different places of the country. If the House of Representatives had such a wide vote, then clearly the severity is greater than we think.

  246. Your thoughts about strange lesser-known events in history? 

    I thought that all these events were not as serious and I think that’s probably why they are lesser known. I found some of them crazy, for instance, “The Dancing Plague of 1518”. I just cant believe people had the irresistible urge to dance which caused exhaustion, injury, and death. Like why couldn’t they just stop dancing? It’s not an actual illness that causes you to LOSE control over your body completely, its so ridiculous. I had heard of the Great Molasses Flood and thought that was wild too. Another one that I think should be recognized was “The Dog that Saved Antarctica” aka Togo who delivered the serum that saved the kids and then Balto took the credit. Overall I think some of these are stupid and shouldn’t even be considered “events” and some I think should be well known

    • I agree with you! The Dancing Plague of 1518 just seems so weird. I really wonder if they actually danced or if they just had uncontrollable movements that could be characterized as dancing. The Great Molasses Flood is so funny but scary if you were walking in Boston and then you see a large amount of some substance going towards you and not knowing what it is. Then realizing that it is molasses and not being able to get out. Some of these events are not that strange and some are purely stupid but some are really cool and should be known.

  247. PYOT from KE: Read about the working conditions of mill girls in Lowell, as well as the accidents and negligence that occurred. What stands out to you as interesting a/o surprising?

    What I thought was interesting was that fact that the newspapers knew of the horrible accidents that were happening to the female workers there and printed them, yet the public didn’t do anything, it just said they “relished the horrific details”. I would’ve thought that as soon as people found out what was happening to these people they would want to help or fix it, but it doesn’t seem like people did anything. If anything, it was entertainment for them.

    • Yeah, I also think it is just so bad that the owners of these mills knew that the conditions were horrible and there was so much crowding and they did not address the issue. Also that in newspapers and the news they did not list all of the fatalities probably trying to make the mills seem safer and a good place to work.

      • Although it takes away a big portion of the reality of working in the mills, its intelligent in the sense of advertising this job and not forming a dark aura around this occupation.. keeping the job more open and less looked-away from

  248. PYOT from AO: Out of all the technology that you use, what do you think is the most important and effective one? What would be different about your lifestyle and routine if you didn’t have it? Why?

    I was gonna say my phone, as I use it a lot throughout my day, but if I think back to when I didn’t have a phone there honestly wasn’t much of a difference except being able to contact my friends. I feel like there are a lot more important technologies, like air conditioning and heat. If we didn’t have that it would be hard to live in the North east during the winter and it would be hard to live in the south west during the summer. Besides that, I think the most important technology is the internet, as it makes it so I can do school work and look up questions and communicate with other people. If I didn’t have all of the world’s information at my fingertips through the internet then I wouldn’t know as much. It would also be a lot harder to do research and find pictures for school projects.

  249. Take a look at these amazing easter eggs from around the world. Which one is the most interesting? What one do you like the most? For what egg was technology the most important? For what egg was technology not that important? Share your thoughts on this, or any of the previous prompts:

    All of the eggs and egg artwork looks really cool. I am personally a little biased and I would say that Switzerlands is the best because I love to go there and have gone 4 times. For Easter Switzerland puts up lots of brightly collared decorations and eggs like the US. I think Switzerland definitely does it better than the U.S. In the photo they have so much more decorations around towns and have easter bunny figures. Other than that I would say that Croatias, Ukraines and Russia’s eggs look the most interesting and hard to do. Croatia has large eggs similar to how Switzerland has large animals around their cities to show the significance. I really want to know if there are competitions of who can make the ‘best’ easter egg each year. They basically use the easter eggs as murals to paint different art works. I like Ukraines because it seems to fit their culture and looks like there was hard work in it and the people who made it took pride into their work. Russias is cool to me just because it is so unique compared to the other ones and it is less of a traditional easter egg. I also think that it is probably the most interesting because it has metal in it and some of the eggs open  up and they can be used as ornaments so it lasts longer than some of the other ones. I feel like technology was the most important for Russia’s due to the metal used in it and the cutting needed to do it and also the chocolate eggs because the chocolate needs to get processed and get shaped to how they want it to be. They also have to get another chocolate in the main egg. I think that technology is important for all of them but the least important for the more “ordinary” looking eggs like Mexicos or the U.S.’s. They are not as interket and are really just die on an egg. It was really cool looking at the different eggs different countries do because they are relatively close to each other with colorful eggs but the way they are done and the way they are shown is much different. 

    (Photo of the eggs that are the most interesting to me)

    Croatia

    Ukraine

    Russia

  250.  the in-class discussion about growth mindset and fixed mindset consider the following questions: Would you say you have more of a fixed mindset or a growth mindset? Why? If you have more of a fixed mindset what can you do to have more of an open/growth mindset?

    I think I am a more growth mindset to be honest, because I like to learn new things about economics, politics and other things in a general, I like to be challenged most time when is not something almost impossible to do, I try to make new friends and also I like to help the others when they’re having difficulty with some work, but also I have a fixed mindset sometimes, because sometimes I like to be more in the “comfort” zone when people try to make drastic changes that can be irreversible, but I’m trying to improve that and understand more if that changes can be good or bad for that specific situation.

  251. Compare Socialism and Capitalism. Why is one “better” than the other? Explain.

    In my opinion, Capitalism is much better than Socialism because in Socialism for example you have to pay taxes (if you like it or not) to give public schools and if you wanna put your son on a private school you would still have to pay taxes, and this can be applied to Hospitals and other services, so I think Capitalism is better because you have more options and are not forced to pay taxes to the government, that sometimes doesn’t even make a good use of that money, and also by the concept that everyone should grew by themselves and not by the help of the others because human beings have to be independent to be successful in his personal and professional life.

    • wait… don’t we pay taxes in our more capitalistic society?

      • i’m saying that if you do have public services created by the government like education , you have to pay taxes even if you wanna use a private service, and sometimes the public service is bad like Brazil to get even worse, in my opinion there’s no need for public services if you are obligated to pay for a service, even if you don’t use it, but is a really good question anyway.

  252. PYOT from SM: From the in-class discussion about growth mindset and fixed mindset consider the following questions: Would you say you have more of a fixed mindset or a growth mindset? Why? If you have more of a fixed mindset what can you do to have more of an open/growth mindset?

    I would say I have more of a fixed mindset just because of my sports and school. I could just be saying this but I think that a lot of kids put a lot of pressure on themselves these days because of social media. We see people doing things better than us for example getting better grades or winning something which makes you feel like you have to be just like them and be as good or even better than them at what they are doing. Some things I do to get me out of my fixed mindset is catching myself saying things like “i can’t” and changing it to something more positive like “I can’t do this yet…”. Also not comparing yourself to others because just because they are doing something doesn’t mean you should be doing it too. 

  253. Take a look at some of the early 20th- century inventions. Did anything stand out to you or suprise you? Why?

    The first invention that stood out to me was the escalator. I would honestly expect it to be a more recent invention after 1950 maybe, but it came out in 1900. I think that it is pretty cool that they were able to develop that technology back then. The next thing that stood out to me was the vacuum cleaner came out in 1901. That is another invention that came earlier than I would have expected. I know that they were not like the ones we currently use today, but that is still pretty impressive. The next one actually surprises me. The invention of air conditioner came out in 1902. Now that is one especially that I would have expected to come out later. I think of air conditioning as a very modern invention, even the ones used in windows rather than inside your house. The next one that surprised me was that crossword puzzles were invented in 1913. It is not the time frame that surprises me, but the fact that it was on this list. I just find that pretty random, but it is a cool thing I’ll give them that. Another surprising one to me is that the gas mask came out in 1914. I feel like those would be way more modern. I mean I know they kinda had one during the bubonic plague for doctors, but I feel like a gas mask is a little different. Another thing that really surprises me is the fact that the first robot was built in 1921. I feel like I’d expect this kind of thing to happen in the 70’s but definitely not the 20’s so I will say that is very impressive. The last one I will write about is the microwave oven. This was invented in 1946 and I find that surprising. I feel like I keep saying the same thing over and over but I feel like for this one, it’s at least 15-25 years ahead of the time I would expect.

  254. PYOT from a peer: Check out this article about the Willow Project. What are your thoughts about this huge controversy? Who does it benefit / who does it hurt? What actions should / could be taken by us people?

    After reading about this I think that this idea of taking so much oil out of the ground and burning it into our environment would be really bad as today we already use so much fuel and the fossil fuels are very bad for our environment. This project would benefit the state and federal governments but would also create thousands of jobs in industries like transportation and logistics. There are many pros to this project but one of the biggest cons and things that would cause the most harm to us is the pollution. With all this new oil coming out of the ground, we will burn as we use it for fuel, heat, electricity, and many other things, putting toxic fossils fuels into the air and killing our environment. This will worsen global climate change. The project is expected to produce 600 million barrels of oil which will create greenhouse gases, float into the atmosphere, and hold heat warming the global environment. Some actions that we could take to try and prevent this from happening is to send a letter to the Biden Administration expressing how you want them to implement policies like this project to prevent exploiting public lands in the future.

  255. response to What would your life be like if you were a child laborer in the Industrial Revolution? What are the negative impacts of being one?

    I think that being a child laborer would be a terrible life I would work long hours and become worn out every day for little to no pay. and the more exhausted I get the more of a risk I have of getting injured at the factories because there is no safety check in the factories. I would also not get any education so I would be dum and will spend my life in the factory never experiencing a true childhood.

  256. PYOT from MZ: What would your life be like if you were a child laborer in the Industrial Revolution? What are the negative impacts of being one?

    I think that my life would be not awesome sauce. I would have to wake up early not have a heatry and nutritous breakfast, and then get in the factory. The place is also not up to safe and health regulations so i can lose a toe or any body part. I bet that the lunches wont be good so most people will get hangry and brawls might start. After the long and gruesome hours I would go home and sleep. I think that its bad for people because they cant live a full childhood and it is dangerous.

  257. Voting for the next president is starting to happen! Do some research on the history of voting. Did anything surprise you? Did you expect some events to happen earlier / later?

    In the 1700’s the votes were only for white property holders. Given the time period, I guess it makes sense. The next major thing that shocked me was that women got the right to vote in 1920. We are reding about women fighting for the right to vote in the 1800’s showing how long it took them to get there. That honestly shows dedication and I know that it was a very important matter, but they had to work for it and I appreciate that. Another thing that i find very interesting is the fact that the voting age changed from 21 to 18 in 1971. I find that interesting because I mean it makes sense, but I guess I just always assumed that its been 18 forever. I never knew that people of language minority groups had issues and that things had to be added to the Voting Rights Act for this. I find that pretty interesting because again, I just assumed people would be voting no problem. The part about making voting more accessible to elderly and disabled people is actually very smart as well as a very humane thing to do. Everybody should be allowed to vote, and abilities to move or get around should not interfere with that. The events that I didn’t go over either I already knew and didn’t really stick out to me, or were just, in my opinion, not as important and impactful as these. I personally feel like it makes sense in the time frame that all of these happened, but for women, maybe a little bit sooner, but not that much of a difference overall.

  258. PYOT from ZM / AO: Take a look at this link  and the differences between Catholic and Orthodox Easter/ what are some things you noticed? additional link on Greek/Orthodox Easter for more info 

    Catholic Easter and Orthodox Easter differences- 

    • Orthodox Easter is normally celebrated later than Christian easter due to the way the churches calculate the holiday with two different calendars.
      • Chrisitans
        •  celebrate the resurrection of Jesus on Easter Sunday or the 40th day of Lent. Which is started on Ash wednesday every year and lasts 40 days. 
        • They follow the Julian calendar for easter. This calendar was established in 45 B.C. by Julius Caesar and is based on the solar system and the earth’s revolutions. 
        • Decorate eggs to symbolize a new life have a joyful church services followed by family meals and gatherings with meals like ham, hot bread, and spring veggies
    • Orthodox
      • celebrate Easter as the passover or the eternal passover from the life from earth heaven. Similar to Catholic Easter it is celebrated on the 40th day of the great lent. But Orthodox Easter follows the Jewish passover. 
      • Their easter takes place between April 4th and May 8th following the first full moon after pass over. Also it will always fall after the Jewish passover. 
      • Decorate eggs to symbolize a new life, have joyful church services followed by family meals and gatherings, and a candle light procession. Their meals have things like red dyed hard boiled and most of the things found at a christian easter gathering. 

    Overall Catholic and Orthodox Easter – 

    It is surprising overall to see how many days leading up to Easter have a special significance to catholics like Maundy Thursday or Good Friday. They both have some type of lent and easter happened on the 40th day. What surprised me is one of the reasons they happen on different days is the calendar they follow and the creation of the Gregorian Calendar. It is interesting how what they do is very similar but different at the same time. Like they both have some type of service and gatherings after but the days are different. I feel like at some point the day for Easter will be the same.  

    Greek/Orthodox Easter – 

    • Easter is the biggest holiday of the year for Greeks
    • They will fast and do prayers leading up to easter and they make sure to have elaborate traditions
    • The preperation they have for easter starts on Great Lent like for Orthodox Catholics and Christians. 
    • Many people will take of Holy saturday due to its importance and there will be a service just before midnight where the whole church does dark and after midnight the lights go back on. They will also sing hymns
    • Easter Sunday early meal is where the Greeks break their fast and have eggs that are dyed red and there will be no pastel colors at the table, sort of similar to orthodox easter but not so much to christian easter. 
    • They will also eat roasted lamb as the traditional choices they have with greek easter bread. 

    I am really surprised that Easter is the biggest day of the year for Greek orthodox. Like why not Chrisitan and this really makes me wonder what made Easter be so much more significant. I honestly want to go to an easter or a greek orthodox because it sounds like fun and would be a good learning moment. Everything they do seems worth it because in the end they get to have a big celebration and eat food. I really want to try their food as foods from places around the world interest me a lot. 

    _______

    ALSO, with Easter coming up, where did Easter egg hunts come from? What caused them to start happening? Your thoughts on this, or any of the previous

     Where did Easter egg hunts come from? 

    Due to pre- christian societies having the association of eggs to spring, a new life and the shell is a metaphor for the tomb of Jesus. Also eggs are a big part of the celebration of easter anyways. Edward I purchased 450 eggs to be decorated with colors and gold leafs then distributed to households which is very interesting and is probably the main reason easter egg hunts are associated with easter. Also when a protestant reformer Martin Luther organized an egg hunt men would hide eggs for women and children to find again symbolizing the resurrection of Jesus

    My thoughts 

    It is really cool to see people like Martin Luther and others start a tradition of finding easter eggs and then sparking the idea to make it a real tradition that many people do around the world nowadays. I also find it very interesting that so many people started to catch onto decorating easter eggs and having chocolate easter eggs as a gift. 

  259. PYOT from MZ: What would your life be like if you were a child laborer in the Industrial Revolution? What are the negative impacts of being one?

    If I were a child laborer in the Industrial Revolution my life would be really bad. I think this because most of the kids worked back then because their family’s needed money and to help their family. If I were a child laborer then that means that my family is not wealthy and is also not a good start to life and that almost already means that my life is going to be difficult. All of the more wealthy family’s children did not need to work because their kids were set and did not need to worry about money. Some of the larger negative impacts were that I would need to be very careful in a very dangerous environment because A lot of people got injured and the owner of the factory would just kick us out with no hesitation. If I got seriously injured they would not care and my life would be changed very poorly and I would never be able to do stuff like other kids. Lets say that I lost 3 of my fingers then my life would be much different then other kids. Another problem besides just being very scared and having a large risk for injury I am working for very little and not really making any money because I am a child the employer did not have to pay us as much. Another negative impact was that I am not getting the best education at a could possible get because I am being forced to work at such a young age and having a lot of opportunity’s being closed.

  260. Take a look at some of the early 20th-century inventions. Did anything stand out to you or surprise you? Why?

    For me it’s not necessarily surprising but I think it’s interesting to see that the technology not only made advances on sectors like industry , automobiles and gadgets, but also technology made some simple things that made our life more easier, comfortable and happy overtime like the bra for women, teddy bear for kids, bluepoint pen to not use ink and many other little things that make a life’s better and more comfortable.

  261. Voting for the next president is starting to happen! Do some research on the history of voting. Did anything surprise you? Did you expect some events to happen earlier / later?

    I think that is surprising to see that most countries initially have given the right to vote only to white men or men who had a lot of wealth and power, because they had fear that women and people from other ethnicity would take them of the power, so it’s surprising that most countries were like that before.

  262. Harriet Tubman Day is on March 10th. Do some extra research on a female abolitionist, Harriet Tubman. What did you find?

    I find it really interesting that Harriet was one of 8 children, also, the fact that her name at birth was Arminta Ross (nicknamed Minty). Her mother, Harriet was enslaved and even though her father wasn’t, her and her siblings were all forced into slavery because of their mom. I find their old rules on like slavery kinda random. Like it makes me wonder how and when they decided that if a woman is a slave, all of her children should be, even if the father isn’t. Her whole abolitionist mindset started when she was running errands at a store and witnessed another girl trying to escape and in this moment, she refused to assist this person’s enslaver in capturing this woman. I find that really cool that that is the moment it kinda clicked for her that that is what she was passionate about. I also find it insane that she had narcolepsy and seizures causing her lots of physical pain. That is kind of crazy how we can figure out now what exactly was hurting this woman. Harriet met her husband, John Tubman, when she was sent to work with her father at timber fields. She married at 22 and changed her name to Harriet, like her mother. From there, she went to escape to Pennsylvania and found other abolitionists like herself along the way. They used the Underground Railroad in order to escape, and like some think, it is not an actual train track. I think her story is very inspirational because even though she had disabilities slowing her down, she still got what she needed to do, done.

  263. PYOT from a peer: Take a look at more facts on Karl Marx. Are there any facts that you find surprising or interesting?

    My perspective on Karl Marx before reading this was that he was a pretty professional and deep thinker, but from the article he wasn’t like that at all. In his early life he spent most of his days getting drunk and fighting, even riding a donkey through town drunk once. One of his most interesting ideas was that religion was like a drug, as it helped “suppress their immediate pain and misery with pleasant illusions, to the benefit of their oppressors”. It’s interesting for me to read articles like this as it gives the people we’re talking about a personality and they feel more real.

    • I agree, Maura. You would think that somebody who had such a large impact on communism. I think it is very interesting to see how very different impacts on these people could’ve helped to influence them, and I feel like the real thing is always the opposite of what our expectations are.

  264. PYOT from AO: Out of all the technology that you use, what do you think is the most important and effective one? What would be different about your lifestyle and routine if you didn’t have it? Why? 

    I would say out of all of the technology I use everyday my phone and chromebook are the most important and effective ones to do what i need. I am always on my phone keeping myself entertained, texting friends and family to stay connected, to see what my teachers posted, to look at my grades, email my teachers and more. I also would say that it is the most important because I spend the most time on it, especially when I look at my screen time on the weekends I realize how much I rely on it.  I also use it for directions when helping my parents or looking up information like where to eat. I would say my chromebook is also very important to my life because I need it for school all of the time. To complete my assignments, email teachers, and anything school related. I would say that my phone is the most effective technology I use everyday due to the fact that you can do so many different tasks/things on it. If I did not have my phone I would have to find different ways to communicate with friends and family, and keep myself entertained. Which would be hard for me to do without it, and I know that is probably a problem. If I did not have it I would also have to find a way to just function. My phone is my life and it has everything I need. A few years ago I got an ipad thinking it would be better than my phone because I could also use it as a computer but it turned out not to be true and I find myself not using it as often. It is probably due to its size and how I do not have cellular for it. I could live without my chrome book fine because I can use my phone, ipad or mac. 

  265. PYOT from AO: Out of all the technology that you use, what do you think is the most important and effective one? What would be different about your lifestyle and routine if you didn’t have it? Why?

    This is a clear answer, but my phone. The phone has downsides, but it’s my most used and useful device. To start, I can contact all of my friends, family, and teachers at the click of a button. I don’t have to wait months, even years to see my grandparents, with my phone I can easily call them and have a conversation with them. Along with that, I can email my teacher past school hours to talk to them about things Im not understand, or feedback on projects. Also, It gives both me and my parents a sense of safety because they always have my location. If im ever in danger, or they simply just need to see where i am, they can do so. Finally, its honestly so resourceful. I honestly don’t know what I would do without google. I cant imagine having to actually read books to seek information. Honestly if I could only use one app for the rest of my life, it would be google.

    • I agree with all your points. However I do find it interesting that if you only had to use one app it would be Google because surprisingly, I don’t really search things on Google. I don’t use it very often.

  266. During class, we discussed what type of economy America has. Add onto the discussion, give more examples of what type of economy America has. Why do you think this?

    America gives not only a more capitalist economy, but also a more capitalist society were if you wanna be successful, you had to achieve the most part of it by your own, but there’s also some socialists characteristics on America’s economy like the public schools and other types of services like Police and Firemen, and also is interesting to see the polarization of economy’s view between Democrats and Republicans with Democrats being more in favor of Socialism and Republicans preferring much more the Capitalism, and also is interesting to see that most part of the American Continent there’s this Polarization between Capitalism and Socialism like Brazil, Argentina, Colombia and Mexico.

  267. Read about the working conditions of mill girls in Lowell, as well as the accidents and negligence that occurred. What stands out to you as interesting a/o surprising

    One thing that surprises me is that the Chiefs of industries and other businesses really don’t used to have any kind of morals and empathy with their workers, the workers were treated like animals just to have extreme quantity money coming to the ‘Big bosses’ of the company, and also they did this to Women and Child what is horrible.

  268. PYOT from a peer: Check out this link on The 7 Most Dangerous Technology Trends, and share thoughts on what technology sounds useful and improves everyday life, and what could really be easily used to harm us. Which of the 7 was surprising to you, which was predictable, and why? 

    1. Drone Swarms

    I think that this is actually very smart as it is like swarming insects and can help overwhelm the sensory of their enemies in order to get an advantage. When in war anything you can do to weaking your enemy is helpful. But they can also be used to find where people are if there are cameras attached to them. Another benefit of this technology is the fact that they can be programmed to do certain things which probably would have the greatest effects possible. I think that this is very smart and a good technological invention but probably has many flaws and doubts so I do not think it is going to quickly grow populations around the world. Also people might get their hands on these and misuse them which already happened.  This technological invention does not surprise me a lot because over the years drones have become more popular for many different reasons like for videos or even drown firework shows, 

    2. Spying Smart Home Devices

    I don’t think that this is the best thing ever because now all of the data that companies have gotten from you talking with your phone around or alexa, what you search, what you watch and every single thing you do is now getting tracked and companies are selling their data about it. Which is very scary and at some point will harm us. Literally everything we do is getting watched or listened to in some way. Even though companies say that they are keeping your data  “private” are they really?

    3. Facial Recognition

    This can be used as a good thing and a bad thing for sure. Like being able to unlock your phone from facial recognition or tracking down people who did bad things from a camera catching it and recognizing their face is a good thing that facial recognition does. It can monitor streets and catch people jaywalking or making sure they are wearing a facial covering.  But it can be used as a bad thing as people can be found guilty of things they did not do. But this can happen for anything. This one has a good purpose and is a good technological invention in my opinion

    4. AI Cloning

    AI cloning is cool to think about but also very scary.  Thinking about you talking to your phone and it can create a snippet of what sounds like you talking is freeky. The fact that AI can take like 10 photos or videos of you and it is able to create a clone of you that looks realistic and be a really cool thing and a scary thing that could be misused very quickly. Like people taking a few photos of celebrities off of google, saving them and then putting them into a program that can clone people. Then making the ‘celebrity’ that is a clone say or do something, send it to a random person and then make them believe that it was an actual celebrity. It is not totally AI closing but a few weeks ago someone used some AI tool and made it look like the magic kingdom was on fire making many people freak out. I would say it makes it easy to harm you and does not benefit us greatly. 

    5. Ransomware, AI and Bot-enabled Blackmailing and Hacking

    This does not benefit us and is going to harm us because as technology advances, so do hackers, and criminals. AI is making it so this can be done even more efficiently and can do things like sending fake emails or tricking people to donate money to them. There has to be more people trying to stop things because it is getting worse and worse everyday. This is definitely one of the downsides of AI and technology. 

    6. Smart Dust

    This is really cool and is going to benefit us in my opinion. Microelectromechanical systems (MEMS), are the size of a grain of salt and can be used in healthcare. “Also called motes, this smart dust has a plethora of positive uses in healthcare, security, and more, but would be frightening to control if used for evil pursuits.” Even though it can have bad things with it the intentions are positive and I think it can be very cool and helpful to society. 

    7. Fake News Bots

    This is just bad and is going to hurt society. It is a Ai system that can write fake news articles to make people think whatever is said is true and then just cause a lot of other issues. Due to the fiction that is told it is missus all of the time and tries to hurt other businesses. 

    RANKINGS OF WHAT ONES ARE THE MOST USEFUL,  IMPROVES EVERYDAY LIFE, WHAT ONES COULD EASILY HARM US, WHAT ONE WAS THE MOST SURPRISING, WHAT ONE WAS LEAST SURPRISING AND WHAT ONE WAS PREDICTABLE.

    1. Drone Swarms

    • Surprising
    • Useful

    2. Spying Smart Home Devices

    • could easily harm us
    • not surprising

    3. Facial Recognition

    • useful
    • could harm us

    4. AI Cloning

    • could easily harm us
    • cool

    5. Ransomware, AI and Bot-enabled Blackmailing and Hacking

    • could easily harm us
    • not surprising

    6. Smart Dust

    • useful
    • surprising
    • could harm us

    7. Fake News Bots

    • harmful
    • somewhat surprising
    • does not make life better or easier

    A common theme is that if it is a bad thing with technology it is not as surprising because it is just something that will happen. Also for any technology it can be used in a good or bad way but is scary how so many things can be used in a bad intention or way.

  269. Compare Socialism and Capitalism. Why is one “better” than the other? Explain.

    I personally believe if I have to choose one that Capitalism is better. Capitalism Provides more wealth as it allows the people to start businesses and also gives people more say in government as they have more power than when the government just controls everything. It helps stop an authoritarian government as it promotes more individual power and property compared to socialism having power over most things like price of products/labor, employment, healthcare. Real life examples of socialist countries are the Soviet Union or China, and North Korea. They were all dictatorships who seem that the people’s lives got worse for example, Soviet Union had millions of people starve related to their want to industrialize. China has many human rights violations, and North Korea controls its citizens while also comitting human rights violations to increase their control. It may be the temptation of power but as seen in life, socialist countries can turn down a bad path with dictatorships forming like Cuba for another example plus it is just plain dangerous for a government to control many aspects of someones life as it gives them the power use them as puppets.

  270. Compare Socialism and Capitalism. Why is one “better” than the other? Explain.

    I think that Capitalism is better and cooler, because America is a capitalist country and America I would say is pretty successful. When I hear the word capitalist I think of the mobile game capitalist empire in which I was a quintillionare, which also makes me think of money and more money the better. All of the sayings about money cant make you happy are wrong, because they have never had a little kid hat with a propeller on it and a overly sized swirly lollipop. If they did they would be jumping with joy.

    • I agree money makes happiness

    • that’s deep dude…

  271. Compare Socialism and Capitalism. Why is one “better” than the other

    I think Capitalism is better overall, economically it helps keep the economy running and socialism is susceptible to a economic meltdown, I think every person should get a equal chance at success though socialism but capitalism creates stronger people to help the overall nation succeed when socialism doesn’t create strong people through success and failure

    • I actually feel like capitalism could lead to social meltdown and socialism could keep the economy running. I feel like the economy is fragile and therefore it needs something or some people to run it. If people are able to tell people what needs to be done, then I think that it would run much more smoothly than capitalism, where people are battling with each other to become the most rich. The U.S. is a successful nation, but the People’s Republic of China is an example of a socialist nation that is still doing good.

      • I think that this could be seen during something like the Great Depression and stock market crashes. An ordered society where everything is shared out just makes more sense to me than the current economic battlefield that the U.S. has right now

  272. PYOT from AO: Out of all the technology that you use, what do you think is the most important and effective one? What would be different about your lifestyle and routine if you didn’t have it? Why?

    I would have to say that my phone is the most important source of technology in my life. It is the main source I use to communicate with my friends and family so without that I feel like I wouldn’t have much of a social life except for the times I am physically with people. I find that the only way I can really keep in touch with my friends is through my phone because I don’t see them a lot during school and I have a busy life outside of school too so it’s hard to find time to catch up and hang out with friends. However I am able to keep up with them on social media so we don’t grow apart. This is similar to my family because a lot of them live very far away and I am lucky to see them 3 times a year but it is nice to be able to stay in touch with them and keep up with their life. What I am trying to say is that I think I would feel very disconnected from society and friends/family if I didn’t have a phone.

    • Do you think that life would actually be better in some ways without a customization phone due to it’s harsh nature of inducing stress and anxiety? I mean, I feel like there are other ways of communication and expression that exist right now and will possibly be made in the future that can solve this entire issue.

      • I think that life might be better without phones because of all of the anxiety it can bring. It allows me to do things that create anxiety like always checking power school to see what I got, or having to always make sure I have it because of seperation anxiety I sometimes get. Also just all of the bad things people can text and put on social media just causes a lot of issues. Personally it is like I can not live without it which is very un-healthy. During the summer I had to set a screen time for my self because I would find I would spend way to much time on it.

        • The thing is that I think we have to ask ourselves if the good aspects of phone outweigh the bad. I believe that the good aspects completely break the scale compared to the bad aspects. The only thing causing these feelings of stress and anxiety are social media which is just a fraction of the full functionality of a phone. I think that changes can be made to the phone & social media in order to get rid of these negative feelings.

      • I agree with you point on how there are sources of communication outside of our phones but they are a lot less efficient. With our phones we can communicate with people through the click of a button. If we didn’t have things that easy we would have to be mailing people or using landlines which a lot of people don’t even have anymore. Getting rid of phones would be better for peoples mental health and physical health even but it would make a lot of other things way harder.

    • I agree with you. I can not live without my phone as it is the main thing I spend my time on. I can live without my computer, Ipad, airpods and really any other technology. My phone is my life, when I am bored I go on it, I communicate with my family and friends it is just a huge part of my life. With out my phone I just feel I am missing a part of me.

  273. Spring is coming up soon! What do you think about the origins of early Easter? Is it what you expected?

    Personally, I am a Christian and already know what Easter is about, I was just curious to see whether the article said the same thing that I believe. I know that it is the Sunday that Jesus was resurrected after dying from his crucifixion on Friday. I think it is interesting that the holiday itself came later, but people still celebrated his resurrection as a holiday before it happened. Also, it is pretty cool that the word Easter comes from an unknown origin. You would think that they would know considering how popular this holiday is, especially regarding Christians around the world. I find it weird that at first, Easter was a large controversy in Christianity. I honestly never knew how they picked the date for Easter because it had to be on a Sunday, but always falls on a different day. This article cleared that up for me when I read that now it falls on the first Sunday after the first full moon after the spring equinox, so Easter can happen any day between March 22 and April 25. I think that it is pretty cool, but personally, I like it better when it is later in April since it will be warmer. So yes, I would say that the origin of Easter is what I expected.

  274. Spring is coming up soon! What do you think about the origins of early Easter? Is it what you expected?

    I wasn’t really surprised by the actual origin, as I already knew that it was a religious holiday celebrating the resurrection of Jesus Christ, but I was surprised to read about the origins of some modern day Easter customs. Decorating eggs I thought was just because eggs represented spring and new life but it was actually because they didn’t eat the eggs their chicken’s laid during the “Holy Week” and instead decorated them. Easter eggs hunts were popularized by the white house, which I thought was interesting too.

  275. Out of all the technology that you use, what do you think is the most important and effective one? What would be different about your lifestyle and routine if you didn’t have it? Why?

    Probably Electricity, because almost everything today that is essential uses technology like, if you want to preserve some food in the fridge, the fridge uses energy to do that, to heat up food in the microwave is the same thing, smartphones just work with energy and many other things, so I think that the most important technology ever developed that I use is energy because nothing is possible without it.

  276. Is climate change the greatest threat facing the world right now? Check out this article about climate change. Should it be taken more seriously, or less seriously, why?

    I think climate change is already being taken very seriously, even in developing countries like Brazil and Argentina, most public and private schools talk a lot about the climate change in classes like history or geography, so I think is already being taken seriously, but we should still improves that model to make it more productive and faster, and also take care of some other serious problems like pollution, wars and poverty

    • I guess that climate change is being taken seriously to an extent, but I don’t believe that it is enough. Every day new legislature is being passed regarding farming for more efficient energy sources, such as the Willow Project. This money from the legislative branch should be going into repairing the Earth through things like planting more trees or doing research regarding how to get rid of CO2 levels in the atmosphere. All issues I feel are secondary to this. Global warming should terrify everyone and should be our most immediate threat.

  277. Check out this article on the challenges of combating climate change while we’re dependent on fossil fuels- why is this problem so hard to address? What are some steps going forward to address?

    I think that it is very crazy to see how far we have come with fossil fuels, but in a bad way. The amount that we use is actually insane and the fact that we need to stop using them in the next 30 years to make change. This is so insane to me because it just shows the damage that we have already done and how permanent our actions can be. This problem is so hard to address because people are SO dependent on these fossil fuels for their everyday lives, that they wouldn’t know what to do with themselves if these things were taken away. I found it interesting how the article compared the use of fossil fuels to smoking cigarettes. It’s kinda a random analogy, but actually makes a lot of sense. It said how once you start using them, you get addicted and it is near impossible to stop. This is honestly so true because I can’t even picture our lives without cars, or phones, or factories. It honestly just makes me think that we would all basically have Amish lifestyles, and knowing how addicted our society is to these things, especially phones, it would be a tricky thing to do. I think people should definitely realize how much a negative impact we are making on the environment, and try to limit their use on these things. Ways that they can do that is by having the same phone until yours actually breaks so that we aren’t being wasteful. Also, driving cars less (if possible). The government could also try to make some limits on certain uses of certain things in order to prolong the tipping point of the climate change to where we can’t go back.

  278. Share your thoughts on some of Gandhi’s controversial and outdated opinions. Did you know about them before reading this article? What do you think this says about society? Do you think that Gandhi contributed enough “good” to overshadow the “bad?” (look for Sak response to this… and feel free to respond to that too…)

    Is surprising to see that Gandhi had such opinions being that peaceful guy that he was, but we should understand that even if some made great advancements in some area, that doesn’t mean that this person has a lovely personality and is good to live with, Gandhi is a good example but also Nicola Tesla is good example, because he was fat phobic and has a lot of issues with somethings.

  279. Check out this article about the Willow Project. What are your thoughts about this huge controversy? Who does it benefit / who does it hurt? What actions should / could be taken by us people?

    I think that the ConocoPhilips should do what they want in Alaska considering that the government had approved their project, and if you don’t agree with this decision and think that energy by fossil fuels are destroying the world, you can choose to not use fossil fuels and use renewable, because there’s people who still use fossil fuels and they have that right to choose, so destroy the company for me is too far.

  280. Napoleon played a key role during the French Revolution. What do you think about the backstory of Napoleon? As well as, where would you rank him on the Political Spectrum? 

    Its hard to put him on the Political Spectrum, as he could be a lot of different things. When I did my poster on the Political spectrum I watched a video putting some important French figures on the spectrum, but they said they couldn’t put Napoleon up on there. He had some liberal reforms, such as more freedom of speech, but also turned back the clock and brought the revolution back to a dictatorship, so he could be both liberal and conservative. On my poster, I had two pictures of him and put him in both places, as I believe he isn’t just in one place.

    • I see what you mean when you can’t put him on the political spectrum. Even I wouldn’t label him as a moderate because moderates are generally seen as chill, whereas Napoleon clearly makes huge acts of agency on both sides of the political spectrum, reactionary and radical. The fact that his events kinda contradict each other adds to his fame and why he was a unique French leader.

    • After reading the article about 7 dangerous technology trends that are rising, I wasn’t surprised for some… which isn’t good.

      My first thought on drone swarms was that it reminded me of a dystopian novel I read in 7th grade which went deeper into how wars in the future are fought miles away, out in space using drone and robotic technology. I mean technically this is good that there wont be deaths, but this – like most things – can be taken advantage of. Drones in this sense I don’t think could be used for offense. It would have to be a drone of good size in order to be able to deal good damage. On the flip side, if it’s drone vs. drone, nobody dies. Although I just did say this was a good thing, no deaths equals little feeling of accomplishment. In the article, they describe drones being used for things like search-and-rescue and minimize casualties.

      Many of the technology trends that are rising dealt with identify and personal information theft. For example, Smart Home devices. It’s quite obvious that there’s a microphone in it that has to be listening. For example, Alexa has to listen for you to say “Alexa”, meaning that it’s actually always on. These smart devices can collect information on your regular habits, and what you want to buy. For example, I remember someone talking about something they wanted to buy and it popping up as an advertisement in social media just a couple of hours/days later. For Google Maps, it obviously tracks where you live and the routes you take. It is starting to be seen more today how people put cameras in things too, such as behind mirrors. People attempt to combat this issue by covering their computer camera, but nothing is ever 100%.

      Something I was on the fence about was face recognition, especially used in cities to immediately pick up on “people of interest” who could look suspicious. However, this soon just turns into racial profiling. I watched a video similar to this on how algorithms are becoming racist. In the video, it describes how people of darker skins aren’t recognized by the system.

      AI Cloning & Blackmailing didn’t surprise me. As AI develops and becomes more intelligent, it can create completely copies just based on limited materials. For example, based on the article, AI’s can make videos of you saying things that you never said, only using a snip of your voice and something like a picture. Also in the article, it talked about how humans are less and less being able to differentiate between a human and the result of AI. I found this scary.

      It’s obvious that good things can easily be taken advantage of, even seen in real life today. From what I’m seeing, this is just the start which will get worse and worse over time. I believe that the Earth is slowly and slowly killing itself with the use of technology, and humanity will eventually die because it becomes too advanced.

  281. PYOT from AO: Out of all the technology that you use, what do you think is the most important and effective one? What would be different about your lifestyle and routine if you didn’t have it? Why?

    Although phones and computers are very important, it is kinda random, but I feel like washer and dryer machines for clothes are the most important. I understand that I can obviously do more with phones but I feel like it makes you kinda grateful when you think about how your lifestyle would be if you didn’t have a washer or dryer. You would spend so much more time washing clothes rather than just throwing them in a machine, clicking a button, going to do something else, and then coming back to them clean. I feel like dryers aren’t as important because I do air dry a lot of my clothes, however, it does make it a lot easier and speeds up the drying process so much. I would definitely spend more time washing clothes and procrastinating on it. I just think that I have obviously become so used to having it, that my lifestyle would be completely different without it.

  282. Your thoughts about strange lesser-known events in history?

    Something that really struck me by surprise was that an Emu war existed. I think that it is crazy and strange that Emus could attack an entire civilization and start a whole war. It took a whole army of farmers with machine guns to try and fight them off. I think that if a giant mob of Emus were running towards me I would be pretty scared. It sounds kind of stupid but they are pretty big animals and seem to be pretty fearless. The emus were trying to destroy the farmers crops.

    • The thought that there was an Emu war is crazy. It makes sense why it happened but it is just hard to comprehend that there was a whole army of farmers with machine guns trying to fight with them. Emus look very scary, so I would also be very scared if there was a lot of Emus running towards me.

  283. PYOT from AO: Out of all the technology that you use, what do you think is the most important and effective one? What would be different about your lifestyle and routine if you didn’t have it? Why?

    Its hard to say which out of ALL the technology created which one is the most important and effective. There’s just so many new technology as well as old. I think we cant really count super advanced stuff that is being created and stuff like Satellites and other tech that NASA uses for example. I think they probably have the strongest tech. But then again if you think about the technology that helps keep people alive, its hard to say. But out of all the technology that I use, which is mostly my phone, or my Chromebook for school, I would say that my phone is more important and effective. I know that all my schoolwork is on my Chromebook, but with all the things that administrators block, it ruins its effectivness. For example, my phone has no limits on what I can research and who I can talk to. It also has a way to call 911 and other emergency lines. I think my life wouldnt be drastically changed but it would be different. I’m not super addicted to my phone, so I think my routine would be the same. But the way that I contacted my friends and family would be a lifestyle change because I wouldn’t have text, Snapchat, or call. While I don’t NEED those things because I see my family and my friends I see at school, it would certainly change the things I do and the way they are done. I think this is because people are so used to having cellphones that they don’t know what their life would be like without it.

    • I agree that it’s hard to choose what technology is the most important when we live in a world full of it. Deciding which invention of technology comes down to what aspect of life we find the most important. Is it relaxation, which entails spas, massage technology, etc? Is it traffic and transportation, which includes trains, airplanes, cars, and bicycles? Is it communication and efficiency, such as phones, computers, and tablets? For me it’s between transportation and communication. Communication allows for far places around the globe to connect in just a couple of seconds, but transportation allows you to actually get to these other places around the world. At the end of the day, I think that communication and efficiency prevails with transportation just a few steps behind. If I didn’t have communication and efficiency, most things today would have to still be done by hand or in a more difficult manner, like mathematics, using a flashlight, doing schoolwork (virtually) checking the weather, and even checking the time. In terms of communication, I simply wouldn’t be able to reach important people in the time needed. However, without transportation, the effects felt are just as strong. Getting to school would be difficult, especially getting to hospitals in short amounts of time and going grocery shopping (which includes to AND from).

  284. Check out this link on The 7 Most Dangerous Technology Trends, and share thoughts on what technology sounds useful and improves everyday life, and what could really be easily used to harm us. Which of the 7 was surprising to you, which was predictable, and why?

    I think the most Surprising one for me was the AI Cloning, It is really dangerous to have an AI created by someone with bad intentions to make fake images or audios of a specific person to destroy this person career can work if well planed and a good AI, but also the the other technologies like Facial Recognition and the Spying devices are also pretty scary.

  285. The “Fish Wives” were responsible for the March on Versailles. Is there anything interesting about them? Why were they known as “Fish Wives?

    I thought their nicknames were pretty interesting, like fish-lag or fishlass. In old English wife actually meant women, which makes a lot more sense because they weren’t the “wives of fish”. I’m not surprised that they were known for being very crude, with their colorful language, smoking, and dress. They were very loud because they needed to in order to sell their fish fast. It sounds like a hard profession, but it makes sense that they were able to overtake the palace at Versailles since they were very strong and bold women.

  286. Check out  these articles  and tell me what you think – should these statues come down?  What should / could we do with images and monuments that reflect imperial heritages of European / American cultures?

    I think that these statues and memories of that period of these countries should not be erased, but they should be preserved because even if this things represent bad times of these countries, this things also is history and can be used to discover secrets of the past and mainly to show people what’s right and wrong and to not make the mistakes of the past.

  287. PYOT from a peer: Check out this article about the Willow Project. What are your thoughts about this huge controversy? Who does it benefit / who does it hurt? What actions should / could be taken by us people?

    When I chose this post to respond to, I had never heard of the Willow Project before and didn’t know what it was. I soon realized that it is an oil drilling venture on Alaska’s North Slope which is owned by the government. Where this project is set to happen is planned to hold 600 million barrels of oil and that the oil would take years to reach. After learning this I have already developed my opinion on it a little bit. One, I feel like that it is good that we are finding it since it is very necessary to us however, I feel like once people know they have a lot of something, they start to use it more generously and I feel that they would go through it faster than we should as well as speeding up the process of killing the environment. This would benefit mostly companies and manufacturers in the US but I think that it is more harmful than helpful. The people that live in Alaska would really be affected by this and wouldn’t like it. I feel that this would pollute the air there so much and cause a lot more ice to melt which is what we’re trying to get away from. I think that we should just learn to better conserve our oil so these measures don’t have to be taken just yet. I think that this project should eventually happen, but people need to be smarter about their use of oil first.

    • It makes me wonder what drilling in Alaska will actually do for the environment. I know it will probably kill some of the wildlife, but what else? 600 million barrels of oil which could take decades to get is at our fingertips with this idea, which enables us to not have to worry about running out of energy, maybe even putting that energy to different uses. What matters most to me is if this is a more environment-friendly solution compared to what we are doing now… burning fossil fuels.

      • I agree, Fennell. I feel like we need to know all of the information in order to have a set opinion on this matter. Regardless of what happens, there is pros and cons regarding our needs as well as the safety of the environment. The ideal would be for it to produce as much energy as possible while also being safe for the environment, but I feel that it usually leans more in one way than the other rather than being a nice middle.

  288. PYOT from a peer: Take a look at more facts on Karl Marx. Are there any facts that you find surprising or interesting?

    Something I found interesting about Marx was that he had a thick accent and that made him a better figure. I would think that if he was different from the people that he was ruling and came from a different place then he wouldn’t be that popular. He also had a lisp and apparently that didn’t help him with his popularity. I would think that the accent would be more hated than the lisp was. Another fact was that he would ride a donkey drunk around the city. This surprised me that he was still able to be a good leader even if he was doing this kind of stuff. I thought less people would take him seriously if he was acting this way and being irresponsible.

    • I also found it funny that Karl Marx had a heavy accent unlike the rest of the people around him. It kinda contrast his idea of communism that everyone is the same. He seemed to really stand out against people. I also know that I can’t understand people that have a lisp. Maybe Karl Marx had originally made speeches about his ideas but found that people couldn’t understand him as much. So he switched to books which do not rely on how you talk but just pure thoughts. I agree, I honestly don’t know how people supported him too he seemed like such a weird person.

  289. PYOT from a peer: Take a look at more facts on Karl Marx. Are there ay facts that you find surprising or interesting?

    Going into this, I honestly had no clue who Karl Marx even was. I quickly realized that he is well known for his impact on communism. I find it interesting that he is known well as the “father of communism”. I think that it is pretty cool how his family had a long line of rabbis which his father broke to become a lawyer. I think that this definitely set an example for Karl as it kinda showed him to follow his dreams and to be passionate about them. Also, his father even changed religions in order to actually become a lawyer showing the measures he went to in order to do what he wanted to do. I find it very random that the article mentions how he had a lisp. I feel like that small piece of information did not impact my thoughts about him. Also, the article mentions how he used to drink, fight, and carry a pistol around. He carried a pistol because the reactionaries would get into fights with people. I think this does show how strongly he believed in his opinions since he was a liberal, some may even say radical. Also, I find it cool to see how much of a passion he had for writing. He wrote a novel at age 19, ran a newspaper, and tried to run another newspaper. That in my opinion shows dedication. One main thing that Marx advocated for in communism was the abolition of private property. A little bit after in the article, it says how this actually ended up backfiring and resulted in millions of deaths and that Joseph Stalin actually took advantage of this. That is honestly interesting to me, to see ones opinion have so many consequences. I know that is common however this is crazy to me. It is also interesting to read about his thoughts on religion. His belief was compared to “a heart in a heartless world” which is an interesting analogy, but it makes sense. It kinda shows it’s effect and how it makes people think. Overall, I think that he was a very interesting person with an insane past.

  290. Based on our conversations of nationalism, ethnic identities, and homogeneous and heterogenous societies, check out this article on the most / least “diverse” societies in the world – what facts or trends are interesting or surprising to you? What do we learn from any of this info? What might peeps “miss-learn” or assume incorrectly based of this info?

    Diversity is something that has a huge difference between countries because it really depends on the history of the country itself to determine if it is a diverse country or not, and also it depends much on the institution that decided if that country is diverse or not like the U.S who has a lot of immigrants but is not defined as a diverse country

  291. PYOT from a peer: Take a look at more facts on Karl Marx. Are there any facts that you find surprising or interesting?

    It’s cool to see that even that these famous people look like they want to change the world and look tough, they are still humans and have frustrations, fears, characteristics and family.

    • I agree, Henrique. Sometimes people feel that they have to be perfect in order to make a difference, however this article proves that thought wrong! I think it is cool to see how Marx overcame his flaws and still did incredible things.

  292. Your thoughts about strange lesser-known events in history?

    1. Dancing Plague of 1518
    • I find this a very odd event. How do people just get the urge to dance? Not just a couple people though, over 400! That’s just plain weird to me. The fact that it led to injury makes sense. People could get hurt dancing or be sore, fine. But death?! Thats just very random to me.
    1. The Great Emu War
    • I find it weird that it says that they went to war with the emus. Thats like saying that exterminators go to war with bugs and rodents. The fact that these Australians brought machine guns is insane. Like how did they think of this rather than maybe trying to scare them away rather than kill them off if they’re getting to the crops? Kinda crazy to think that it actually made a large impact on history.
    1. The Tsunami Bomb
    • I think it is weird that people even came up with this in the first place. But the fact that New Zealand was actually trying to put it into action? That is kind of weird to me like it makes me wonder how they even do that. Like a giant water balloon is what it makes me think of.
    1. The Dancing House of Prague
    • After reading this small passage about this, my first thought is how is it controversial? I think it is interesting how the article says that it defies convention. It is a symbol of artistic freedom and to be different from architectural norms. That is kinda random in my opinion. Like obviously it is lesser known for a reason since it is clearly not that important.
    1. The Forgotten Female Samurai
    • The first thing that this article reminds me of is that other CP prompt about that female pirate that conquered like 3x more than Blackbeard did. I think it is pretty cool how these women got into samurai. The article says that people usually think of men, and not gonna lie, that is what I think of too since you don’t see to many females in the art.
    1. The Voynich Manuscript
    • I think it is cool how there are some languages and hieroglyphic type things that we don’t understand yet. I have always wondered how people even figure out the meanings of these kind of things but it is very interesting to see what these scientists come up with. I think it is really cool that so many people are working together to figure out this secret language, but similar to what I was saying before, I wonder how they come to conclusions on what each one means.
    1. The Forgotten Pyramids of Sudan
    • I think that it is really cool how Egypt is not the only place that has pyramids. As the article correctly said, most people only correlate pyramids to Egypt which does kinda close off out mids to other locations that may have them. 
    1. The Great Molasses Flood
    • The first thing that I really notice is that this happened in Boston. That is kinda random in my opinion. This is a really weird thing that happened in my opinion because it is about how this storage tank released a “deadly tidal wave” of syrup causing destruction. Like I don’t even know how to approach this it is just so random. All I can think about is that it reminds me of the movie Cloudy With a Chance of Meatballs and, how did they even go about cleaning that up as well as where did they get so much syrup?
    1. The Female Computers of Nasa
    • I think that it is really cool the amount of involvement that women had in NASA. I think it is so cool that these women were able to make these crazy calculations without any technology. It makes you think about how much we rely on technology for things much simpler than that. It is so interesting how much of an impact these women made and how much they helped NASA!
    1. The Dog That Saved Antarctica
    • I think it is pretty cool even just by reading the title of this section. A dog saved Antarctica. Pretty insane. I think it is so cool that a simple sled dog was able to make so much of a difference in Antarctica’s history!
    • I agree I think that the Emu War is really absurd. Honestly I don’t why people would use machine guns against emus. In my opinion emus don’t even look that viscous and that people couldn’t just capture or keep them tamed. I also found it kind of strange that the weirdest animals live on the Australian continent. Not only are there tons of emus that were roaming around I know there were tons of spiders,rats,and snakes that also roam that continent. In my opinion emus would not be my first choice in animals to get rid of especially since they aren’t the deadliest of animals.

  293. Your thoughts about strange lesser-known events in history? 

    One event in history that I found interesting was The Tsunami bomb. Scientists in New Zealand made a secret plan to create a bomb so powerful it could flood entire coastal cities. This is really smart as most places were trying to make bombs to just drop on cities and openly declare war but if they hid them like New Zealand was trying to do then the coastal cities would just think the tsunami was natural and not a nation trying to attack them. This was very smart by them and a good decision if they didn’t want to or have enough resources to go to war. 

    Another event that I did know and had learned about was the Great Molasses flood in boston. This was one of the most interesting events on the list as it didn’t really have anything to do with guns and war and was about how the sticky substance, Molasses, destroyed a whole city. I found this to be a really weird decision to put so much Molasse in a very badly constructed tank high in the air. This one was very avoidable and was pretty much just caused by dumb decisions. 

    The Forgotten Pyramids of Sudan were interesting to me because I thought that pyramids were only constructed in Egypt and not anywhere else in the world. There are believed to be more than 200 pyramids in Sudan, where almost all are located on the Island of Meroe. I would not have expected this and want to learn more about it as I’ve never even heard of other pyramids. I also wonder how these were constructed and if they used the same materials and methods of constructing them that the Egyptians did.

    • Yeah, the three moments you picked were the 3 I thought were the most interesting.

      The Tsunami bomb was a really cool idea because it was so powerful and creative. The other side probably would not expect it and when it came they could not do a lot to stop it. I really want to know how much time and effort they put into it because it seems very complex.

      The Great Molasses Flood was really interesting as once people got stuck in it there was no good way to get out due to the sticky nature. I think that it would have been fun if there was not a lot but when it is a flood that is different. It just feels like something out of a cartoon that little kids would watch.

      I think that the Forgotten Pyramids of Sudan are really interesting because they were made neighboring Egypt and are not really know. This would make sense because Egypt wants to show off their Pyramids and make them look even better than they are. I think it is just interesting that they have been so Forgotten because it is a huge feat to make Pyramids.

  294. What are your thoughts on the origins and customs of Groundhog Day?

    Personally, I love groundhogs day so much. Even though I don’t think that  Punxsutawney Phil can actually predict the weather, its still a fun and engaging day. I know that some people find it silly or dumb its a very fun day for my family. My family always gets together to see what the weather is going to be like. Honestly even though its very unbelievable the whole concept of groundhog predicting the weather, but its still very fun to think about.

    • I agree Hannah. In my personal opinion, it is a pretty stupid day, however, it is kinda funny how much society loves this groundhog. I don’t usually pay any mind to the holiday itself or what comes of it but I do think it is pretty funny.

  295. PYOT from AO: With Easter coming up, where did Easter egg hunts come from? What cause them to start happening? Your thoughts on this?

    I find it kinda interesting that in some pre-Christian societies, eggs were associated with new life. I find this very interesting because I figured that some people who didn’t celebrate the religious aspect of the holiday just made this up in order to enjoy it more, kinda like Santa on Christmas. It makes sense now though that eggs are so often correlated with Easter because of this. The hunt itself though, comes from Germany. At first, I am thinking to myself that if the egg represents life, is searching for an egg “searching for life” or “life with Christ” something like that. That is my thought after reading that the egg represents life. The real reason is actually because Martin Luther organized egg hunts for his congregation where the men would hide these eggs for the children and women to find. This would relate to the women that found Jesus’ empty tomb. That is actually a pretty cool connection to make. I honestly find that so crazy that Martin Luther was involved in this though. When I thought of this idea for a PYOT, I had no idea that it would directly relate to somebody we actually learned a lot about in this class. That to me is such a crazy coincidence.

  296. I personally find cats to be better companions to dogs largely due to their serene and calm nature. Their calmness is a soothing presence in a home, providing a peaceful environment that many individuals, myself included, greatly appreciate. Additionally, while dogs possess their own unique qualities, they can sometimes be a bit too much to handle, especially when their boundless energy leads to a need for constant engagement and activity. This can be overwhelming, especially for those who seek a more relaxed and low-maintenance pet. Cats, with their self-sufficient attitudes and quiet companionship, makes them better than dogs in my opinion.

    • I agree, I personally think it all depends on the type and breed of dogs and cats for their personalities. Like some cats are higher energy and love bringing mice and other creatures into your house but then others are very quiet and you might not see them often. For dogs it is a little harder to have a quiet companion due to them always wanting love and wanting to play with you. I would say I like dogs better because I have one and I am allergic to cats. But both of them are good companions. Like if you want a pet that you do not have to walk often and deal with all of the chores of them then get a cat. But if you want a pet that is a little bit more high maintenance and likes to go outside than a dog is a perfect fit. For the best animal for kings and queens I would say a cat is better if you are always busy but dogs are also great if you want to spend quality time outside and with them.

  297. I’d prefer to be a doctor than a pirate or banker. Doctors have the opportunity to make a difference in people’s lives, providing care and comfort during their most vulnerable times. The job security in the medical field is typically strong, as healthcare is a constant need regardless of economic problems.

    • Yeah, I feel that with being a doctor there are many different types and fields you can go into. Like a cardiologist or a pediatrician for example. Which are two very different roles but it is still a doctor. You get to help people but you also might see people die or bad things which makes it sound not as good. I never thought of the job security but that is a good point. Unless you do something really bad then you will probably keep the job because hospitals and doctors offices are always looking for more people to work. Also doctors are always needed no matter where you are and what it is for.

  298. Check out some of the lesser known but interesting (often strangely so…) facts from the French Revolution – what stands out to you as most interesting? most disturbing?  most reflective of what’s happening in French revolutionary society? Each and any of those Qs, or from any other angles that catch your attention: 

    One of the most interesting facts that stood out to me while reading this was “Implemented in France during the revolution, the metric system is today the official system of weights and measurement in all nations – except for Burma, Liberia and the United States.” I found this interesting because we mostly see the French Revolution as a bad time in history associated with violence and murder. But this fact shows how there were some good things that came from the revolution. I also found this interesting because of how the metric system is still alive today and is still used everywhere today besides the U.S.

    One fact that I found disturbing was “According to legend Robespierre was laid face-up on the guillotine – considered a more demeaning death because it was messier and the victim would see the blade falling. No reliable historical sources confirm this story, however, so it is probably untrue.” Even though this fact might not be true it is still very disturbing. Imagine laying on a guillotine and having to just sit there and look up at the blade that is going to come down and kill you. I also found this disturbing as his executioners believed he deserved to be killed like this because he was responsible for so many beheadings.

    The fact that I think is the most reflective of what’s happening in the French revolutionary society was “Under the Law of Suspects even the wrong choice of phrase could lead to one’s arrest and trial. There were at least two cases where the accused was put on trial for referring to another person as Monsieur (‘Mister’) instead of the mandated revolutionary greeting Citoyen (‘citizen’).” This fact reflected what was going on in the French revolutionary society as it shows the mass amount of violence and force used over the smallest things. It shows how unstable the government and law was during this time and how bad things really got. 

    Another fact that caught my attention was “On October 31st 1793, 21 people were reportedly guillotined in Paris, in the space of just 38 minutes.” which was also reflective of what was happening in French revolutionary society. This shows how bad the mass murders were and how out of control they were. 21 executions in 38 minutes means there was 1 execution every 1 minute and 8 seconds which is crazy and totally unnecessary.

  299. I think it was better to be an American colonist rather than a british citizen because of the difference in independence and freedom. American colonists, often had access to land and the opportunity for ownership, which was less common in Britain due to the established hierarchy and land distribution. This allowed for a sense of independence and the ability to cultivate a self-sustaining lifestyle. While, many British citizens, particularly the lower classes, faced limited social mobility and often lived under challenging conditions with crowded cities and poor working environments.

  300. “Hamilton” the musical has brought a lot of attention to Alexander Hamilton’s story, but its purpose leaned more towards entertainment rather than historical facts. The musical dramatizes events and emphasizes certain aspects of Hamilton’s life and he’s not as important as they made him seem.

    Although Hamilton was an influential founding father, he was just one of many who played significant roles in the formation of the United States. He was never president, and some of his most ambitious ideas, like his suggestion for a monarchy-like government, weren’t adopted.

    The musical also doesn’t fully dive into the complexities of his political and personal life, such as his contentious relationships with other founding fathers. I think that Hamilton’s importance is significant, but the musical amplifies his legacy to a great extent.

  301. It is interesting that groundhog day traditionally related to Christianity. People used to believe that the behavior of hibernating animals could predict the arrival of spring. When this idea spread to North America, they associated it with a groundhog which I find strange because they could have chosen any hibernating animal and they chose one that in my opinion isn’t very interesting or popular. Nowadays thousands of people gather to witness the groundhogs predictions which I think is insane that this tradition has been going on for so long and is a huge deal.

    • Yeah, the whole idea of groundhogs day is cute but very random and strange. I do not understand why people will travel to see a groundhog predict if spring will come early or not because it is only like 50% accurate. I would say this tradition was really cool and who ever started it might be very smart if it was more than 400 years ago. Also I would probably say that they might have a good idea of how weather can determine when/if spring comes. I honestly don’t even think I have never watched this happen. I always just hear people talk about it after. So I wonder if this tradition slowly starts to stop being so big, if people will miss it.

      • Thinking about this, I guess groundhog day makes more sense. Since animals that hibernate have a natural sense on when to end hibernation, it makes sense to track this behavior. Although they may not always be accurate, their behavior directly tells us the coming of spring, almost like how trees/flowers begin to wilt and blossom. This gives us an approximate time, however it shouldn’t be regarded to as 100% accurate.

  302. I think it’s interesting Mary wore what was considered undergarment as “outside clothes” because I thought she would feel judged but she didn’t and started a new fashion trend

    • I feel like that is a bold move just because she was so hated and she probably did not want anything else to make her more hated. But I also feel like she might not care at that point because she was so hated. She was someone who like to start fashion trends so it sort of make sense why she did that.

  303. The French Revolution and the COVID-19 pandemic are distinct events with very different impacts and causes. The French Revolution was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France that lasted from 1789 until 1799. It was marked by its significant violence, including public executions, and was driven by the desire for a change in governance, with the people rising against the monarchy to establish a republic. While, the COVID-19 pandemic is a global health crisis that began in 2019.The main concern during the pandemic has been the fear of disease, with efforts focused on preventing the spread of the virus, developing vaccines, and treating those who are sick. There’s no intent for political revolution; the actions were aimed at protecting public health. So, even though they the people were all driven by some type of fear I don’t think they relate to eachother. 

    • You are so right. The French Revolution and the COVID-19 pandemic are indeed distinct events with very different impacts and causes. The French revolutions was a time of intense social and political change, driven by the desire for a new form of governance. It involved radical actions and violence as people rose against the monarchy.

      • Its kind of funny to compare these two events, but I can see why they do. As you said Mady, the revolution was a huge social and political change, so was COVID. I’m not sure how COVID was between the other two towns, but at least in Bolton, the friends you came out of covid with usually stuck through out middle school. Along with that, just looking back on the whole pandemic, people who used to be very socially active came out of the pandemic different, to say the least. Some people came back very reserved and quiet. And I seriously believe that the pandemic had something to do with that. I believe this can connect to the Revolution because after all that was done, I assume many people where stuck trying to avoid all that was happening, and that trauma might’ve changed their social lives and made them more reserved.

  304. A theory I find interesting about Valentines day is the Lupercalia festival. This festival has rituals that were preformed to purify and protect the city. This is a brutal celebration but it also included pairing men and women through a lottery system which is interesting as nowadays there is apps. It is crazy how these origins have shaped these holidays and the culture around them nowadays.

    • I also find it interesting the change between the lottery system and now dating apps. This aspect itself emphasizes the false love back then since they were simply paired and how love moving to become more genuine during the Valentines day that we have today and also everyday.

  305. PYOT from AO: Since St. Patrick’s Day is coming soon, how did the phrase, “luck of the Irish” come about? What did you find interesting? Your thoughts?

    The phrase “luck of the Irish” came from the most famous and successful miners in the gold and silver rush years. These miners were of Irish American birth and there good fortune and association with Irish descent made the phrase “luck of the Irish. Something that I thought was interesting was the fact that the term wasn’t of Irish origin. I found this interesting as when I think of Irish people I think of how lucky they are. I would not of expected a phrase like this to come from some Irish American born miners.

    • It was surprising to me too Zach. But I think that if it was to come from Irish descent it could’ve been seen as stuck-up in a way. So it makes me feel better that they where given this name rather then taken it. I also find it Ironic that our basketball team, the Celtics, Is in one of the most Irish cities in America. Along with that the Celtics are tied for the most MBA championships of all time.

  306. The origins of early Easter is really fascinating. I didn’t expect it to have roots in ancient pagan. The celebrations are also interesting but expected because they symbolize the arrival of spring and rebirth. Though I did expect it to be more centered around what it has now become associated with which is the resurrection of Jesus Christ.

  307. Spring is coming up soon! What do you think about the origins of early Easter? Is it what you expected?

    One thing that caught my attention in the article was the section about the Easter bunny. I thought it was interesting because the Easter bunny has absolutely nothing to do with the origins of Easter at all and it is kind of just something that America adapted to in the early 1900’s. I think it’s crazy because that was not even that long ago if you think about it. It also makes me think about how different cultures see different holidays. The article also said in other countries there is no animal to represent Easter and in some there are but it is not a bunny. In Switzerland it is a cuckoo and in Westphalia it is a fox.

    • That’s interesting, but it does make sense that the Easter bunny was more of an added mascot as it seems like a generally just fun aspect of Easter and has nothing to do with the origins or religious celebration part. I feel like we see this a lot in holidays where fun mascots are added, probably for marketing and for the children’s benefit

  308. Your thoughts on the not-so-sweet origins of Valentine’s Day?

    I think that the origins of Valentine’s Day were really gross .First of all they sacrificed goats and dogs and spread the remains on women. But even weirder the women liked this and it was sort of a tradition. They liked it because men would choose the women to wipe the remains on and it was their way of match making. I just think that is just a very gross and gruesome way of finding someone to match with. As the holiday started to spread it started changing and people celebrated it differently so I think that is how we know it today, which is the normal Valentine’s day that does not have anything to do with slaughtering but it has to do with love. It just shows how things can change over time and the origin of things can be forgotten.

    • I agree! I never realized the origins of Valentines day and how different it is from how we celebrate it. It is so wrong in my opinion how they sacrificed goats and dogs and whipped women. It is just so interesting how Valentines day morphed into what we know it as now.

  309. PYOT from SM: Focus on the people we have already covered in unit 10 – do the nicknames given to Kings and Queens make sense? Are any of these wrong? If so, why are they wrong? Do any of the nicknames fit the person perfectly? What are your thoughts?

    Louis XIV

    • I think the nickname the “Sun King” is a very fitting name as well as being very creative. It makes a lot of sense because things did “revolve” around him in a sense so I think it is overall a great nickname for him

    Louis XVI

    • “Louis the Last” was the nickname given to Louis XVI as an offensive name. I think that this name isn’t very creative, but I feel that it gets the point across as well as being true; he was the last Louis in power as a monarch.

    Marie Antoinette

    • I think that the nicknames that she was given were very offensive but considering what happened when she was queen and what she did, I honestly don’t really blame them. A popular one was “Madame Deficit” and “L’Autrichienne” which were meant as very aggressive, rude names towards her.
    • Louis XIV’s nickname is very fitting for what he wanted. He wanted everyone and everything to revolve around him and for him to be the reason for everything that happened to his monarchy. I would say it is fitting for his goals. Louis XVI’s nickname was unoriginal but the truth due to him being the last monarch of that time. It make sense and fits and that is good. It is not making fun of him that much too. Marie Antoinette’s nicknames were very wrong and offensive but sort of make sense as she did continue to “waste Frances bank” during a financial crisis. Fashion was just to important to her and not her monarchy. Her names are wrong but kind of right for what she did.

  310. PYOT from ZM: Pick a current event from the news, provide a link to an article you read and talk about why you think this event is important. Provide opposing views from how the event reported? Why did you pick to write about it, how do you think this event will impact history, short term and long?

    I chose to look into the Texas wildfires https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/03/us/smokehouse-creek-wildfire-texas-sunday/index.html

    I thought this was important because of how massive these fires are. They are the biggest fires in Texas’s history and are being referred to as ‘monster’ fires. They are super dangerous and have destroyed so much land and property all across Texas. It is reported that they have crushed their crop production, killed thousands of state cattle and even two people. The worst part is that if the winds get stronger and the air dryer then the fires will just keep getting worse and worse. It’s so sad because of how much climate change is killing our earth, and how we continue to do next to nothing to try and help reverse or even just stop the effects. If we continue to do nothing not only will the earth suffer but the people will too.

  311. The French Revolution started because of many different political ideologies and beliefs. If you were alive, where would you stand on the French Political spectrum? Why? 

    I would be on the more moderate liberal side in the revolution. If people were being starved and the rulers were really bad at ruling, I would want to get rid of them but not violently. Maybe a little forcefully if they refused to give up their power, but just so they could step down and have somebody else take over. I would want to hire an economic professional to lead the people through the revolution until the financial situation was stable again. Then maybe the monarchy could be restored but with the guidance of the economic professional so they wouldn’t end up in poverty again.

    • I agree, that’s probably where I would stand too. I think France was definitely in need of the revolution and I would want the monarchy don’t but I wouldn’t be violent about it. I like the ways you suggested about changing things and I would also try and focus on helping the poorer people get more access to food and resources so something like that wouldn’t have to happen again.

      • I agree. I would not support a faulty and uncaring monarchy that continues to exert their power. I especially wouldn’t want to be caught in support of the monarchy during the Reign of Terror. I guess that having a limited monarchy with a government could work but I doubt people would be in favor to basically returning to the old system with only a few changes after everything they had to go through.

  312. Check out this link on Alexander Hamilton – What are some things you noticed about him? How did he change history, was he really as important as the musical makes him out to be?

    I feel like Alexander Hamilton deserves a bit more recognition than what he gets (not including the play). I don’t remember ever hearing Alexander Hamilton coming up during history classes when talking about the revolution, which personally I think is wrong. There are a lot of founding fathers that deserve more recognition, but Hamilton wrote 51 of the articles in the federalist papers, was George Washington’s right hand man, and was a very strategic military leader and I think he deserves more credit. The musical could have hyped him up a bit much but just in history classes I would like to see his name mentioned more.

    • I agree. I feel like in history there are so many important people that history books just don’t mention. Of course they deserve recognition, but if students learned about every important historical figure ever that deserved to be recognized, we would be studying forever.

      • That’s a good point, I guess we cant really cover everybody but I think he at least deserves more of a mention. I think there is a tendency to focus on specific people in great detail and drown out all the other ‘background characters’

        • I believe the musical did a great job at portraying the beneficial characteristics of Alexander and his accomplishments. The overall success of this musical proves how certain things can become interesting when translated into a more entertaining form.

  313. Your thoughts about strange lesser-known events in history? 

    1. The Dancing Plague of 1518:

    I think that this event is very strange. This happened in a small town in France where people started to get an uncontrollable urge to dance which led to a lot of things like exhaustion, injuries and death. This is just so weird and I really want to know what caused this to happen. The fact that it is more than just a few people makes me a little concerned. Like was there something wrong with what they were eating or where they possessed? But the fact that this uncontrollable dancing led to people dying is insane to think about. People must have had to be crazy. I personally think it would be cool if there were videos of recreating strange history events like this just because it would be funny to see and people could learn about strange lesser-known events. 

    2. The Great Emu War:

    This is just purely funny that Australia actually had a war against emus due to them wreaking havoc on farmers and their crops. This does make sense because farmers do not like when animals wreck their crops because that is a main source of income for them and emus are not known to be the most friendly creature ever. They look kinda ugly in my opinion. 

    3. The Tsunami Bomb:

    I think that this one is very smart due to it causing a lot of issues to others during WWII and possibly wrecking their plans. It is really cool how New Zealand created this plan and was able to do it. This was definitely not an easy feat and needed a lot of time and thought put into it. I really want to know how much time and thought they put into this because it was a big plan.

    5. The Forgotten Female Samurai:

    I feel like this moment is important in history because it shows that a number of women embrace being a samurai and it does not have to be associated with men. Also that women can be good at something that might seem like something men would do and it is ok. 

    6. The Voynich Manuscript:

    This just seems very weird and cool to throw. I really want to know what is written in it since so far no one has been able to read it. I think as a fun activity people should get a page of it and try guessing what it says. I think with the illustrations it would make it even more fun. I really want to know where it came from and who did it.  

    7. The Forgotten Pyramids of Sudan:

    This one is really cool and can show that things get forgotten. Like how Sudan has a vast collection of ancient pyramids that are rivals to Egypts. I feel like people might have made them not as known so Egypt looks better than it is. Making the Great pyramids seem even more of a huge feat. 

    8. The Great Molasses Flood:

    This one is purely funny. I would be terrified for my life but it just sounds like something out of a movie. Imagine there being so much molasses that you can not get out of it. But it does sound kinda good because I love anything with molasses in it. It is just such an unusual event when molasses tanks rupture and they leave a tidal wave of molasses. 

    9. The Female Computers of NASA:

    I have heard of this before because my engineering teacher last year was all about this. This is really cool because they were women first off when women were not able to do that much and they were very smart. But their jobs  had a lot of responsibilities because if they mess up then things can go wrong very quickly. This whole thing is very cool because they were like computers and paved the path for space exploration. I personally would not want to do this job because of all the pressure put onto you. 

    10. The Dog That Saved Antarctica:

    This is so sweet and stories about 4 legged animals helping people should be spread more. This dog was just a sled dog but ended up helping antarctica. Dogs are the best in my opinion. I just feel like animals get forgotten in history and they are an important part of it. 

    In general I think that more people should know about these events because they are funny and interesting in  my opinion. 

    • The dancing plague is very funny to me. I wonder if this story could have just been made up because it seems very strange for an event like this to happen. It hard to believe that people would dance themselves to death.

      • I also feel the same way. It is so odd and they don’t know the reason why these people had the urge to dance. It is just so hard to understand the reason behind it. Also the fact that people died from this is just crazy.

        • It’s interesting the historiography that goes behind the dancing plague. The dancing part was most likely applied based on the movements of the people. In reality, just from quick thought, I don’t think that the people dancing were enjoying it. I think that they could’ve been uncontrollably moving, especially in pain. These movements, almost like twitching, could be similar to that a dancer makes, hence giving it it’s name.

          • Yeah, it was so random and has no known reason. I just really want to know why it happened and why so many people died. Like did they just faint from the continuous dancing, or dehydration. I never thought of it being uncontrollable movements that were like dancing and that is the reason for its name. I was inferring that it would be actually dancing.

            • I don’t know why but it kinda reminds of the Black Death. Even though the disease wasn’t actually black, the rapid-growing and brutal nature of it gave it it’s name, which is an example of historiography. In this case, just based on the use of the word “plague” and not something like “parade” or “festival”, I automatically assume that this wasn’t as happy as I thought it out to be.

  314. What are your thoughts on the origins and customs of Groundhog Day

    I think Groundhog Day is just overall such a silly day. Men dress up in top hats and watch as the Groundhog “determines” whether or not spring will come sooner. The Groundhogs are only 50% accurate so I don’t see what all the rave is about if the decision isn’t truthful. There is also nothing special about the animal Groundhog. When the Germans settles in Pennsylvania, they just randomly chose a Groundhog. Overall, I think Groundhog Day is a fun and silly holiday to learn about in school, but I don’t think it is that significant because the Groundhogs are almost never right.

    • I agree! It is such a stupid but kind of fun thing. I think everything related to groundhogs day is just funny as men wear tall hats and watch the groundhog to determine something that is only right half of the time. People just love it to much for it not being accurate and only being a ground hog. I just don’t understand why people actually do this. It is cool if you are a little kid but other than that I don’t understand the hype about it.

  315. Share your thoughts on the “Potato King” – what are your thoughts, Tots? (…sorry)

    I think the history and methods that Fredrick the Great used is quite interesting. It was really clevor when he sort of convinced his people potatoes were valuable. I think its funny how he actually wanted people to try to steal the potatoes from his garden. He was an exceptional ruler and during a great famine, he knew that the only way for people to survive was to increase the potatoes crops. I think it’s cool that thanks to hum, potatoes are now a huge part of German cuisine.

    • I agree. It defiantly is a weird strategy to try and get people to like something but I guess it worked well since we use potatoes so much in our everyday lives. However I don’t think this strategy would have worked today!

    • Same, his tactics were very weird but effective. Him protecting his potatoes during the day but then also making them easily accessible during the night and wanting people to think they are very expensive and highly rated. Which was very smart as people started to think it was expensive and wanted to try them. He was a very smart ruler during a famine and saved many peoples lives.

  316. Your thoughts on the not-so-sweet origins of Valentines Day?

    I thought this was super bizarre, not only because of how violent it is, but also how much Valentines day has changed since the start. It’s crazy to think that what is now a sweet and sentimental holiday used to be so gruesome and violent. On Valentines day men would use animal hides to whip the women, as compared to men buying flowers now it’s crazy!. It really shows the growth and development of social norms in our society though. There has been a lot of progress in getting rid of gender imbalance and this is definitely a huge example of how far we’ve come.

    • I like your point about the growth and development of social norms. While society still has a lot more to improve, it’s definitely changed in a good way over the years. People used to celebrate violence like with the hides. Even if they thought it would help women become fertile, it’s still crazy. Logical thinking has really changed the way people think about the world.

  317. Your thoughts about strange lesser-known events in history? 

    Some of these are super interesting, but some I couldn’t help laughing at, like the Emu one. I mean I don’t like that I did that it’s wrong and violent. I just find it slightly funny in an odd way that the farmers would go to such extremes over Emus. Similarly the Dancing plague was oddly funny because of how random it is. It’s very peculiar that such a large group would feel the need to endlessly dance for no apparent reason.

    Some of these are actually super important, like the hidden figures of NASA’s early space exploration and the tsunami bomb. I knew about the NASA women because of the movie hidden figures and early childhood curiosity I guess, but I still think it’s not publicized enough considering just how important they were to NASA’s operations and missions.

    • I agree. It’s funny to picture armed Australians fighting against emus but I guess it makes sense. If animals are destroying your crops, you’re going to want to get rid of them. The Dancing Plague just seems non believable. How is there a disease that makes people dance? That just sounds crazy, but it actually caused people to get hurt and die.

      I also saw the movie hidden figures. I agree that they aren’t credited enough with how helpful they were in space missions. Also apparently dogs played a big role in saving Antarctica. It’s crazy how many big events/important people and animals there are that the average person doesn’t know about.

      • I was curious if the Dancing plague wasn’t actually a disease, but more of something like an old fashioned TikTok trend? like the tide pods thing, so many people got sick or died from that just because they saw other people doing it and I was thinking it could be similar. Like not an actual sickness that caused people to dance, just a ‘challenge’ or something like that.

        • Yeah, maybe. People definitely could’ve been dumb enough to risk their lives to do something popular. I just think dancing till you pass out and die wouldn’t become a popular challenge. I think the disease may have been something that made your limbs flail around uncontrollably and people just called it dancing.

          • That is possible, but I do honestly think people would be dumb enough considering what we’ve seen on TikTok. Though it probably more likely that they couldnt control it because why would they keep dancing when they know they were dying

  318. What are your thoughts on the origins and customs of Groundhog Day?

    I feel like Groundhogs day is really just a silly holiday meant for people to get a small laugh and maybe get their hopes up about the weather. I don’t think people generally take it that seriously except for the small Inner Circle group. I feel like the groundhogese think is a bit silly but it could just be a joke, I’m not sure. I also found it interesting that The groundhog in Staten Island was way more accurate but maybe that’s just luck or something.

    • I agree with you I also think Groundhogs Day is just a silly holiday. I never really understood it until recently it just did not really make sense to me. I guess it is just a nice holiday to have to get people excited for spring.

  319. Share your thoughts on some of the notable women of the American revolutionary war

    I found this essay very interesting. When talking about the american revolution, I would never of thought that women had such a huge role. Its kind of upsetting that these women helped america so significantly, and its rarely brought up. Personally, I think that there should be more on women in history in text books like the one we where given. It sounds corny, but it really does inspire little girls to believe they can make an impact too.

    • I totally agree! It’s actually really disappointing to know how many impactful women were skipped over in our history textbooks. I feel like they only include women when they really have to, or if they did something bad which puts such a fog over all the amazing women in history who really had a positive impact on our society. I feel like one of the only woman I can really recall from the American Revolution is Betsy Ross, which is really sad because we know she was not the only major contributor to our revolution. We definitely need updated textbooks and more information about the woman of our history because it really does make a difference in girls lives growing up.

      • What surprises me as well is the fact that textbooks are meant to take a neutral stance on history, for example not disagreeing or agreeing with an event or decision. This makes me question why women accomplishments aren’t documented, I doubt it’s because the publishers just don’t want to.

        • That came to my mind too. It’s honestly just disappointing how shadowed women in history are. It’s seriously surprising this whole topic isn’t talked about more. I wonder how some of the earliest feminists would’ve felt about this. What I mean by that is if someone like Olympe de Gouges was to speak on this topic how would she feel. Would she be happy that women are even mentioned, or would she be infuriated that they’re not spoken about enough?

          • Based on how Olympe de Gouge’s belief that The Declaration of Man and the Citizen should apply to women as well, she would be infuriated that clearly the inclusion of women isn’t as up to par as many men. I mean, I guess she would be happy that there is some inclusion, but based on her fierce nature she would continue to push for more.

  320. PYOT from AB: The French Revolution started because of many different political ideologies and beliefs. If you were alive, where would you stand on the French Political spectrum? Why? 

    Personally, I think that during the French Revolution I would’ve fallen on the more moderate side of liberal beliefs. I think that I would be pissed about the economic state and I think that if I was on the verge of starving to death I would definitely want some changes. But I don’t think that I would indivisually act against. What I mean by that is, I would attend riots and events like that, but I would never say or do anything to spotlight me. For that reason I think that I would be more on the moderate side rather then radicals. Because I wouldnt inject violence into what I belived in.

    • I agree with you. It definitely would have been hard to state your opinion about the whole thing with many different things going on at the time. I would also not trust the rulers at the time because of everything that was happening and I would be very mad and confused because the whole country of France was just falling apart.

  321. Share your thoughts on the “Potato King” – what are your thoughts, Tots? (…sorry)

    I think he is extremely creative and a good ruler compared to those who I have researched due to The French Revolution projects. I also think he was generous, though he didn’t have to make sure the people under his rule were fed, he did, and was innovative in the way he did so. He gave them potato seeds/ meals with potatoes to make sure they were full. I also think he was a big help in making people aware that potatoes aren’t poisonous like nightshade, and that they’re actually a filling and tasty side for a meal.

    • Potatoes are definitely one of my favorite foods and I am so glad he made sure the people of France were fed and introduced potatoes because I don’t know what I would do if they did not exist.

      • Your comment makes me wonder a few things. What would’ve happened if King Louis had given potatoes to the French, instead of the “Potato king”. How would the Revolution been different? Would the Revolution even have happened? How would peoples perspectives of Louis be different?

        • I think that if Kind Louis did not introduce potatoes there would have been a lot of deaths but people would also find a different food to eat during the famine. Also I feel like potatoes would be popular everywhere even if he did not do that. He was a very important person but there is many people who are more important than him.

    • Yeah, what he did was actually very smart with his tactics to make people want to eat them and then people starting to catch on to eating them in order for them to get spread even more to other places. Potatoes are amazing in my opinion and I am glad for him showing people in Europe it is ok to eat potatoes because now potatoes are very popular everywhere.

  322. Your thoughts about strange lesser-known events in history?

    The first event that I found interesting is The Molasses Flood. I think it’s interesting because it took place in Boston and I don’t know about it and that’s uncommon because I live in the state that Boston is in. I also think it’s interesting because it has to be with molasses and that is a very random food. I also started from a very small source and it’s crazy that it got that big. Another event I think is interesting is The Dancing Plague of 1518. I think it is very creepy and I’m not sure if I believe it. I just think it is very weird that people danced to death and injury. It was only about 400 people that were affected by this and maybe it had something to do with some sort of cult-ish thing because I just think that is a very weird thing to happen for it to be a “plague”.

  323. Your thoughts on the not-so-sweet origins of Valentines Day?

    To begin I think the sacrifice of a poor little innocent goat and dog is unnecessary and disturbing. Like what did the animal ever do to you. And I also don’t agree with the fact that the men would then then skin the animals and proceeded to whip innocent women with their hides. LIKE WHAT?!?!?!? It was also said that the women would line up to be physically hit by men, I understand the fact that their was an obvious power imbalance between men and women and the men could have instilled some fear in them, but at the end of the day get yourself up and walk home.

    • I couldn’t agree more with your points here. I think its just so awful to abuse women and KILL innocent animals.

    • You made some fantastic points Maddy. Its honestly just bissare to think that people used to spend valentines day that way. This really just shows how much we’ve evolved both with womens rights, and also with reguarally practiced ideas.

    • I agree! I wonder if more people knew about this now if it would affect the way we celebrate it. If you think about it, it is kind of weird that this holiday used to be so bad and we just completely covered it up and have completely changed the meaning of the holiday. It almost feels bad celebrating knowing such bad things happened.

    • I agree with you so much. The dog and goat thing is so sad and with it being whipped on women is even sadder. It is also very bad about the males abusing the females. Overall it is just such a big different and no equality.

  324. PYOT from AO: Since St. Patrick’s Day is coming soon, how did the phrase, “luck of the Irish” come about? What did you find interesting? Your thoughts?

    I think it is very interesting that the phrase luck of the Irish did not come from Ireland and it is more of an American gambling term used by gamblers. Something I also found interesting is that the ancient Celtics believed in this type of luck. We live in a state that has a team called the Boston Celtics. I think that is a good connection because maybe there is Irish heritage in Boston and the Celtics are a very lucky team.

  325. Your thoughts about strange lesser-known events in history? 

    I think they are interesting, but less important in world history.

    Emu war sounds cool. I like emus

    Tsunami Bomb sounds like like a regular bomb underwater

    The dancing house, I can;t dance, so it’s boring

    Female samurai’s are cool

    This unknown language is creepy. seems cool if its broken

    Sudan’s Pyramids are just like Egypt’s, just less famous.

    Molasses flood sounds sticky and destructive.

    Nasa female computers sound very smart

    The dog that explored Antarctica, sounds like a good dog.

    • The Emu war seems really weird but I understand why it happened because crops are very important to farmers and when something goes wrong with their crops they sometimes get furious. Emus are ugly in my opinion, they look like ostrich.

      The Tsunami Bomb was very smart due to Tsunamis being very powerful and people can not do that much to escape them except pray that they will survive it and they will still have enough things to survive.

      The Voynich Manuscript is very cool in my opinion as it has stumped many people when they try to figure out what it says and is very mysterious. There should be games where you have to try and figure out what one of the pages says of the Manuscript and the most creative one gets like a point.

      The Pyramids in Sudan should be more known as Egypt should not be the only place taking credit to making huge pyramids. I just feel like Egyptians wanted to be known for doing this massive feat and be the only ones known.

      The Molasses Flood in Boston sounds very fun but scary. Who ever created the containers the Molasses was in must have got in a lot of trouble due to the effects of molasses flooding streets.

  326. Your thoughts about strange lesser-known events in history? 

    The dancing plauge that makes people dance sounds like the song “Dancing Queen” which is cool.

    The great Emu war is one of the most important wars in my opinion because it sounds cool.

    The tsunami bomb makes no sense, you would need a lot of water to create a tsunami which wont fit in a bomb.

    The female samuris sound like they were ground breakers for women in history which makes them important.

    The great molasses flood, I think that they should have just ate all of the molasses that was flowing down the streets which might have saved some of the peoples lives that died.

    The dog that saved Antarctica sounds like a good boy whos name was Toga which sounds like Rango which was a good movie which makes him cool.

    • IF the bomb itself was powerful enough it would be able to displace enough water in order to make a tsunami probably, but I agree that a bomb can’t make a tsunami out of the blue.

  327. What are your thoughts on the origins and customs of Groundhog Day

    I think that it is cool how the men trekked to a site called Gobblers Knob and it makes it sound like the groundhog is a supervillian who ruined the day by seeing his own shadow.

    • How does the groundhog seeing his shadow make him seem like a super villain? I feel like this is a very interesting take on the holiday of groundhogs day and what it actually means to the groundhog when he sees his shadow.

      • It is because he is the bearer of bad news. Which is big vocabulary for badness.

    • I just think the concept of Groundhogs Day is weird and not needed it just does not make sense to me why it is such a big deal.

  328. I liked the song that covered Bad Romance, because it was a cover of Bad Romance.

    • could you elaborate more on this topic?

      • No

  329. Responding to:

    Peruse the U9 assignment (terms 1,2, and 3, and Q1), and the unit presentation (slides 26-32 of unit presentation in particular) that connect to the thoughts expressed in class regarding the Hobbes/Locke debate, and provide your thoughts

    I think that both arguments are too extreme. Both arguments have their pros and cons. 1 person making all the decisions overall has more flaws. (Hobbs ideology) This is because with 1 person making all of the decisions there is bound to be disagreement and disputes. Also, if 1 person is making every decision, people will become envious and want that power and would attempt to get it. One pro to this ideology is that with 1 leader decisions would be made quicker and more efficient because it doesn’t have to be approved. This is very important in times of crisis when decisions have to be made swiftly. The argument that people can do it themselves (Locke’s ideology) is overall better but has a major flaw of efficiency. This is because of the fact that if a lot of people are making decisions it will take long for them to come to an agreement. This also raises the point of what would happen If there was a tie. There’d have to be someone to make the absolute decision. This ideology is good however, because more people will have a say In what’s happening which means people in general would be happier because they’re being represented.

    • Based on your pros and cons, I find it hard to distinguish if efficiency is more important than timeliness. I think I’m going to have to go for efficiency since the outcome would have a lasting impact whereas timeliness could have rebuttals, as you said. If it’s something that is immediate like a war or collapsing economy, it gets more tricky, however I still think that efficiency is really important in these situations because if a decision is made without considering the outcome, then it’s going to make the situation even worse.

      • This is why I find that different branches of government is a good idea. The legislative has big control but the executive still has the power to make decisions along side them. They work hand in hand based on separation of powers, thus maintaining our long-lasting government.

  330. Responding to the question: Focus Themes: – any you think that I’m missing? Any really important drivers of peoples’ actions that aren’t covered in my list of 12? explain:

    I think that relationships would be another good focus theme addition. I believe this because how you are treated changes your mood which can dictate your decision making. This is shown in many past kings who’s rule would decline after the death of a wife.

  331. Since St. Patrick’s Day is coming soon, how did the phrase, “luck of the Irish” come about? What did you find interesting? Your thoughts?

    I found it interesting that it didn’t originally originate from Ireland. It kind of makes sense because it’s kind of a “saying” and I feel like Irish people wouldn’t say that about themselves because it’s like how we wouldn’t say something about Americans as a common saying. I had no idea that the saying came from the fact that Irish people mining fortunes and were considered lucky. I also wonder why the four leaf clover was considered to be a “lucky” thing and how it relates to Ireland.

    • I agree, this article was very interesting. I feel that no one who is Irish would say “luck of the Irish” because it is derogatory and people could infer that Irish are dumb and stupid. It can be used in a bad way only by saying that the Irish have luck. I also found it interesting that this did not originate in Ireland. The whole word of lucky or luck can be used in so many ways good and bad. I really do not understand that four leaf clovers make you ‘lucky” because they are more common than you would think. Also how it relates to Irish is just interesting.

      • Thanks, and Yes I agree. I wonder why and how it became related to Irish people.

  332. Check out some of the lesser known but interesting (often strangely so…) facts from the French Revolution – what stands out to you as most interesting? moist disturbing?  most reflective of what’s happening in French revolutionary society? Each and any of those Qs, or from any other angles that catch your attention:

    Many different facts surprised me and stuck out to me but there were a few that stuck out more than others. The one that said that France had 15 different constitutions since the revolution. I think that to have 15 different constitutions is insane and very excessive. Most of them weren’t even completed before a new one was created. It seemed like a waste of time and if they had just made the first one right it would have saved a lot of time. Another one that was absolutely crazy to me was that a pet dog was executed by its owner. Its owner was a raging republican who seemed to be pretty good at training dogs. He taught his dog to howl at the mention of the republic which to me is pretty impressive and I don’t think I could ever do that. The dog seemed to have done something wrong because it was put to death through the guillotine. This all happened during the reign of terror and I feel like the dog couldn’t have done something that bad and it probably didn’t deserve this. The final one that really stuck out to me was that it is rumored that when Robespierre was executed on the guillotine he was facing upward. It was said to be more of a demeaning death because it was more of a messy process and the victim could see the blade coming. I don’t think that being able to see the blade coming would make a difference the only thing it would do is make me a little bit more scared cause if I was face down then I wouldn’t know when it’s coming and I don’t have the anticipation. This isn’t confirmed at all it is just said that that is what happened.

  333. Share your thoughts on some of the notable women of the American revolutionary war

    I did not realize how many jobs women had in the American Revolutionary war. In my opinion it is really cool what George Washington did by hiring women who would get the role of spies, messengers, and scouts because they could be undetected when following camps and nurses on the battlefield. This was probably due to their stereotypical roles people south think they would do like being a nurse or a cook.  It is really interesting just seeing the different roles because I would have thought men would be spies because it seems like a more masculine thing to do and they did not want women to do anything masculine. George Washington was a very smart person for sure with good tactics and ideas in order to have the war go in their favor. 

    • This is a great example of how Agency completely changed the ideology of the role of women. Maybe this was the uprising to feminine power in the U.S., like the kickstart it needed. George Washington was real for this because he was benefiting the war and physically advocating for women rights, making it a win-win.

    • I agree with you it is really cool that women could have so many different jobs in the war and it really shows equality coming between men and women. Even though they could not really fight in the war itself you can tell it was evolving and women are earning equality back.

  334. PYOT from SM: Focus on the people we have already covered in unit 10 – do the nicknames given to Kings and Queens make sense? Are any of these wrong? If so, why are they wrong? Do any of the nicknames fit the person perfectly? What are your thoughts?

    Most of the names are right except for Louis XVI because there was Louis XVII when Napoleon spent 100 days in the Elba, but at that time before it it was pretty right, The Sun king is a really good name considering that France was an absolute monarchy where the king is the power and the estate, The Beloved is an funny name considering that had lose his people affection because of his failures, and Madame Deficit is also very funny considering that Marie spent a lot of money on luxurious things when the country was at a economic crisis.

  335. Your thoughts on the not-so-sweet origins of Valentines Day?

    I was NOT expecting the origins of this day. Originally it was a day where men slaughtered goats and dogs and whipped women with the hides of the animals they killed. The women would line up for men to hit them because the men believed it would make them fertile. This was so unexpected to me and so brutal. It was so different because now its about celebrating love for your partners, friends, and family but back then it was a sick way for beliefs.

  336. Check out more information on the fashion of Queen Marie Antoinette. Is there anything that you find interesting, or anything that surprises you?

    I found it interesting that once people saw the dress that she had and wanted it, the slave trade and cotton industry exploded, which makes sense because they had to pick more cotton to make more dresses. I also found it cool that her fashion reached the western world and spread an influence. I found the hair and pearl adorned makeup to be strange and looked weird.

    • I agree with you her makeup did look kind of weird but it does show how different style was back then. I also think it is cool that her fashion was such a big influence on many people.

    • I agree with you Kate, some of her fashion choices modern day seem quite odd. But as Kate L said, this just shows us how much we’ve adapted our style. It might seem weird now all of the makeup, hair, and dress choices she made. But durring that time her style was the “dream”. All women wanted to have the ability to dress as she did. Shes kind of like an influencer, you could say. Or she was, before she was turned against. This just makes me wonder how different style will be in 10, 100, 1,000 years from now. What will change? what will stay the same?

  337. Read this article about the weirdest people in history. Who were the weirdest in your opinion? Any thoughts on their ways? Things that you found crazy weird? 

    I think the weirdest guy on this was Lord Timothy Dexter. The way he got so rich was based on pure luck because he made so many weird and bad decisions. I found it also kinda of cool how everything worked out for him in the end and that was what interested me the most in his story. Also, the fact that he faked his death and planned a whole fancy funeral for himself was really weird. Another thing that made it kind of weird is that when he saw his wife smiling at his funeral he was super mad, after the funeral ended he revealed that he was still alive to his wife and proceeded to can her. This was an act of hitting his wife with a wooden stick. 

  338. Sorry, in order to copy and paste my work it was very complicated so here is a google doc of it.

    (a previous post revisited and modified): Wealth and Poverty – take a look at both sites, traveling through any links of your choice within (check out some of the topics / categories / deeper dives…) and offer your comparing / contrasting thoughts; not looking for any specific response – just what stands out to you as interesting, surprising, or what you think the stats within tell us about our world today… I’ll offer some thoughts periodically and reply to those invited and welcomed! Also consider consider number form the previous in comparison to Massachusetts’ towns ranked by income … see #’s 60, 113, 255 – and compared to a national average income … reasons for the comparisons of our towns to others in the state? to the national average?

    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1souTG04JVnuZnVv4rWnycS2BLWet5EDN_c-gL8PDOTI/edit?usp=sharing

  339. PYOT from SM: Focus on the people we have already covered in unit 10 – do the nicknames given to Kings and Queens make sense? Are any of these wrong? If so, why are they wrong? Do any of the nicknames fit the person perfectly? What are your thoughts?

    I found some of the nicknames to be quite subjective by the revolutionaries. Both Marie Antoinette “”Madame Deficit”and Louis XVI “Louis the Last” were both given nicknames that made them seem a lot worse than they actually were. This reminds me of when revolutionaries had already said that Marie said “Let them eat cake”. I feel the revolutionaries tried so hard to make the royals look really bad even though most of them didn’t even personally know who they were in real life.

  340. What are your thoughts on the origins and customs of Groundhog Day

    Personally I don’t think determining how the weather is going to be with a groundhog is a very trustworthy way to do so. I find it stupid that there is even a holiday for this and that people spend money just to see this groundhog. I wonder if society will eventually grow out of it and just forget the holiday all together. I wouldn’t be mad about it! However it is nice to hear if spring will come sooner just to get my hopes up more. Don’t like it when it says winter will be longer though 

    • I agree, groundhogs are so in accurate. It is a cool thing to say that a ground hog determined if spring would come early if it was correct that year and it is a fun thing to watch but is stupid. I really do not understand why someone would start this. The only reason why it might make sense is to have like a 1st grade field trip to see a groundhog predict if spring is coming early or if winter is going to be longer.

      • Yes it’s defiantly something fun for little kids to participate on. It is honestly a waste of time, money, and energy to keep it as big of a holiday as it is.

        • Yeah, I don’t even think that I have ever watched it happen. I think I have only heard about what the results were.

    • I agree, Maya. Like I get how it started and that they want to keep this tradition going, but seriously, who actually believes a GROUNDHOG? I think that it would effect absolutely nobody if they got rid of this holiday. It isn’t like we don’t have school because it is that important of a holiday.

      • I believe that as time passes, holidays and traditions will get more ridiculous. We can already see how the traditions of holidays like Halloween, Valentines Day, and Christmas changed with the passing of time, and they will probably continue to change. Holidays these days are becoming more and more ridiculous and I believe that we are headed in the wrong direction.

      • It’s sad that people seriously celebrate this tradition. I agree Ashley, like what is a groundhog anyway, and why a groundhog? It’s a useless holiday that isn’t accurate or have any lasting effects. I guess you could consider it to be a fun tradition, but we all see how these holidays can completely change just with a little of time.

  341. Read this article about the weirdest people in history. Who were the weirdest in your opinion? Any thoughts on their ways? Things that you found crazy weird? 

    Lord timothy dexter was definitely a character. It amazes me how people can make such terrible decisions and be such bad people but still get credit and attention. If you think about it, it isn’t really fair because there are plenty of people who devote their lives to trying to make an impact and get no recognition but people like him are famous for doing stupid things and not trying at all. You also have to be a psycho to fake your death just to see how people react.

    Digby tatham warter may seem like he is stupid but personally I think what he did was pretty smart. Poking someone in the eye with an umbrella probably wouldn’t be my first choice in war but it worked very well for him apparently. Sometimes thinking outside of the box can end in better outcomes!

    What Bill Millin did was very interesting to say the least. I’m not sure why the German soldiers didn’t shoot him when they had an easy chance to. The article says it was because they thought he had gone mad but i don’t think that that was a good reason. Maybe since he didn’t care that his teammates were dying right beside him and because the Germans didn’t shoot him he was a spy or in some sort of operation. Or he could have just been crazy who knows. 

    Adrian carton has convinced me that he is made of steel. How could one get shot 5 times in 5 different places and survive? Not even to mention the fact that he ripped off his fingers because the surgeon wouldn’t. Even after all this he said that he “enjoyed the war”. It shocks me that someone could go through something so traumatic and say that they enjoyed it!

  342. PYOT from SM: Would you rather live life as a doctor, a banker or a pirate? Explain? How is life better? What are the pros and cons?

    Personally I would want to be a doctor. I like the idea of being able to help people. There are some aspects that I wouldn’t want to go through like the late nights and an extended time in school but I think it would be worth it in the end. Being a baker seems kind of boring to me and I shouldn’t be trusted with other people’s money! I would definitely not want to be a pirate because the ocean is very scary to me and I get very sea sick so that wouldn’t end well for me or anyone else. I would think about it if I was born in the time that pirates existed but in the present time that would be the last thing I would want to be. 

    • I like the idea of being a doctor but I could not deal with seeing people sick and see people struggling. I also feel like I would struggle with seeing bodily fluids. I would not like having night shifts and all of the school and education in order to become one. Being a banker would definitely be boring to me because it is a lot of staring at computers and doing work that would probably be mindless work. Being a pirate seems fun but it was unsafe and a lot of people got really sick and died.

      • I think it’s important to take into account the time period. Back then, the salary of doctors was only as much as patients were willing to give. Sometimes even it would be in the form of farm produce or anything with value. Medicine back then wasn’t at all as expensive and prestigious as it is today. If anything, it was seen as a neutral or dirty job based on the pay. As time has passed, the medical profession has gotten much more accredited and therefore more expensive. If it were to be back then, being a banker would be the best option because you’re actually working with money. The concept of a doctor has changed over the years and makes me wonder how other professions will change as time passes, such as police, teachers, politicians, and movie stars. With the new use of robots in surgeries, I believe that doctors will become unnecessary.

        • I agree, the time period defiantly is a big factor in this. To be honest I didn’t really think about the time period when I wrote that out. If it was during the time that pirates existed then I would probably be more used to things like being on the ocean because it was like the main way of transportation. Right now it isn’t something I do everyday so I am less used to it. If I think it about it that way then I would rather be a pirate because it seems more fun than being a doctor or banker. However if there were pirates still in the present time, I would want to be a doctor still.

        • That is true, I was think about it more from a point of view around our time period and less back then. When you think about it more when pirates were more prevalent then the job is much different.

          .

          • Being a banker and doctor is considered much more of a regular job compared to being a pirate. As social standards have changed, so have jobs. As I said on another post, I wonder how certain jobs will change as we move into the future. Will there be any new jobs? What jobs will cease to exist? What jobs will change, and how?

  343. Share your thoughts on some of the notable women of the American revolutionary war

    I think it is cool that George Washington helped break through the social expectations for women by sending them to be spies. The article said that during the war women were mostly used for cooking and nursing the soldiers back to health and it wasn’t until they started becoming spies that they were more involved in the action of the war. Little things like this are moments of breakthrough for women and if it wasn’t for these little moments I don’t think women in society now would have as much impact.

  344. PYOT from AO: Since St. Patrick’s Day is coming soon, how did the phrase, “luck of the Irish” come about? What did you find interesting? Your thoughts?

    Honestly, if I just thought about it, I wouldn’t really know where that phrase came from, just that it was common and that it existed. I find it really interesting seeing that it actually came from that the Irish miners were the most successful and famous in the 19th century. I also find it interesting how it was kinda used as a put-down. Like, people said it in order to kinda backhanded compliment these miners I guess. I also find it interesting how it is commonly widespread across Irish people to have themes of luck and good fortune across them as well as being storytellers. I think that that is pretty cool that they could tell these stories to people, but even more so if they actually “experienced” this luck. Also, I learned something new because I didn’t know that the word happiness was involved in the definition of luck. This kinda made me thing about when people say, “good luck” to you before a game or something, they’re also kinda telling you to be happy so that is a pretty cool thought.

  345. Responding to:

    Massachusetts’ towns ranked by income … see #’s 60, 113, 255 – and compare to a national average income … reasons for the comparisons of our towns to others in the state? to the national average?

    I found it interesting that at the very bottom of the Massachusetts avg salary document, that there seemed to be a very high amount of cities. Most lower income people tend to live in cities. This is because of lower costing houses, easier accessibility to things, and public transportation.

    On the topic of the Average US incomes:

    I wonder why Maryland seems to have the largest median income while Arkansas seems to have the lowest. There doesn’t seem to be any correlation. One possibility could be inflation across various states. This is because some states have higher property values than others. For example, Arkansas has an avg home cost of $195,502 (https://www.zillow.com/home-values/6/ar/) and Maryland has an avg propety value of 401,305 (https://www.zillow.com/home-values/27/md/)

    • I wasn’t surprised that the top MA towns in per capita income included Lexington, Wellesley, Weston, Dover, and Lexington. All 5 of these towns have top ranked high schools as well in Massachusetts, which isn’t a surprising correlation. I believe that the correlation between house value and income, especially seen in Maryland and Arkansas, is based on the economy. Both go hand-in-hand for each other. A society that has a high income has to keep up by keeping the value of houses high. We can see this play out in places like New York/California compared to Texas and Idaho.

  346. In response to:

    Check out the life and works of renowned French revolutionary painter Jacques Louis David – what do both his art, and the trajectory of his life story, tell us about the era of the French Revolution?

    I found it interesting that he was described as anti-social. I thought this because of the fact that he was very straight forward regarding his art. He was said to have begged his uncles to get trained by artists in order to refine his skills. However, after he was given an artist mentor, he refused and found another mentor that he thought was more his style. This shows his passion for art because he was very direct when determining his artistic legacy despite him being anti social.

    On a side note, I also found it very interesting that a lot of artists seemed to have a mentor, and then eventually, get an apprentice. I found this surprising because it thought there would be a good amount of artists that were self-taught and created their own unique styles. However, it seems that many artists had a mentor, and then had an apprentice as they became successful.

  347. PYOT from AO: Since St. Patrick’s Day is coming soon, how did the phrase, “luck of the Irish” come about? What did you find interesting? Your thoughts?

    I think that it is interesting but also makes sense that the phrase was kind of derogatory towards the Irish. It was derogatory because it was meant to call the Irish miners “fools” and they are just getting lucky that they are successful miners. I think this makes sense because America does have a long history of racism and it wouldn’t be far fetched that they are also racist to (in this case) Irish miners.

    • I agree, Aiden. Derogatory is actually a very good word to use in this case. It is kinda condescending too. It’s like if you won something that you probably worked really hard for and somebody says, “oh they just got lucky”. I don’t know about others, but I’d honestly be mad. Also, it does seem interesting that the Irish found most of the gold and silver and maybe a little bit of luck was involved, but I don’t think that it was pure luck.

      • I believe it was pure luck. Geography is what enabled them to the gold and silver minds. As the colonizers of Ireland moved in, they were lucky to be on land that had great mineral outputs. It’s not like they could tell that it was prosperous of that kinda thing. Skill is required to mine, but it’s luck that it’s there in the first place.

    • Yeah, it is like saying that Irish are dumb and are very lucky about random things. Also that they have no skill and talent.

  348. PYOT from ZM: Pick a current event from the news, provide a link to an article you read and talk about why you think this event is important. Provide opposing views from how the event reported? Why did you pick to write about it, how do you think this event will impact history, short term and long?

    https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/12/learning/should-parents-ever-be-held-responsible-for-the-harmful-actions-of-their-children.html

    This article was about a parent who was convicted because her son fatally shot four people and injured 7 others at a school shooting. After reading it, I don’t know if I agreed with the decision to find her guilty or not. I definitely need more information. They said she was convicted because she could have done simple things to prevent it. In a different case I read about, the mother ignored doctors and experts telling her her son had issues and was not mentally well and gave her son weapons. In that case, I agree, the mother was in the wrong. In this case, it didn’t specify. I chose to write about this case because school shootings are a very important topic in the US especially in this recent couple years.

    • I agree that you would need more information to make a decision but I do think that she should have been convicted. My reason for this is because a kid is never bad it is on the parents and how they raise and discipline their children. Just like people say with animals, an animal is never bad they just have a bad owner. However, if the mom wasn’t involved in this at all like if she didn’t live with or spend a lot of time with the child because they lived with someone else or something she shouldn’t be convicted. In this case though she was involved and she could have done something to prevent it so there is some fault on her.

      • Yes, I agree, a kid is never bad and it is on the parents and how they raise and discipline their kids, but I feel that’s only true when it’s talking about big things that they do. For example, the mother is guilty when her child shot people, as she raised her son like that, but I wouldn’t say that a parent is guilty if their child does something small, like says something rude. Some things are just a kids personality.

        • I first thought that it would be completely the son’s fault. However, it’s obviously the parent’s responsibility to make sure to their child is in the best health possible… mental or physical. If his mother obviously ignored obvious signs, then she failed as being a parent and should be charged along with her son. If her mother was providing weapons, it becomes even worse. This brings up the big question, should the person raising be in trouble or the person who did it. I believe the answer is the person raising them, since they could have heavy influence on their decisions (which in this case, she did). They both deserve to be incarcerated, not only the son.

          • I think this is super interesting because like you said, we don’t really get enough information on how the child grew up or how the mother could be involved in his decision making. I feel like, as you guys have been saying, it is the parents responsibility to raise the kid well, and she is should be able to guide him in the right direction so this type of thing doesn’t happen. That being said, at some point, especially as kids get older, they stop really caring about parents influences. The parent can do all the right things and the child will go the wrong way because of outside influence, or just for the sake of rebellion. This child was younger so the mother has a much greater influence but I still don’t think she should get all the blame for this, especially if it means she is taking all the punishment in his place.

            • That is a good point. If the kid gets too much bad outside influence, there’s not much a parent can do to control them because they are already heading down a dark path. I think if the mother intentionally gave him a gun as a gift then she should be held partly responsible cause that was a crazy thing to do. Who’s going to trust their kid with a gun??? In this case, the mother should’ve been guilty, but I think it depends in other cases. If the kid was sneaking around behind his parents back and doing shady things to get a gun and plan out a school shooting, I don’t think the parents should be held responsible unless they were obviously neglecting their child. If they knew something was wrong with their kid and they chose to ignore it, then they would be guilty, but if they were actually trying to do the best they could then that’s not their fault.

              • Do you think that if a child were to go down the wrong path based on bad influences such as smoking or consuming illegal substances that a parent could help him/her, or do you believe that it is too late. I believe that in some instances a parent can help, but it depends the extent of how far the child has gone. I agree on your point on how child neglection is a big part to take into account when dealing with this case.

            • I like your take on the relationship between time and familial influence. I agree on the fact that if he was older then his parents shouldn’t have gotten that part of the blame, especially if these neurological conditions begin to unravel once he lives solo. Since the kid was in his development years, his parents did have influence on his development and therefore should take some of the blame.

  349. PYOT from SM: Focus on the people we have already covered in unit 10 – do the nicknames given to Kings and Queens make sense? Are any of these wrong? If so, why are they wrong? Do any of the nicknames fit the person perfectly? What are your thoughts?

    I feel really bad for Marie Antoinette, she got a lot of really bad nicknames that I’ve read about even outside of this article. I understand why she received them, she was an outsider, and she didn’t have any kids with louis for a very long time. Still these nicknames were very cruel.

    • Yeah, the nicknames she got made sense but she should not have got all of those. I feel bad about all of the ones she got but when you continue to spend a lot of money on clothing when your county is struggling and probably did not know what was happening outside of Versialles then the nicknames do start to happen. I agree that the nicknames were very cruel to. They were a little excessive and unnecessary.

      • I see what you both are saying however, I think the nicknames were well deserved. The amount of money she spent was absurd. She wasted the French bank on her own personal use. This caused a lot of financial struggles and poverty. Think about the French families who were struggling just because of economic despair. If you were in their shoes, would you still feel this way?

        • I completely agree, Aiden. She was very selfish in my opinion because as you said, she spent SO MUCH MONEY on herself and personal, uneccessary items and goods while the rest of France were starving. I know people may say “well she didn’t know”, but how ignorant and unaware can you be especially about the place that you are literally the queen of.

          • I think she didn’t know what she was doing because of how young she was. She was born royal so she was basically forced into the throne super young and was forced to marry Louis XVI. I agree that spending so much money on herself was a super selfish thing to do but I don’t think it was all her fault. She grew up with a ton of money and got whatever she wanted. She was oblivious to the world of poverty. On top of that, she didn’t know what was happening because she was too young to know how to run a country. I think she didn’t deserve the horrible nicknames because she was put in a bad position. France needed an educated ruler that knew how to handle difficult situations, but instead, a spoiled girl was placed in that position.

            • If I or anyone were in this position of hers, I believe that they would act the same. If she was oblivious to the world of poverty and had tons of wealth, then she would basically believe that being rich was a given. I don’t believe that she should be blamed for that. It’s kinda similar to how like our school gets chromebooks but other schools require you to get some sort of computer yourself. Or how we get phones that we get phones that we are able to use a lot while there are other people in the world struggling. Or especially how a certain industry big exerts a lot of CO2 and other toxic chemicals into the atmosphere. These businesses don’t feel the effect, but other people in more remote locations are much more susceptible.

        • She deserves the name but it is not right in my opinion. She spend so much money on things that were not necessary when almost everyone in her country is financially struggling. She was very unaware or did not care about what was happening outside of the gates of Versailles. But I would say she mostly did not care and fashion was the only thing she cared about. The bank of France did not matter for anyone else but her probably in her mind. Which was very wrong because people were really struggling.

          • Since she was a woman, it’s interesting that people took advantage of this and applied so many more labels compared to Louis XVI. If Marie were a man, I doubt that she would be labeled any differently than Louis XVI or Louis XVIII. I guess it’s just expected that women are obsessed with fashion, which shows the ideology that was going around. She still deserves titles but definitely not that many. What do you guys think? Do you think her being a woman strongly influenced the way people saw her?

            • I think people still would’ve seen her as a terrible and selfish ruler but being a woman just made her an even bigger target so I don’t really think being a woman would’ve made a huge difference. People still would’ve hated her. I think the people were too starved/angry to care.

    • The reason for her harassment and most hate and rumors being directed towards her is befsuse

  350. PYOT from AO: Since St. Patrick’s Day is coming soon, how did the phrase, “luck of the Irish” come about? What did you find interesting? Your thoughts?

    I thought that the phrase would have been invented a lot further back because I feel that when you think about Irish people getting lucky you would think of St, Patrick’s day which was invented on March 17, 1631 which was a lot earlier than the gold and silver rush. I thought it would have had more of an Irish dissent besides the phrase just coming from the Americas during the Gold and Silver rush. Some of the most famous miners were Irish or was Irish but born in the Americas and that is where the phrase comes from. Gold and silver mining is just all luck as it says in the artical and it was just luck that some of the Irish miners to stumble across all of this wealth so the other miners realized that the Irish were finding a lot of gold and silver so they starting that phrase ” Luck of the Irish”. I thought this artical was very interesting and I was surprised to hear that this phrase did not have more of a Irish heritage.

  351. History and numbers of the slave trade – what stands out to you regarding the impact and growth of slavery in the Americas / the future US?

    This website was really helpful when understanding the actual size of the slave trade and amount of people that died. Instead of just saying a bunch of numbers and dates it did a really good job of using interactive info-graphics, pictures, and charts to show the actual scale. What’s crazy is how fast the amount of slave trading grew in a short amount of time, as the amount shot up really quickly really fast. Why did pirates kidnapping millions of foreign people not raise a red flag for people in the Americas? Didn’t they have a moral conscience or see that the conditions of the ship and the journey were horrible? Because it seems like the people back then didn’t give it a second thought.

    • After going through the website, I completely agree that the website represented data in a way that allows even young people to synthesize it. It was really smart of them to use perspective in order to show data instead of numbers. I agree with your point that people didn’t acknowledge what they were doing, I guess they were too focused on progress and the economic benefits the slave trade gives. Thankfully, as time passed, people began to open their eyes to the true nature of slavery.

  352. Your thoughts on the not-so-sweet origins of Valentines Day? 

    In the past this holiday was not celebrated the way it is today, men would sacrifice animals and would use women. On this day they would hurt women and get drunk, compared to today this day was very cruel. This holiday became more common because Shakespeare and  Chaucer romanticized it in their writing.  I believe that having to big figures talk about this holiday and make it sweeter was a big part of how it evolved into a sweet holiday to express your love towards someone. Today people buy flowers and chocolates to express their love to their significant other or someone they love. 

    • I was also surprised on the way this holiday was differently celebrated. I wonder how it evolved from something so aweful and didnt make any sense to buying flowers and chocolate to people they love.

  353. (a previous post revisited and modified): Wealth and Poverty – take a look at both sites, traveling through any links of your choice within (check out some of the topics / categories / deeper dives…) and offer your comparing / contrasting thoughts; not looking for any specific response – just what stands out to you as interesting, surprising, or what you think the stats within tell us about our world today… I’ll offer some thoughts periodically and replies to them invited and welcomed!

    I clicked on link about real time billionaires, and it’s crazy how some people are making/losing over a couple billion dollars everyday like it’s nothing. I did some research on poor countries and there are a lot of people in the world who barely make a couple of dollars a day, much less a billion dollars. Like from the poverty link it says that in South Sudan over 98% of the people there make less than $10 a day. People might say that people who make a lot of money do a ton of work and that people who are poor don’t put in enough work (which can be true, for ex. doctors & medical school). But honestly, I can’t see any of these huge oil tycoons do any more work than people in third world countries slaving away to survive and feed their families. This kinda brings up the question is billionaires should be doing anything to help extremely poor population, or if it’s just capitalism and how much you work that’s how much money you make. I don’t really know the answer, but I do know that it’s great when some billionaires like Li Ka-Shing donate billions of dollars towards causes like that. I don’t think it can be forced, it just has to be the billionaires decision to help.

  354. Share your thoughts on the “Potato King” – what are your thoughts, Tots? (…sorry)

    I think his name is pretty fitting because he saved a lot of people by creating a new way to provide food. When the people were refusing to eat this new crop I found it very interesting how he came up with the idea to guard his crops. He thought that if the people saw that he was guarding the crops that they would like they have more value and they would then want to eat them. He knew his plan worked when the people invaded his crops when there wasnt anyone guarding the potatoes. 

  355. What are your thoughts / what do you notice / why do you think Henry   VIII had so many wives?

    -Henry had 6 wives plus a few or women he “kept on the side”. I noticed that he would marry two and then he had to have different wives beheaded to almost replace them. This brought success for him instead of judgment. I think he married so many wives because he got bored, he wanted different personalities and for things to never be the same. Only one of them gave Henry a child but that wasn’t enough for her to not be killed. His wife’s also didn’t just stand around, they helped him influence cultures, religions and different roles there were for royals. His last wife though was able to out live and smart him.

  356. PYOT from AO: Since St. Patrick’s Day is coming soon, how did the phrase, “luck of the Irish” come about? What did you find interesting? Your thoughts?

    I learned that this phrase comes from the gold and silver rush of the 19th century, the most successful miners were of Irish decent. I don’t think Irish people in particular are lucky, my family on my dad’s side is Irish and I wouldn’t say we’re luckier than others.

  357. An interesting PYOT choice from a peer – Check out more information on the fashion of Queen Marie Antoinette. Is there anything that you find interesting, or anything that surprises you?

    • I find it interesting the Queen Marie Antoinette always had on big hair or long dress to show her power of Royalty. She treated money like it was nothing and was always spending it on new clothes to where. She was known to be very feminine so she wore pretty light colors like blues, pinks , yellows and would make her dresses with expensive materials like silk. It’s surprising that she was able to influence a large percentage of the world with the times being crazy and full of distractions all the time. She wasn’t afraid to wear outdoor clothes indoors or the other way around, her influence on women’s fashion got her very high up on the power levels. Her style is still used to this day as a term to describe a kind of style designers would use.
  358. Some interesting information on the connection between Madame Tussaud and the French Revolution – what are your thoughts on “death masks“, and what does her story tell us about that era?

    -Madame Tussaud is a wax museum named after Madame Tussaud that carries two wax figures from the french revolution. She is from France and got to work for Princess Elizabeth of France, the sister of King Louis XVI later working with her again. During the protest against the monarchy and a couple days before the Attack of Bastille her wax figures were ruined. They were beheaded just like they were real people. This is strange because people really seemed to be so desperate to have any kind of royal heads. She would later be “accused of being royalist” and anyone that did anything wrong during this time period would be sent to the guillotine. Madame Tussaud is also none for making Death masks for people who were killed by the guillotine. Just like the heads, her masks would be paraded around the town. It was made out of wax and many people found it very beautiful. It also had the purpose of being a way for ancestors to recognize their loved ones.

  359. PYOT from AO: Since St. Patrick’s Day is coming soon, how did the phrase, “luck of the Irish” come about? What did you find interesting? Your thoughts?

    The phrase “Luck of the Irish” started in the second half of the 19th century. It started when Irish miners had a lot of success with mining gold and silver. As time passed the phrase luck of the Irish began because they were having such success. I think it’s also interesting how storytellers from the past also believed in luck and I guess how the stories they used to tell can seem cool and more believable to people.

  360. Check out some of the lesser known but interesting (often strangely so…) facts from the French Revolution – what stands out to you as most interesting? moist disturbing?  most reflective of what’s happening in French revolutionary society? Each and any of those Qs, or from any other angles that catch your attention: 

    • The first fact that I read was about how a volcano played a part in the start of the French Revolution. When the volcano erupted it sent dust and ash to the skies of Europe, causing the temperatures to drop and the crops took a hit. Louis XIV had a disease in his foot which could have killed him a day before he really died, so instead just one of his legs supposedly died before he did which is a little disturbing. Salt was one of the most smuggled items during this time period because it made meat much more preservable which is very important and it added some flavor to their already very bland diets. Lastly, which is very interesting because if you compare this fact with movies about the French revolution it won’t always be the same. Robespierre was supposedly laid upside down in the guillotine so that it hit his neck and was more painful. It also would make him be able to see the blade fall and how his life was going to end soon because of all the things he did.
    • The volcano eroding in my opinion was a cannon event. Ironically enough, it gave people the motivation and the boost to finally revolt against the monarchy. The eruption had a huge impact on the famine, which helped show people how careless the monarchy was into fixing this problem. Once they saw this, they knew that something had to be done. The volcano eroding was a great event to finally open peoples eyes.

  361. PYOT from AO: Since St. Patrick’s Day is coming soon, how did the phrase, “luck of the Irish” come about? What did you find interesting? Your thoughts?

    The phrase “Luck of the Irish” isnt an Irish saying. Its an American-made term. This phrase came about after several very successful miners were Irish. So the Americans believed they had some crazy gift. I wonder how it stuck so long, I feel like its not common enough said to stick for so long.

  362. Your thoughts on the not-so-sweet origins of Valentines Day?

    The whole idea that a holiday modernly about love was once a very violent and dark day. Its insane to me that a holiday where you sacrifice your wallet for your loved ones to get them candy and flowers was once a day to sacrifice animals?! Along with that they used to whip women. I seriously find this almost unbelievable just how much this day has evolved. It once was a day dedicated to murder and the beating of women to being a day to express your love to someone. I wonder how much the world would change or stay the same if Valentine day was never a thing.

    • At this point, I am accustomed to such big changes in certain traditions to benefit others. However, I don’t see the connection between the dark traditions back then and the light-hearted ones we have today. What aspects of Valentines day today were taken from that of the past? I like the question you posed at the end, and it makes me wonder what certain holidays are going to be like in the future. Are they going to become more and more light-hearted (which changes the traditions so much that it could create a completely different holiday than as it started out with), return to being dark, or just disappear in general as technology swallows humanity?

  363. PYOT from SM: Focus on the people we have already covered in unit 10 – do the nicknames given to Kings and Queens make sense? Are any of these wrong? If so, why are they wrong? Do any of the nicknames fit the person perfectly? What are your thoughts?

    I thought the nickname “grandfather of Europe” fit Philippe I, Duc d’Orléans perfectly at first, because it makes sense since he had so many children that he married into royal families. But now I dunno, because just because you have a lot of royal family doesn’t mean that you will have more descendants in Europe than anyone else, since royals were a small percentage of the population. Or maybe it does, because royal families lasted longer than starving peasants.

    Rarely in this list is a monarch the one giving the nickname, except for king Louis XV. I thought the nicknames that King Louis gave his own daughters were rude, as he called them ageing sow (pig), rag, scrap, and his disabled daughter “bad silk”.

  364. PYOT from AO: Since St. Patrick’s Day is coming soon, how did the phrase, “luck of the Irish” come about? What did you find interesting? Your thoughts?

    I thought it was interesting how right away a professor said that it didn’t have any Irish origin and I was thinking oh maybe it was from another country but actually it was because of Irish miners. People would associate their wealth from mining and with them being Irish and that created “the luck of the Irish”. To me, I guess that’s not technically of Irish origin because it happened in the United States, but it did become a thing because of Irish people.

    A different theory suggests that it is actually of Irish origin, as there were many old tales and gods and goddess associated with luck. So yes, I would say that it is of Irish origin either way.

  365. PYOT from SM: Focus on the people we have already covered in unit 10 – do the nicknames given to Kings and Queens make sense? Are any of these wrong? If so, why are they wrong? Do any of the nicknames fit the person perfectly? What are your thoughts?

    Sun king

    • The nickname given to Louis XIV makes sense for what he thought of himself. He thought that he was the center of power in France, everyone relied on him and he was like the opening to opportunities or a light. I would not say that this is wrong as he believed it and it is not making fun of him.

    Louis the Last

    • The nickname given to Louis XVI fits what he was, as he was the last king the revolutionaries were hoping for and revolutionaries did get rid of him. His one is not wrong as it is the true thing that happened. 

    “Madame Deficit” and “L’Autrichienne”

    • The nickname given to Marie Antoinette definitely makes sense because of her lavish spendings and outfits/fashion. I would say she sort of deserves the name but it was not right. All of this issues about her were hard to avoid, especially when people write things about you are created making you seem even worse when everything is not your fault. Also people saying complete lies so you are more hated. No one should ever be called what her nickname was in my opinion. 
    • I don’t know if I agree with the name Sun King. Although he was an absolute monarchist, I don’t believe that anyone needed him in order for France to thrive. We spent this entire unit learning that he didn’t basically nothing for France but heavily borrow from it’s already-crippled economy. I would say that only him regarded himself as the Sun King, which shows his self-centered nature and why he isn’t fit to rule in the first place.

  366. In response to:

    PYOT from SG: Which focus theme do you think is most attached to Columbus discovering the Americas and what followed (the Columbian Exchange, the spread of disease, conquering of Native Americans, etc. – revisit Unit 8 stuff too)?

    I think that the most attached focus theme would be Movement and Agency

    Firstly, Movement is a very important focus theme because of the fact that the Colombian exchange was all as a result of migration. Columbus and his crew, set sail from Spain and migrated to the Americas by sea. This shows movement because migration is considered the movement of a group of people or peoples

    Agency, is another important focus theme. I said this because Christopher Columbus specifically, was in charge of the exploration and led his whole crew. He himself, dictated what his crew would do to the Native Americans, goods they would trade, exc.

    • If I had to rank it, Agency would be #1, Movement #2, Then Economy/Progress #3.

      Well, Agency is the reason that it is called the “Colombian Exchange” because his last name is Colombo –> Colombus. He obviously led the explorations to America which inevitably led to being one of the most important “accomplishments” in history. Cristoff set up the organization needed for succesful movement.

      Movement was the entire idea of the Colombian Exchange.. not only the movement of people between continents but also the movement of ideas, hence the “Exchange” part of the name. This movement to North America wasn’t a one-and-done. He made four transatlantic voyages back and forth! The Colombian Exchange traded ideas, items, and customs from Spain and Europe to Meso/North America. The lists go on and on, but overall I would say that it was a mutual benefit. There was new knowledge on planting a more diverse range of crops, and new methods of transportation such as the horse.

      Economy and Progress is the motive behind the movement. Cristoff’s goal was to find a new route to the Spice Islands and Eastern Asia including China, India, and Japan. If he was able to reach these islands, he would be able to progress Spain by bringing back the riches. Everyone knows that spice had a great value for its uses in flavor, medicine, and preservation which were practically unheard of. Reaching this would lead Spain to a period of prosperity. However, as Christopher landed in Mesoamerica, he began to set up European civilizations. The riches and potential of Meso-america and North America were in his grasp.

  367. PYOT from AO: Since St. Patrick’s Day is coming soon, how did the phrase, “luck of the Irish” come about? What did you find interesting? Your thoughts?

    This was very interesting to me. During the silver and gold Irish part of the 1850s, a lot of Irish were successful miners. So over time Irish got associated with the expression “luck of the Irish”  But people also think that this phrase has a much older meaning when Irish storytellers tell tales. Those tales would reference luck and fortune. The route of the word luck is very cool, it means happiness or good fortune. I think that the phase “luck of the Irish” is not such a great phrase because people started using it almost like a slur. People start to perceive it differently than it was. Almost saying that the Irish have no skill and are just super lucky. 

    • I find it interesting but not surprising that the phrase “luck of the Irish” has cut off the sentence, leaving just “luck”. This is just another example of how cultural diffusion completely changes or disregards certain aspects of an idea’s origin and only takes along with it the part that it wants. This is just like chocolate. Chocolate was meant to be bitter, however Europeans simply took the chocolate-tasting aspect of it and added sugar to make something different. It makes sense now why a Shamrock (a clover) is a popular symbol of Ireland.

  368. Review linked materials and think about the lifestyles of the American colonists  vs the lifestyles of the British back in England. Which one would you prefer and why?

    My thoughts on American Colonists lifestyle – 

    • If you were not wealthy it does not sound nice. What was common to see in a wealthy household was finely carved furniture, wallpaper, china, silver,  crystals and chairs. Which sounds so much nicer compared to what the less fortunate American colonists got. It was a small , crowded house with very basic furniture and no nice things. Also a lot of people would live in log cabins which I would assume were not nice either with basic things. 
    • They had decent drinks for everyone no matter if you were wealthy or poor,  like cider, beer and coffee. There was not a huge difference which seems good for the people. 
    • In 1765 there was a chocolate factory opened in Massachusetts. Which in my opinion sounds great. 
    • They had food but if you were poor you had to grow it yourself. There were decent foods like carrots, turnips, and onions. This makes life sound a little bit better there because of their food options.
    • The main jobs people would have were craftsmen like carpenters, coopers, tanners, millers, and blacksmiths. Also in most towns they had someone who would be a gunsmiths, locksmiths, clock and watchmakers, silversmiths, and cabinet makers. Those sound like ordinary jobs that were necessary but I would assume that jobs like gunsmiths and locksmiths were only for the more wealthy people. Meaning the pay of people is much different. 
    • The clothing women had to wear does not seem that bad. I would have thought it would be worse.

    My thoughts the British lifestyle – 

    • Most people lived in the countryside and would farm to get their income. So the amount of work they put in the more money they would get. Everyone had to work for their money. 
    • They had a hierarchy with rich landowners at the top of nobility, landowners who are not rich but not poor, and then the middle class of merchants and professional men.
    • They had a large population with many people in Britain of over 6 million people but in each town there was a population of about 10000 people. Which probably has a lot of people in some towns but then in other towns it probably feels like not a lot of people. So that is good if you are in a large town. 
    • They seem to be advanced with their towns with enough power to pave and clean streets.  
    • They seem to also have a good supply of food with slaughtering animals before winter so they can make it through the whole winter. They also would farm a lot of crops. So people probably did not have to stress about not having enough food. Which is great so they could focus on other things but I wonder if that means people lose money because a lot of people work and get money by farming. 
    • Most poor people would eat bread and potatoes because it was cheap which is really smart because they are filling and can be made into other things by what you do to them/ 
    • The wealthy people had large houses that were comfortable but the poor people lived in 2-3 rooms and if you were very poor you would live in one room which sounds really bad but at least it is not sleeping in a forest. 
    • They seem advanced with games like chess, tennis and some version of football. Dominos from China, gambling, theaters, plays, cricket, and spas. Which seems really nice. 

    What one I would prefer – 

    I would really prefer to be in Britain because of their advancements, society and thoughts. They have fun games to keep you entertained, games to play if you are a kid or adult like cricket, and dominos. There is nothing wrong with being an american colonist it just doesn’t seem as good. 

  369. Check out some of the lesser known but interesting (often strangely so…) facts from the French Revolution – what stands out to you as most interesting? moist disturbing?  most reflective of what’s happening in French revolutionary society? Each and any of those Qs, or from any other angles that catch your attention: 

    One thing that stood out to me was the difference between Louis XIV and Louis XVI. It was funny to me that both of them had the same and even acted in a similar manner. First both of them valued luxury and enjoyed living at Versailles. They both only focused on themselves instead of doing what was best for the country and its citizens. Even though both of them have the same name they seem to have a couple differences. This made me wonder why did the French Revolution happened under Louis XVI but not Louis XIV? It makes me think that maybe it wasn’t because of a poor monarchy but actually something to do with citizens. The article says how most people aren’t getting their right nutrition due to eating bad crops which probably caused them to think differently.

    • I don’t find it surprising that Louis XIV was like XVI. They are very closely related so I am not surprised that XVI’s teachings and strategies rubbed off on XIV. I wouldn’t be surprised if XVI was XIV’s role model.

      • The same names and similar personalities magnify the changes the needed to be done in terms of setting up a more stable government that can meet the needs of a society. I believe that these crops that were said to make people go crazy actually helped. The way the monarchy was treating its citizens was far from okay, and I guess that these crops gave them the jump start to the revolution.

  370. Would you rather live life as a doctor, a banker or a pirate? Explain? How is life better? What are the pros and cons?

    I think I would want to be a banker they make a lot of money on average and wouldn’t live a very stressful life like a doctor. However doctors do make lots of money. I do think being a pirate would be cool but I feel like you would have to deal with being a criminal and also having to track down ships as a living. I think it’s also a pretty random job and even though you have other members of a ship usually you would probably get pretty lonely. However pirates would make a lot of money depending on what they take but I think the job would be too hard for me and I would probably get seasick.

  371. Check out this link on Alexander Hamilton – What are some things you noticed about him? How did he change history, was he really as important as the musical makes him out to be?

    I do think the musical Hamilton shows how important he really was. Even though the musical is named Hamilton, it doesn’t really just give a story about alexander. I think it could have been anyone from that time but Lin Manuel chose to focus it around the story of Alexander and expanded the history from just that. He could have chosen someone else but I think he chose Alexander because he is a good example of dedication and leadership. He also had a lot of love for his country which might have inspired people today to be more involved. 

    • I agree that the musical sets him out to be important, however he isn’t the main focus. I like how you worded how the musical makes it seem as the history revolves around him. The characters demonstrate the relationships that Alexander has. It makes me kinda confused because there were definitely more important during the time period compared to Alexander Hamilton, so why did the writers choose to focus on him? I would think that because his story is motivational and promotes themes of determination, confidence, and courage to take risks. Still, the songs accurately depict events. Suspenseful moments would be represented by a more uptight melody whereas big moments like winning the Battle of Yorktown would break into a grandiose arrangement. All in all, emotions and the passing of time are represented well, allowing watchers to understand history in a different way compared to textbooks and data.

  372. I had no clue that the origins of valentine’s day were this dark. I’ve always thought of it as a holiday of love, definitely not what the article says. It amazes me that a holiday can evolve from murdering animals and beating women with the skins of those animals to a day where we celebrate love. Maybe the reason for this is to undo all the bad things that used to happen by celebrating how much we love each other!  

    • Same, I always thought that the origins of Valentines day would be happy just because of what it is like now. It just amazes me how a “holiday” can have origins that are so dark with whipping women and killing animals but then becoming something that is about love. I really want to know how it changes.

    • I agree, that would be a good way of hiding it’s past. I know that they may not want to broadcast the past behind it because of the bad things, however reading this article is the first time I have ever heard about this so it is definitely something society tries to keep on the down low.

  373. Your thoughts on the not-so-sweet origins of Valentines Day?

    I think it’s surprising to see that some celebrations that we commemorate today and see as cute celebrations don’t have that sweet origin as we think like they sacrifice dogs and goats to celebrate, that is not that cute to see.

    • It is crazy how Valentines Day used to be so dark but is cheerful now. It is so wrong that they would sacrifice animals and celebrate it.

  374. Review linked materials and think about the lifestyles of the American colonists  vs the lifestyles of the British back in England. Which one would you prefer and why?

    At first, daily life in colonial america sounded pretty bad for the poor, as they didn’t live in warm or nice houses. Their food didn’t sound bad, though. But there was also a clash of religions, and if I came over the america to have freedom of religion, I wouldn’t like that. So at first I was preferring the lifestyle of the British, but then I read the article for it and it sounds horrible. Life was pretty good if you were rich, but the majority of the population was so poor they were barely surviving, so if I lived during that time I think chances are that I would be poor. The food in Britain also sounded gross, as it said that it was very plain and that meat was a luxury for people. Women’s clothing for american colonists also sounds more comfortable than women’s clothing in England.

  375. -Valentine’s Day as we know it is a day of love and connection normally within couples and is meant to be a positive day. Back when the holiday was first created women were mistreated by the men and their names were put into a bowl to be matched with a man. People seemed to get drunk on this day and not wear clothes, but today the holiday is not known as a big drinking day but more about candy and chocolates. They made handmade paper cards and later hallmark cards. Chaucer and Shakespeare were big influences on the Holiday when they wrote about it, which Influenced Britain to see it. The day has always been full of spoiling and loving people, but today has become more of a happy holiday versus some actions that used to happen with the Romans.

    • Originally I couldn’t find what values from the old Valentines day carried into the Valentines Day that we know today since back then it was dark and about sacrifice and today it’s much more joyous. However, I realized that back then celebrated “un-love” because they were poorly treating women. Maybe they learned from their mistakes… causing them to flip around the tradition.

  376. An interesting PYOT choice from a peer- Check out more information on the fashion of Queen Marie Antoinette. Is there anything that you find interesting, or anything that surprises you?

    One thing that stuck out to me first was the fact that clothing symbolized nationality during this time period. I think that this is definitely a huge factor that plays into why she dressed the way she did. Maybe to try to represent France as being rich, and wealthy, and that others should be jealous of them, that kind of thing. When it talks about how she was not liked for being “friends” with enemies of France (Austria, her native country). I honestly see why France is upset. I mean even though that is where she is from, she moved to France and is literally the queen of France. I’d honestly be mad too if the queen of my country was socializing with our enemies. It would look pretty sketchy. I think it is crazy that she spent so much money on her clothes too! Like, I guess she may not have realized, but her country was starving. If she didn’t like that the country was not fond of her because she was friends with other countries, she could have tried to “fix” their trust by paying for their food and things of that matter. Not all of it of course, but at least enough that they wouldn’t starve though. I mean I’m sure Louis didn’t want his country to hate him, but Marie probably caused some of that problem.

    • I agree, if I was a peasant in France at that time I wouldn’t like her either, as she seems pretty stuck up and spoiled. I wanted to see the other side of the story and maybe find out more about her personality so I read this article: https://www.biography.com/royalty/marie-antoinette. It made her seem a little more humane, since she did have a rough time marrying a stranger at 14, moving to a different country, and having to do a bunch of strange rituals in front of strangers. Almost all of her children were killed, Sophia at age 1, Louis-Joseph at age 7, and Louis-Charles was separated during the revolution and abused and mistreated at age 10, then killed. Only one survived, but lived a miserable life. So I do kinda feel bad for her, as she was a devoted mother. She wrote letters back to her parents and it makes you a little bit more sorry for her, but overall I agree, she could have done something more for her country and was rich and spoiled.

      • I agree. She kinda seemed like a brat but I also feel bad for her. She did really know any better because she ruled at a super young age being basically forced into the throne. Her whole life she was just handed whatever she wanted so I think that was kind of her expectation. Being raised a royal, maybe she wasn’t aware how bad poverty could get. I think this is why she wanted so many extravagances. She had so much money to get anything she wanted and she didn’t know her country was doing as bad as it was. Also since she was such a young ruler, she probably couldn’t have made the best decisions with all the money she had. Imagine the president being 25 years old. That’s super young. I don’t think France’s problems should necessarily be blamed on her. It kinda was her fault, but it also wasn’t.

    • I agree if my country’s enemy was plotting with the queen I would be upset. However it made me wonder why there was a feud between those two countries. I would assume since there was a marriage between the two countries they wouldn’t continue fighting but that doesn’t seem like the case. I also feel really bad for Marie imagine being married off to an enemy country just to be hated by all the citizens. It also seemed like a lot of false rumors were made about her like we talked about in class about her saying “let them eat cake” but Marie probably didn’t even know what was going on at the time. I find it partially King Louis fault because he could have limited the bad press about her but instead he let more rumors go including it was her fault for not being able to have a child even though it was Louis fault. I also feel it was partially her parents fault if they didn’t force her to marry the king of France and she could have lived a more peaceful life and probably would have prevented her execution.

    • I agree that it is very sketchy that she had been talking with the enemy. I’ve I was under her rule I would want to find a way to leave so I wouldn’t have to worry about her untrustworthy rule. Also I would be upset at the amount of money she was spending on clothing. As a leader she should have been putting some of that money into the poeple instead of keeping it all to her self. She is proving to be a very selfish peorson.

    • I agree on the fact that dressing so richly and lavishly could possibly give off the impression of France being rich. It makes me question why she cared about style so much. I would be mad as well if the queen was talking with other nations, especially if she is from another nation. Thankfully the U.S. constitution sets out standards such as being born in the U.S. and being a citizen for a certain number of years. It would be sketchy if someone who is ruling your nation isn’t from the nation itself… it’s almost like the nation is being captured, ‘

  377. An interesting PYOT choice from a peer – Check out more information on the fashion of Queen Marie Antoinette. Is there anything that you find interesting, or anything that surprises you?

    I find it very interesting that Marie Antoinette was heavily hated yet so many people followed her fashion. People made up mean things about her but everybody loved her fashion. They wanted to execute her but everybody wanted to have her cotton dress which blew up the cotton industry. Her sense of fashion was so influential that it is still referenced in modern times.

    • I agree, Lily. Maybe because she was still Queen of France, people thought that dressing like her would make them look wealthier or “better” within society. I also find it fascinating that people STILL follow here fashion trends today. That just shows how much of an impact she left on France, and countries all over the world.

      • I agree with both of you. Even if you are hated you still have an influence on society. Like Hitler, he was a greatly hated person but probably had an impact on society and views.

    • Yeah I agree, she was such a hated person but such an influential person for fashion and increasing the popularity/demand for cotton. It is just so weird to have such a hated person be so influential. It is also cool to think that her fashion is still seen in modern times.

    • It is almost like Regina George from mean girls. She is a hated person but everyone wants to be just like her. They are almost blinded by trying to follow her fashion trends because the people didn’t seem to realize how bad of a person she was.

      • It almost makes me confused why Marie Antoinette is followed by people that don’t like her, similarly to Regina George. In the movie, I guess they just feel threatened by her which makes them want to keep up, but I still don’t have an exact answer.

  378. Check out the life and works of renowned French revolutionary painter Jacques Louis David – what do both his art, and the trajectory of his life story, tell us about the era of the French Revolution? 

    Since his father died in a duel and his mother abandoned him when he was nine, I assume that people were selfish and unloyal, yet this made him persistent in winning a funded trip to Rome for 3-5 years from his artwork after 5 years. The French Revolution and the revolutionaries were very impactful because even though King Louis XVI rewarded him with lodgings in the Louvre, he was a full supporter of the Revolution. He even based some of his art on French politics. His artwork also shows how influential Jean Paul Marat was in the French Revolution because David immortalized Marat in his paintings. His life story shows how influential his art was because Napoleon kept asking him to paint pictures of him and he was paid very well. Such an important figure like Napoleon wouldn’t have thought so highly of David the artist if art didn’t have an important role in influencing people. His art was also very influential in the Neoclassical movement.

    • I found this very interesting, maybe if Jacques Louis David’s parents hadn’t died at such a young age his view on life would be different. He would definitely need money to survive so he probably took on painting to ensure he wouldn’t be broke. If his parents were still alive I assume he would have tried to do something else with his life or even if he did do painting he wouldn’t have been as persistent as he was because he wouldn’t be relying on it as much assuming his parent would fund him in some ways.

  379. Check out some of the lesser known but interesting (often strangely so…) facts from the French Revolution – what stands out to you as most interesting? moist disturbing?  most reflective of what’s happening in French revolutionary society? Each and any of those Qs, or from any other angles that catch your attention: 

    One interesting fact I found was that Jean Jacques Rousseau basically forced his lover to give up four of their kids to orphanages because he didn’t want the inconvenience. If he was such a bad person, why did so many people want to follow him? 

    Another interesting fact I found was that French peasants ate spoiled grain when the grain stocks were low and it caused them to have hallucinations and hysteria. Maybe this is why so many people were violent. They found it worked so they kept using it.

    France has had fifteen different constitutions since the revolution, some not even implemented while the US has had two with additional amendments. This might be because of how violent and extreme the French Revolution got. I guess the French had a lot more problems and disagreements.

    Another thing I found interesting was that people thought the blood of kings had mystical healing powers which again proves how easily influenced people are because the whole crowd at the execution of King Louis XVI tried to get their clothes soaked in his blood. Why do people believe this when there wasn’t any proof? This also makes me wonder why more people haven’t tried to kill the kings more often.

    • Check out some of the lesser known but interesting (often strangely so…) facts from the French Revolution – what stands out to you as most interesting? moist disturbing?  most reflective of what’s happening in French revolutionary society? Each and any of those Qs, or from any other angles that catch your attention: 

      To me, the grossest fact I read about was the fact that a man named Robespierre was laid face-up on the guillotine, which is just so gross to me. There would be a lot more bleeding, it would hurt more because the skin on your neck is a lot more sensitive on the front than it is in the back, and he would see the blade falling. That is so messed up, I would hate to die like that. I also read about how they placed a dog on the guillotine, which is so sad. I love dogs. They shouldn’t have done that to a dog. They did it because the dog was trained to howl at the sound of the revolution.

      • Honestly it doesn’t really disturb me that Robespierre was guillotined face up because he could’ve just closed his eyes. Even if he didn’t, I just don’t think it makes that much of a difference if he knows he’s going to die anyways. The dog being guillotined is very sad. Even if he did howl at the sound of the revolution, wouldn’t people just think he was howling just because he’s a dog. I guess that just shows how seriously everybody took the revolution.

      • Executing him face-up on the guillotine is the least they could do to amount to all the murder and violence that he caused during the Reign Terror. If anything, it would make more sense to execute him through torture, especially if he was the person that was putting your own life at risk when you were on his side. I’m surprised that turning him over was the most they would do to someone who was responsible for the murder of over 40,000 solely during the peak.

        The dogs part however doesn’t make much sense to me. I thought that the guillotine was meant to originally execute people who were threats to the insurgence. Dogs at most could inconvenience the owners… executing a dog just proves the insanity and craziness of the team period. Did they even think of what they were doing? Was it that big of a deal?

    • I agree with you, if there are that many constitutions something probably isn’t working right. If many people were arguing that probably means they never had a plan compared to the American Revolution who already had an idea of why they are fighting. I think the French just found the American revolution as such an success they thought theirs would be the same but it ended up being a lot more vicious.

      • I agree that the multiple constitutions emphasizes the craziness of the time period. Using the idea of how much the U.S. Constitution is praised and seen in our every day life, the fact that 15 constitutions were in play exaggerates the instability of the time period, especially if these 15 constitutions were made by different groups of people based on their own political views. If these 15 constitutions were chronological that would give it a completely different aura. Even though 15 would still be a lot, if it was a single government that would give the constitutions a theme of progress instead of different ideologies.

  380. Your thoughts on the not-so-sweet origins of Valentines Day?

    I’m very surprised that the origins of Valentines day are actually pretty violent. Men whipped women with the hides of dead animals and they all thought it would somehow make the women fertile. I would think that Valentines Day would start with something to do with sweet gestures or something not as violent, but I guess the women considered the whipping a sweet gesture because they thought it would help them. It’s just crazy that the women wanted to be physically pained just because people believed it would actually help them. This just proves how easily people are influenced.

    • Yeah, there was a ton of violence which makes me wonder why they did not want to have a different day be like the Valentines day we know. I feel like there is just bad connections to the day if you know the origins. I do wonder what was the driving cause to making it less violent and about love. I am pretty sure Shakespere was part of making it more about love but I am not sure. When I started reading this article I was not expecting to hear that people would whip women or sacrifice animals back then. I do not understand why woman would want to be physically pained, but a lot of people would do it. But it is the Roman and they were slightly violent to others and themselves.

      • Maybe Valentines Day could’ve been chosen to be on a different day, but not many people know the origins of any holiday so I guess it would make sense that it would fall on February 14 if its origins were the 13-15. Also it kinda doesn’t make sense to change the date if the history of the holiday isn’t the best because it holds more importance than if you just picked a random day in the year.

        • Yeah, I feel like there can always be ties to the old traditions once people know the origins. Like make it February 12th or 16th. Just a different day that is not when everything took place for Romans. You did bring up a good point that I did not think about. About how it makes sense why it falls on the 14th. I feel like there is nothing wrong with when it happens it is just some people might negatively think about the day once they know the origins.

          • I guess if there was a new holiday that started out violently in more modern times we could change the celebration day but since the origins of Valentines day happened so long ago I don’t think its violent history has much impact on anybody nowadays. Also it would be really weird to change Valentines day right now because at this point so many people have gotten used to the holiday falling on the fourteenth. Changing the date might work for a really new holiday.

            • That it true. If it was changed it would be very odd and I do not think that a lot of people realize the origins of Valentines day. So it does not really matter and would be weird to change it like you said. If the “dark origins” happened in the last 100 years and was a new holiday then it might make more sense to switch the dates. I really do not think anyone at this point knows the origins, I asked my parents and they had no clue. It is like if you change what day St. Patricks day is or Halloween. It does not make a lot of sense to change the day when it has been a holiday for a long time.

              • If there were to be a violent holiday to be created now, I believe that people would immediately begin to neglect and be against it instead of changing it. This type of thing has been looked at with a completely different eye today compared to years ago, and with growing liberalism, people wouldn’t want to bother changing the holiday in the first place. I guess back then these traditions weren’t that bad, and changing it wasn’t that big of a deal. I still question what ideas from the original valentines day were brought to the valentines day that we have today. There are few, if any. If this tradition was considered to be normal back then, then I wonder what traditions we have today will be considered to be weird to the future generations. I think that Halloween could be considered weird, maybe even Christmas. Infact, with the growing people in opposition against him, Columbus day will definitely change (and it is now to Indigineous People’s Day)

  381. Your thoughts on the not-so-sweet origins of Valentines Day?

    -Valentines day as we know it is a day of love and connection normally within couples and is meant to be a positive day. Back when the holiday was first created women were mistreated by the men and there names were put into a bowl to be matched with a man. People seemed to get drunk on this day and not where clothes, but today the holiday is not known as a big drinking day but more about candy and chocolates. They made hand mad paper cards and later hallmark cards. Chaucer and Shakespeare were big influences of the Holiday when they wrote about it, which Influenced Britain to see it. The day has always been full of spoiling and loving people, but today has become more of a happy holiday versus some actions that used to happen with the Romans.

  382. A not-so-epic battle – check out these   two musical takes on the French Revolution – rate your fav / least fav based upon their incorporation of information, and style of delivery:

    I personally like the first video better than the second one. It was very catchy and funny. The delivery of the first one was so much better than the second one. Despite the second one being longer it seemed to have less information that would be needed to get a greater understanding.  

    Video #1

    • had important information and described main events that happened
      • such as talking about the differences of the three estates
      •  or talked about what the people wanted
      •  or how robespierre wanted the king to be killed
      • talked about how the reign of terror started and how they did not want the rebels talking so they used the guillotine
    • good way of presenting the information, seemed to have information in chronological order
    • short but sweet
    • the important thing that they covered for a greater amount of time was important.  
    • it was catchy and funny

    Video #2

    • had some of the important information
    • not as great of a way to give the information
    • repeated the same information a lot making it longer than it needed to be
    • did not focus greatly on what could have been covered to make it easier to understand. 
    • say revolution, equality and liberty so much when it was not needed. 
    • long and does not have a lot of information.
    • I agree with you, the first video seemed a lot better, both in terms of presentation and in information. Video two was really repetitive, just kinda showing the same shots and saying the same words over and over again while the first video was more informational. Both were pretty catchy and creative in my opinion, but yes, I agree that video one was better.

      • Both videos were informational but the first one had more facts, was easy to listen to and remember the information told and just was better in my opinion. There was nothing wrong with the second one it as just repetitive, and had less information

      • I agree that video one is better. Even if the information was better in the second video, I believe that it’s cancelled out by it’s presentation. If it’s a song, especially educational, they can’t repeat the same thing.. They also can’t just throw out random facts that seem to not fit in.

    • I do agree video two wasn’t as interesting as video one. One thing I think was kinda helpful was the repetition. I felt like I remembered a lot more from the second video because the first video would only go over something once. I know for me to learn something I need lots of repetition so I can actually remember things. Although the second video did start to lose me halfway through because I felt like I already knew everything and didn’t need to keep watching it.

  383. In response to the question: “Your thoughts on the not-so-sweet origins of Valentines Day

    I found it interesting but not surprising that past valentine day celebrations included things like sacrifices and objectifying women. This is because in the past sacrifices were used often and women were often objectified because of certain religious and biased views. I also found it interesting that they believed beating women with the hides of sacrificed animals would increase fertility.

    • Yeah, how Valentines Day used to be is nothing like it is now. It was never about love and is dark. I think that it is so wrong to sacrifice people for religion. The old traditions are so messed up and weird. I do wonder why they did not just create a new day for love instead of making it a day that used to be so dark.

  384. I am responding to “An interesting PYOT choice from a peer – Check out more information on the fashion of Queen Marie Antoinette. Is there anything that you find interesting, or anything that surprises you?” I think it is interesting that even though Marie didn’t like invent anything other than clothing or really accomplish anything traditionally, she still affected history with her choice of clothing helped increase the demand for cotton in Europe which increased the slave trade’s profit in the USA.I am also surprised by how she wore a dress uniquely as most saw it as an undergarment but she wore her dress as outwear and this choice helped increase demand for cotton.

    • Yeah, I was so surprised that one person could greatly increase the demand for cotton. I do wonder if people looked up to what she wore and tried to recreate it even though she was greatly hated by most people. But she was a huge clothing person and had a lot of clothes which makes sort of sense why she caused the demand for cotton to greatly rise.

  385. What are your thoughts on the origins and customs of Groundhog Day?

    The first thing that stuck out to me is when the article said that the first Groundhog Day was celebrated in Punxsutawney. I don’t know if I was one of few that just didn’t know this but I had an epiphany in my head. THATS WHY the groundhog is called Punxsutawney Phil. I don’t know how I didn’t think anything of it before. I also find it fascinating that a group of men actually started this tradition, not just one person. It is also insane to see how much this event grew. It started with a group of men, and evolved into tens of thousands of spectators, waiting to watch a single little groundhog on February 2!

    • I did not know that the first Groundhog Day was celebrated in Punxsutawney and that is why he is called Punxsutawney Phil. That does make sense now that i think about it because there are not many other reasons why Punxsutawney would be in a groundhogs name. I also think it is cool to see how traditions grow and grow to become a big thing.

    • If this is how society is acting, I believe that it is on a slide of failure. They are putting faith – which even doesn’t add up – infront of science, the hard truths of how the world works. Faith is simply meant to explain the phenomenas, and there are different faiths because people believe that different figures or ideas are responsible for certain things. If faith is being put into a groundhog that clearly doesn’t match with science, that means that Thomas Aquinas isn’t always right and that faith doesn’t always go with science. I may understand that groundhog day is meant to be for fun, but we all know what can happen when time passes. We have seen holidays get completely transformed, social customs get changed, and possibly in the future a heavier emphasis of faith than hard-based fact.

  386. Your thoughts on the not-so-sweet origins of Valentines Day?

    I found the history of Valentines Day very interesting because we all think of this day as a day of love and happiness but it was almost the opposite back when it first became a things. Back in ancient Rome which is one of the places that Valentines day mostly likely originated from this day was celebrated by men sacrificing a goats and dogs, and then whipping women with the hides of the animals they had just killed. I also found out that the woman would want to do this and would actually line up because they believed that by getting whipped they would be able to become fertile so they really just did this to be able to have children. I don’t know why the woman would believe that they needed to get whipped in order to have a child and it is almost crazy to think about that and who came up with the idea of this in the first place. Another interesting the found was that the Roman’s were mostly likely responsible for the name of Valentine’s day because it was said that their Emperor Claudius II killed two men that were both named Valentine on Feb. 14 on 2 different years which I found to be very interesting timing for this to happen. I think that it was very weird how Valentines day actually got its name. It was said that around the same time, the Normans celebrated Galatin’s Day. Galatin meant “lover of women.” and this was likely confused with St. Valentine’s Day at some point because they sound alike and they must have just embraced Valentines day over Galatin’s day. Since Valentines day was actually bloody and dark it got sweeter because Chaucer and Shakespeare romanticized it in their work which really made the holiday get more about love and moved away from danger and blood.

  387. Your thoughts on the not-so sweet origins of Valentines Day?
    I find it interesting that a holiday that is so widespread and celebrated, doesn’t have exact known origins. Reading about the old Roman traditions, I am shocked. I honestly would have figured that Valentines day is something that originated in Greece and Cupid had something to do with a Greek god, but no. In Rome it was a three day thing (13-15) and it was a feast. Men would sacrifice a goat and a dog and whip the women with the hides of the animals they just killed. Honestly, I feel bad for these women as anyone would but the craziest part to me is that they wanted to get hit. Im sure that they didn’t enjoy the physical pain that it would bring them, however, they believed that it would make them fertile, so did it in order to be able to bear children. As I continue to read, I start to understand a little more about how our “celebration” of the holiday connects to theirs. They had a matchmaking ceremony where men would draw names out of a jar of the woman that they would be with. Obviously nowadays, that isn’t how we do that kind of thing. There are still arranged marriages however most of society chooses their spouses nowadays. Also, this starts to make more sense, as the article tells us that it was a drunken event. The name “Valentines Day” is actually kinda funny. People celebrated Galatins Day, and Galatin means “lover of women”, and was confused with St, valentine. I think that is a little cool of how the name came to be, but makes me wonder why they didn’t just change it back to Galatin’s day.

    • I agree, one thing that stood out to me was that we still don’t know the origins of Valentine’s day even though it’s a worldwide holiday. It makes me wonder how a holiday that started with beating women with animal sacrifices changed to celebrating love. It seems so weird to think how much a holiday can change. This makes me think if other holidays we celebrate today have been altered and how it could have been celebrated differently. I also agree with you I feel people literally believe anything they were told. I’m pretty sure women didn’t get more fertile after getting hit, and I think it would cause a lot of pain. I do guess people also believed that if women were not fertile they had no purpose in living so women probably really wanted to get hit so they wouldn’t be a disappointment despite getting hurt.

  388. A deeper dive into a very busy dude… what are your thoughts on the many jobs / rivalries / monumental issues and events that Charles V was involved in – which do you think kept him up nights the most?  Is he a good or bad guy?  Respond as inspired

    Reading all of the things that Charles V did during his reign makes me exhausted for him. When I picture royals/monarchs/nobility I picture really lazy people who just sit in their palaces all day eating. But Charles V took 40 trips through his kingdom during his reign and spent a quarter of it traveling. He constantly was fighting and having to deal with warfare. He put down rebellions and fought in a ton of wars. He had to learn another language, Castilian. I don’t think he was a horrible guy or a really good guy, cause it’s really hard to be king. No matter what you do someone will be unhappy with you and he had to make tough decisions sometimes.

  389. Check out the life and works of renowned French revolutionary painter Jacques Louis David – what do both his art, and the trajectory of his life story, tell us about the era of the French Revolution? 

    His life and works tell us a lot about French society during this time. It says that his father was killed in a duel, so I guess duels happened often back then. He went to two artists to learn how to paint instead of school, so people must have learned their trade from working with craftsman instead of from school. This is shown even more by how he had 50 pupils that he taught. It’s really cool how a lot of the photos that I have been using for projects, slideshows, and posters or have seen in textbooks and videos were all painted by him. He had a lot of famous paintings. His paintings defined specific moments during the time and immortalized them, such as the death of Jean-Paul Marat.

  390. Some interesting information on the connection between Madame Tussaud and the French Revolution – what are your thoughts on “death masks“, and what does her story tell use about that era?

    I thought the death masks were super creepy, as it would be really weird if your decapitated head was preserved for generations of people to see. What’s really gross is how realistic they are, as they almost look real. They were pretty helpful for madame Tussaud, though, as they saved her from being beheaded. It’s crazy how someone from the French Revolution started something that is still around today (her wax museum is the most renowned in the world and has the largest collection of wax figures in the world). Her story tells us that during that era is was very easy to be convicted of beheading, and that is was very little things that saved you or convicted you. I didn’t know that they shaved people’s heads before they were executed.

  391. PYOT from a peer: As we learn more about the Columbian Exchange, we learn more and more about the many different foods that were exchanged in the process. What is one food product that was brought to the Americas due to the Columbian Exchange that you’re thankful for?

    I most thankful for the exchange of a bunch of fruit. I love any and all fruit and could eat it all day. Apples, bananas, oranges, lemons, grapes, and other citrus fruits were brought from the Old World to the New World. I really love the taste of fruit, but it’s also great because of how many different vitamins there are in these fruits.

    • Yeah, I never realized how many foods came from the Columbian exchange like potatoes, fruit, corn and more. I am thankful for almost everything that came with the Columbian Exchange because of all of the varieties it allows us to eat. Like there is a lot of fruit that came with it and you can make many things out of it, a plus is it is healthy. Also things like potatoes which can be made into so many different things by how it gets seasoned or cooked.

  392. PYOT from MZ: If you had to be one person in the French Revolution, who would you pick and why? Would you be a major role player in the revolution? What would your social class or political views be? What would your chances of being beheaded be, and what position in history could avoid that?

    I was gonna choose to be a Jacobin, as they seemed to have the lowest risk of being beheaded during this time, but then I found out that women weren’t allowed in the Jacobin club or really any political clubs at all. In that case I think I would live in rural France as the major mobs and beheading is happening in Paris. I wouldn’t be a noble because then I would get beheaded during the reign of terror. I would advocate for the revolution because if I’m not a noble then I’m basically a starving peasant and would be unhappy with the King and the food shortages. That position in history seems to be the safest one during the French Revolution.

  393. What are your thoughts on the origins and customs of Groundhog Day?

    I think it’s interesting how people had their own traditions but they were still relatively the same relating to the start of spring. I wonder why out of all the animals they chose the groundhogs though, I think its a random animal.

  394. PYOT from SM: Would you rather live life as a doctor, a banker or a pirate? Explain? How is life better? What are the pros and cons?

    I don’t think I could ever be a doctor, despite the good pay, because I can’t deal with blood or anything like that at all. It’s too gross for me and I couldn’t handle operating on people. So it’s between pirate and banker. Honestly, neither of these would be my favorite option, between constantly having to live your life on the run, having to kill people, being on a boat 24/7 and long hours at an office working with numbers. While I would think both pay very well, with a pirate there’s a big change of getting sick or dying and they eat horrible meals most of the time, so I think I would stick with the safest option of the banker.

    • Yeah, I feel like all of the options are hard. Like a doctor has a good pay, but is it really? In order to even become a doctor you have to pay a lot of money for schools, spend a lot of time studying and when you become one you have to work long and weird hours. Which makes they pay not a lot when you think of all of the work put in. My dad is an Optometrist and he had to go school for 7 or 8 years. For the average job as a doctor you have to go to school for at least 10 years, for a surgeon it is at least 13 years and for an anesthesiologist it is about 12-14 years. That is just the amount of time to become one of those. Now you have pay off all of that time in school. The average debt a doctor has after all of school 200,000 not including undergrad and other debt in college. I also can not deal with blood or anything like that. It is just so gross to me. I feel like being a pirate is hard because you see people get sick and die which is sort of like being a doctor. But being a banker seems boring.

      • I agree! The cost of medical school, an undergraduate degree, and residency alone can leave you in debt. I agree that becoming a doctor takes really long, and I wonder if there are a lot of doctor positions open. I wouldn’t be surprised that most pirates die from disease. Being a banker, although the most boring option, is the only feasible option. Do you think that it’s still worth it being a doctor for the pay? I wonder how pirates get their income, and is it enough to sustain a life at sea?

  395. A not-so-epic battle – check out these two musical takes on the French Revolution – rate your fav / least fav based upon their incorporation of information, and style of delivery: 

    I think I liked the first one better, though both were very good, because the first one had more information in it and summarized it better, but with the second video it was a little confusing what was happening. The first video mentioned a lot of the people that we talked about, but the second video talked about some different people. I thought both styles were very cool, the first one seemed to have more diversity while the second one was more just the same person dancing over and over again. Both styles were really cool and both people were really talented, I just liked the info from the first one better.

    • I agree. The first video was so much better in the way they presented the information and summarized it. If you did not know a lot about the french revolution when you watch this video, you would be able to learn a lot without getting easily confused. It also had scenes which told what they were saying. I think this video is better if you are a visual learner. I like how the first video talked about people, and events. The first one was also easy to listen to. In the second video it was a little more confusing. They was a lot of repetition of the same words making it a little confusing to understand if you did not know what happened during it. It also did not have a lot of different photos so it did not tell the revolution well in my opinion.

  396. What are your thoughts on the origins and customs of Groundhog Day

    It’s interesting because this is kinda a weird holiday if you think about it, yet so many people watch it happen and go along with it. Punxsutawny Phil has only been right 39% of the time, but around 40,000 people come to the event every year and even more watch it live online. I think its pretty crazy how just a newspaper editor started this and what’s even more ironic is that the people who helped him with it were Groundhog hunters. Groundhogs can only live around 6-8 years usually, but everyone plays along saying that there has only been one Phil and they give him a magic life elixir every summer. Kinda just a weird holiday in general.

    • I also think the amount of people who watch it is crazy, I feel like at this point people only watch it because it is one of the only things in American culture that is actually our and not just stolen from another culture. To be honest I never really thought about the lifespan of groundhogs, I didn’t know that there were so many different groundhogs that cycle out through the years, I thought there were only 5 or 6 different groundhogs. Of course now that I think about it it’s obvious but I had never really thought about it. I thought it was weird that they didn’t shoot the groundhog day movie in Punxsutawney, instead they shot it in illinois.

      • I find it interesting on your point how American culture is just pieced together parts of other cultures. I guess this is what could help make America united but diverse. On the flip side however, if people are starting to buy into these silly and inaccurate traditions, then I believe that humanity is not going the right way. What is the future going to be like if we believe now that an animal can predict the weather?

  397. Your thoughts on the not-so-sweet origins of Valentines Day?

    I really don’t get why the celebration of two saints’s death was mixed with Lupercalia, a love celebration. They seem to have nothing in common with each other, but it says over the years things got muddled and mixed together. For me that’s like mixing a Holiday we have celebrating a person like Columbus Day and combining it with Halloween. Also, I don’t get why the Romans thought back then that hitting women on this day made them fertile. It’s horrible how they would whip them. After this it quickly turned into a commercialized holiday by the Hallmark company.

    • Along with Halloween, it’s clear that we don’t understand the reason behind the traditions of some holidays enough for it to make sense during this time period. However, holiday traditions like this were I guess considered the normal, since the tradition of Halloween also has an aspect of spookiness and changing meaning over time. It makes me question what future holidays will be like, and what they would think of our past holidays. Maybe the will actually think that the holidays we have right now don’t make sense, for example celebrating certain people. Valentines Day reminds me of Thanksgiving. I heard that Thanksgiving didn’t necessarily have the best background but it pulled through to be a celebratory holiday. I wonder what holidays will be made in the future, maybe celebrating certain important people or important accomplishments.

  398. In my opinion, the rap was well executed. It had a nice flow but lacked detailed information in terms of history. The visuals of the rap were not engaging as to the fact it was just still black and white photos. While the song was very engaging, it had videos and photos in motion which made it a lot more fun, but the song’s flow wasn’t as good as the rap. It was harder to listen to because it just didn’t sound “right” compared to the original song it was inspired from. The information from the song was very informative as I liked how they wrote it from the perspective of the common people/people who wanted change. It went step by step, and I recognized some of the information from the books we read for notes, while the rap was very vague and the information was obvious. Even though the song was better in many factors, I still think that rap is better because of the flow and how smooth/well put together the song was. It makes up for the lack of information and engagement in my opinion.

  399. Your thoughts on the not-so-sweet origins of Valentines Day?

    I think that it’s really weird how obsessed they were with fertility and whipping young women. I just wonder how that even became a thing and why they thought it was a good idea. I also wonder how that turned into the modern valentines day which is actually about love and doing nice things for the people you love?

  400. “When grain stocks were low French peasants often ate spoiled grain infected with ergot. Ergot is a fungus which, if eaten in sufficient quantities, produces hallucinogenic effects similar to the drug LSD. Some historians believe that ergot-fuelled hallucinations and hysteria may have triggered some or most of the unrest during the Great Fear.”

    To me, this text was the most interesting because it shows how the people during the French Revolution were affected mentally. Due to the lack of harvest, grain stocks were low and the less fortunate could only afford so much. So, they resulted in eating spoiled grain that was infected with ergot. Ergot is a fungus which causes an increase in a chemical in the brain called serotonin. It can cause convulsions, vomiting, hallucinations, etc. With these effects the people couldn’t think clearly so most of their actions were made without proper thought.  

    The text provides an insight into the living conditions of approximately 70% of the country’s population, offering context for their following actions. Because of this, it makes sense as to what they did and why they did it. The widespread unrest, worsened by the consumption of contaminated food, distorted their perceptions and amplified their resentment towards the monarch, leading to violent outbursts. The state of collective hysteria contributed to the Great Fear known for merciless killings, intense protests, and excessive defense of personal rights and property. It reveals that their extreme methods were a desperate attempt out of fear to keep their rights. I think that the French Revolution was fueled by their sudden reactions rather than rational thought. With the population’s actions it gave rise to a strong sense of nationalism that unified their ideals during the French Revolution for further measures. The texts reveals valuable information as to how the people we physically and mentally which affected their actions in the revolution, hence why I think it’s important.

  401. Your thoughts on the not-so-sweet origins of Valentines Day?

    That’s really gross, but at this point I’m honestly not surprised, the Romans were kind of insane with their weird traditions. I thought it was really cool that Shakespeare romanticized Valentines day, he basically helped turn it into the holiday we know and love today.

    • Yeah, it is really not that surprising that the Romans made it so gross and dark and I also think that it is cool that Shakespeare romanticized Valentines day because it has been like how he made it for a long time.

    • I agree, the Romans are kinda known for doing weird things. But I wonder where their weird traditions originate from or why they don’t question it. Why do you think that is?

      I think this is because they didn’t have enough scientific knowledge that we have today so they turned to superstition to make sense of the world around them. So maybe the didn’t doubt their beliefs because they didn’t what to believe and they found comfort in knowing something (true or not) rather than nothing.

      • I agree I also wondered why people don’t question weird traditions. I think that most people were actually scared back then to go against tradition or what was expected of a person. Kinda like in class we discussed how many people feared the Roman Catholic Church because if you spoke out against them it would result in your death and many others. I know if my life was on the line I would probably listen to whoever was in charge even if it seemed really weird. So for many people they probably did it more out of fear than having nothing to believe in. Although I do think for many people that beliefs cause people to stay humble with their life and strive to be the best versions of themselves kinda like realigion.

  402. Check out the life and works of renowned French revolutionary painter Jacques Louis David – what do both his art, and the trajectory of his life story, tell us about the era of the French Revolution? 

    What his trajectory of his life story can tell us about the era and what his art can tell us about the era of the French revolution – 

    • This is not fully connected to his trajectory but at the age of 9 his dad died and mother abandoned him. Which could tell us that in the era there were a lot of killing and unstable families. This made it so he had to live with his uncles but luckily they were very good at art and architecture. So this could also tell us that during this era there were a lot of talented people who influenced others greatly. 
    • He wanted to become some type of artist, always filling up sketch pads with drawings and never paying attention in school to lessons. He also could have had a facial disfigurement causing it hard to speak so he did art to comfort himself. During that era there were probably a lot of people who did not want to pay attention to school because you do not  need all of the general education to become an artist or a painter. Also people probably used art to cope with issues they had. 
    • He wanted to attend the Royal academy in order to win the Prix de Rome. So he could get money and show off his artwork. If he won he would get money. This could sort of tell us that people wanted to win so they could get money and be recognized. 
    • He studied renaissance artists so that he could get information from them and apply it to his art/painting. I feel like this is smart since they were very good and this would let them increase his skills. During this era there was probably a lot of people looking up to Renaissance people because they were great at art. 
    • He was a huge supporter of the revolution and this was shown in his art with him capturing rebellions. It seems like many painters would put their views of the revolution and it seems like a good way to express their opinions on it since it seems relatively safe. 
    • In his artwork he would often paint Napoleon, showing that he admired what he was doing to the French. Like being a fierce ruler and crossing the Alps. Many people probably looked up to his artwork or even Napoleon because they seem like great people to them. It seems very common during the French revolution that people would either really look up or really hate the leader. Also during that time where was actually some pole that liked the leader, I feel like there was just so many people that did not like the leader and wanted to kill him. 
    • People started collecting his art work and got universally recognized as one of France’s most important artists, and a key figure in the history of European art. He started as a person who was not social and was self conscious to a person who gets looked up to and known for his artwork of the revolution and widely known 
  403. Your thoughts on the not-so-sweet origins of Valentine’s Day?

    I just think that it is surprising that Valentine’s day is not a “nice” day and it was actually a dark one.  How the Romans celebrated it definitely brings out its dark side. They would sacrifice dogs and goats, Also men would sometimes whip women. It is really crazy in my opinion to see the holidays meaning evolve. It went from something that was dark to a happier day. People started to do festival or theatrical interpretations of what it used to be like.  People started almost merging it with different holidays that happened around the same time. Also people like Shakespeare started to make their writings more romantic which could have been due to Valentines becoming more of a happy day. In my opinion it is just crazy to see how the traditions spread like how Hallmark started to mass produce cards around Valentine’s day. I almost feel like Valentine’s day became less dark because then companies could make a bigger profit on items. Now around Valentine’s day there are so many things related to it, like flowers, jewelry, chocolate and even more things getting bought. It is really crazy to see the evolution of Valentines day.

    • I agree, the original valentines day had nothing to do with love. I wonder why didn’t people just create a new holiday rather than making one that doesn’t correlate to the celebration at all the new holiday?

      • I agree, it just does not make a lot of sense why they did not create a different day if they are not even closely related. Love and the dark traditions of the roman valentines day are so different.

  404. What are your thoughts on the origins and customs of Groundhog Day

    Ground hog day was interesting back in 1887. The Day stemmed from many different country’s having many different beliefs. The Germans beliefs stuck out the most to me because it relates to the modern day we have today. The believed that the next day would only be sunny if groundhogs or other small rodents could see their shadow. this is much like the modern day ground hog day, but they believed this every day instead of once a year. personally I think that this holiday is all just a story, but many think that this is all true.

  405. Kind of out there a bit, and a reach at times, but check out this interesting article that compares France entering the Revolution, and the US entering the coronavirus pandemic – do you buy any of its suggested connections or parallels? Any points the author makes that you agree / disagree with? Explain your thoughts:

    I would say that they are sort of similar which is scary. During the French revolution and COVID-19 people would hoard supplies. For both people would hoard paper, food, and weapons. People also just went crazy too. In both people’s political views greatly effected what they thought of it. Like for Covid some people thought it was all fake but then others thought it was so serious and they needed to take huge precautions same thing with the french revolution. Some people thought that how government was it was fine but some people thought there needed to be a huge amount of change. it is just very scary how they can actually be similar

    *I could not read all of the article*

  406. An interesting PYOT choice from a peer – Check out more information on the fashion of Queen Marie Antoinette. Is there anything that you find interesting, or anything that surprises you?

    I found it very interesting that even though Marie Antoinette was hated by many people she still had a huge influence on what people wore. I also found it interesting that she increased the cotton production with her fashion. I feel that if there was an increased cotton population that means that the expensive material was bought by many people probably including some of the lower class people. This made me think why are people buying expensive clothes when they have barely enough money for food.

    • Yeah, I also found it interesting that she could be so hated but then also have such a great effect and influence on society and clothing. It is really cool how a singly person could be a major reason in the increase of cotton and other materials. Her style was very elaborate, expensive and she had such a huge collection so it makes since she increased the supplies of materials.

  407. What are your thoughts on the origins and customs of Groundhog Day?

    The holiday is originally celebrated by the Celts. However the Germans were the ones that brought it to America and made it the holidays that we celebrate today. The main groundhog that predicts the season is named Punxsutawney Phil. Every year he comes out to the public and either sees his shadow or doesn’t see it and depending on what the out come is there will either be six more weeks of winter or spring will start as scheduled in March. If he does see his shadow that means that there will be six more weeks of winter, if he doesn’t that means that Spring will be on time. What I found interesting was how accurate the groundhog was. Punxsutawney Phil was right 50% of the time which isn’t that bad for a groundhog. The Staten Island groundhog however was accurate 80% of the time which is very good.

    • I found it very interesting that people all over the world celebrate Groundhog day, I always assumed it was an american holiday. This shows how much traditions are influenced by other traditions especially America. Not only did we take Groundhog day we also took holidays like St. Patrick’s day and more. This kinda reminds me of when we learned about the Columbian exchange not only did people exchange foods and goods they also exchanged ideas.

  408. Check out some of the lesser known but interesting (often strangely so…) facts from the French Revolution – what stands out to you as most interesting? moist disturbing?  most reflective of what’s happening in French revolutionary society? Each and any of those Qs, or from any other angles that catch your attention: 

    Over all I did not think that the facts were very crazy as I had expected them to be. One of the facts that I found interesting was that the French Revolution was mostly caused by a volcano. In 1783 their was a eruption of the Laki volcano and this spread large amounts of dust, and ash into the skies over Europe. This lowered mean temperatures for up to two years, causing disruption to harvests and a significant reduction in crop yields. We have talked about this in class about how the revolution was caused in a way by a shortage of food but I did not expect for this to be caused by a volcano. Something that relates to this shortage of food that I found interesting was that since grain stocks were at a all time low French peasants often ate spoiled grain infected with ergot, and ergot is a fungus which if eaten in large amounts some historians believe that ergot fueled hallucinations and hysteria which may have triggered some or most of the unrest during the Great Fear, which I thought was very interesting and this shows some of the effects that the volcano had on the people.

    Another fact I found interesting was that in late 1792 a parrot and its two female owners, were hauled before the Revolutionary Tribunal of Paris. The Tribunal was investigating reports the parrot frequently said “Long live the King” The parrot, under cross examination, said nothing controversial, so the case was dismissed. I feel like this is very interesting because it shows how they were very strict with what was going to be said and it almost seems like everyone is just on edge and even a bird was able to be judged of a crime back then. Another fact that relates to this is that On October 31st 1793, 21 people were reportedly guillotined in Paris, in the space of just 38 minutes. I feel like this really relates to what I said before about how everyone is just on edge and this shows because about everyone 2 minutes a person was killed so no one could trust anyone else. A reason this could have happened was about what we talked about in class about how people were able to just be accused of something and then they could be connived of that crime and killed even though their is no evidence they did this thing.

  409. What are your thoughts on the origins and customs of Groundhog Day? 

    I think that the whole idea of Groundhog’s Day is a little stupid. They are not even that accurate. It is a funny tradition to do though. I also do not understand why people will just wait for a groundhog to come up to see if there will be a real spring. It just seems like a waste of time if you are not a little kid. Like I remember whenever the beginning of winter is in Kindergarten I had to give my teacher a stuffed animal to hibernate and then whatever the groundhog said that determines when you get that stuffed animal back. It is interesting that groundhogs are actually part of the squirele family. I would not have expected that at all. Also how they can lose about half of their body weight when hibernating because of their metabolism rate. 

  410. Check out some of the lesser known but interesting (often strangely so…) facts from the French Revolution – what stands out to you as most interesting? moist disturbing?  most reflective of what’s happening in French revolutionary society? Each and any of those Qs, or from any other angles that catch your attention: 

    What was interesting/surprising – 

    • One of the reasons for the French revolution was bread and wheat and the price increasing. I always wanted to know the reason for the bad harvests and it was the eruption in 1783 of Laki volcano which brought a lot of ash and dust to Europe causing temperatures to lower for 2 years and that caused the disruption to the harvest causing lower crop productions. 
    • Many people started to destroy Notre Dame Cathedrals artwork because it had religious symbols
    • Denis Diderot’s Encyclopedia was the first ever comprehensible encyclopedia with science and the natural world in it.  This is really interesting because it probably changed people’s views on the whole revolution. 
    • Marie Antoinette got the name  l’Autrichienne, which means Austrian women or Austrian B**ch which was very mean. Also she got other names like ‘Austrian whore’, ‘Madame Deficit’, ‘Madame Veto’ and the ‘Baker’s Wife’. Also Marie got blamed for literally anything even if she did not do it. 

    Just interesting things from that article that were not directly tied to the French revolution. 

    • Jeanne de Valois, escaped prison and fled to London in 1788. I want to know who she got out of the prison. I feel like that is a hard thing to do and to flea to London. 
    • There was a tax on salt in France. This is so odd, I guess since people needed salt in order to keep meat fresh it was a good thing to tax on because people could make a good profit from it. 
    • Joseph-Francois Foullon told people to eat grass. That just seems so odd and weird. When I was little I tried grass before and it tastes really good. I do not understand why people would eat grass even when there is a shortage of bread and goods. 
    • The revolution impacted the metric system in France. This is interesting and makes me wonder what system they had before this. 
    • After the death of Maarie Georges Danton wanted her body to be carved out of clay or something so he could continue to see her and love her. That is just weird to do,  I understand why he might do that but still. 
    • One of the victims of the Terror was Antoine Lavoisier. Considered now to be the father of modern chemistry. That is just crazy to think about and very interesting. 
    • In mid 1793 there was a  shortage of soap in the French capital which is just crazy to think about and people started to cause riots. There were just so many issues in France that caused many more issues. 
    •  Robespierre  had to face the guillotine. It is just so wrong that so many people had to get faced by the guillotine. 

    Horrible stuff – 

    • Does get guillotined during the reign of terror. Like what did they do wrong. They are so loving. 
  411. An interesting PYOT choice from a peer – Check out more information on the fashion of Queen Marie Antoinette. Is there anything that you find interesting, or anything that surprises you?

    There were definitely some things that were interesting or stood out to me like how due to her fashion. She was a major leading factor in keeping France as the fashion capital of Europe in the 18th century. It is interesting that the amount of money she spent is probably the reason why she was like the fashion queen of Europe. She also brought some colors into fashion like the colors pastel pink, blue and soft yellows. This does not surprise me as much but she was greatly known for her overspending and extravagant goods. I feel like I would spend some money on clothes and parting like her but not a lot of money especially when your country is not in a good situation. The dresses in the photo look nice and expensive for sure. It must be very hard to walk around for a long time because the dress looks so big and heavy. 

  412. PYOT from MZ: Find and read an article about some big “What If’ ____ didn’t happen?” in history and comment how your life would be like now. For example, “What if the French never entered the American Revolutionary War?” or “What if we were colonized by ancient China” etc… be sure to include link to the article in your response.

    What if George Washington didn’t step back from power and chose to take the throne that was offered to him after the revolutionary war?

    After the Revolutionary war George Washington could have easily taken power of the weakened colonies, especially after they completely trusted him and General Lewis Nicola basically offered him a throne. I think that if we had become a monarchy that there would have been another revolution pretty quickly, within at least a couple of generations. The people had just thrown off a controlling monarchy and wouldn’t taken it lightly if George Washington had become a dictator. Also, the French revolution probably wouldn’t haven’t happened, at least not for a while, as it was inspired by the American Revolution. I read a book about this hypothesis, “American Royals”. While it was a bit more like a soap opera than I liked, it was interesting to imagine living in a monarchy in America in modern times. What are your thoughts? What would happen, and would it be better or worse?

    (info from https://www.mountvernon.org/library/digitalhistory/digital-encyclopedia/article/lewis-nicola/#:~:text=In%20May%20of%201782%2C%20Nicola,war%20were%20making%20themselves%20felt. and page 1 of “American Royals” by Katherine McGee)

  413. PYOT from LR (assist MS): Check out and share your thought on peeps’ from this unit and their love of  cats  and  dogs  – feel free to weigh in on your preference as well

    I think that it is just funny that Louis XV was such a cat lover and many other people at Versailles. It really is weird to me that Louis XV owned both cats and dogs but was much more of a cat lover. Also in my opinion dogs are better but cats are so much easier to take care of if you are busy. Cats need less attention, and exercise compared to Dogs. I also personally do not think that the dogs most people have are great, they are kind of ugly and useless. Their faces look weird and they have short legs which is pathetic. The farther down the article the dogs got better. 

    Pros and Cons cats

    • Do not need a lot of exercise
    • Rather independent
    • you can hold them in your hand
    • they can be aggressive and bite
    • Good in small spaces
    • Good companion
    • Quiet
    • They do like to scratch things 
    • They shed and you can find hair balls

    Pros and Cons of Dogs 

    •  They require exercise and attention
    • They can be more destructive 
    • Aggressive (but it is normally the owner or if they were a stray that makes them aggressive. Also i feel like cats are more aggressive than dogs since dogs have a big heart)
    • Unconditional love
    • Caring 
    • Playful
    • Social
    • Need to get trained
    • Time commitment
    • They can be noisy
    • Need more space

    Overall I think that a cat is better for life at Versailles but if you have enough time and Verisalle is big enough a dog could be a great choice too

  414. Check out this excerpted section of the Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen – what are your thoughts on the stated goals of the National Assembly?  How do they compare /contrast to goals expressed by American revolutionaries in their Declaration of Independence and Constitution?

    Probably the National Assembly tried to calm down the population and put order on the revolts by giving them liberty. It contrasts with the Americans by being like the English and American Bill of Rights and the American independence in general because of the liberty ideas and self-care.

  415. French Revolution Rap Videos

    The first video was helpful with the pictures that it provided. A lot of information was packed into the song, and although it went fast, the pictures helped me understand it. There was a heavy emphasis on the radical ideals roaming around, shown by the chorus talking about the mass use of the guillotine to execute rebels.

    The second video made me bored. I don’t think that the actual dates that events occurred was needed because people are focusing on the song part of it. This song didn’t emphasize the violence during the French Revolution which was a disappoint. This song talked about the affects of the French Revolution, like Catholicism taking a back seat and the effects of certain documents passing.

    It may be bias that I like the first one because it’s rap, but it was easier for me to follow along.

    • I agree, I feel like the second video did not really emphasize how bloody and terrible the French revolution truly was by using the photos of lyrics. While the first video really showed how bad the revolution truly was. As well with your idea about how the 1st video showed more photos that really showed the viewers of what it could have looked like to be in the moment while in the 2nd video they tried to make more of a music video.

  416. PYOT from a peer: Check out this article regarding how Ivan the Terrible got his name. What stands out, and do you think Ivan deserved the nickname he got?

    Yes, if definitely think that Ivan deserved the name that he got, as he used his position in power to massacre and murder his own people. A defense for this was that he was raised wrong, but having a bad childhood doesn’t make any of the things he did any less terrible. However, Terrible also can describe his leaderships skills and how he ruled his country, and he actually did some good stuff, like tax reforms and establishing parliament, but that doesn’t make up for the horrible things he did, so yes, he should be called Ivan the Terrible.

  417. Check out some of the lesser known but interesting (often strangely so…) facts from the French Revolution – what stands out to you as most interesting? moist disturbing?  most reflective of what’s happening in French revolutionary society? Each and any of those Qs, or from any other angles that catch your attention: 

    There were a lot of crazy facts in here, like how someone died by defenestration – falling out a window, and I thought it was nice how they provided a window in to these people’s characters and personalities. For example, I always had a good view of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, but it turns out that “during his lifetime he persuaded his unmarried lover to hand four of their illegitimate children to orphanages. In his memoirs, Rousseau admitted to doing this so as to avoid the “inconvenience of a brat”. I find that horrible, and know view him completely different.

    Another horrible one was where a pet dog was killed by beheading because its master (a republican) allegedly taught him to howl at the mention of the republic. I thought that wasn’t fair at all, because it wasn’t the dogs fault and I feel like there were more problems going on then to worry about than a dog howling.

    • I agree, I feel like their was a lot more to think about than just a dog howling and with all of the important events going on around the people it was surprising to think about how they would take the time out of their day to just kill a dog for howling.

    • I agree I found it really weird that people would behead a dog back then. It’s not like the dog had an opinion. It shows how many unnecessary deaths there were caused and makes me believe if some people just killed another just for the satisfaction of having them dead. I did find it strange though that people were this mentally unstable. In the article it also mentioned how people would eat dead or no good crops because they had nothing to eat. If people had the right nutrition maybe they wouldn’t have been this insane.

  418. Read this article about the weirdest people in history. Who were the weirdest in your opinion? Any thoughts on their ways? Things that you found crazy weird? 

    I think that the weirdest people were Lord Timothy Dexter, Bill Millin and Digby Tatham Warter. 

    Lord Timothy Dexter – He decided he wanted to fake his own death to see peoples reactions and created a grand funeral just for that. He was also a person who just made a lot of weird and idiotic decisions. Why would you decide to fake your own death and spend the money when people were trying to already make you bankrupt. You have to really be just weird to want to see what people do when you die. 

    Bill Milin – He would play his bagpipe on Normandy Beach and men would drop to the ground. This is just really interesting, like would he be a target to getting killed if Germans were killing others on the beach. It is cool because it could make it more like a ceremony to show how people fought hard. It is just weird that he would do this because it is risking his life. Which i would not think would be what you would want to do during d-day if you did not have to. 

    Digby Tatham Warter and his umbrella- he would go to war using his umbrella. There is just little to no purpose of taking an umbrella to war except to look someone which would not even do that much damage. You could use a sword and a bow, which would be more effective and useful during war. Also if you are using an umbrella to stay dry, then maybe you should not have wanted to go to war. But I know it was random who got picked so they did not really have a huge decision to do it or not. But being outdoors fighting if you do not like the rain is not a great idea. 

    I do not understand why Leo Major is on the list, he doesn’t even seem like a weird person he just did a crazy feat of capturing 93 germans during War II single handed in one night.  Which is crazy, capturing 93 German soldiers in one day is a huge thing that must have been really hard. Since the Germans were probably trying to fight and kill him while he was trying to capture them. He did not have a great life with a poor relationship and was never trying to be someone special, but little did he know he would be one of the most impactful soldiers ever. After this day, he was probably regarded as a great soldier who probably would get a promotion to a higher rank. This is just crazy weird in my opinion and not “weird’ 

    In general everyone was some sort of weird crazy just because it is a little odd. 

  419. Talking about the Hamilton musical, there are people who I feel were more influential to the foundation and success of our country. For example, Roger Sherman made the Great Compromise and worked on all 4 foundation documents (Articles of Association, Declaration of Independence, Articles of Confederation, and the Constitution), however there are still more important people. What about Abraham Lincoln or George Washington, the obvious go-to people? I don’t see what was so special about Alexander, but then I thought that maybe the musical was tryna teach a lesson on how someone who was raised from a poor lifestyle can do so much good. I found it weird then that the intro song which described his background was short and not as emphasized as it should be. Maybe it’s the fact that he shot in the air during his duel with Aaron Burr which shows some sort of morals he had? Alexander still helped during important battles like Yorktown and became a personal assistant of George Washington, but I’m confused on why they would make a musical on someone who isn’t the flagship model.

    • I agree, I don’t think Hamilton is that influential. I know I never had heard of his name until I heard about the musical. Although I don’t think Hamilton should have a whole musical on himself, there are many more influential people that have influenced our country a lot more. Although I think the musical was used to put more of a spotlight on a character from the revolution that hadn’t been very well known before.

  420.  Wealth and Poverty – take a look at both sites, traveling through any links of your choice within (check out some of the topics / categories / deeper dives…) and offer your comparing / contrasting thoughts; not looking for any specific response – just what stands out to you as interesting, surprising, or what you think the stats within tell us about our world today… I’ll offer some thoughts periodically and replies to them invited and welcomed!  Also consider consider number form the previous in comparison to Massachusetts’ towns ranked by income   … see #’s 60, 113, 255 – and compare to a national average income … reasons for the comparisons of our towns to others in the state? to the national average?

    It can be many reasons like how much tax does each town implies at the citizens, it depends on the jobs that each citizen and family has, how much each town gov. spends on public services and how much each family gets, but i don’t think is much of a problem because almost all the cities of Massachusetts have an average above the rest of the United States so it’s not a problem that difference

  421. Share your thoughts on the “Potato King” – what are your thoughts, Tots? (…sorry)

    The potato king also know as Frederick the Great, shows how royals farmed back then. Frederick’s love for the potato crop in Prussia was interesting, considering that he had a lot of skeptics. He tried to promote the potato as a great crop for people to grow because he knew it would be a well sustainable crop. His grave which is covered in potato plants shows his dedication to potatoes and how he tried to change agriculture for the better of his country. It shows his devotion to potatoes. This is a strange but important thing that the did was for the better of his country and made it so he is a part of history.

  422. A not-so-epic battle – check out these two musical takes on the French Revolution – rate your fav / least fav based upon their incorporation of information, and style of delivery: 

    I like the 1st music video the best which is the rap because I liked the way that they gave us the information and I enjoyed the amount of information that it gave us even if it was a little repetitive at times. I did not like the second music video as much because in total I just liked the way that the first music video gave us the information and the speed that it gave us the information at more. When I compared the 2 videos I just feel like the 1st video gives us more information about the French Revolution in total more than the 2nd video. Those are my reasons why I think that I would want to listen to the 1st rap music video more than the 2nd music video.

  423. Check out the life and works of renowned French revolutionary painter Jacques Louis David – what do both his art, and the trajectory of his life story, tell us about the era of the French Revolution?

    Honestly his life kind of sucked at the beginning because at the age of 9 his father was killed in a duel and he was abandoned by his mother, who left him to live with his uncles. David had a deep scar on his cheek that made it difficult for him to eat, speak or even move the left side of his face, as well as a benign tumor that brought about the cruel nickname ‘David of the Tumor’ which could have effected him a lot when he was a young kind, I feel like if I were called a lot of mean names at such a young age it might have effected me as a child. All of these things that were going on his life caused him to be very introverted and quiet. Then one trip really changed his life and during that trip he meet a lot of very famous artists and when he went back to France his art work caught the eyes of many and then he was elected as a member of the Royal Academy and after this his art work caught the attention of King Louis XVI, who awarded David lodgings in the Louvre itself and from this point his life changes in a lot of different ways. David was a big supporter of the French Revolution. This is reflected in several of his most powerful paintings, which capture the rebellious passion and determination of the revolutionaries and by looking at his painting you can tell that he was one the revolutionary’s side. Another way that his painting show how he was on the revolutionary’s side was that one of his paintings called The “Tennis Court Oath”, which shows the revolutionaries vowing to establish a new republic. Another piece is called the “The Death of Marat” This painting reflects actual events and mostly the assassination of the revolutionary leader. I felt like this was kind of surprising because since he got most of his fame from King Louis XVI, so I am surprised he would just turn on him that that. But at the same time I can see the side that he is coming from, he grew up relatively poor and maybe seeing how much wealth the royals had maybe that caused him to want to get rid of monarchy and start more of republic so no other child had to grow up how he had to, but this is just a option I have on this concept.

  424. Check out this link on Alexander Hamilton – What are some things you noticed about him? How did he change history, was he really as important as the musical makes him out to be?

    I feel like after reading this article I have so much more respect for Alexander Hamilton and I learned a lot about him. I felt like he had a huge impact on history in several different ways and it was honestly very surprising to me just how much he was able to accomplish throughout his life time. One thing I noticed is that he was a orphan in his early teens and in his youth he worked as a clerk for an international shipping company and then his intelligence was noticed by the locals who then created a fund to provide him with a formal education in the North American colonies which in think was amazing for them to do that for him. Ever since that happened he went though life and it almost seamed he was trying to get every title he could and some of them are that he was a Founding Father of the United States, soldier, lawyer, scholar, economist, congressman, and first U.S. Secretary of the Treasury. He also had a lot of impact in the American revolutionary war and became a general and participated in a lot of very important events and some of those are how he crossed the cold waters of the Delaware River to surprise attack Hessian forces at Trenton, New Jersey, and at Valley Forge he and others write letters to governors and Congress asking for supplies. At the Siege of Yorktown he bravely led Continental forces to capture a British redoubt and that is not even all that he did. You could honesty argue that he did more out of battles than he did in the battles. Some of the things that he did out of the fight was that he helped establish the principle that courts have the right and responsibility to interpret law and the Judicial review remains a cornerstone of the American legal system even today. Also, he helped found the Bank of New York. Another thing he did for banking that I thought was very cool was that he thought of a way to assist New York commerce Hamilton wrote the bank’s constitution. This document inspired other banks to follow a similar model. I felt like this was very interesting and cool because I feel like everyone knows how a bank works and everyone uses one and he created the rules on how banks work even today. As a member of Congress Hamilton attended the Constitutional Convention at Independence hall in Philadelphia. He also wrote 51 out of 85 essays which are now known as the Federalist Papers which were made to convince people for the ratification of the U.S. Constitution. Even thought Hamilton had done so many things in his life I think that the biggest thing that is known as is that he was the first Secretary of the Treasury. Hamilton devised plans for funding the national debt, securing federal credit, encouraging expansion of manufacturing, and organizing the federal bank. I feel like Alexander Hamilton has a incredible influence on the history of the United States of America. I feel that if he did not live today a lot of the things that he accomplished could not have happened for a decent amount of time. Honestly he just had such a huge impact on history I could just talk about all of the things that he did in his life time for what feels like forever.

  425. An interesting PYOT choice from a peer – Check out more information on the fashion of Queen Marie Antoinette. Is there anything that you find interesting, or anything that surprises you?

    I felt like I learned a lot about Queen Mary Antoinette in this article. Marie Antoinette was born as a Austrian princess, she married Louis XVI because of this she gained a lot of wealth and power in general. Her main thing was that she was known for her overspending on extravagant goods, partying, and really just spending money in general so Marie was a leading factor in keeping France the fashion capital of Europe during the 18th century. Clothing was a powerful symbol of nationality during this era and she really didn’t hold back on her spending of clothes and that’s the left such a huge footprint in fashion history was probably because of the amount of money she spent on clothing. Also, The reason we relate pastel blues, pinks and soft yellows to this era of fashion is accredited to the taste of Marie Antoinette and she wore and spent so much that she even has certain colors that we basically known to be hers and if that does not tell you anything I don’t know what will. She wore feminine motifs that incorporated frills, ruffles and lace with corset bodices leading to enormous floor length skirts made of silk and overall all of her outfits were very large and almost seemed like they would be kind of annoying because of how large they are. One last thing is that her style was so well know around the world that people were drawing and painting portraits of her and because of her dresses and outfits in general and she blew up the cotton industry and enabled the Slave Trade in the United States to explode and overall she had a large influence of style thoughtful the entire world.

  426. PYOT from a peer: Take a look at this article of 15 facts about Napoleon. What stands out?

    In this article I have learned a lot of new interesting facts about Napoleon but some of the most important and funny facts that I think I have learned is that he wrote a romance novel in his life. The name of the book is Clisson et Eugénie and the story tells a fictionalized account of the young soldier’s relationship with Bernardine Eugénie Désirée Clary, whose sister married his brother Joseph. I feel like this surprised me because Napoleon was a general, a revolutionary, and an emperor and out of all of these very intense things that he did in his life time he still wanted to write a love novel. If he were to have made a book I would have thought for the book to be about all of the battles he fought in or his life style as a emperor but a love novel would probably be the last thing I would expect. Another fact about him that I would not have expected was that Napoleon attempted suicide before exile on Elba. This all started when he had a disastrous campaign in Russia and pressures from the Sixth Coalition. Napoleon was forced to as part of the Treaty of Fontainebleau. Although he would be sentenced to live out a comfortable life as sovereign on the island of Elda. His very first reaction to this was suicide. The way he tried to commit suicide was by swallowing a pill but when he consumed I guess it lost some of its poison and it only made him very sick and did not actually kill him. He did this because I feel he did not want to live out his life Just relaxing and he wanted to really do something so being put on a island and not being able to do much was a very bad punishment to him. The last fact that I thought was kind of funny was that Napoleonian was not actually short at all and was actually measured to be around 5’7 but back in those days that was considered to be average or a little taller. even though he was not short a lot of people thought he was because of English cartoons, his nickname, and other long lasting impression that the emperor was short. I felt like this was kind of funny because I feel like being short kind of sucks in this world nowadays and he was not even short he was just normal height that a lot of people were at that time and to live as a good height your entire life but then because of cartoon you are then considered short is kind of funny and I almost feel bad for him.

  427. Share your thoughts on some of the notable women of the American revolutionary war

    The Revolutionary War was not just fought by men it also had women who helped during the war, a lot of them playing crucial roles behind the scenes. One women was Anna Smith Strong, who was a spy for the Continental Army. She worked in the Culper spy ring. She gathered information and passed it on to soldiers which helped them in battle, which helped them take down Britain. She is overlooked in history even though she helped a lot to take down the British and it is probably because she is a woman. Another woman from the war is Deborah Sampson, who disguised herself as a man just so she could join the army and fight in the war. She showed a lot of bravery and hard work, and she was a part of lots of battles and was even injured in some. She is and example of what some women had to do just to fight for their country and also shows the inequality during that time period since she wasn’t able to fight for her country based on her gender. Because of their actions in helping the war they made a difference when it came to the Americans winning the war and they showed other women what they can do.

  428. Review linked materials and think about the lifestyles of the American colonists  vs the lifestyles of the British back in England. Which one would you prefer and why?

    I read both the lifestyles of these peoples and I decided I would rather live the British one. My first reason is because of the good education and technology advancements. There are schools and various types of tech that developed with them that the colonists didnt have. They also had medicine which is HUGE. Overall I think the society is better developed for good living.

    The lifestyle of American colonists was rough at first, but by the 18th century they had more luxurious lives and lived in houses that were as comfortable as in Europe. Wealthy people had carved furniture, wallpaper, china, and silver or crystal chairs. However for poor colonists houses were small and crowded and everything interior wise was basic. They also owned pewter, which looked like silver, but people called it “poor mans silver”. For the wealthy fashionable clothes was important but for the poor they didnt change. Most of these people farmed for a living, and it was hard labor. Some in Europe could become carpenters, millers, blacksmiths etc. By the 18th century they could be gunsmiths, locksmiths, watchmakers, silversmiths, and cabinet makers. I noticed that by the 18th century life for these people was much more luxurious.

    The lifestyle of the British was similarly changed by the 18th century wealthy wise. Before that time their jobs were hard and tiring, and many worked in mines or factories. Owning land showed wealth back then for them, and there was a social hierarchy. Eventually people slowly became richer and there was not as many poors. There was an agricultural revolution which advanced the food production. However a tiny minority of British owned luxurious homes. A key lifestyle factor of the British was that there were schools and good education. Another huge part of their successful lifestyle was the advancement of anatomy, which enabled them to create medicine. There was also much art and science improvements. Technology also advanced immensely.

  429. Take a look at the 1st 11 “Maps that explain America” and tell me what stands out to you regarding the roots and influences on the Americas both before and after European exploration and colonization:

    What first stood out to me was that the article would switch from maps specifically of the United States (such as the one “what it would look like now if the Europeans hadn’t come) and maps that were of America in general. Interesting how when we say america we immedietly think of the united states of america, when in reality america is the two continents on the western hemisphere.

    From the map about “European exploration of America”, the thing that stood out the most to me was that Spain seemed to be the biggest country involved with the most trips, exploration, and sailers. Interesting how Spain was the first European country to find it and the one that was originally the most involved, yet it became controlled by England and we speak english. I wonder what would have happened if the US were colonized by spain.

  430. An interesting PYOT choice from a peer – Check out more information on the fashion of Queen Marie Antoinette. Is there anything that you find interesting, or anything that surprises you?

    What surprised me the most was that the people of France seemed to hate Marie Antoinette, as she spent money extravagantly on clothes and parties, almost bankrupting France, adultery, and having loyalties to enemies of France. For these reasons she was executed by guillotine. Yet, the people of France, despite hating her, still obsessed over her fashion style and wanted to have the same dresses as her. In a portrait of her in a new, almost scandalous type of dress, everyone had to have it. Interesting how the French idolized someone that they hated.

  431. What are your thoughts on the origins and customs of Groundhog Day?

    • Before reading the article I never understood Groundhog Day. How does it see its shadow, communicate it to humans, and how does that all add up to whether there will be a longer or shorter winter? It just all seems so fake,  there is no way they actually understand the groundhog, “They supposedly speak to the groundhog in “Groundhogese.”) Although it does seem to be generally accurate most of the time it just doesn’t make sense how someone could have thought to choose this animal and its job out of the blue one day. I wonder if it would all be the same if we just brought in meteorologists and compared there answers to the groundhog to see if this tradition is really telling the truth always.
    • I agree that before I read the article on groundhogs I never really fully understood it. It seemed fake before because of how bizarre of a tradition it is. I thought your thoughts on testing if it was accurate was cool and interesting. I wonder as well.

  432. PYOT from SM: Would you rather live life as a doctor, a banker or a pirate? Explain? How is life better? What are the pros and cons?  

    – I would rather live life as a Banker because the pay of a Banker is around $85,000 per year, and that is pretty sustainable for one person throughout the year. Although this job does come with stress and long hours so does the Job of a doctor and the doctor’s job consists of more hardships. It’s a lot less hectic environment than many would assume and more breaks are provided to keep your schedule in routine. Some may argue that staying late at the office every work night wouldn’t be ideal but at least you get to be surrounded with coworkers, as a doctor many schedules don’t line up like that or you are too tired. A pirate’s life is completely different and is something I am not interested in.

  433. Check out and share your thought on peeps’ from this unit and their love of  cats  and  dogs  – feel free to weigh in on your preference as well

    Louis XV was seen as a cat lover and had a “angora” cat because they were popular in France at the time. At a young age he seemed more drawn to Cats then dogs but he was very aggressive with them at a young age, killing three but he was just a kid. When he grew he had a cat named Brilliant, and it was probably nice to have a cat that could comfort him while he had the big job of being King. His cat would sit in the fancy rooms when he had meetings and just acted like it was normal. The popular dog breed back in the day/during the time was a Cavalier King Charles Spaniel from England. This dog was more for comfort and being a lap dog. King Charles dog was treated better than any other pets, he got to go places that no other was able to go and “maintained royal status.” Also Queen Mary I and William went to power soon after and they too were dog lovers but for a different breed, the Short-nosed Pug and Japanese Chin. Dogs seemed to be very popular in England, and dogs definitely over cats personally.  

  434. Share your thoughts on the “Potato King” – what are your thoughts, Tots? (…sorry)

    -I think it’s interesting how one person can figure out that these potatoes were actually good for you, and would be able to trick the world into wanting them. He made the potatoes seem like they were special, and something that people would only be getting if they stole it which sparked human interest very fast. Most people are going to question new things, but luckily people tried this new idea because it became a staple in German meals and is eaten everyday by many Americans and people all over the world. It only takes one person to have an idea to impact everyone’s opinions. 

    • I find it interesting how he analyzed human nature and used it to his advantage instead of using brute force. He made something appear valuable to himself, and this then made other people think it’s valuable. It’s a good strategy, but I believe that this could be used in bad ways too.

  435. PYOT from a peer: Check out this article regarding how Ivan the Terrible got his name. What stands out, and do you think Ivan deserved the nickname he got?

    -Ivan started off with being put in lots of pressure at a young age. He was given the role of Ruler of Moscow and that’s a lot of responsibility. His name was actually Ivan Grozny which in English translates to terrible which is one of the ways he was named. Also some of the actions Ivan took during his life also lead to his name. Like beating his daughter in law in the stomach while pregnant and his son in the head with his cane, injuring both. He had a history of watching the Boyars riot and kill, and his own family was attacked in front of him which will forever change a person. Ivan was not very healthy in the head and clearly had some issues, but that doesn’t excuse his Terrible actions. He does deserve this name but there were definitely worse people during this time period.

  436. Read this article about the weirdest people in history. Who were the weirdest in your opinion? Any thoughts on their ways? Things that you found crazy weird?

    • The weirdest in my opinion were numbers 1,5 and 7. Number 1 had married a rich widow for her money but then faked his death just to get reactions, and then proceeded to cane his wife when she didn’t give him the reaction he was looking for. This man went through all that trouble to get attention and he thought of the plan to fake his own death just for him to come back and hurt the people that went to his funeral. The fifth person was a Man from Scotland who played the bagpipes around Normandy Beach so that the German soldiers wouldn’t kill him. This plan did end up working because they thought he went mad. This is actually pretty smart on his end because it saved his life but it did bring more attention to him which could have been dangerous in this situation. We don’t really know why he did this but he was surprised himself when they didn’t shoot him and kept him alive. Lastly, the 7th person was a Man who attacked another ship at sea just because the night before he and other ship members had gotten drunk and thrown their hats overboard. They didn’t have any intentions to hurt the other sailors, but just to steal their hats. This isn’t the weirdest person I read about but it definitely is a little strange that they wanted new hats that bad and that they were willing to attack just to get what they wanted faster. All of these people seemed to create attention for themselves for random and unneeded reasons at the time.
  437. What are your thoughts on the origins and customs of Groundhog Day

    I think that groundhog day is all fake. Before reading the article I felt like it was just a fun tradition that “marks” the end of winter and the start of spring, and never really believed the results. As a kid I would be super excited for this day, but now I think its all bs. Its super cute that a groundhog does this, and while it may be slightly accurate, there is no guarantee on anything about the start and end of winter and spring. After reading the article I found out that its surpisingly accurate and the groundhog is right 80% of the time. I also read about the wooly bear caterpillars. I love these insects because they are fuzzy and orange and brown. I find them all over the place during the fall. They are literally everywhere around my house during october. On my driveway, the grass, the rock wall, everywhere. I found it cool that they are basically “fall” seasonal bugs that only come out at that time. According to tradition about them, if the bugs have more orange than black fuzz, the upcoming winter will be mild. But something even crazier is that the informtion is delayed, meaning that the variation is due to last years weather, and not the upcoming. I found it cute and interesting that the groundhog is actually pretty accurate.

  438. Share your thoughts on some of the notable women of the American revolutionary war

    I found it interesting that women were told to do the job of spies, messengers, and scouts because they were covert and could be undetected as acting like a nurse on a battlefield, cooks and cleaners, and camp followers. I find this interesting specially because of the stereotypes back then that women could not fight in the war, so having a job like this, even taking part in the war is huge. I also find it cool that they had such important roles. Getting information from the enemy is something no man could do back then, and I can even see it that women could do it exclusively better. But I dont think people understand how important their role was, and how much they contributed to the war. When I thought about how much they really did it blows my mind. Its such a dangerous job as well. To spy and play the role as the enemy and blend in is super hard to do and this information that they gathered helped the soldiers in so many ways when it came to where the enemy would next be, their plans in their attack, and every inside scoop imaginable. I would even go as far to say it might be the most important job. And I think its also funny that they thought women would be best at it instead of men because of their nature, and how secretive they can be, as well as the roles that they play during the war. Overall I thought this to be super super cool and impressive.

    • I also found that very interesting, I always wondered why women were never mentioned. I always thought they would just stay at home until the war was over. However I didn’t know they would be such a crucial part in the Revolutionary War. I think this was very clever of them because most people wouldn’t think a woman would be fighting in the war so they wouldn’t suspect them to be helping the Americans. I always heard how these military leaders would get a feeling to sneak up on people but maybe it was actually the women that were spies who were giving them the inside scoop.

      • Interesting point on women being spies, I don’t know if women being used as spies should be considered to be okay. I think its wrong but also advantageous considering how women were seen during these times. Since men were the ones at war, women would be under the line and behind the scenes. I guess both men and women have their roles, however I don’t know how I feel about how the responsibility of women being of a more hidden nature.

  439. A deeper dive into a very busy dude… what are your thoughts on the many jobs / rivalries / monumental issues and events that Charles V was involved in – which do you think kept him up nights the most?  Is he a good or bad guy?  Respond as inspired

    Charles V, one of the roman emperors, was very busy with lots of things on his plate. Like being a ruler of an empire and dealing with rivalries. He was also dealing with a lot more things like being the king of Spain and dealing with beefs with France. Plus, there were huge issues like the Protestant Reformation changing Europe, he had to deal with the Ottomans expanding and threating to take over some of his land. I can’t take a side whether he is a good or bad guy because there are many reasons for both. He made some moves that make him more of a bad guy, like trying to stop the protestant’s revolution and fighting with some of Europe. But he also tried to keep his empire together and maintain peace in a crazy time. He did make some pretty big moves that were good, like establishing the Council of Trent to help issues within the Catholic Church. Charles V might have had his flaws, but he was definitely not a fully bad person. He was trying to manage an empire in a hard time where he had to make some hard decisions. But he also tried to keep his empire together and maintain peace as best he could.

  440. Share your thoughts on some of the notable women of the American revolutionary war

    One thing that I found to be very interesting is that in the American revolutionary war George Washington often hired women as spies messengers and scouts during the war effort because of their ability to be undetected as they worked as camp followers, nurses on the battlefield and within the domestic sphere as cooks and cleaners. I feel like this is crazy smart and strategic move by George Washington because since woman were not treated as equals to men they were often over looked and not really given much thought so if he had them as spies they would not even be considered. This group would become known as the Culper Spy Ring. It would become one of the most very successful and they were known for uncovering Benedict Arnold’s treasonous weakness to the British. One of the very smart choices that was made was that the ring communicated through a series of coded numbers and members were assigned a specific number to protect their identity in case of exposure. I feel like overall this is one of the smartest things I have heard that went on in this war and I feel like this is some incredible choices that were made by the colonists that defiantly could have influenced how this war ended in total.

    • I found your takeaways to be very interesting and it made me dive deeper into the meaning. I liked how you said that it was clever that they hired women as spies because at the time women were not treated as equals and they were overlooked during the war, so thinking they were spies would not be considered. I never thought about that but now that you mention it it makes a lot of sense.

      • Yeah, I felt like this is just such a smart move by the colonists and without this artical I never would have even considered this is a idea and it is just so smart that I’m surprised I didn’t think about this myself.

  441. PYOT from LR: What are your thoughts / what do you notice / why do you think Henry   VIII had so many wives?

    I found it very interesting how many wives King Henry VIII had not only had several wives he also had plenty of mistresses. This is probably what caused him to have different STDs and probably what caused him to be unable to have a son throughout his many relationships. I also think that Henry VIII’s first wife Catherine deserved a lot better they had been actually in love and for him to quickly divorce her over he lack to have a son is terrible especially since she only had one chance to have a son. In some ways I think Henry VIII’s multiple wives somehow helped his country in the long run because if he only had Catherine the Great’s child which is Bloody Mary I bet the society would have been a lot worse especially if Elizabeth I wasn’t born. Although I still think this doesn’t make up for his actions.

    • I agree with you on how suprising it is that he not only treated his wives badly, but he also cheated on them, and cheated on the girls he was cheating with. I laughed when I saw ur comment about std’s but it makes sense and now that I think about it it probably had to do with something in the reason he couldnt have kids.

  442. What are your thoughts on the origins and customs of Groundhog Day

    I personally don’t really believe in groundhogs day and I don’t really care for it and unless you like live near the town it originated from and I don’t know why anyone really would because it has been studied that the groundhog is usually 50/50 on his predictions so even if he were to see his shadow than mostly would not predict when winter is going to end anyways. One thing that really surprised me was that tens of thousands of spectators attend Groundhog Day events in Punxsutawney so I can understand going their if their are fun events and stuff to do as a family but if you go to the event just to see if the groundhog sees his shadow than I don’t really understand why you would waste your time. I did think that the origins of Groundhog day was kind of interesting. Groundhog Day started when a local newspaper editor that goes by the name of Clymer Freas sold a group of businessmen and groundhog hunters on the idea and they actually took this to heart. Those men walked to a site called Gobbler’s Knob where the groundhog was and became the first people to report the new abouts when he saw his shadow. This entire event that is known around the world today all started from just a local man telling these guys this made up story. One last thing that I found very weird about the customs of Groundhogs Day was that their is a group of people for Groundhogs day and their members wear top hats and conduct the official proceedings in the Pennsylvania Dutch dialect and it is said they supposedly speak to the groundhog in “Groundhogese. I found this very weird because we all know that their is no way that these people are actually able to speak to the Groundhog and I don’t really understand the meaning of them doing this.

    • I also never really believed the results of groundhogs day, which I kinda feel bad about because its such a classic tradition, but I think thats what makes me think of it as some cute idea. I just find it hard to belive but it shocked me that they were actually 80% correct.

  443. PYOT from ZM: Search up your birthday and write about any important events or holiday that happened on that day. How much importance did that event have on modern society? Is it a well known event/holiday or not? Why do you think that might be?

    I found this website that tells you everything about what happened on the day you were born. A couple interesting things that happened was that the big Buddha temple In China was completed. Whatever you like was the top song which I think is funny because I know that song very well. Nothing that important happened on the exact day I was born but the next day Barack Obama was elected president. I think that’s pretty cool because right as I was born there was a new president, a Fresh Start. A lot of the time voting day is around my birthday and presidents get chosen around that time. The closest thing there is to a holiday on my birthday is National sandwich day. I don’t know why that’s a day to be recognized and I don’t think it has anything to connect to but it is pretty cool. 

  444. Take a look at the 1st 11 “Maps that explain America” and tell me what stands out to you regarding the roots and influences on the Americas both before and after European exploration and colonization:

    The first map I found interesting was the one about all the languages that had been spoken throughout the United states. There is an insane amount of languages that are spoken. I just think that’s crazy because now everyone just speaks one language and that’s english. I don’t really understand how people grew out of that and just converted into one language but it definitely took time and effort for all the people in generations to follow. Some of the languages, for example Utian Kind of sound like Utah to me and it is around the area so I was thinking maybe Utah was named after the language. Something else that surprised me about the language map is that there were big spots on the map where people didn’t know what the language was spoken there and most of it was in the mid to Northeast. The next map I found interesting is the economic Trading map. It’s cool how different resources and different things grow in different places so getting it from people and treating people is a big part of society. I think way over half the stuff we have in the United States doesn’t come from here and the same thing with Europe way over half of that stuff doesn’t come from there. One specific thing I found Interesting that came here from Europe was coffee beans. I know that I see many people in a day drinking multiple cups of coffee so I am just thinking if that never got traded what things would be like. I think it would be crazy if it was never discovered, the first thing so common like that.

  445. Read this article about the weirdest people in history. Who were the weirdest in your opinion? Any thoughts on their ways? Things that you found crazy weird?

    Someone I found really weird and unreasonable was Lord Timothy Dexter. I thought it was interesting that he was from around this area very close to where we are and I’ve never heard about him. All he thought about throughout life was wanting money and making good deals but he never had good money he just wanted to make a good image of herself. and he never even made good business deals at all. Something he also did was fake his death which is very weird. He wanted to see how people reacted and he liked how everyone reacted besides his wife and then confronted her. If I was his wife I would be in shock. I wouldn’t believe that he would be alive. I don’t even know what I do. That’s just crazy. I think faking your death is really unreasonable because there’s no point you’re not supposed to know what happens after you die and he must have felt really bad about himself if he wanted to know what people thought of him in life.

    • I also thought that faking your death was particularly weird and very bizarre. Who randomly thinks that they want to know what peoples reaction would be when they die?

  446. I would rather live as a doctor because you get to save lives. being a doctor seems fun and stressful at times. I think life is better because you know that you are saving lives everyday and you can tell people that. obviously pros are helping people and saving people its also comes with respect from people. Some cons are that you have to have years education/training, work long hours and its also a very high level of responsibility. 

    • Yeah, but you have to work long hours, go to school for a long time, get into debt and they pay might not be worth all of the time you spend. I think being a banker is the worst since you time gets used up a lot and it seems boring. There is also not a great pay. Being a pirate seems like the most fun because you get to party, hang out and enjoy life, but there is a lot of cons like diseases and many people dying. It is really hard to make the decision of what job is better just because of all of the pros and cons, like pay and the amount of time you spend working.

      • I kind of disagree with you here. I think that its totally worth the time to save lives as being a doctor. I dont think that I would regret it, and while I would also want to be a pirate, I think each one is rewarding in their own ways. I just dont think you are right when you say that the amount of work, time, and pay is not worth “just saving lives”, sorry if it sounds agrresive Im not it just sounds that way lol. 🙂

        • I agree with you Kate, Sloane does make some good points about it is a lot of debt and long hour which is hard for some people but you make fairly good money and your saving lives. People could also like the long hours and just knowing they are helping someone makes them like the job more.

    • I agree Mady, I think that saving lives makes up for the amount of work it took to get there. And I honnetly think the feeling of knowing you are doing good deeds would be better than high pay.

      • 100% It is also hard being a doctor because you don’t always save them sometimes it doesn’t go in your favor. But as you said you still have that good feeling that you are doing something good and helping others.

        • Yes. I also agree with your earlier response about how some people may like the labor that comes with the job. I also like your point about how it sometimes goes wrong, but I also feel like while it may be traumatic for the doctor to have to break the news and stuff, they also become better doctors because they grow from the expierience. Thats another pro, is that you are always gaining peoples respect and learning to be a better doctor.

    • I agree with you Mady. Yes, there are the cons where you could end someone’s life, and it’s very time consuming. I think that the pros outweigh the cons when it comes to being a doctor. Just the whole aspect that single handedly you have the opportunity to save someones life, while also making great money.

  447. PYOT from LR (assist MS): Check out and share your thought on peeps’ from this unit and their love of  cats  and  dogs  – feel free to weigh in on your preference as well

    I felt like it was kind of surprising about how many important people owned and loved cats in that time period. Some of the main people that the article said owned cats were Louis 14th, Queen Marie Leszczyńska, and Marie Antoinette. The cat that was the main point of this article was the angora, which is a longhaired breed which was said to have originated in Ankara in Turkey. So that means that they must have been brought over to France and the explorer that brought the first know breed of cat to France went by the name of Nicholas Fabri de Peiresc. I was most surprised to hear that Louis 14th loved cats so much because I thought that he would just have so much going on around him that he wouldn’t really have time but one of his butlers said that “at the age of twelve, Louis possessed a female cat called Charlotte who had a litter of four kittens.  The young king handled them so much that three out of four died within twenty-four hours” I feel like that just shows how much he loved the cats and when it is said that he handled the cats so much that they died is that he was just 12 and gave them so much love that they died because he did to much but if anyone thinks something different I would like to hear your view on this topic. Me personally I am more of the dog person because I just feel like a dog is more energic and are more fun to play and have around because of just all of the fun things you can do with dogs and I feel like cats just hide from you and aren’t really any fun to have and you just cant do much with them.

    • I can see why dog people love their dog’s energetic personality and why they wouldn’t like an aloof cat, but cats aren’t always antisocial. In my experience, my cats have different moods and sometimes they’re very energetic and run around the house like crazy and you can play with them and other times they get really lazy and just want to sleep next to you. Cats aren’t not energetic, they just aren’t sometimes, and they aren’t completely antisocial. They only hide from new people. When my neighbors come over, they seem pretty comfortable with them but if I introduce them to new people, they have to warm up to them. They never attack anybody. This is just my experience with my maine coon cats who are super sweet. It just kinda depends on what kind of cat you’re talking about because my neighbor’s cat has known me for years and still attacks me. I feel like I would still enjoy having a dog if I did, it’s just that I prefer maine coon cats.

  448. Share your thoughts on some of the notable women of the American revolutionary war:

    Something that I found interesting is that women were used for this. because women were not really treated equally back then but George Washington was smart to use them to spy on the British in Disguise of them being nurses And cooks or cleaners. it probably gave many women the feeling that they had something important to do. this also makes me think who’s around me now that could be a spy you could never know. no one knew back then the woman did a great job at disguising themselves and finding things out and Reporting it back to George Washington.

  449. PYOT from LR (assist MS): Check out and share your thought on peeps’ from this unit and their love of  cats  and  dogs  – feel free to weigh in on your preference as well

    I think it’s cool that the same dogs that were there back then are still around now. They just looked a little bit different back then because they have evolved. I definitely think the use for a dog has changed they used to use dogs for warming their lap in feet and for killing bugs but now I feel like dogs are more used because people like them and do a bunch of activities with them they do still sit on people’s laps and feet and they probably do still eat bugs but that’s not the only reason people have them. Something I found interesting is that King Charles named a bunch of his dogs after himself and they kind of carried on for Generations and he always got the same Spaniel dog. Most Royal figures had small dogs, usually  spaniels. Maybe they didn’t know about the wide variety of breeds that there were and that just this type of dog could do good things for them. but now we know that there are many types of dogs that can do many different things. 

  450. Watch the linked JG / CC video on some topics from and changes wrought by the American Revolution –  reflect and respond to his idea that the American Revolution “wasn’t that revolutionary” (aka didn’t change much socially for many), or just respond with any particular thoughts or impressions your were left with concerning JG’s choices of focus topics and themes: 

    I thought that his focus themes were important because it covered the different views of the people during the Rev. JG thought that the Revolution was not so revolutionary because of the process that it took. JG points out that colonists felt like they were sarving in detail for ungrateful people who did not care what became of them. Because he also points out that their conditions werent great and they were often cold and had little rations. Overall I think that the reason it wasnt so revolutionary in his opinion is because of how the different groups of people during the time endured it.

  451. PYOT from LR: What are your thoughts / what do you notice / why do you think HenryVIII had so many wives?

    The reason I think Henry had so many wives was fully out of selfishness. All he wanted was a baby boy so he could continue on to be the next ruler. After having so many wives and children that ended up being girls and then finally getting a boy but it dying during birth is well deserved. Obviously not for the baby but for Henry. After all the terrible things he did, he defiantly did not deserve what he had been longing for. It also makes me sad that so many children had to grow up knowing that their dad had no love for them and thought that they weren’t good enough. It probably wasn’t as big of a deal back then but now it would be a huge thing in society.

    • I really like what you said your takeaways were and I agree. He was selfish and the only reason he wanted a wife was for a boy to continue his helm or whatever. Even though its not really talked about, he was probably a bad ruler too considering his behavior towards his wives.

  452. Watch the linked JG / CC video on some topics from and changes wrought by the American Revolution –  reflect and respond to his idea that the American Revolution “wasn’t that revolutionary” (aka didn’t change much socially for many), or just respond with any particular thoughts or impressions your were left with concerning JG’s choices of focus topics and themes: 

    One thing that stood out to me was during the video John Green stated how Revolutionary either means no social change or a big change. I feel the revolution is neither. As much as the revolution didn’t change that much it still changed enough for there to be a new society with a different set a ruled even if a couple were borrowed from the British like John Locke’s ideas or a Bill of Rights. I also feel that the revolutionary wasn’t a complete flip “American Revolution” means a change in america and if you think how like was before and after the revolutions an average citizens life didn’t change much except for a new law book to follow.

  453. PYOT from LR: What are your thoughts / what do you notice / why do you think Henry   VIII had so many wives?

    King Henry had a total of six wives in his lifetime, along with many mistresses. His first wife was Cathrine of Aragon, they were married for 23 years. Catherine was described as the only woman Henry ever loved. Henry viewed her as a perfect wife and basically praised her, there was only one problem, she couldn’t have a son. He divorced her because of this reason. I think that Henry’s and cathrines marriage will impact all of  his other marriages, because she’s the only one who he really loved. And I think that if I married the love of my life and I had to divorce her because she couldn’t have a baby boy, I would be heartbroken. Henry’s second wife was Anne Boleyn. Anne and Henry weren’t exclusive, but this made Anne angry. Anne didnt want to be just one of his mistresses. After leaving the roman catholic church for her, they got married. Anne and Henry tried for a son, but again were unable. So Henry lost interest in Anne. This made Anne “go crazy”. Henry was so desperate to get rid of Anne, so he had her killed. Henry’s third wife Jane Seymour. Only days after Annes death, he got remarried. Jane had finally given him the boy he always desired, but soon later she died. But she was buried next to him. After reading about her I kinda feel bad for Cathrine. She’s buried next to the wife he didnt even love the most, only because she could provide him a son. Anne of Cleves was his fourth wife. Anne was chosen by Henry after he saw a painting. Henry was disappointed when she didnt look like the painting. There was already a marriage agreement, so they got married anyway. They were married for 6 months but divorced after then. Anne was referred to as the “ugly wife”, which is honestly so sad. But I do think it’s funny that Henry got catfished. Henry’s fifth wife was Catherine Howard. During their marriage Henry became very overweight, and couldn’t walk. Henry again praised her with gifts and was so kind to her. But once he heard she was sleeping around she was killed.Catherine Parr was his sixth wife. Cathrine was a huge influence on culture during that time. Henry passed away before cathrine did. After learning all about Henry and his many many wives. I think it’s kinda ironic that Cathrine of Aragon was the only wife he ever loved, and after that he married two more catharines. I wonder if subconsciously he had such a big attachment to Cathrine that he was attracted to people named catherine? Also why didnt he keep trying to have a boy with cathrine if he loved her so much? Especially because they were so young and definitely had more time.

  454. Modern day slavery is a serious issues. Some things that can help prevent this is raising awareness about this issue, and supporting organizations that help victims of slavery. we should make stronger laws and enforcement about slavery. Its important for individuals, communities, and government to work and address this issue and we need to protect the rights and dignity of all people.

    • I agree, slavery is a huge issue and not enough people realize it still is common and happens to a lot of kids. There are many things we could do to help prevent this like what you said, getting more people to be aware of what is happening and enforcing more laws to help combat this. If there was stronger laws and more people aware of this, I feel like it could greatly help stop. When more laws are in place then there could be a better system of stopping this like The Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000. This was in place to help find the camps that enforced slavery and tried to abolish it. Or even something like the 13th amendment that states “Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convinced, shall exist within the United States or any place subject to their jurisdiction” Which is trying to forbids the idea of slavery and in forces a punishment.

  455. Share your thoughts on the “Potato King” – what are your thoughts, Tots? (…sorry)

    I think it is interesting that This is due out of respect by putting potatoes on someone’s grave. I think it  makes more sense that King Frederick basically introduced many many people to potatoes and maybe they wouldn’t be very like today if he  didn’t force his people to eat potatoes. I know that I really like potatoes. They are one of my favorite foods and you can make so many things with them. I couldn’t imagine my life without them. If I were someone being forced by King Frederick to eat this random thing I’ve never seen before I definitely would try it.

  456. PYOT from LR: What are your thoughts / what do you notice / why do you think Henry   VIII had so many wives?

    I think one of the reasons Henry had so many wives was because he was desperate for a male heir and was unsatisfied with the daughters he had. A lot of his wives had daughters not sons, or had complications.

    His first wife, Catherine was known for infertility issues and though she did have a son he died within weeks of being born. They also had a daughter together (bloody Mary) but he was unsatisfied so Henry claimed their marriage invalid and married Anne Boleyn, (had to start C of E to do so) and I think its because he was desperate for a male heir and didn’t see himself having one if he stayed with Catherine.

    Anne Boleyn was only married to Henry for 3 years because she was accused of treason, but she also only had a daughter (Elizabeth I) Her death was known for marking the start of the English reformation

    Henry’s third wife was Jane Seymour who did actually have a son. I think Henry probably would have stopped marrying different people after her but she died giving birth to their son Edward.

    As Henry got older he stopped having kids, but i feel like his motivation for at least his first few wives was definitely heir related, and then became more political as that became unrealistic to have more kids.

    • I agree I find it very selfish of Henry VIII to continue cheating on his wives even after getting his wish to have a son. This leads me to believe maybe the whole son act was just pretending to make up for his actions. I also found it very interesting that Henry VIII had the power to convince people that his marriage with Catherine was invalid. THis leads me to think that there must have been a lot of gender norms women had to achieve as a Queen of the Kind at the time.

  457. On my birthday the world health organization declared the H1N1 influenza virus outbreak a global pandemic. This did have a impact on modern society it affected public health systems, travel, and just daily life for people. This led to increases awareness of infectious diseases and why vaccination is very important. But it was a major event that helps us know approach and prepare for different pandemics today. This is a well known event in history because it received lots of media coverage and attention at this time because this was a global health crisis. This pandemic also had a really strong affect on the world and has a big impact on public health measures and awareness.

  458. Effects of the start of the “Columbian Exchange” – what stands out to you in regards to this article on the unique significance of the CE on the course of human history

    What stands out to me is the fact the the Europeans didn’t even ask the Native Americans of they could share their land and their resources, they just moved in with thousands of people and livestock because for some reason they assumed they were entitled to take over.

    • I think that things like this might have been the stem towards the discrimination against people who aren’t considered “normal” in society. What I’m trying to say is that if things like this hadn’t happened then things like racism wouldn’t be as big as they were or currently are. We take so much of how we live our life from when people did a long long time ago and it is now very outdated.

    • That is kind of mean and wrong how Europeans never asked to share the land and resources with Native Americans. Like Maya said this is like discrimination against them because they were not the “average” people they saw everyday and Europeans probably thought they were not as important and there land was not important enough just for them.

    • I agree with I find it very interesting how people back then had no remorse. It leads me to believe how their societies acted/ how their ruler acted. Many significant rulers at the time were very violent and got what they wanted. Although there are some good rulers most did what was best for themselves.

  459. PYOT from LR: What are your thoughts / what do you notice / why do you think HenryVIII had so many wives?

    Henry VIII had so many wives because he wanted power, and a male heir would have provided him with that. Lots of rulers during his time married for power and not for love so I don’t think it really mattered to him if he actually loved the woman. Just if she could provide better political opportunities and also if she looked pretty. He didn’t want to marry Anne of Cleves because she was “too ugly”. He was a mean and unfair husband because he executed Anne Boleyn and Catherine Howard for adultery even though he took on many mistresses, and Henry may have even fabricated the charges against Anne.

    • I had similar thoughts, Henry was definitely selfish and ignorant during his rule by disregarding his wives feelings. I also think his behavior was a good reflection on the social norms of their time. With seeing women as lesser (daughters meant nothing to him) and also I think women must have had less value in terms of relationships and status because he didn’t really care if he loved them so long as they helped him politically.

    • I agree, he probably wanted a lot of power and to maintain it so increasing the possibly of a male heir would do that. During those times, women weren’t really allowed to be really apart of the monarch, I noticed that they were kinda just there so I think that that’s why Henry doesn’t really care too much about their feelings or having a lot of wives

  460. PYOT from LR: What are your thoughts / what do you notice / why do you think Henry   VIII had so many wives?

    I had hear of the rhyme of Henry before from the play SIX but my takeaways were basically that he was an awful husband. In addition to his cruel behavior to them, he also had many secret other girls he was seeing, and it is clear he had no respect. All of his marriages were short lived whether it was because of Henry or because of natural causes.

    • I agree but to add on to why his marriages were short lived was his selfishness. This goes along with what you say about Henry being the problem. He wouldn’t stop marrying other women until he got what he wanted which was a baby boy. In the long run he never ended up getting what he wanted which I think was well deserved after what he put all of his ex-wives and children through.

      • I agree with you Maya, again I believe he was still in love with his first wife, but as you said he was a total jerk. He was extremely selfish and after having a boy, he got his karma in a way. He was honestly tramp and couldn’t stay loyal to one woman, then when one of his wife’s does it in return he has her killed. I just think that he was self centered and abusive.

      • I agree with you maya, I think that he deserved not getting what he wanted. Its crazy that he didnt respect them when he depended on them for his baby boy.

    • Kate, I agree that king Henry was a terrible spouse to his wives. I just think that he honestly had a hard time getting over his first wife because she was “the only one hes ever loved”. That’s clearly not a reason for him to act the way he did, but i think that he was honestly just heart broken over Catherine which lead to resentment for his other 5 wives.

      • I think this is an interesting point because while the article said that he only loved her I have also heard that they may have had more of a friendly working relationship and less of a love relationship after a few years of marriage. If this is the case its still selfish of him to divorce her because their relationship worked well. Obviously the article is probably more accurate than what I’ve heard but its still interesting

        • I’ve heard that too. But even if he considered Catherine a friend, they were married for 20+ years. I think if Henry only thought of Catherine as a friend he would have divorced her sooner. Especially because he is so self centered, he would want him to be the happiest he can.

      • Hannah I think you made an interesting point that is not really brought up in the article which is that he may have been also dealing with the loss of his first wife, and felt like maybe nobody could replace her, but I still dont think this is an excuse for his treatment

        • I agree with you. It sounds like the king was really in love with Catherine and I doubt that’s easy having to divorce him. But I also think during the time. Women weren’t nearly as equal as men and I don’t believe that England had a Queen ruling their land at the time. I bet that would be very difficult for one of his daughters to rule over England. Especially because the conservatives in England wouldn’t like that change, and that neglect would be hard.

    • Its especially selfish because not only was he seeing other girls, but it was rumored that he had a child with another girl too which is ironic because he beheaded Katherine Howard on claims of unloyalty even though he may have just made that up

  461. PYOT from LR (assist MS): Check out and share your thought on peeps’ from this unit and their love of cats and dogs – feel free to weigh in on your preference as well

    I think it’s kinda funny that Louis XV is such a cat lover. Especially because he owned both cats and dogs. Personally, I also own both cats and dogs, and I love them so much. But I’m a dog person. I also just think that there are a lot more cat lovers that are girls rather than boys. And The whole saying “A man’s best friend” is referring to a dog, not a cat. Also, I stereotype men in power, like a king, being very serious and intimidating, and I just see them having a pitbull or something rather than a cat. So I just think it’s a little funny. After reading the article about the history of the cavalier, I definitely find it interesting. The cavalier was considered a royal dog, and most royal families owned one of these dogs.

    • I agree that its very stereotypical.

    • That is funny. When I think of a ruling man I think of someone who probably has dogs because some dogs and be fierce and intimidating. Also dogs are know as a mans best friend. I personally am a dog person because cats just get easily upset and are kind of mean to others. Also when I think of a dog person I think of a social out going and carring about others. Having a cat is like being an introvert, only caring about your self and never being out going. So it is kind of funny how he was a cat person.

      • I agree with you Sloane, I think that Louis broke those stereotypes and I love that for him. I know what you’re saying about cats. Most cats arent friendly twords people they dont know/arent used to, which can make cats undesirable. But when you own a cat its very different. Especially when your cat likes you very much, its hard not to love them

    • I agree when I think of a powerful ruler especially Louis XV. It’s kinda funny to think of the guy who would intimidate his own people to be cuddled up with a fuzzy cat. I also found it interesting that he didn’t have any type of dog. I always feel like people back then would have some really scary dog that would bite someone’s head off or some type of war dog.

  462. Revisit slides 36-55 of unit 9 slides presentation, perhaps taking a look at vid links and proposed questions on slides 34 and 39, and tell me your thoughts – did Russia benefit from the reigns of Ivan and Peter? Or was Russia worse off as a result? Explain your thoughts:

    Ivan the Terrible was the first ruler of Russia to use the title czar. He expanded the territory of Russia and started off on a good note. But, after the death of his wife, he became cruel and killed people with no apparent reason. He had secret police to execute fear within his people and executed nobility and commoners. He stabbed his own son in a heated argument and had no care for others’ feelings and even lives to do such things without remorse.

    While Peter the Great, was a reformer who looked to Western Europe for inspiration. He modernized the Russian military and government, established a new modern capital, St. Petersburg, and introduced cultural reforms that westernized Russia.

    Neither of them benefited Russia greatly. Ivan’s rule planted fear and mistrust within Russian society and his violent actions led to instability and suffering. Even though Peter advanced Russia’s status as a European power, I think that he eroded traditional Russian culture and led to a loss of cultural identity.

    • I agree as much as Ivan and Peter helped Russia it was almost selfish of them. Most of the things they did would benefit themselves in some sort of way. Even though they wanted to make Russia a more westernized/freer place I think they added way to many rules and made the society even more stricter than before.

  463. PYOT from LR (assist MS): Check out and share your thought on peeps’ from this unit and their love of  cats  and  dogs  – feel free to weigh in on your preference as well

    Louis XV and many rulers in France started to own and love cats in the 18th century. The most popular breed was angoras which created the Maine coon breed. I have maine coon cats and they’re the sweetest cat breed in my opinion. I feel like a lot of people don’t like cats because they can be mean and they can bite and scratch people but my cats never attack anybody. Also, people might not like cats because they are anti-social, but my cats love to cuddle with me and hang out with me, and they are also more independent than dogs. I think cats might have been better pets for rulers because they allow people to relax after long days of hard work and sometimes that is better than being around an energetic dog. Also, since cats are more independent and require less care than dogs, it gives rulers more time and energy to put into other work.

    • I like cats, but dogs are better in my opinion. Some cats are very nice and love you but I have had many experiences where they scratch and bite you. I am allergic to cats too. It is really funny how many French rulers started to get cats. I would feel like a ruler would want a dog. Leaders just fit the personality of a dog better than a cat. But they do not need a lot of maintenance which is good if you are busy all day. Which I would imagine kings would be every occupied. Cats are also in general less energetic so they do not have to go on walks. Allowing the king to get more work done without distractions. I know when I am doing homework literally anything can be a distraction causing me to be less productive. Like I see my fridge and I think about what I want to eat, then how much I like something.

      • All the people who have been attacked by cats have to meet maine coon cats because they are so sweet.

    • That’s a good point, and I’ve never really had bad experiences with cats either, mine was a sweetheart and i loved relaxing with her after a long day, like you said that would be better for rulers. Another reason I think is that Cats are generally more magestic/royal looking if you know what i mean. While I love my dogs i recognise they are very aloof and generally not the animal a royal family would want to represent them. Also if you think of lions they are like the king of the jungle so kinds may have wanted an animal like that to represent them

      I am personally a dog person, though i do love cats. I just find that its easier to bond with them and I like taking my dogs on walks and runs to the park and stuff which you cant really do with cats. I still love my cat a lot but its just harder to spend time with them because of how much they relax.

      • I can see how it would be harder to spend more time with cats than dogs, but I don’t really mind because they are sooooo distracting when I’m trying to get homework done because when they’re in a cuddly mood, my cat will just sit on top of me and prevent me from doing any work. When I don’t have to get work done, I can easily spend time with my cats so I guess this isn’t really a problem for me since I have three cats who might be in different moods at different times.

  464. PYOT from a peer: Check out this article regarding how Ivan the Terrible got his name. What stands out, and do you think Ivan deserved the nickname he got?

    In my opinion, he did deserve is nickname. Even though, he had a traumatic childhood and the loss of his wife, that’s not an excuse to kill innocent people because there’s something wrong with him.

    • I agree that he should have this nickname but I can also see it from a different point of view. With this name, to me it stands out more than just Ivan and I don’t think he deserves any of that extra attention with the name.

    • I feel like he deserves the name but really does not. Like he did really bad things but he is not the only thing to blame because of his childhood and what he was. He saw a lot of people get killed and his parents get killed when he was young. There is no excuse for what he did but there are reasons that could have led to what he did.

  465. PYOT from ZM: Search up your birthday and write about any important events or holiday that happened on that day. How much importance did that event have on modern society? Is it a well known event/holiday or not? Why do you think that might be?

    I think the most important event that happened on my birthday was that in 1507 German cartographer Martin Waldseemüller is the first to use the name America on his world map “Universalis Cosmographia”. This is important because it changed when the world was seen. The map helped traders and merchants to get a scope into where exactly they need to go it made the trading routes easier. Waldseemüller was also the first to put “America” on the map which later became the official name which is recognizable. It was important because without the map, maybe people could have fought over what they’d like to name the new country/continent. It could have ended in a large dispute but I didn’t. I think is marks a time when America was finally recognized as it’s own, independent nation.

  466. In the continuing effort to make sure Her-stories don’t get lost in the teaching of HIStory, check out these bad-ass ladies, and possibly talk about how and why herstories still get underemphasized today

    The article shows women like Caterina Sforza, who did things that men usually did back then even though they were women. Caterina Sforza’s is a good example to women because it shows that they can do anything because she commanded armies, defended her land, and played a big role in creating Renaissance Italy. She challenges how things usually were back then and sometimes today where people think that men are better and that women can’t do anything. However, despite positive stories like Caterina Sforza’s, there aren’t as many women in history as there are men or ones that are remembered and talked about today. This shows that people did not value women back then and that the people that did, didn’t even speak out or try and challenge the social norms. Even today, women stories are often not shown due to a man that did something equivalent just because they are a man. This shows a bad understanding of history because women were a big party of it and they weren’t highlighted enough. to address this we need to preserve these women we need to keep their stories alive so they don’t get lost in history.

  467. Read about the roles of “wet nurses” and their lives, how they became one, and their important role in the Royal family with this link, and the horrifying history of them with this link.

    Wet nurses played a crucial role in the Royal family, serving as second mother to the kids of royals. In the article it shows how these women were usually from lower classes and were chosen based on how healthy they are and their ability to produce milk. sometimes even their physical appearance. Even though helping raise a royal child was a prestigious job. They didn’t have the best lives. They had bad schedules and didn’t see their families much, they were also judged in society. The article shows the case of Frances Browne, who nursed four royal babies, showing what her work had her do. Also the article show’s the tragic history of wet nursing, including when some nurses were abused. This shows the importance of recognizing the contributions and sacrifices made by these women in nurturing the future monarchs.

    • I agree with you Brendan. With how important their roles were in society they were grossly mistreated. With all of the work they do for their children, just for them to turn around and abuse them like that. They basically leave their own family to service the royals. I just think they should’ve been treated better. Regardless if they were in a lower class.

      • I agree, it’s sad that these woman raised their children yet were abused, why do you think this is?

        I think this because they were from lower social classes meaning they didn’t have a lot of power. Since they developed a close, social role with royal families children, maybe the mothers felt jealous hence why they abused and treated them poorly.

    • I agree. Wet Nurses had a very important role for the royal families since they were like a baby sitter/second mother. They had to do at lot of work and did not have a good life. I feel like people did not care about what they did. They had to work a lot and not see there actual family that often. It is sad to hear that some wet nurses were abused because they had part of helping the royal family which feels very important and a privilege. They should have been acknowledge more than they were and what they did. It was not an easy job and seems sad.

  468. PYOT from LR: What are your thoughts / what do you notice / why do you think Henry   VIII had so many wives?

    Early in the article it said that his first wife, Catherine of Aragon, was the only wife that he truly loved. I think that this impacted his later other marriages because it will never work out if he doesn’t truly love them. King Henry left Catherine because she was unable to produce a boy. I think that doing that was very dramatic and they could have tried again until they had a boy. He divorced her against the will of the church which upset a lot of people. When he did this he was just doing what was best for him and not thinking about the church.

  469. PYOT from a peer: Read this article about Jane Grey – what stands out to you? Maybe also check out this article on what would have happened if she had kept the throne. Any other ideas on scenarios that could have occurred if Jane had remained queen, or any overall thoughts?’

    Lady Jane Grey is notoriously famous for only being queen for 9 days. She was born into royalty, one of the many daughters of King Henry the Eighth. Her parents were disappointed she wasn’t born a boy until they realized she wasn’t completely useless. Her parents had very high expectations for their daughter. Her mother passed while giving birth to their son(Edward) they desired so much. Jane’s parents then planned for Jane and Edward to get married, so Jane could be the queen. That stood out to me significantly, honestly just because that’s so crazy. The whole idea was that incest was not acceptable at all. Now if you commit incest you will be arrested, regardless if it was forced like how Jane was forced. After Henry’s death Edward became king, as a child. This also was crazy to me because I don’t see how a child could be even considered to be a ruler of a whole kingdom. Why wouldn’t they just pick Jane? Edward died, and Jane was forced to take the Crown. The people of England was disappointed for this decision, they didn’t want for Jane to be Queen and neither did Jane. Because of this she was accused of treason, and was killed. I think Jane’s story is extremely sad, and I believe that it’s honestly unlucky how her life turned out. Being born into a family that was out of the gate not happy with her. And then being forced to the crown. Honesty is upsetting.

    • I think not being wanted by Jane’s family is very unhealthy. Even though people thought of her as very bright her family probably brought her confidence down a lot more. If her parents don’t think she can rule as well as her younger brother how is she going to be able to be a successful ruler? I also found it super sad that she was accused of treason once again it shows how if you aren’t a male figure in the royal family you had very little say and probably would get executed for just being alive.

      • Good point Natalie,

        Do you think that if her parents had been more supportive, or if she was a male how much longer her rule would’ve been? Or how different her life might’ve been if she wasnt born before Edward. Do you think she wouldve had a more enjoyable life?

  470. PYOT from ZM: Search up your birthday and write about any important events or holiday that happened on that day. How much importance did that event have on modern society? Is it a well known event/holiday or not? Why do you think that might be?

    My birthday is July 18th. The only thing that popped up when I looked it up was Nelson Mandela International day. I personally haven’t ever heard of this holiday. The purpose of this holiday is to take action and inspire change in your society. The holiday is named after a man named Nelson Mandela who devoted his whole life to service humanity. He was a South African president and had a huge contribution to the culture of peace and freedom. I think this holiday should be much bigger than it is because the meaning of it is so important for all societies. 

  471. PYOT from LR (assist MS): Check out and share your thought on peeps’ from this unit and their love of  cats  and  dogs  – feel free to weigh in on your preference as well

    I am a dog person by far but thats not to say that I dont like cats. I think that its kinda cool how some people get their pet based off of their lifestyle, and it doesnt depend all on the animal itself. For instance people who may have a busier life, may own a cat because they are lower maintenance and independent, and while they still require the love and attention dogs get, they dont like it as often, so thats perfect for people who have busier lives. They also dont need to go out to the bathroom and thats another reason. However people who have more free time or even just the lifestyle, like activeness and a best friend, might get a dog. I also read about the history of the King Charles Spaniel and found it cool that this dog was a “royal” breed and every royal family owned one. They liked the characteristics of the dog and the facial features. I love my dog and she is literally the only reason I wake up in the morning.

    • Cats fit the lifestyle of Kings and Queens but not the personality you need in order to be one. Dogs have the personality of independent, confident, laidback, affectionate, adaptable. Kings need the personality of independent for when you have to think of things and are not relying on others, adaptable for when things are not going right and you need to make change and confident in what you are doing. If you start second guessing what you did that leads to issues, you should almost always go with your gut. The general personality traits for a cat are fearful, dominate and impulsive which can not go so great when you are a king. If you are fearful then you start to question what can happen from you actions or if you actions/decisions are correct. Then if you are dominate that could be good but you have to realize that other people have power and there opinion matters, then impulsive which is really not good because when you make decisions or actions to quick it can end up going a bad way if you do not consider everything. It is really funny how they had mostly cats but there personality and traits needed to be like a dog. it does make sense why they had cats, it is because they are less maintenance and need less attention compared to dogs.

  472. In response to: Read this article about the weirdest people in history. Who were the weirdest in your opinion? Any thoughts on their ways? Things that you found crazy weird? 

    I think the weirdest people in this article is Joshua Norton. “Joshua Norton declared himself the “Emperor of the United States and Protector of Mexico.” And he ordered the dissolution of the US Congress and even issued his own currency.” I think this is weird because of how random it was. He just decided one day that to get out of legal trouble he should declare to be emperor. I wonder if he really thought that would work. In the article it also says that people did listen to him in some places and I wonder why. The only reason I can think of is that he was a manipulator, but even then, I don’t think that would work.

    Another thing I noted while reading this article was that a lot of people on the list had a connection to bagpipes (Bill Millin, Jack Churchill). I wonder why both these soldiers chose to do that? And both these people did something that hadn’t been done by others in the war. Were these people really weird or was there approach just different?

  473. Read about the roles of “wet nurses” and their lives, how they became one, and their important role in the Royal family with this link, and the horrifying history of them with this link.

    I thought it was horrible how rude the rich people were to the wet nurses who literally did so much for them, even prioritizing the noble’s children over their own so much that their own children die. The nobles treated the wet nurses horribly, even thought they were crucial in the time period.

  474. Check out and share your thought on peeps’ from this unit and their love of  cats  and  dogs  – feel free to weigh in on your preference as well

    I can fully understand their love for dogs and cats because they are nice friends and help us when we are sad so, it fully understandable ( even if i prefer dogs than cats)

    • I completely agree Henrique. If I lived back then I would definitely have at least one dog. I think that they are so fun to be around and bring comfort. Right now I have two dogs and I love them so much they are so fun to play with. I think cats are less exciting but they’re still cute, they are just less playful.

  475. PYOT from a peer: Check out this article regarding how Ivan the Terrible got his name. What stands out, and do you think Ivan deserved the nickname he got?

    Something that stood out to me was when he got into a heated argument with his son and ended up killing him. Now I understand getting into fights with your family, trust me I get into fights all the time with mine, I just think killing someone is a big deal. (I hope you do too #staysafe)So for that reasoning I believe Ivan deserves the nickname “Ivan the Terrible”

    • I agree, killing his son over something so small is literally enough to give him that title.

  476. PYOT from LR: What are your thoughts / what do you notice / why do you think Henry   VIII had so many wives?

    I think it’s crazy how much wife’s does this man got, even saying that one he really loved was Catherine of Aragon, so its’s strange but it was probably because to maintain his power.

  477. Share your thoughts on the “Potato King” – what are your thoughts, Tots? (…sorry)

    I think the Prussians had a smart idea to not eat what they do not know just in case but if everyone lived like that then we wouldn’t have the joy of eating potatoes and probably many other things. King Fredericks idea on how to spread the consumption of food was very clever but it is also kind of funny to think that people made potatoes that big of a deal.  

  478. PYOT from LR: What are your thoughts / what do you notice / why do you think Henry VIII had so many wives?

    The reason that Henry the 8th had so many wives is because he wanted a male heir. His first wife he stopped liking and his second wife he beheaded for this reason. He lost interest in his wives very fast and have many affairs, even started a new church so he could get a new wife. I think the main reason is that he got bored easily and didn’t want to have a stable relationship with one person; he had children with many of his wife’s ladies in waiting. All in all, not a great person when it came to relationships. He didn’t really seem to value marriage as much as he should.

  479. PYOT from a peer: Check out this article regarding how Ivan the Terrible got his name. What stands out, and do you think Ivan deserved the nickname he got?

    I think Ivan the Terrible does deserve his name because I remember in class that Ivan actually promoted people calling him “The Terrible”. Although I think he wouldn’t have been called Ivan the Terrible if it wasn’t for his childhood. For most people their childhood influences who they are. For example Ivan had been surrounded by people who would continually abuse him or neglect him. This makes sense because later in his life he abused his daughter/killed his son. Maybe if Ivan’s childhood was a lot better he could have been an even better ruler.

    • I agree, his childhood and enviroment he grew up in probably was one of the leading causes for what he did but also he could have had some mental issues which could also lead to his actions.

    • I agree Natalie. I feel that in his case especially, your childhood really shapes you as a person, whether it’s in a good way or bad way. I feel like it also carried into his mindset of what’s right and wrong. Since he was used to being abused as a kid, maybe he thought it was ok for him to punch a pregnant woman and cause her to have a miscarriage.

      • Yeah, when you are young you are learning what things are like and what is ‘normal’. So he learned at a young age that violence is a common thing. His mindset was definitely shaped by his enviroment and childhood. To me it is concerning that peoples childhood can shape and effect them so much.

  480. Take a look at the 1st 11 “Maps that explain America” and tell me what stands out to you regarding the roots and influences on the Americas both before and after European exploration and colonization:

    I feel that Columbus changed the shape of america. In map 5 it shows what america looks like. There are more societies that are spread out which makes me believe america wouldn’t be as advanced as the rest of the world because there were not different societies exchanging ideas so they were more of a cultural differentiation that diffusion before Columbus. In map 11 it showed how more and more land was taken by Europeans over the years. It shows how Europeans basically took over the americas when there had been people living there forever kinda shaping the American culture today.

    • You have a really good point, while Columbus may not have been the best he did connect a lot of people who shared ideas to further our society. This definitely shaped america to what it is today even if the way we got there wasn’t the best.

  481. Share your thoughts on the “Potato King” – what are your thoughts, Tots? (…sorry)

    I thought it was very interesting that people were afraid of potatoes. Out of all the foods that people ate back then I was surprised that potatoes were the food people wouldn’t eat. I also always felt like potatoes were such a european thing so it shocked me that potatoes were actually from South America. I think King Frederick the Great did a lot more than just grow potatoes for his people he influenced a new cuisine that most people in Germany eat today.

    • People were so afraid of potatoes which seems odd to most people because potatoes are eaten everywhere now. King Fredrick the great was a smart king since he never in forced people to eat the potatoes but made them look valuable by having people guard them and this conveniently happened during a famine so the potatoes were like a “life saver” to the people who ate them. He has a big impact because it caused a great spread and acceptance of potatoes.

    • I agree, Natalie. Considering how popular and common potatoes are today, it is weird to think that people actually had a fear of them. I agree, I never really thought about it but I don’t think that I would have guessed that potatoes are from Europe. I agree, he definitely had a HUGE impact on people all over the worlds eating habits. If it wasn’t for him, we could still possibly fear potatoes.

  482. PYOT from ZM: Search up your birthday and write about any important events or holiday that happened on that day. How much importance did that event have on modern society? Is it a well known event/holiday or not? Why do you think that might be?

    My birthday is June 18th, and some important things that happened on this day in the past are:

    1983- Sally K Ride became america’s first female astronaut in space.This is super cool because in general space travel is important in itself but its also super impactful for the first woman to fly to space. Its impactful because especially earlier in history the divide between womens job “rights” and mens was a lot different than it is now and this helped break the barrier.

    1979- President Jimmy Carter and Soviet President Leonid I. Brezhnev signed the SALT II strategic arms limitation treaty in Vienna. I feel like in general all traties signed are always important to bring peace and also to put more limitations on unsafe actions. In general it promotes the general wellfare of society.

    2021- Joe Biden signed legislation adding Juneteenth as a national holiday. (juneteenth is celebrated June 19th) Juneteenth is super important for the black lives matter movement, and while it was celebrated for many years prior it was never a federal holiday until Biden signed the legislation on June 18th.

  483. Read this article about the weirdest people in history. Who were the weirdest in your opinion? Any thoughts on their ways? Things that you found crazy weird? 

    The person I thought the weirdest was Lieutenant General Adrian Carton de Wiart. First off, he dropped out of school, faked his name, and wasn’t even a british citizen just to be able to join the army which is very odd as back then most people were drafted and didn’t want to fight. Later in Somalia he was shot in the eye and ear and somehow survived even with the medical equipment back then. Even after this you would think he would give up and not go back to war, but he was actually happy to move to England as he thought that was where the most action was going. This is weird and crazy because it just shows his pure dedication to fight in the war and not stop. AND then he was shot in the head, hips, ear, ankle, and ribs while also injuring his hand very badly. Doctors told him that he didn’t need amputation so he just tore off his fingers, which seems very psychotic, but didn’t stop him as he continued to fight. As he was flying over the Mediterranean Sea his plane was shot down, which obviously he survived, he was then taken as prisoner in italy. He THEN escaped but then got captured again. In the end you could pretty much say he was psychotic because of how much he went through without really letting it stop him. He even said he “enjoyed the war.” 

    Someone that I think wasn’t that weird was Lord Timothy Dexter. I didn’t seem to find him that weird because they classified him as “weird” because of odd decisions he made but to me it seemed like he was smart and could make the best out of bad situations. First off, when he traveled with 42,000 warming pans to a country that enjoys hot weather and didn’t need them, he was smart and turned them into ladles and sold them to sugar and molasses plantation owners. This isn’t weird as he just was smart about it and was very good at making business decisions. Also when he traveled to Newcastle to sell coals to a place with an already very large coal mine, he got very lucky as the mine was on strike and made a crazy profit as people came to him to buy coals. Overall, I wouldn’t consider him to be a “weird person” just someone with a lot of luck but also very smart and able to make good decisions when needed.

    • I agree with what you’re saying about Timothy Dexter. But the main point about him is that I was thinking about how he paid a group of trustworthy people and faked his own death to see if people would be sad to see that he died. So yes, I can see your point about how he was a smart business man but I feel like your might be missing the point that if you are that insecure about the people around you that you fake your own death I would consider him to be a weird person in general.

      • Yeah I guess you could say that. I was just mostly thinking about his money decisions and how he was a smart man which didn’t really seem odd to me. The more weird part about him was his personal life which I didn’t really talk about and maybe I should have as there was a bit about it on the article. I mainly focused on his business life because I feel like that was included more in the article and they kind of inferred that’s where his weirdness came from. I wouldn’t say his decisions were weird as they suggested in the article but more of smart and just plain out lucky on his part.

        • I agree with William. I like the points you made on your first weird person because he had the most damaging personality which caused him to become phycotic. But I would also consider Timothy Dexter to be equally as weird because of faking your own death. While he was successful, its just not normal to do that.

  484. PYOT from a peer: As we learn more about the Columbian Exchange, we learn more and more about the many different foods that were exchanged in the process. What is one food product that was brought to the Americas due to the Columbian Exchange that you’re thankful for?

    some of the food from the Colombian exchange that i am grateful for is citrus fruit. I’m grateful for this because oranges are my favorite food, and also because lemons limes and oranges are used in so many desserts and just cooking in general. I wouldn’t be able to make and eat my favorite foods without them.

    Another food I’m grateful for is peaches. I was a little shocked these weren’t from america because of how popular they are and the fact that Georgia is so often associated with peaches, but I’m grateful for them nonetheless. Also they probably boosted our economy a lot (especially Georgia) which is really good for america as a whole

    • I agree I know Columbus brought a bunch of diseases but he also brought a lot of valuable fruits that are essential to a lot of peoples “healthy” diets today. If it weren’t for columbus we may have a different type of food that is necessary to eat or maybe we wouldn’t be as healthy today. I know fruits especially Oranges have a lot of good minerals and vitamins that do protect us from a lot of common diseases.

  485. Read this article about the weirdest people in history. Who were the weirdest in your opinion? Any thoughts on their ways? Things that you found crazy weird?

    I found this article interesting because the people on it weren’t as weird as i had expected. Timothy Dexter had more dumb luck I think, and less was a generally weird person because he made poor decisions that happened to end in his favor.

    Leo Major seemed like a war hero, not really someone who should be on the weirdest peoples list and i’m not really sure what he did to get there.

    overall i’m not really sure about this list and i’m sure there are plenty of other people in the world who have done more weird things.

    • I agree, Zoe. These are only more known people that got on this list. For all we know, there is probably much weirder people somewhere doing things that seem weird to us, that nobody even knows about.

  486. Read this article about the weirdest people in history. Who were the weirdest in your opinion? Any thoughts on their ways? Things that you found crazy weird? 

    One thing that I noticed was a lot of the people kinda insane ideas either saved their lives or benefitted themselves. One of the people “Bill Millan” was a Scottish Bagpiper that would play his bagpipe over battlefields as much as it sounds stupid the German soldiers thought he was really out of his mind that they didn’t bother to shoot him. In some ways this is kind of smart because what if you knew that you were gonna die and needed to protect yourself from enemy fire pretending to be crazy is actually really smart. Maybe Bill Millan wasn’t actually crazy and was just a really good actor/ bagpiper.

    • I also think that is an insane person. Like why would you bring a bag pipe, sword and bow to war. There are many more tools that are more useful than a bag pipe. Like an actual gun. Also who would you want to have to carry around 3 large sizes objects when you could bring just one. It is cool though that he was really good at fighting with his weapons. I feel like he might have wanted to show off his ability to fight and kill people without the ordinary gun.

  487. Sorry, for my last post the 2 links are

    https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/migrants-arrested-in-new-york-city-robbery-pattern/

    https://www.foxnews.com/us/illegal-migrant-flips-middle-fingers-charged-attacking-nypd-times-square

  488. Check out (and fill out your own copy as directed) of this political spectrum activity to explain / identify the different spectrum labels and their meanings by providing examples; AND/OR take my little goofy prospect quiz on slide 11, AND/OR the several links to other prospect quizzes on slide12 of Unit 9 presentation; what are your thoughts on any of your results?  did they support or surprise what you thought you’d see as results?

    Slideshow results – When we did the in class political spectrum thing I got a 4. This made sense because my dad is conservative and my mom is moderate. My results for this one did not surprise me due to many families and how they are the major ones to affect your political beliefs. 

    Website result for Political Typology Quiz – I got the middle right which is in between moderate and conservative. Which again makes since to me and did not surprise me as my parents are the same. 

    I side with quiz – This one also made since and did not surprise me as my parents side to the republican side and my quiz cam out to a republican. 

    Overall none of my results surprised my due to my families political views and how they greatly impact the views on children and their family/kids. 

  489. Check out the JG / CC video on the English Civil War – what stands out to you about what changes, and what doesn’t, in the turbulent 17th century in England?

    What stands out to me – 

    • When King James tried to unite Scotland, england, wales and ireland he had many problems due to many different religious, economic and general diversity
      • This stands out to me because I would feel like someone who really wanted to unite and get many places together would try very hard and not care about all of the disagreements that happened. But it also makes sense because they are different places with different rulers and different influences
    • If you disapprove of the king you basically got beaten to death, like getting your face hitt, people would break your bones and hang you.
      • This stands out to me because I would have thought they would be a little nicer to people living there and not beat them up if they disapprove of the king. People should be able to make their own decisions and choices if they like the king or not. They would not be forced to like them and if not get bitten
    • Became a republic but was ruled by a person who was really a dictator
      • I would have felt like after everything that happened they might realize that absolute monarchies or dictatorships do not work so great to govern a society. 
    • King Charles the second wanted to become King after seeing his father die
      • I am sorry but who would want to become king after seeing your dad who was a king die. Like did he want to fix a major issue that happened and fix society. But after seeing a family member die you could contemplate your decisions . 

    What does not stand out ot me-

    • King James tried a lot of things but failed, even trying to have his son marry someone else who had connections who he thought would help
      • This does make sense because it seems like britain does not like change and wants a lot of power. What does stand out to me is how dedicated he was even making his son marry someone who had connections in order to try and get more power
    • Many people did not like people trying to take their power
      • This does not stand out to me as they really did not want anyone to take their land and their main goal was to achieve as much as they could. 
    • Everyone wanted more power
      • This does not stand out to me because everyone probably wanted to feel achieved or fix some issue that has happening because there was a lot. 
    • Kings tried to find loopholes to continue taxation even though he was not supposed to
      • This does not stand out to me since all of the kings seemed very determined to do what they wanted to do and not let parliament or anyone stop them. 

    Overall there was a lot of things that sort of stood out to me and some things that did not just because of how England was back then.

  490. Read this article about the weirdest people in history. Who were the weirdest in your opinion? Any thoughts on their ways? Things that you found crazy weird?

    I thought it was interesting how the article had a lot of people in there that were soldiers or went to war. Kind of points towards the impact that war has on people’s minds and mental health. I would say that Leo Major wasn’t weird, he was just incredibly brave and skilled. The story of how he captured 93 enemy soldiers and then liberated an entire town by himself sounds like something out of a movie, and it really just shows how he’s a genius for figuring out how to do that, not that he was weird or crazy. Some people, like Adrian Carton, actually were very crazy, because that general said that he “enjoyed the war” and he tore his own fingers off. Physically it is possible, but psychologically it would take a crazy person for their mind to let them do it.

    • Yeah, from the posts people have done so far there is a major theme of how most of the people went to war some how. Adrian Carton sounds like a strange person. Why would you enjoy war and tar your fingers off? I understand how war could be fun, but why is it fun, you are risking your life and killing others. He seems like a person with some mental issues as taring off your fingers and enjoying war is not a normal thing to do.

    • To add on to this, I think that Timothy Dexter wasn’t very weird he was just very gullible and it happened to turn out well for him. I put him on the luckiest people of all time list, but not on the craziest people list.

  491. PYOT from ZM: Pick a current event from the news, provide a link to an article you read and talk about why you think this event is important. Provide opposing views from how the event reported? Why did you pick to write about it, how do you think this event will impact history, short term and long?

    The news article I found was made from CBS News and it was about how “7 migrants arrested in NYC robbery pattern, officials say” This article is about how as you could already tell from the title the police arrested 7 people because lately their has been a citywide robbery pattern and the police believe they are part of group responsible for a citywide pattern of cell phone robberies. Some of the stolen goods were recovered in the raid that they had conducted. The most important thing that I think is going to come out of this is that the police said “These small number of people are breaking the law and are having a huge impact on our public safety, and that is why we zeroed in on them,” I feel like this is going to be a very big deal because as we all know that some people lately have not been happy with the amount of immigrants coming into the country and a example of this is that even locally their was a discussion about the amount of immigrants and I do not know a lot about of this discussion or how it conducted but I do know their was a discussion about it and a certain amount of people are not happy about this and I then they start to hear that Immigrants are committing crimes and as the police said “These small number of people are breaking the law and are having a huge impact on our public safety” I feel like their is going to be a lot less amount of people that are going to be open to the idea of immigrants coming in locally.” and some of the people that were all for having immigrants come in locally might rethink their decision about this or be more open to the other side of the discussion. Another thing that I found in the news was another news article that was related to this article I had already stated and it said how a “Illegal migrant flips middle fingers after being charged with attacking NYPD in Times Square” The mans name was Jhoan Boada, and he was 22 years old. He made the offensive double handed signal after he was released from police custody on charges of assaulting a police officer and gang assault for the shocking beat down in times square on Saturday near a migrant shelter and the worst part about this is that he didn’t appear bothered by the serious charges as he flipped his two middle fingers and smirked at reporters and photographers outside the Midtown South Precinct. These to articles I feel are very related because it is both about two immigrates coming into the U.S.A. and committing acts of violence that not completely not acceptable to do. A lot of people that did not want immigrants to be coming into the U.S. could easily use this as good evidence how we should take more action do start defending our border and close it up as Donald Trump was trying to do before he left office and now Joe Biden as opened the border back up and they could say that we should start shutting down the borders because immigrants are making the U.S. not as much as a safe place as it was before. I feel like this is very important because it can make the U.S. considering putting a higher security on our border and maybe try and slow down the amount of immigrants that are coming to the U.S. per day. I thought to write about this because as we know the amount of immigrants coming into the U.S. per day is getting very large and a lot of Americans are trying to slow down the amount and these articles could end up being good reasoning for these actuations and I feel like could be a big part in the discussion on putting more security on our borders. I feel like this could have not a very large impact on our history but in the future could be used as evidence for the U.S. government to start to shut down our bordars so the articles in total are not very important by themselves but added together they could help change the U.S. border policy

  492. History and numbers of the slave trade – what stands out to you regarding the impact and growth of slavery in the Americas / the future US?

    What stands out to me after reading this article is why did those in the Americas decide to bring specifically Africans, against their will to be degraded in a new environment to be abused? Although the main cause is agriculture, the new country/colonies were very fond of the idea of freedom (from Britain) so why did they think that their freedom was more important than Africans? If it was based on their physical differences, why were they seen as “bad” differences? What causes the whole indifference?

  493. A food I am grateful for from the Columbian Exchange is Tomatoes. Tomatoes are very diverse and can be used to make a lot of foods, snacks, or sides. I could have a nice tomato soup with my grilled cheese or chopped sliced in my turkey sandwich. There’s so much to do with tomatoes and you can make them taste different ways with different species or have different textures based on how you prep and cook them. In conclusion, I’m grateful for tomatoes from the Columbian Exchange because of the diversity of the vegetable and how it can be made to be a lot of delicious things.

    • Yeah, I do not love tomatoes but I am still grateful for them, a tomato soup or a tomato sauce is amazing. I am also grateful for the Columbian exchange because of potatoes. They can be made into so many different things that you might not expect like:

      • Mashed potatoes.
      • French fries.
      • Potato chips.
      • Hash browns.
      • Potato soup.
      • Potato salad.
      • Shepherd’s pie.
      • Potato pancakes.
      • Crispy air fried potatoes
      • Twice baked potatoes
      • Potato boats
      • Pan fried potatoes
      • Potato croquetts

      Just to list some. There is even more. They are also rather cheap and can keep you full for a long time.

      • Yes, I agree Sloane, potatoes are delicious. Another thing is that during that time period Europeans would eat around 10 pounds of potatoes each day and led to a population boom. Since I descend from a bunch of different European countries, I wonder if potatoes weren’t exchanged my ancestors wouldn’t have made it.

        • That is crazy and I did not know that. Potatoes went from something that was not eaten in Europe, Asia or Africa to Europeans eating 10 pounds a day. That is a good thought you brought up, if the Columbian Exchange did not happen and people started eating them would we been alive or our parents, grandparents and greatgrand parents

  494. Thomas Hobbes and John Locke’s ideas were both beneficial in governing history. Hobbes promotes absolute rule while Lockes promotes the opposite. I think that John Locke’s ideas are better for running a more successful government because of the inclusivity in decision making.
    In Thomas Hobbes’ book “Leviathan,” he argues that life in a state of nature, without government, would be poor, nasty, brutal , and short.To escape this chaos, Hobbes believed people needed a strong, central authority. He envisioned a social contract where everyone would give up some of their freedoms in exchange for order and protection, leading to an absolute monarchy.
    While Locke, had a more optimistic view. He believed in the natural rights of life, liberty, and property. In his “Two Treatises of Government,” he argues that the government’s role is to protect these rights, and if it fails to do so, citizens have the right to overthrow it. Locke’s ideas were super influential in the development of democracy and even influenced the American Declaration of Independence.
    Locke was a supporter of individual rights and freedoms. He believed that a government should be built upon the consent of the governed, and its main purpose is to protect the natural rights of its citizens. This idea is pretty powerful because it puts the people at the center of the government’s responsibilities.
    He believes a government is limited and is always accountable to those it governs. This creates a system of checks and balances where power is not concentrated in the hands of a few, reducing the risk of dictatorship. His idea of a representative government, where leaders are elected by the people and for the people.
    So, Locke’s ideas about government are the best because they promote freedom, equality, and justice.

  495. Read this article about the weirdest people in history. Who were the weirdest in your opinion? Any thoughts on their ways? Things that you found crazy weird? 

    Lord Timothy Dexter was a very sting man but one thing that he did really stood out to me was the he faked his own death by highering men that he could trust than hade them make the funeral very formal and like have fancy wine as well as exotic liquor he did this to see what all of the people would do but when he saw that his wife was smiling. So latter that night he snuck into his own house and caned his wife in the kitchen and when the others walked in they saw him a man that was ment to be dead

    • I agree, someone who takes their own death to see what others do is so odd. You really have to have something wrong with you to spend the money to fake a death and making it look very realistic and normal. Also his wife must have not loved him or he did bad things because someone who smiles when there spouse might be dead has issues. They both seem like interesting people and had possible mental issues. I just really do not understand why someone work fake there own death to see others reactions. Also killing your wife because she was smiling is not right to do either. He is an odd/weird man for sure.

      • It makes me question, is faking your death worse than risking it? After deep thought, I still can’t think about it. I recognized that today, people fake their deaths as political strategy, so that wouldn’t make it as weird. However, he did it on behalf of his own interest. However, he technically did it kinda like an experiment in order to find a specific result. I don’t see the rationale behind risking your life. Faking your death, as we know, is fake. Risking your life though is real. When you consider the actual impact that these can have, I believe that risking your life is worse than faking your death. Do you think faking your death is weirder than risking it?

        • That is a hard thing to even think about. I feel like faking your own death and risking your own death are just hard to think about. There is a lot that has to be done for both. Like faking your own death, you need to find people who will do it, get everything you need and arrange it. If you risk your own life you have to put some thought into it. They are equally as bad I feel like. The impact of risking your own life and dying has a greater impact and a wider impact on people but as we know from what Lord Timothy Dexter did, he ended up killing his wife because she smiled when it happened.

  496. I think that the potato king did something that saved his land. If he didn’t get his people to eat the potatoes they might have died from hunger.

    • I agree, what King Fredrick II/”the potato king” did was very important to helping out his monarchy. He was very smart with his tactics to as he did not force people to eat them and had people guarding them during the day so people started to think that they were valuable. He also never inforced people to eat them. I would say it makes since why people did not want to eat the potatoes because they come from a family that is poisonous for humans to eat. With out his actions people could have died as potatoes are a great food for keeping people full and they are rather cheap. Potatoes are a staple around the world now to which is really cool to see the jump from not a lot of people eating them to people eating some type of potatoes almost every day.

    • I agree Tyler. I think that what the Potato King did was incredibly useful and successful for his people. His tactics were well thought-out and they had a purpose, he didn’t just try to put the potatoes in their faces and force them to eat them. If he hadn’t had these strategies that he did, there might not have been enough food for all of his people therefore they would’ve gone hungry and starved. He really put in all of his effort to save his people.

  497. Read this article about the weirdest people in history. Who were the weirdest in your opinion? Any thoughts on their ways? Things that you found crazy weird? 

    I read about Jack Churchill, also known as “Mad Jack”. He just seemed like a really interesting guy. He has the only recorded longbow kill in World War II, which is a pretty unique thing to say you did. He also went into every battle with a bagpipe. Why?? Jack went into every battle with a sword and a bow, which I thought was pretty cool considering most soldiers during wwii used regular guns. He was basically a war machine on his own, he single handedly captured 14 Germans with only his sword and his bow, and he lost his sword in the process. Instead of just taking the hit he went back and got his sword. Overall, super cool guy that I wish I knew about sooner.

    • I also thought it was interesting that he brought a sword, a bow, and a bagpipe to battle instead of a gun. Why wouldn’t he just use a gun? I think he might be conservative because he is using older weapons instead of newer ones like guns, so maybe he is opposed to new inventions and new ideas. Another weird person I found interesting was Mike the Durable. He dodged death a bunch of times which almost makes it seem like this person was just made up. I guess he just had a really really healthy body which is weird because he was an alcoholic homeless man.

      • It’s so weird, it seems like the people with the worst habits live the longest, or are the healthiest. Speaking of people who lived, another person I read about was Lieutenant General Adrian Carton de Wiart, a British soldier who fought in both World Wars. He was shot in his ears, eye, hip, ankle, and rib but he survived. I think that is insane, especially without the help of modern medicine.

        • That does sound crazy. Speaking of bad habits, it’s crazy how Timothy Dexter made a bunch of idiotic decisions that made him rich. He invested in U.S paper money, and his neighbor tried to trick him by getting him to sell bed warming pans to people in hot weather, but he sold them as ladles and made a bunch of money. He was very stupid and somehow smart at the same time. It also seems like these weird people had a ton of luck.

      • Yeah, like why would he bring a bagpipe, it has not purpose to be seen at war. He was very good at fighting people with his sword and bow. But at war I feel like the less amount of things you bring but they work very well is better than bringing a lot of impractical items. I feel like he was almost trying to prove something by not using a gun and using a sword and bow. I also find Mike the Durable very interesting. Why would you try killing your self many times. It is really cool how he treed killing himself and never died in those many attempts. I feel like he was a “special” person because he could get close to death many times but never die. Also how he was an alcoholic and homeless can really show that he might have had some mutation or some gene that most people do not have.

    • I also found him interesting, Hannah. I think its so impressive that he was able to capture so many people while heavily out armed. I almost find it unbelievable that he could pull that off, I wonder if what was recorded was the whole truth. I just think hes more likely to get shot faster then he could stab someone, or shoot them with a bow. I just really think its a little exaggerated.

    • I also think that Jack Churchill is a rather interesting guy. Why would someone bring a bagpipe to war. There are many other items that could be used in a better way to help. Also many more items are more practical to bring to war, like an actual gun. It does seem like him using a sword and a bow worked very well since he was able to kill many people with it.

  498. PYOT from a peer: As we learn more about the Columbian Exchange, we learn more and more about the many different foods that were exchanged in the process. What is one food product that was brought to the Americas due to the Columbian Exchange that you’re thankful for?

    I am thankful for the coffee bean being brought to the Americas because coffee can help me wake up in the morning and get through the day. It tastes really good and it especially helps me stay up late writing lab reports. I’m also thankful for coffee beans in America because my friend heavily relies on coffee to function and I don’t know what she’d do without it.

    • Hmmm I wonder who that friend is. Couldn’t be me. Unrelated but I am also super thankful for the coffee bean, I love coffee, it’s my favorite beverage other than water. It’s basically 50% of my diet. Another food I’m thankful for is the potato, it is super tasty and it goes with everything. One last thing I am grateful for is corn, street corn is the best and it is super sweet and yummy.

      • I agree that potatoes are an amazing food. I’m also grateful for peaches, pears, bananas, grapes, and citrus fruits because I love fruit. They are my favorite snack and dessert.

  499. PYOT from SM: Would you rather live life as a doctor, a banker or a pirate? Explain? How is life better? What are the pros and cons?

    I think that I wouldn’t really want any of these jobs because there are so many cons to all of them, but if I had to pick then I would probably go with the pirate.

    I think the pirate would be the best option because they seem to have the least stressful job, and also the most free time. The investment banker job apparently is very stressful and also allows workers almost no free time at all. Being a doctor seems very stressful too considering how many people in pain you’d have to see every day. Also I know being a physician often doesn’t pay enough to fully support people.

    the article said that pirates often had fun parties and played music and enjoyed themselves and neither of the other jobs have any chance for free time so i would want to be a pirate. ‘

    there are a few cons of pirates that make me not want to be one either, like their poor hygiene, violent lifestyle, and susceptibility to disease.

    • I definitely agree with you. None of these different lifestyles sound amazing, but I would choose being a pirate if I had to. Having fun all the time sounds way better than the high stress and long hours of a doctor or investment banker. The cons of those two lifestyles outweigh the cons of the pirate. I wouldn’t really mind the violence or the shorter lifespan as much as the unhygienic and disease part.

    • I would agree with you. except for the amount of disease you are exposed to as a pirate. Every time I think of Pirates, I think of how unhygienic it must be living on a ship for years with a bunch of men. I can’t do it. I would much rather be a doctor, while you are also susceptible to disease the environment is much more sterile.

      • I would least likely want to be a doctor because I would not want to be around a bunch of sick people. I know there are also sick people being a pirate, but if I was a doctor, then I would have to diagnose them and make them well again and I wouldn’t want that job. I would way rather be a sick person on a boat having fun than being stressed around a bunch of sick people.

        • Yeah, I feel like a doctor has a good pay but a hard job where you have to work hard and can get diseases from the people you have to work with. Though if you are a doctor you can take your knowladge and use it even when you are not at work. Just think of during covid with all of the nurses and doctors exposed to covid and how they had a higher chance of getting it. I get grossed out when people are sick, especcialy when they do not even try to not get others sick. So I would also not like to be a doctor.

    • I agree, it is very hard to make a decision on what job is the best. There is just so many pros and cons for each, being a doctor you have long hours, little sleep and a labor intensive job. But you do get a good pay which might not be a great pay if you think about all of the work you have to do. Then being a banker you get a ok pay, but the job just seems boring. The being a pirate which is the most fun one in my opinion but there is a lot of ways you could die. I personally would choose a pirate because you get to hang out, party and have a fun time. But then there is many diseases, poor hygiene, and a violent life style like you said.

      • yeah I agree, I had a hard time choosing because of all the pros and cons. Banker seemed way too boring for all the time you have to put in, and the article not only said they had no free time, but also basically no sleep either which is not a good lifestyle for me. I also know that a lot of doctors have to deal with really terrible things, not only the stress but also witnessing people suffer and not being able to help. I don’t think I could have a job like that everyday so process of elimination led me to pirate. Also I enjoy my free time so.

  500. Share your thoughts on the “Potato King” – what are your thoughts, Tots? (…sorry)

    I think it was pretty weird how even though other people all throughout Europe were starting to eat potatoes, and even when there was a famine, the people of Prussia still refused to eat the potatoes. If they were going to die of starvation, then why not take a small risk of eating a plant that everybody else is eating safely even if it is related to a poisonous plant? This shows how untrustworthy people were and how they were almost paranoid of the potato. If King Frederick the Great wasn’t able to come up with a genius idea on how to get his people to eat the potatoes, then the people of Prussia might not have survived because of their stubbornness. This connects to the focus theme of agency and Thomas Hobbs argument because King Frederick had to come up with something himself to keep his people alive. Without him, Prussia’s society would have crumbled. They needed a leader to step up and show them what was good for them because the people could not have made good decisions by themselves.

  501. Read this article about the weirdest people in history. Who were the weirdest in your opinion? Any thoughts on their ways? Things that you found crazy weird? 

    -I don’t find what #1 placed, Timothy Dexter to have done anything to be on this list. I found his actions to be something fun to do rather than strange. It is said that he made terrible business deals and yet all of them seemed to pay out in his favor. If that isn’t standing on business I don’t know what is. In anger that I could see myself relating to, I do find assaulting his wife after she didn’t cry at his staged funeral to be a little strange though.

    – #2 Digby Tatham Warter deserves to be on his list. I find it funny that he brought such an item onto the battlefield and overpowered others with it. Always having his trusty weapon shows real dedication. I think we should add him to the top 100 people of the century and give him a round of applause for such entertainment. If I imagine myself dying from an umbrella in a war zone I would laugh. Digby Tatham Warter shows us that sometimes things considered unconventional are still meant to succeed even if weirdly strange. I do find it quite strange that he wore a bowler hat though.

    -#3 Leo Major. I don’t have anything to say about his courageous man other than that he is the prototype of standing on business. He should not be in the top 10 weirdest people, but rather, in a hall of fame for being such a goat. When people ask me who I want to be when I’m older, first I say Joe Tripi, then I say Leo Major.
    -#4 Jack Churchill. I believe this is where the term crack head originated. He deserves to be on this list and should be moved to the top spot for his heinous crimes (against my common sense). I don’t understand how he lived so long or how he held a record but someone should’ve put him down.

    #5 Bill Millin. Playing the fiddle in a war zone surrounded by bodies is crazy. I just know the Germans shot him after he finished playing. I personally invite him to sit at the round table. Exhibit B. I don’t think he went mad, I think that this was simply a strategy. I don’t think anyone IN HISTORY has ever been as locked in as this man right here. After Joe Tripi & uncle Leo Major I want to be Bill Millin fr fr.

  502. PYOT from a peer: Check out this article regarding how Ivan the Terrible got his name. What stands out, and do you think Ivan deserved the nickname he got?

    The first thing that stood out to me while I read this article was the fact that even though his name has the word terrible in it, their definition of terrible was different back then compared to ours now. Honestly. That kinda makes sense that a words meaning would change over the course of so many years.  Their definition meant that he was feared and/or scary, but ours means that there is poor character. I think this is some very good context that people should be more aware of, so it isn’t misinterpreted. The other thing that stood out most was the fact that he was so suspicious of others conspiring against them, he had them put to death. I feel like this is an extreme version of superstition. Honestly, this shows how much he wanted to stay in power, for him to do everything in his power to stay in power. Honestly, when I think Ivan fits the definition of our version of terrible to. Considering what he did to his daughter in law (caused her to miscarry while she was pregnant) and killing his son, that is pretty terrible to me.

  503. In the continuing effort to make sure Her-stories don’t get lost in the teaching of HIStory, check out these bad-ass ladies, and possibly talk about how and why herstories still get underemphasized today.

    The first part that stood out to me about Queen Tamar of Georgia was the part where it says she showed courage and did not waver when she was about to fight a war where her enemies outnumbered he troops. I find this honestly amazing. The fact that she wasn’t nervous, even if she was she didn’t show it, and led her troops to be confident just like her. I find this very inspirational because it makes you think about how you may be nervous for something but compared to fighting a war, it is nothing. This just shows how great of a mindset she must have had, very determined which I love. Next, it says that she expanded borders and oversaw huge architectural projects. I find this great how she was able to establish power and keep it. It is so cool just to see what accomplishments she has made. She also sat on war councils. It is so cool to see all of the things that women did back then before they have as much rights as they do now.

    • I agree with your points. I think that it is interesting to see how many women are neglected simply because they are women. I think it’s cool to see a different perspective on important people!

    • I didn’t know they had monarchies in Georgia, especially that they had woman leaders. I wonder how the inhabitants of Georgia or surrounding states felt about it.

  504. From the articles, I learned that wet nurses are nurses who had an emotional connection to royal families’ children and were considered foster mothers. They took the responsibility of raising someone else’s child. A wet nurse would breastfeed a baby, rather than its mother. They were often employed when a moth couldn’t or chose not to nurse her own baby; it could have been due to health issues or even just social norms. The elite often views breastfeeding as a task beneath their status.

    The benefits for a wet nurse coming from a wealthy and respected family could provide financial stability for them and their family which influenced their newborn that abandoned the job. It could mean receiving better living conditions. It could provide social advantages such as the wet nurses’ own social standing. Service to a respectable family could be a reflection of her character and skills leading to further employment opportunities and social security.

    I think wet nurses were a somewhat sad job. For example, they had to leave their own children to care for others, potentially leaving them to have artificial food that the other caretakers would give them. This could cause their own children to hold a grudge against their mother and affect their relationship.

  505. History and numbers of the slave trade – what stands out to you regarding the impact and growth of slavery in the Americas / the future US?

    Something that definitely stood out to me was the how fast the amount of slaves grew between 1800 and 1860. In 1800 there were 800,000 and in 60 years it grew five times the size and there were 4,000,000 slaves. I think that it was crazy how when the enslavement of Africans started, it was only 350 people that were taken. The difference from when it started to when it ended was very drastic but I think a lot can be learned from it. After seeing just how many people were enslaved I really understood how horrible of a time that was.

    • It’s interesting to see the numbers go up that fast, but it makes sense because people realized how effective slaves were. Since most were permanent, there was no need to pay individuals for physical labor, and there was no need to have to reteach people every time you hired them. The fact that most slaves had dark skin made them Group Think as them being part of the lowest social class as time moved on, and therefore there wasn’t that much rebuttal probably

      • Yeah, the growth rate was insane and conserning to me. It makes a lot of sense because of the growth of trade, people to be fine with physical labor and the need for people working for little to no pay. Slaves were the fit for their criteria since they did not need a payment they would just work and work. I would also say that group think is a major part of people with darker complexion were the vast majority of slaves because it is the collective idea that people with dark skin were the “best slaves” and if they were told to work they would.

  506. Share your thoughts on the “Potato King” – what are your thoughts, Tots? (…sorry)

    I think that it was cool how King Fredrick convinvced people to eat the potatoes by  pretending they were valuable. I didn’t know anything about this and I found it interesting that potatos are part of a poisonous group. This is why the people did not eat them, but I think he does deserve his name because he technically saved people from famine by tricking them into eating potatoes.

    • This article was very interesting and shows how people’s strategies can work so well. Like what King Fredrick did, convincing people to eat them because they were valuable. I also did not know that potatoes are part of a poisonous family, and that is very interesting, bringing up the question “why are they not poisonous to humans?” Also King Fredricks strategy saved many lives so people should be very thankful for him.

      • What Frederick II did was pretty smart, and it promotes values of self exploration and learning. Comparing to this more light and gentle introduction of potatoes to the modern day Russia which is stereotyped as rough and brutal, it makes me wonder what happened. On the flip side, many more people these days use self exploration in order to teach students, and I think that it’s helpful just like Frederick’s result

        • Yeah, the way he promoted potatoes was very smart, he did not strictly enforce people to eat them but he guided them and sort of tricked them into thinking they were very valuable. Also I am pretty sure this was during a famine so it was a benifit to make more people want to try and explore them. There was many things that tied to people eating them and making them popular but I feel like he is the main figure who promoted them.

  507. YOT from a peer: Check out this article regarding how Ivan the Terrible got his name. What stands out, and do you think Ivan deserved the nickname he got?

    I think that Ivan the Terrible definetly deserved his name considering he murdered a pregnant woman and the womans husband, however, I think that the reason for his behavior was because he was brought up in a household where there was violence. He got his name because of all the brutal things he did to his family. 

    • I think that he deserves it but it is not right for him to have that nickname. He had a bad childhood with his parents dying when he was young and seeing others get killed. So that is a reason that could have led to him killing his son and a pregnant women. That is not an excuse though because he can control what he does. It is like people that live in a place where there is a lot of violence might think it is more normal than people living in Lancaster, Stow or Bolton. The environment is a reason but still not an excuse for it to happen. He could have controlled is actions and this would have never happened. He does sort of deserve the name in my opinion because of all of the brutal things he did to others but control is the main issue he had.

      • I think regardless there’s not plausible reason for him to kill both his son and a pregnant woman. I understand he had a rough childhood and a rough household, and that affected his mental health in his adult life. But murder is not ok, period. I understand what you say that his enviornment could affect how the views on violence are. Especially because durring that time there was a lot of war going on. I dont think controll had much to do with it. I think the first time he commited an insane act was controll, But if no one is stopping him and hes getting his way why would he stop? And i get one could say “because its not the right thing to do” but going back to the environment, people where more desensitized to the violence.

        • Yeah, there are things like how he grew up and what he say that could have led to what he did but there is no reason for what he did and it is not right. Expecially killing his son and a pregnant woman.

    • I agree Hannah. I think that the fact that he grew up in a harsh and violent environment made him more susceptible to act the way that he did. This made him revolt more against the people around him. I don’t think him being a bad person is completely due to the fact that he didn’t have a good childhood I think there is more to it, I just think that is main reason to his behavior.

      • There are many things in my opinion that contributed to what he did but as a young child seeing violence that has a much greater impact than even a teen seeing violence. His enviroment had a big impact to because when people see violence more commonly they start to think it is more normal and “ok’. He has no excuse to be violent and do what he did because he could have started to realize that it is no ok. He does deserve the name relative to what he did but there is many other people who are worse and have done worse things.

  508. Read about the roles of “wet nurses” and their lives, how they became one, and their important role in the Royal family with this link, and the horrifying history of them with this link.

    The role of a wet nurse is to foster the baby of a Royal Family and breastfeed the child. I think this is a little strange that the mother/queen doesnt do it herself considering it is her child, but I guess if they have busy roles wetnurses are the best option. To become a wet nurse the nurse would have to first ensure that the infant would survive,the mother would choose someone to be her wetnurse. It was not mandatory for a wetnurse to come from a wealthy family, but they needed to be healthy, well tempered, and discreet. As a wet nurse, you had to temporarily distance yourself from your family, as your duty is now focused on the royal child. They were very well payed. Next I read the horrifying story. I found it scary that if babies were not brought to wet nurses to be fed, they died of diarrhea and malnutrition from the formula. I also read that because it was not required for them to be of a higher class and social status, it was possible they carried more diseases because they are poorer. There were also some cases where wetnurses would abandon the baby from being tired of their job to feed it, which resulted in the baby dying.

    • Already from the name “wet nurses”, it gave me an ick because just the word “wet” makes it sound a bit nastry, since it’s not always fun to be wet. Naming it something else like “foster parents” which could diffuse to what foster parents we have today would be more respectable and make more sense than “wet nurse”, because it sounds like a dirty job that isn’t entirely respected

      • I totally agree with you, I think its just a huge disrespect to mothers in general. The whole role of a wet nurse is to mother the children, so for them to describe them as “wet” is a huge slap in the face. Do you think the “wet nurses” knew they where being disrespected, or do you think they where completely oblivious? And if they did know they where being disrespected, how do you think they reacted?

        • I think that if wet nurses actually knew what they were doing, then clearly they would see themselves as low, and therefore it would make sense if they were being disrespected. If they understand that they are being used for something that they are all born with, then how is that any different than men being hired off of the streets to give one woman babies? That’s a big no, that’s just not how it supposed to be. It’s offensive, in fact. I feel like this is comparable to black people (who are stereotyped to be strong) doing physical labor, or people of Asian descent behind hired to do computational work, if you get what I’m trying to say. But then, with your question about how they would react, I think that they would understand that they are doing a job however they’re really only doing it for the money. Someone who is skilled in a certain profession would most likely do that work because they are good at it and they get $$$, even if it is overlooked. Just like this, most women have the ability to be wet nurses, which means that it’s an easy job to make $$$ of. Do you think that wet nurses felt disrespected or low in the social hierarchy, and do you think they would like doing their job? Do you think they could easily quit? Just like you said, what would their reaction be to this discrimination?

          • You’re right, I think that they would keep their job regardless. Especially being a part of the lower class, they’re already used to the mistreatment. And I bet they felt blessed to work for the royals. I’m not sure if they would like their job, i think it would depend on the person. If someone liked babies more i think they would obviously like their job more than someone who didn’t like babies. I doubt it would be easy to quit their job, especially because they work for royals. I feel like that could be seen as treason in some cases.

        • I think that the wet nurse already knew they were being disrespected. Already, it was considered a lower-class occupation and they knew that their role was looked down upon. Apparently the upper classes thought it was unfashionable or even bad to the mother’s health and beauty to breastfeed. They were aware that their employment was not just about nurturing a child but also server that status and convenience of the mother. But, even though they were constantly degraded and seen as “unfashionable’ they still knew they played a crucial role in the children they raised and knew the importance of their emotional physical health.

      • I agree, I think the term “wet nurse” is odd to represent someone who is basically raising a child emotionally and physically. You’d think they’d be more respect from the royal families.

  509. Read this article about the weirdest people in history. Who were the weirdest in your opinion? Any thoughts on their ways? Things that you found crazy weird?

    Digby Tatham Warter is the weirdest person of the 10. My reasons for this are that he used an umbrella in the battle of World War II, and he was known for his unusual fighting skills because he always carried the umbrella onto the battlefield. However, there was one time that he did make use of it because he overthrew a German vehicle by poking the driver in the eye with the umbrella. I think that all these people are extraordinary and weird, but this came as a shock to me because of how serious the war was. I would personally be scared and I find it crazy that he brought a UMBRELLA onto the battlefield.

    • I would agree with you. That is a very odd technique for fighting in a world war. An umbrella is not going to even do that much. Unless it symbolized something there was no purpose. In the grand scheme of things an umbrella cannot do that much and is useless, he did used it but is pocking someones eye out something you need to bring an umbrella for? If I was in war I would find something that had many purposes unlike the use of an umbrella.

      • I agree with you, unless it was like the umbrellas in the movies where it’s secretly a gun, It’s pointless. Honestly even though i think if you’re going to fight in a world war, guns are much more useful. Id rather have a knife/sword then an umbrella. You can poke someone’s eye out and also cut them if you use a blade. Honestly i really don’t see the use of an umbrella, unless you really really dislike the rain. And I think if you hate rain that much, you shouldn’t serve in the war.

        • An umbrella has only one major purpose and some little purposes. There is not point of having an umbrella in war if it is not constantly raining. Like you said, if you do not like the rain or harsh and odd climates you should probably re- consider why you are in the military.

  510. Read this article about the weirdest in history. Who were the weirdest in your opinion? Any thoughts on their ways? Things that you found crazy weird?

    I am going to write my thoughts about the three people that stood out most to me.

    The first person that really stood out to me when I was reading this article was the person #2, Digby Tatham Warter. What he did was he carried an umbrella in the battlefield with him (during WWⅡ) and ended up using it to poke a German vehicle driver in the eye and overpower it. I found this pretty funny. Personally, I always keep a little umbrella in my backpack because I am a control freak and I like to be prepared for things. I feel like I can kinda “relate” to him because he may have been carrying it for peace of mind if it rained, and I can’t say I blame him. 

    The next person that stood out was #5 on the list. His name was Bill Millin. He was a bagpiper that played the bagpipe all around Normandy Beach and men fell around him dead, but nobody would shoot or kill him because they assumed that he went crazy. I honestly find this kinda funny. He was just being himself and not even worrying about being killed while doing something entertaining to others, as well as himself.

    The last person I think stood out the most was person #6. This man named Joshua Norton declared himself the “Emperor of the United States and Protector of Mexico”. He also ordered the dissolution of the US Congress and made his own currency. I find this so funny. He just decided one day to “change the world” and make his own money. I think that the funniest part about this is that some restaurants actually accepted his money. I feel like so many people must have thought he was delusional.

    • I agree with your choices Ashley. I also thought that the first person who brought the umbrella into war was super weird, but what he did and his strange behavior payed off in war.

      • Yes, it kinda makes me wonder whether anybody else had this kinda thing that they did in war, or a superstition that was super weird and random. Even that but maybe one of these things caused their downfall rather than their success.

    • Someone who brings an umbrella to the battle field must have some superstition. An umbrella is such a random object to bring. It is really funny that he chose to bring a umbrella to the battle field. There are so many more things that are actually useful. I really want to know more about Bill Millin and how he played the bagpipe and men would die around him. This is just so strange and odd. Like did they fall and die because he played bad or what? Joshua Norton just seems like a person who wants to do what ever he wants to do and wants support for it. I am sorry but who in there right mind decides to say they are the Emperor of the United States and Protector of Mexico and make a currency. That is just going a little far. All of these people seem weird for sure. So I have to agree with you that they are some of the weirdest people to ever live.

  511. PYOT from ZM: Pick a current event from the news, provide a link to an article you read and talk about why you think this event is important. Provide opposing views from how the event was reported? Why did you pick to write about it, how do you think this event will impact history, short term and long?

    https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/19/middleeast/red-sea-crisis-explainer-houthi-yemen-israel-intl/index.html 

    This is about the Houthis and them attacking ships in the Red sea. They are rebels who are stepping up their strikes on ships to try and get revenge against Israel for its military campaign in Gaza. I think that this event from a month ago is important because it is probably to get revenge against Israel for its military campaign in Gaza. This is also due to a civil war in Yemen which has been going on for a long time and has caused many deaths. This is important also because it caused America and the UK have been looking into the threats they might have on these two counties and seeing how powerful they are. It just seems like the Houthis are powerful and want to get as much revenge and get there greatest effect as humanly possible by getting on oil tankers and attacking. It is kind of like 911 and people trying to severely hurt some places economics and general well being. This article is saying how the Houthis are really bad and how it is very wrong. An opposing view could be they have been fighting for a long time and just want to end the civil war and fix what is done so they are probably trying to hurt their own country so people realize that there is an issue. I chose to write about this because it was connected to Gaza and Hamas which I know is an issue right now. It also just seemed very interesting to read and write about. I think that this will have short term effects of not having as much oil and causing countries to lose money or resources that are necessary and a long term effect could be that due to everything that is happening many people have died which causes permanent damage to families and society. Also another permanent effect is the Yemen is going to run differently because people are fighting for a change and are protesting about what is happening. 

  512. PYOT from ZM: Search up your birthday and write about any important events or holiday that happened on that day. How much importance did that event have on modern society? Is it a well known event/holiday or not? Why do you think that might be?

    My birthday is March 17th. A holiday on my birthday is Saint Patrick’s day. It is significant because it commemorates Saint Patrick and the arrival of Christianity in Ireland, also just the heritage and culture of the Irish in general. This event had a lot of importance on modern day society because it brought Christianity to Ireland which then widespread it across the world making the religion very widely known throughout the world. Saint Patrick’s day is celebrated in a lot of countries around the world and is very well-known. It has become a tradition across the US as there are many people in America with Irish roots including me. It is also very well-known as people with Irish roots bring it all around the world spreading their culture and heritage.

  513. History and numbers of the slave trade – what stands out to you regarding the impact and growth of slavery in the Americas / the future US?

    I wonder who made the original decision to enslave the newly found people of Africa and what the original reaction to black people was. Could it have been the need for labor to help increase the completion of the newly found U.S?

  514. Peruse the U9 assignment (terms 1,2, and 3, and Q1), and the unit presentation (slides 26-32 of unit presentation in particular) that connect to the thoughts expressed in class regarding the Hobbes/Locke debate, and provide your thoughts, with examples to support: who is right? Hobbes (people need leaders to keep them in line) or Locke (peeps can work it out / democracy can work); provide examples from world history we’ve already covered, examples from this unit, or any examples you can think of regarding history we’ve yet to cover, or current events topics, to support either (or both) views regarding which path leads to the most orderly and successful societies (avoid repeating ones already discussed / seen on the Hobbes vs Locke debate doc – unless you’re adding an ex to provide more context to ones already there – that’s fine) – don’t forget linked resources on the unit materials posting on GooGle specific to this topic as well) – another way to respond is to focus on a more specific aspect (such as MB offers via “PYOT”) – do you agree with Locke’s idea of “natural rights”? Are people “born with rights” that others are bound to respect? 

    I would say that Locke is right. There are many examples where a dictatorship or absolute monarchy can work well but overall I feel like it does not work as well. Also the US bases their government and declaration of independence off of Locke, so that means many people think that his ideas are the best way for a government to work with a social contact. When there is one leader in control of the whole government it does not seem to go well. People do need rules but not strict rules because people will still find a way to break them. Like  my cousin who has screen time and very strict parents learned how to ”hack” the system and when they go over to their friends house they just use their friends phone.

    Some pros and cons of a democracy and absolute monarch/dictatorship:

    1.  People rights and Freedom- in democracies people can have individual rights and freedoms to make decisions that they think are good for himself but in monarchies the power and decisions are in the hands of one person. 
    2. When there is a major issue you have to ask many people what they think about it. For example on monday if many people got to chooses if we had a snow day, 2- hour delay or school still, it would take a long time to get to a final decision. Which is not the most effective in situations where you do not have a lot of time to make a decision. But since the superintendent is the one to choose, they have to talk to fewer people and can be the one to make the final decision, the session ends up happening quicker. It might not always be the right thing but at 5 in the morning asking many people what they think is just not effective and quick enough. 
    3. Overall stability- Democracies have more stability due to the ability to have a more transition of power. Like going from Trump to Biden or any president there is the time where the new president can learn what they need to do and see what the other one was trying to achieve. So then when the switch happens there can be less conflicts. Also democracies have checks and balances that allow no one to have too much power controlling what happens. People might think that the president has all of the power but they really do not. They might have a little bit more individual power but not overall power.

    The US is a relatively stable country. An example of the democracy system helping us during the civil war and Great depression  during those times there were presidential switches but it did not greatly affect what happened because of the ability to follow the same rules and be able to be on the same page.

    In my opinion a really great example of why a dictatorship or monarchy is not as good as a democracy is Germany. When Adolf Hitler had Germany it was a dictatorship and did not work so well. He really wanted a  lot of land, power and the ability to control everything. But it did not end up great and caused their demise. The jews revolted and Hitler did not know what to do. So when one person is in control of many things and there is only one person’s opinions that affect a whole country, their decisions can greatly affect the country in a positive or negative way. His absolute power/dictatorship led to a negative impact. 

    But then after Hitler, Germany became a democracy and that greatly impacted and helped them. People can have their own leadership, also democracies have better economics. 

    How economics and types of governments get affected looking at the top 10 countries with best economics

    1. United States – Democracy
    2. China – Neither
    3. Japan – Democracy
    4. Germany – Democracy
    5. India- Democracy
    6. United Kingdom – Monarchy(but like a democracy)
    7. France – Democracy
    8. Russia – Dictatorship
    9. Canada- Democracy
    10. Italy- Democracy

    From looking at the top ten 1 out of the 10 countries are true dictatorships. When there is more stability in general, economics gets better too. The sizes of the counties make a difference but this is just an example of how economics in democracies are normally better.

    I think that people have natural rights” and are “born with rights’ ‘ that others should respect. No one should not have rights , they might be a little bit limited but they still exist. Everyone should have the ability to get a job, but if someone is poor and they do not want to get a job then people should not feel bad because they have the option. Everyone can make decisions for themselves, they should not be limited by someone else to make decisions, and everyone can have their own beliefs. No one has to impose or force them to believe in a different way. 

  515. Watch the linked JG / CC video on some topics from and changes wrought by the American Revolution –  reflect and respond to his idea that the American Revolution “wasn’t that revolutionary” (aka didn’t change much socially for many), or just respond with any particular thoughts or impressions your were left with concerning JG’s choices of focus topics and themes:

    I think it’s inspiring to see the people of a country making a revolution because of a bad government that it had with the English, this event is very important not just to the U.S, but it’s much important for the hole American continent because the independence of the United States had inspired the independence of many other countries like Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, Colombia etc.

  516. Read about the roles of “wet nurses” and their lives, how they became one, and their important role in the Royal family with this link, and the horrifying history of them with this link.

    I think it’s interesting to see that infant mortality was high even for the nobles and royals of the government who had the best health system for that time, and it’s horrible to see what you had to do to become a wet nurse.

    • I agree, Henrique. It is kinda weird to see how much it has happened throughout history. If the royals were taken that great care of, it was genetic because other wise it wouldn’t really make too much sense.

  517. Share your thoughts on the “Potato King” – what are your thoughts, Tots? (…sorry)

    I thought it was kind of funny how the people were starving and yet they still refused the potato, because it was a new crop. I also thought that his strategies to get people to eat potatoes were really funny and creative, I especially liked how he made the people think that potatoes were more valuable than they were by guarding them heavily during the day but not at night, to make them think that they were special. I thought that that was really creative and unique. I would like to visit his grave one day and put a potato there.

    • Yeah, the whole fact that people would rather starve than eat a potato is wild. Not even peasants would eat the potatoes but it is due to a good reason. The potatoes that were in Europe were poisonous so they did have a reason at first not to eat them. The strategies were very creative like having the potatoes be heavily guarded during the day but still allowing people to try one. This is probably a big reason why people starting eating them. Since they were guarded people thought they were probably very valuable. I would also like to visit his grave and put a potato on it just because his ideas seemed so smart and it is just cool.

    • I agree Hannah, I think it was very smart the way he went about making people think that they were valuable. I personally would have never thought about guarding them during the day but it was incredibly useful. It was creative and definitely got people intrigued in what was going on. If I was starving though I would just eat the potato because you’re going to die of hunger anyway so you might as well take your chances and eat the potato.

      • Yeah, his strategy was very smart, he almost tricked the people into eating them by making them look valuable. He had a smart plan that was good. I also would have not thought about guarding them during the day. I would have probably thought of giving out some type of reward when people starting to eat them. I would also try a potato out if I was starving. If you are so hungry you are going to die from not enough food than it is worth a try having a potato that might be poisonous. I would be fine taking the chances because I would either die but if you are close to death that does not matter and if you do not die from it you can get the potatoes and stay alive.

  518. Share your thoughts on the “Potato King” – what are your thoughts, Tots? (…sorry)

    King Fredrick the Great of Prussia was called “Potato King” and had a big impact on his land. At first people were scared to eat potatoes because they had a similar resemblance to poisonous plants, which made people hesitant. But throughout time they became a lot more popular. Fredrick knew that the potatoes would be beneficial for his people so he made them eat them by serving it for dinner at his home. Soon after the potato was a staple in German cuisine.

    • Yeah, I would say that King Fredrick was a very smart man. He knew that potatoes could be eaten and saved lives and had a well planned strategy to make people eat it. Potatoes are relatively cheap and can keep you full for long which would have been very helpful since I think this was during a famine. His strategy of guarding the potatoes was very smart so people thought the potatoes were very valuable. It is crazy how one person’s actions can do so much, he introduced potatoes and made it so more people would eat it and now people everywhere in the world and Europe eat potatoes daily.

  519. Read this article about the weirdest people in history. Who were the weirdest in your opinion? Any thoughts on their ways? Things that you found crazy weird? 

    I think the two weirdest was “Mike the Durable” who beat death several times no matter what people tried to kill him with(anti-freeze, rat poison, raw oysters and whiskey, running him over with a taxi), and the second being Tiimothy Dexter who faked his death and then waited to see who would cry, before beating his wife because she didnt. I think that the reason I think “Mike the Durable” is weird because it sounds fake to be honest. Its insane how he didnt die from all these and I would go as far as to say inhumane. So yea I think hes weird. I also find it really random for someone to play dead and wait to see who cares.

    • I have not read the article yet but “Mike the Durable” seems like a very weird person. If you are trying to kill your self, you should be better at it than what he did. Also who would want to try killing them self by getting run over by a taxi, using anti-freeze, rat poison and eating raw oysters. That was a creative way to try killing your self and a way you could suffer for a long time. Like getting run over by a taxi can break a lot of bones and cause pain, and having rat poisoning can cause bad things such as internal bleeding, organ failure and a coma. Then eating raw oysters is less of a way to kill your self but more of a way to just suffer because of the effects it has. Lastly anti freeze can cause less perminent effects but bad ones like fatigue, nausea and rapid breathing. I do agree with you because that is some weird ways to try and kill your self. Also if you have the name “Mike the Durable” you have a reputation for doing things that could kill you and then not die from it.

      Timothy Dexter sounds like another unusual person and just weird and crazy. I am sorry but why would you even think about faking your death just to see who would cry then after beat up his wife because she did not cry. There is many other things you can no to see if people are loyal and care about you. You do not have to go straight to faking your death. I would be mad at my wife if she did not cry but betting her up after is a little to far.

      • Just a small thought, but if Mike the Durable beat death so many times, is there any way that we could study his DNA in hopes of finding some sort of slight immunity gene that could be used now to help prevent disease or lengthen the average lifespan? It’s probably too late now because we don’t know where his tomb is, but I’m pretty sure we could do something with his bone remains.

        • That is really cool and I did not think about that. There could be a chance of him having some mutation that allowed for him to be more immune or have an advantage. Since he did try to kill him self many times and many ways but would never die.

  520. Read this article about the weirdest people in history. Who were the weirdest in your opinion? Any thoughts on their ways? Things that you found crazy weird?

    After reading this article I found that there were some very weird people that lived back in time but after reading this I think that the weirdest person is Lord Timothy Dexter. He was an 18th-century American businessman that made idiotic business decisions all his life but they weirdly ended up working out for him. He also once faked his own death and hosted a grand funeral just to see how people would react. After watching for a while he got very mad at people and then caned his wife for not crying. Some of the ways that he managed to get immensely rich off of these terrible business ideas was that  In the late 1700s the Continental dollar, America’s first form of paper money failed to gain any public trust then he thought it was a great opportunity to earn respect, invested all his money and his wife’s money in the now discontinued dollars and bought boatloads of the bills then the US Constitution was ratified towards the end of the 18th century and it was decided that the bills could be traded in for treasury bills at 1% of their face values. He became immensely rich instantly just such a weird and risky move and I think he got very lucky for doing this and it actually worked out for him. One other way that he gets these riches is that he gets lied to by his neighbor to go and sell bed warming pans in the West Indies, he took the advice and voyaged to the West Indies but then realized he was lied to and the people their like the heat but then when it looks like he wasted a lot of his money and time going over he comes up with a idea and decided to re brand them as ladles and sold them to sugar plantation owners. The demand was so high that he ended up making 79% in profits from all of this. But arguably the weirdest thing that he did was that he faked his own death and doing this he found out that his wife did not actually love him and she was laughing at the funeral so when she leaves to the kitchen alone she canned her and then everyone else found out that he is still alive which is very weird of someone to do. I think he is the weirdest person because in the end he got rich twice off of pure luck and then faked his own death all in his life time.

    • I agree that faking your death is something totally weird. Who just randomly thinks, “Im going too play dead and see who cries”

      • Ya, I feel like it very strange that someone would do that. The main reason for faking your death is that you would be struggling from bankruptcy or problems with money but as I had already had said he absolutely no problems with money and did not really have a reason to fake his death. The main reason I can think of that he did this is that he might have been a little mentally ill because all he wanted to know was if anyone cried and that’s it or that is what we know and with what we know that seems like he might have been a little crazy.

        • Playing dead and seeing who cries is something a child would do today. They are basically just asking for attention and seeing who gives them it. There have to be better things to do with your time than this, especially as an independent adult. I wonder if there are actually other factors that made him fake his death, because I still can’t believe that an adult would act so immaturely.

          • I agree, I feel like it was for attention and just to spend some money since it seems like he was pretty good in terms of money. It is like when a kid trips and falls and there is little damage but they cry because they want attention. But when you are an adult that is even worse. It is like he is an adult in a kids body. Wanting people to cry and feel bad. I feel like there must be other factors to what he did, he must have been struggling mentally or questioning if people care about him in order to do this.

      • Yeah, there are many other things you can no to see if people care about you. There is no need to go straight to “I will fake my death to see if people cry and care about me” It is also a waste of money to create a huge funeral and not even be dead. You have to really have something wrong in your mind to think of that as the first thing or the thing you want to do. Playing dead can be really bad if you have kids because they are going to get told that their father died and not know what to do, then he will “pop” back up and be alive. It is already confusing enough lets say when your father goes on a trip for work when you are little. That is even worse, since they could get told, yeah your father died and you will never see him again.

  521. PYOT from a peer: Read this article about Jane Grey – what stands out to you? Maybe also check out this article on what would have happened if she had kept the throne. Any other ideas on scenarios that could have occurred if Jane had remained queen, or any overall thoughts?

    Some things that stood out to me right away was the fact that she was famous for being queen for 9 days only. I think that if she had remained being queen she would be beaten down at some point, and I think that this was probably a fate she could not avoid.

    • As a child she was never important, her parents did not really care about her, the only thing they wanted for her was to marry a king for the money. If she continued to be queen there would have been bad things. She was really just a “place holder” since she did not want to be queen or have the responsabilities. If she continued I feel like she would have burnt down the whole monarchy or others would take advantage of a queen who did not want power and cause some type of war. Or others would take over like her sister and kick her out of power. It was probably good that she did not continue to be queen due to her not wanting to be it at all.

    • That stands out to me too. I find it weird how certain people are not recognized or remembered at all after doing a lot more things, but she gets remembered for being a queen for less than two weeks? It is weird to see how the acceptance of some women and not others plays out.

  522. PYOT from a peer: As we learn more about the Columbian Exchange, we learn more and more about the many different foods that were exchanged in the process. What is one food product that was brought to the Americas due to the Columbian Exchange that you’re thankful for?

    One food that I didn’t realize was brought over in the Columbian Exchange, but I am so grateful that it was, is potatoes. I absolutely LOVE potatoes. For starters, there is a lot of foods that I cannot eat, however, potatoes are not one of them. Next, potatoes are healthy and filling. Potatoes are a great thing to have with meals because they are good for you and they will fill you up which essentially, saves you money because potatoes are cheap and you are eating less food. Another reason potatoes are so great is because there are so many things that you can do with them. You can have them as fries, chips, tater tots, mashed, homefries, baked, grilled, literally anything you do with it, it will still taste good. This is why potatoes are my favorite food brought over from the Columbian Exchange.

    • Same! Potatoes are so good! I am very thankful for the Columbian Exchange as it brought a lot of my favorite foods to the Americas. Potatoes can be made into so many thing like fries, chips, Baked potatoes, Mashed potatoes, Potato salad, Roasted potato and more! Almost every meal has some aspect of potatoes in it. Like you said potatoes are a cheap option that can be made into many things and are filling. Potatoes are good with almost everything and can be changed into different things based on the seasonings or how it gets prepared. Making it hard for potatoes to get boring.

  523. PYOT from ZM: Search up your birthday and write about any important events or holidays that happened on that day. How much importance did that event have on modern society? Is it a well known event/holiday or not? Why do you think that might be?

    When I first looked it up, I didn’t know what I’d find. I have never before heard about anything important happening on my birthday, and turns out, there were only a few things. One of the things that came up that I deemed most important was in 2008, the United States Congress apologizes for slavery and laws discriminating against African-Americans. I find it actually really cool that something of that importance happened on my birthday and makes me wonder why I have never heard of it before. I think it had a huge impact on modern society because without it, there still may be beef between African-Americans (and other people), with the United States government for still being discriminated against if it was never addressed in that way. I don’t know how many people know of this event, I sure didn’t, so I would say that it isn’t a very well known holiday. I honestly don’t know why that is. My best guess is that it isn’t  “holiday” so people just forget about it and there is no reason to celebrate it. Juneteenth is a holiday celebrating the end of slavery so that day is a more important one to celebrate. I don’t know that the one on my birthday should necessarily be a holiday, but I definitely think it should be more recognized and addressed.

  524. PYOT from a peer: Read this article about Jane Grey – what stands out to you? Maybe also check out this article on what would have happened if she had kept the throne. Any other ideas on scenarios that could have occurred if Jane had remained queen, or any overall thoughts?

    Something that stood out to me was the fact that just because she wasn’t rich and well-known she wasn’t accepted as queen. This stood out to me as it seemed really harsh that people wouldn’t accept her and hated her just because she wasn’t Mary who was supposed to be the queen. Also, the punishment that she had put on her was really harsh, and almost seemed like they just wanted to blame her for something to get her out of the throne. Mary was almost ruthless and selfish in her decision to kill Jane. When set with the decision to either kill Jane or have no prince she chooses to kill Jane which seems way more serious than not being able to marry her prince, yes it might help her family and make her rich and powerful but she’s taking someone’s life for it that really did nothing. Since we don’t really know any of Jane’s thoughts on what she would do when in power and since she didn’t want to be on the throne then there really is no way to know or tell what she might’ve done in the future. Overall I think her getting thrown out of power by Mary and the people was more beneficial for the government in England because who knows what Jane would’ve done in the office. The execution of her and her family was very harsh but Mary wouldn’t have reigned without it so there was some significance in it and it wasn’t just a waste of human life.

  525. In the continuing effort to make sure Her-stories don’t get lost in the teaching of History, check out these bad-ass ladies, and possibly talk about how and why herstories still get underemphasized today

    As we have already had a discussion about how their are many different important female pirates I feel like this is almost the same thing and sense a lot of the world is effected by misogyny and because of this a lot of woman that had a lot of influence almost get shoved away and don’t get talked about. This is because of many different reasons and one of the biggest reasons is because of there sons, this is because that they don’t want their mothers image hanging over them their entire life and they do this because men were supposed to be the famous, powerful, and important people back in the day. Besides this their are some very important and powerful woman in history. One of these woman goes by the name of Tamar the Great. In her rule she expanded borders, oversaw massive architectural projects, and helped make kingdom’s unique identity at the crossroads of East and West. Also, she did not think of herself as a weak woman as everyone thinks she is but instead she considered herself to be just as power as the men and when attending a meeting it was quoted that she stated that she “took counsel with them, not like a helpless person, or a woman, and did not neglect the dictates of reason.” This shows how she thought of herself as a equal compared to the men even though some people did not think that and I think is is very brave and interesting of her to do. Another woman is Queen Njinga Mbandi of Ndongo-Matamba which is kingdom in Africa. It was said that Njinga would charge into battle with her people. She lived during the 17th century and was the leader of her tribe. She had an older brother who was in power before her, but she was a better hand-to-hand combat fighter, leader, and diplomat, so she kind of takes charge and takes on different types of cultures in order to unite her people. This shows that she is very strong, brave, smart , and caring. She is very strong because we was better than her own brother in combat and being good in combat means that you have to have a lot of strength. She was brave because even though she was the leader of her tribe she would still change in and fight with her tribe instead of sitting in the back and letting it all happen like other leaders. She is smart because she brings in different types of cultures in order to unite her people and make everyone happy instead of trying to force ideas on her people like other leaders. Finally she is caring because for the same reason as being smart she was caring enough to think about what her people were saying and introduced it and made everyone happy. Those are just 2 of some very famous and powerful woman in history and sadly a lot of record of other powerful have been deleted and forgotten about but these woman and more will be known about decades from now because of all that they did.

  526. PYOT from a peer: Read this article about Jane Grey – what stands out to you? Maybe also check out this article on what would have happened if she had kept the throne. Any other ideas on scenarios that could have occurred if Jane had remained queen, or any overall thoughts?

    What stood out to me-

    • At the age of 16 she got to be Queen but was only queen for 9 days 

    -the age doesn’t surprise me but the fact that she was queen for only 9 days surprised me. At first I thought she did something really bad in those 9 days or was she a “placeholder” while they were deciding what to do. But she ended up being a victim of ruthless and gready men and not wanting the power

    • Henry VIII’s third wife

    -so she was not born into the possible position of becoming queen, she became queen because of who she was married to. 

    • She was made sure to be well educated
    • So from a young age her family probably wanted her to become queen, marry a king or have some important role because back then females had less rights and didn’t really go to school. As soon as she turned four her family got her a tutor who would drill her in lessons and make her fit as a good mate for a king. Which ended up working since she was Henry VIII’s third wife. 
    • Her parents did not treat her so well
    • They look down to her being not pretty with her fair skin with freckles, and sandly red hair
    • They would ill-treat her, beating her and treating her poorly
    • They also made her do things she hatted like to go hunting
      • This just shows that she was treated worse than average by her family and she probably did not feel comforted by her family at all. 
    • After Henry VIII(her husband) died, his son Edward VI at the age of nine took over
    • She became a widow and went to Chelsea Palace and was looking for someone to marry for money
      • This stands out to me because it shows how she might have been in it for the money possible because of how she was treated as a child. 
    • She don’t like all of the power everyone had and almost wanted to be left alone
    • She did not want to marry everyone people told her to like the Sudleys who were trying to persuade her parents into letting her marry someone. She would have preferred to be left alone and read books causing her to have hate towards the Dudleys who had power at that time. it seems like she could never be satisfied with what people did. 
    • She got power basically unwillingly

    -After Edward VI died, Jane was brought to Syon House which is where she was forced to accept the crown of England. She was the court waiting for her and for all freaked out because the Dudleys led her to the throne and proceeded to tell her that Edward VI was her heir. 

    -she was not ready or prepared for this to happen, she was not in a great situation with the Dudleys and not she was queen. 

    -When this happened she said`The crown is not my right. It pleases me not. Mary is the rightful heir.` She did not want to be the queen or accept it and later she wrote `It did not become me to accept.`

    -later she got the title taken away and was not queen anymore which ended up in the world’s shortened reign. 

    – She was put in many hard situation where she got crowned the Queen but then did not want it I am surprised that the family she was having some issues with diseased to make her Queen. I feel like this might have been out of spite for what she wanted. 

    – when she got told she was not queen anymore she was not even sad which is surprising but makes sense because she never wanted this position for herself. 

    • Jane was put on trial and sentenced to death
    • This stands out to me because she did not really do anything wrong except not wanting to be the queen. From what I understood she got put on trial because of the new queen and what they wanted. This seems like another example of her getting forced to do things and not being on good terms with others.  People said that she would not be excited but she ended up being executed and had to “walk the plank’. 
    • Her sisters ended up living as tragic of a life to
    • This is interesting and surprising because I feel like it might be more of a family thing and the pressure of their family.

    What stood out to me if she kept the throne-

    • Scenario 1 – She lasts a few months before being deposed
      • She totally had the capability to rule for a long time but she would have had to overcome a lot like getting more people to like her since she had a weak and unpopular claim to the throne. 
      • Her two half-sisters were more popularly supported among nobility and the common people.  This is very surprising to me because if they were popular that could mean Jane would become more popular but that did not seem to happen. 
      • She also had no desire to become the queen so she would have to change a lot in order to become queen for a long period of time. She needed to develop the desire to fight and get rid of others which she did not have that all of the time. I feel like if your parents are raising you so hard to become queen then I would not want to become queen. I feel like people push you too hard and then you do the opposite thing instead. 
      • Also she had to fight against Mary for power and Mary ended up getting the nickname bloody mary because she would burn and kill people. So that probably made Jane a little worried that would happen to her.
    • Senario 3 – Mary and Elizabeth are defeated, Jane rules for many years
      • If this one were to happen it would be the coolest because she would have fought off Mary and stop Elizabeth from taking over, and gained power. This one would have been the most unlikely but the best one in general because she would have proved that she could be queen. 
      • Also all of her family and heirs could have had the possiblilty of ruling which would have been really cool from where Jane started. 
      • Catholicism could have still been very prevelent to

    My overall thoughts- 

    Her life was terrible, becoming queen for 9 days, getting looked down upon, getting harshly treated and getting married then becoming a widow and then trying to get married again for the money. It also seemed like her parents forced/incoraged her for a lot of things like who to marry or how people should look at her. Her parents did not really help her with anything. She was also put in many hard situations like taking the chair as queen and not wanting to. It also seems like her parents kept a lot of things secret from her like that her father was a rebel. The first article made her sound like she was a bad person but the second article made her sound like a smart and intelligent person who could have been queen very well if she took on the power. She was even in a wealthy family because of her great-grandfather. She seems like a good person who just had a bad life and a lot of issues with others.She had a lot in her way of this going well and being able to keep the ole of queen for more than 9 days.     

    (sorry if there is some bad spelling and grammar)

  527. PYOT from a peer: Check out this article regarding how Ivan the Terrible got his name. What stands out, and do you think Ivan deserved the nickname he got?

    I think he does and does not deserve the name Ivan the Terrible because everything he saw at a young age like his parents dying and family members getting killed does not excuse what he did but was probably the reason why. He was a pretty good emperor and good at conquering but he did kill a lot of people including his family which is very wrong. 

    What stood out to me-

    From a young age he had a not so good past and a temper, which probably helped him in war because one of his goals was to watch enemies die. Due to his past he did many bad things like at 51 years old he started to beat his pregnant daughter-in-law because of the clothing she was wearing. Which caused him to kill his unborn grandchild. Also he hit his son on the head with a staff cashing a bad wound. His parents died at a young age so that definitely messed him up for life. If he had to get fostered or live with a different family that can mess people up for a long time and not feel like they are meant to be alive. He also saw many people in his family and in general die at a young age which again is not great for a young child or teen to see. He definitely saw bad things as a child which makes sense why he got the name Ivan the Terrible. This does not mean that he deserves the name, and the fact that he saw many people die and his parents dying with him so young does not excuse this or make it ok. All of the things he saw probably led to him killing his pregnant daughter and law and hurting his son. I feel like he was probably just so paranoid so he did what he did. He was good at conquering other places which I feel like was due to his mentality. This article was very interesting because in it you could see all of the events and trauma that probably led up to him killing many people including his family members.

    • That kinda changes my thinking a bit. We can see today all over the world that the environment shapes the individual, which is demonstrated by the preservation of cultures. But the environment can also negatively affect people. For example, someone from a more slum and violent environment would experience violence. This would make violence look more like a “norm” and therefore we see many people from these environments going into crime when they grow older. But I don’t agree that this is fair. Someone shouldn’t be labeled as “bad” or “evil” for what they have done when it’s really the environment that did it. They can’t change the environment, and you can’t really reject the environment either if it’s all you have. Other people do deserve “terrible” because they are motivated by other factors, like greed and wanting for revenge.

      • Yeah, I feel that the environment is something that can really shape people. Like you said someone who lives in a place where there is more violence than other places could think that violence is normal. Or for Ivan someone who grew up where his parents died when he was young and he was a lot of violence and death, he could have thought that it was normal to see people get killed. Causing him to do it because it did not seem like a horrible crime. The environment was something to say contributed to what he did but he could have chose not to kill and to realize that it was not a great thing to hurt people. Ivan did not have an excuse to do what he did but he had a possible reason that contributed to his actions.

  528. Comparing 2 political spectrum quizzes I took, I’m not that surprised that I scored moderate for both. My parents are a big factor that contribute to my conservative views, especially how they are of the minority population. However, I think that my personal opinion is what bumps it from being conservative to now moderate. Most of these new views have come from my own experiences and media, and therefore I think differently than before about certain things.

  529. I believe that John Locke’s hypothesis is correct in the Locke vs. Hobbes debate. Although a central ruler would be okay, their power can clearly be turned upside down and used for the negative. Then again, there isn’t really anyone there who can stop this power unless they try to revolt, which usually doesn’t work. An example is Adolf Hitler of Germany. He was greedy for land and power, and could easily excuse Jews for being the reason for Germany’s defeat… and I doubt that anyone could go against his beliefs. His absolute power led to a completely negative impact throughout Europe, Germany, and the entire world. Moving on, the English Constitution was solely based on the fact that the King was abusing his power. First, people bring the Magna Carta which establishes a parliament body. Next, they are forced to made a Petition of Rights because Parliament is trying to cut down on how much power the king can use and abuse. Lastly, they have to take the final step into making the English Bill of Rights, which officially set the power differential between Parliament and the King. All of these steps were because of one reason: the king was being bad. Nero, a Roman emperor, let his dark side seep in clearly. Julius Ceaser was assisinated by his own men because of how he was a dictator and how much power he could abuse. North Korea today is an example of how a dictatorship, which is a form of an absolute rule, can turn out negatively. In countries with dictatorships, freedom is limited. How is a civilization a society if there is no diversity or intellect? That civilization is more like a factory, and it doesn’t really seem like they would be able to be succesful (which I think is measured by influence and quality of life). Yes, I understand that there are some good leaders like Asoka, Alexander the Great, Justinian, and Charlemagne, but allowing for there to be a central ruler is just taking a risk. This would be saying that it’s okay because it works for most, but can’t we just make this 100%? There are other forms of government that can also govern effectively like a democracy. Allowing for there to be a bigger body to vote allows for much more fair representation than one person voting. One person can’t understand the struggles and quality of life of the common person, especially if they live in a palace all of their life. More efficient laws could be made by the people who have to be governed by these laws, not someone who imposes laws on the weak. There are more efficient ways to do it than a single ruler.

  530. When first reading the article on the Potato King, the name set the standards for the article. However, after reading deeper, certain aspects surprised me. Potatoes at first were seen as deadly, perfectly explained by the quote ““Was der Bauer nicht kennt, frisst er nicht” (“What the peasant doesn’t know, he will not eat”). This describes how people aren’t willing to take risks in society. This specifically made me think about all the things we neglect that could actually turn out to be surprisingly beneficial. Could plastic be turned into a new superproduct, used for constructiont he next big buildings? Could carbon dioxide be used to make some sort of more energy-efficient fuel? King Frederick the Great expanded the production and consumption of potatoes when Prussia was hit by a famine, and it made me realize that people are forced (or atleast not as afraid) to take risks when they don’t have anything to lose. Using this mindset, we won’t get that far. We need to be a step ahead of the game and try to solve some of these problems quickly.

    • I think it is so surprising that people did not even try potatoes not even peasant. It does make since because they are a part of the Solanaceae family which includes plants that are poisonous to humans. I feel like peasant might want to try it and test it out because of their lifestyle and how it can be harsh and cruel messing people up mentally. Like if there life is really hard and they can not deal with it anymore maybe trying the potato could kill them. Though if I was a peasant living a hard and mentally tough life I don’t think I would try a potato because people said it was poisonous. People do not like taking risks and you can see it in our current society.

  531. Share your thoughts on the “Potato King” – what are your thoughts, Tots? (…sorry)

    First going into the article, I thought it was rather odd that that was a name for someone. I thought maybe it was a weird nickname or something. As it turns out, it is a very interesting reason. Potatoes, as we know, are a cheap but very filling food. Lots of people figured this out all across Europe and started to choose potatoes. However, in Germany there was this saying that basically said that you cannot eat what you don’t know which was about skeptical people. However, the Prussian King Fredrick the Great was all for them, especially when the famine hit. When the famine his people, they still refused to eat potatoes. Now personally, I find this very weird because if you are starving, why wouldn’t you just eat when you have access to it? Or, if you think you are gonna die from starvation, might as well die trying to cure it (that is if potatoes really were untrustworthy as they thought). Anyways, when this happened the King so clearly wanted the best for his people that he served people meals in the royal household and gave out free seed potatoes. Personally, this is in my opinion, the definition of a good king. He did not want his subjects to die and even when they were refusing, he still wanted to get them to eat the potatoes and that just shows the care that he had for them. It is just crazy the extent he went in order to try to get his subjects to survive and to me, that is an amazing characteristic of a king – wanting the well being for everyone, and not just control.

  532. PYOT from a peer: Read this article about Jane Grey – what stands out to you? Maybe also check out this article on what would have happened if she had kept the throne. Any other ideas on scenarios that could have occurred if Jane had remained queen, or any overall thoughts?

    One of things that stood out to me was really how terrible Jane’s life was. She was known to be a tiny girl with fair, freckled skin and sandy red hair, plain rather than pretty, but that did not matter too much because she was royal. All of Jane’s her parents would look upon her as a pawn to be moved at their will. Worse still they treated her terribly in body and in spirit. They beat her and would get very made at her for the slightest thing. They also dressed her in rich silks but told her she would not go far on looks alone. At the beginning of her life she only had a small few people who actually liked her. Also, before their trial it was said to Jane that she would not die but in the end it did not be true and she managed to watch. Jane never even wanted to take the throne and it was almost forced for her to take and and then she was changed with treason because she was forced to take the throne and one of the things they she said before she was killed was that “Good people, I am come to die by law” she began, then said she had been guilty in taking the throne, but guiltless in never having wanted it. This shows how she never even wanted to take the throne in the first place. She was also a very religious and more specifically a Cristian woman and even at the end of her life she was saying prayers. It is thought that their are 3 main different outcomes if Jane had became queen. The first main thing that would have happened is that “She lasts a few months before being deposed” This is because she did not even want to be the Queen in the first place. The second reason this would happen is that she had a weak and unpopular claim to the throne, She also had two half sisters of Edward, Mary and Elizabeth and they both had stronger claims being daughters of Henry VIII and Both also had more popular support amongst the nobility and common folk. The second thing that could have happened is that “The era of Bloody Mary is avoided but Elizabeth eventually overthrows Jane.” This could happen if Jane and Mary cause a civil war and Jane comes out on top but then because of the civil was the country of England becomes weak and then Elizabeth ends up going over and taking over. The Third and final option is that Mary and Elizabeth are defeated, Jane rules for many years. Even though this is the most unlikely of the three things that could have happened but Jane would have overcome the difficulties of the previous scenarios and gone on to rule for many years. I don’t think in the end if Jane made it out and became the queen for a long period of time it would not have done much because in the first place she did not even want to become queen and a lot of the good rulers that we have seen over time have wanted to rule.

    • I agree with you that Jane would not of been a good ruler if she made it out in the end. Her parents didn’t even seem to care about her and there only sole purpose was to make her take the throne so she was Queen, so if she had stayed in power then she wouldn’t have made good decisions for the empire and would not of had a powerful rule in advancing society as she didn’t intend to or even want to do any of this. You could almost say her parents brought her sentencing upon her and killed her for the way they treated her and the decisions they made for her. I agree with you that the way they treated her was almost inhuman and that they went way to far just to make their family rich and powerful.

      • Yeah, she had a good potential but did not care about her parents or being queen and her parents did not care about her. They wanted her to end up being queen but they made her seem less then she actually was. Her parents were probably doing this for themselves so then their whole family can become king or queen. Also it seems like her parents were in it for the money wanting her to re-marry after Henry died. I feel like she would have made bad dessions about what to do if there was war. I feel like she probably would run the whole monarchy down. Not carry about what she did an the outcomes.

  533. PYOT from a peer: Check out this article regarding how Ivan the Terrible got his name. What stands out, and do you think Ivan deserved the nickname he got?

    Ivan was known to be tall, athletic, and probably very physically strong. But even though he had all of those quality’s he struggled with temper from a very young age and it is known to have started at the age of 13 when he wanted a group of other boys killed because he thought they were conspiring against him. I feel like this is a little crazy and intense for just being a kid and I found it very surprising. At the same time Ivan grew up with a very difficult childhood and this is because when at a young age both of his parents died and a lot of other family members die. He also witnessed a lot of different raid from the neighboring Kazan Khanate and when he ended up getting old it is believed that three of his wives had been fatally poisoned, this could be a very major part of the forming of his temper. But the main reason that he is called Ivan the Terrible though is because in 1581 he ended up beating his pregnant daughter in law because she was dressed in what he saw as immodest clothing. I think that this is very absurd because he ended up beating her so badly that she ended up having a miscarriage then by doing this he effectively killing his own unborn grandchild and I think this is absolute crazy because he ended up only doing this because of the clothes she was wearing and not a actual real good reason so I feel that at this point his temper was way to bad and that is when this nickname was probably first invented. Another think that he ended up doing that probably solidified his nickname Ivan the Terrible was that he ended up killing his oldest son with a staff from hitting him in the head because they ended up getting into a argument about the killing of his daughter. One of the last reason that I found that Ivan the terrible has that nickname is because of the things that he did as a emperor and some of those things were that he was constantly warmongering, brutalizing of his own population, attacks on the clergy, nobility and middle classes, torturing and executing of anyone he felt was against him, and was so bad with the Russian economy he brought it to its knees. Those are the reason that I think Ivan the Terrible got that nickname and if I were to decided I think that he does deserve to be called Ivan the Terrible just because of all of the terrible things he did to his family or country

  534. PYOT from ZM: Search up your birthday and write about any important events or holiday that happened on that day. How much importance did that event have on modern society? Is it a well-known event/holiday or not? Why do you think that might be?

    On September 20th, 1850 the United States Congress abolished the slave trade in the district of Colombia. This was a part of the Compromise of 1850. This was very important to modern-day society because this was a big start to ending slavery. Today there are still some slaves but it is definitely not as popular as it was back then. I don’t believe this is a popular or well-known day, I had not heard of this day until I searched it up. I think it might not be very well known because it was not talked about a lot or people are unaware of such a big deal.

    • That is so interesting I had never heard of that day either. It seems incredibly important since it was the beginning of the end for slavery, which makes it strange that I had never heard it. I think that maybe this should be taught in school so more recognition can be brought to it. Unfortunately my birthday had absolutely nothing important on it so it was hard for me to make a post similar to this one.

  535. Share your thoughts on the “Potato King” – what are your thoughts, Tots? (…sorry)

    I think its kind of goofy how he has potatoes sitting on his tombstone but I guess if he has the name “potato king” he should have potatoes on his grave. I found it crazy that potatoes are part of the Solanaceae family which includes plants that are poisonous to humans like the nightshade. Its weird that potatoes are related to deadly plants but if you envision them being toxic you can kind of see it. A potato looks like it could be a toxic vegetable. Nobody ate potatoes until a famine where King Fredrick the Great knew that potatoes would keep people alive. I think its cool that he had to think up a way to make people eat them. He would sneak them into food and pretend they were valuable so people would steal them/eat them. Eventually people did eat them and liked them. I think that he deserves that name because he did introduce potatoes as officially edible. But I also dont think this is a very important historical event, because its just potatoes. Nevertheless it was interesting and I think that he deserves his name.

    • I also think it is a little weird that potatoes are related to a poisonous family. This is just odd because unless you eat a lot of potatoes they do not harm you. But if you eat a lot of something it can poison you anyways. I think it is also interesting how Kind Fredrick would sneak potatoes into people foods and how during the day he would have people guard the potatoes that were growing so people thought they were valuable. I also do not think that this is a major event but it did spark and help potatoes to spread to many places.

  536. Share your thoughts on the “Potato King” – what are your thoughts, Tots? (…sorry)

    This article is very interesting, because it is so unusual. In my opinion it is odd that people in Europe thought that potatoes were poisonous but then everyone in South America and the Americas ate them all of the time knowing that they were perfectly safe. Also since it was poisonous it was not eaten and sometimes hung up as an ornament in Europe. Which in my opinion is really cool and almost funny just due to so many people eating potatoes everywhere now. I think that King Frederick the Great or “the Potato King” was smart. They had a supply of potatoes and when the famine hit one of the only foods was potatoes so he basically proved them wrong and made them eat it. He was very proud of all of his potatoes he had and how they would help save everyone. In my opinion it is very interesting that King Fredrick tried to pass an order to increase potato production and the Prussians refused to. This just really shows how much everyone hated the idea of eating potatoes. King Fredrick was very smart because he never forced people to eat the potatoes but he made it so that it was one of the only things people could eat and tried to continue the planting of potatoes in many places. Also his action of keeping the vegetables and potatoes guarded during the day but not at night made male people think that they were very special and precious. His action was very smart and most likely helped a lot of people live too. It is really cool how one person’s actions can impact history and food made. Now potatoes are in most German cuisine.

  537. Check out this JG / CC video on the rise and decline of Spanish power in the 15th-17th centuries – outline some of the reasons for both, and/or describe what stands out to you from the story of Spain’s central role in shaping the “Atlantic World”:

    The Aztecs began and were formed out of alliance with 3 major cities and the names of those cities are Texcoco, Tenochtitlan, and Tlacopan. The Aztecs were very hierarchical and the way it was formed it was close to what it was like in Europe. Over time the Aztecs expanded their rule over most of southern Mexico, parts of Guatemala, and Yucatan. They in total asked of the not of different tributes from these places and some of those were goods, fancy metals, and people to sacrifice and in the end this is what caused for the Aztec empire to fall. This is because of how much the emperor was demanding of the people he concurred all of the people almost ended up hating their rule so when Cortes sails over it is much easier for them to conquer the Aztec empire. Another civilization was the Incans, They were formed before the Aztecs and in many different ways they were much more successful and in total they managed to rule between 4 – 6 million people before the Spanish showed up. They also had a developed language but they also managed to communicate and keep record through knotted string that were called Quipus. Also, A main part of the Incan empire was trade. For the most part the Incan were kind to the people that they conquered and they mandated that they need to learn the Incan language, One thing that they did to the people that the conquered was that they had the males do unpaid work for the government of the certain amount of time each year. The Incan did better than the Aztecs in the fight with the Spanish because the conquered people of the Incan did not hate living their and did not hate the government as much as they did for the Aztec civilization But in the end they still died to Spanish disease. In total that Aztec and the Incan were perfect places for the the Spanish to take over because they all had similar religious believes, their administrative system very similar. After the Spanish had take over all of this land over time they found some gold but not a lot but then the Spanish found almost like a mountain of silver and then they used indigenous people to mine the silver and did not want to buy slaves because even though they did in Mexico it was not need so in the end they used the indigenous people because they were more adapted to the height of the mountain and then they ended up only getting paid small amounts for their work. The Spanish from all of mining in total ended up gaining over 150,000 tons of silver and this was over 80% of the world supply at that time. Spanish gained a lot of their power from this and then became the richest nation in the world and their currency was worth the most that this time. But sense Spain’s leader did not understand inflation and because of how much silver they had brought over they did not set a tax rate and then because of this they were getting the same amount of money 60 years later from selling silver as they did when they first brought it all home and from this the Spanish ended up not really benefiting from all of the work to get the silver. 1519 was almost the last great year for the Spanish because Charles V Combined Spain and Austria and Charles V dream was to have a unified Central Europe but this was cut short because he was killed and then Spain and Austria were passed onto his sons and then his son that took over Spain got involved and a war where they lost to the English that was called the Spanish Armada in 1588. The main thing that was caused the downfall of the Spanish was also the thing that helped them and most and that was silver. with all of this silver they just kept dumping the money into more and more ships that just ended up getting sunk anyways because of the war. In the end even all of their silver could not even pay for all of the warring that they had done and then the Spanish ended up having to borrow money that in the end they could not manage to pay back so then they ended up declining a lot from this. So in the end the thing that helped them increase there power to a point where they were the most wealthily in the entire world ended causing them to decline and be taken over. Over all the Spanish had a very large impact on the Atlantic World because they ended up establishing a lot of different places that let them gain a lot of control, power and wealth over time.

  538. Share your thoughts on the “Potato King” – what are your thoughts, Tots? (…sorry)

    I think his name “potato king” was well deserved as he was a king who saved his empire from dieing off with potatoes. It seems really odd to me the reason that people refused to eat potatoes back then. I mean they are part of the family of Solanaceae which is a group of many plants that are poisonous to humans. But when the rest of the world is eating them then I would think the Prussia would assume they were safe to eat and start to produce them. Even while they were in famine and were almost dieing of starvation they still refused to eat them which makes it seem more like they were almost against them which doesn’t make the most sense but could be an explanation. King Fredricks plan to serve them in meals in the royal household and guarding them to make them seem very precious was very smart as it caused people to see the value in them and might even force them to try and steal at night when guards weren’t looking. Overall his smart tries to convince people to eat potatoes helped save the Prussia and gives him the deserving name of “Potato King”

    • I agree, the name “potato king” makes so much sense because he saved his empire and influenced foods eaten all over the world. I also do not understand why people refused to eat potatoes but they really did not like to try them. Even peasants did not eat potatoes. That shows a lot because they had hard lives and maybe they could have ended there life from eating on, due to their beliefs. It is funny to read the article because they had such a great fear of potatoes but they are everywhere now. King Fredrick was very smart with his little tactics to save his empire and get people to eat potatoes. Making them look precious and very valuable.

  539. During the where do you stand on the political spectrum activity, I found myself to be at a -13, which is moderate with mostly leftest (liberal) views.

    I did not find this to be surprising. This is because I live in a very democratic area with parents who tend to be moderate and lean to the middle. It makes sense that people would take after their parents political views because those are the people that raise them and teach them things like morals.

  540. Share your thoughts on the “Potato King” – what are your thoughts.

    I thought this was a very interesting topic. I think what King Frederick the Great did to save his country was very smart of him. Potatoes as we have gone over in class were a huge diet for poor people around the world at this time because of all of the different positives of this crop. Potatoes can be grow in perfect soil but at the same time they are still able to be grow in poor conditions so they are the food for people who were poor. After a great famine had hit his land King Frederick the Great decided to try and feed his people potatoes because he knew it could help and even though at this time almost everyone around the world accepted potato’s and eat them consistently besides his people. A phrase from Germany stated “Was der Bauer nicht kennt, frisst er nicht” and this basically means “What the peasant doesn’t know, he will not eat” and his people so strongly believed in this phrase that it was almost impossible to even get his people to even try to consume potatoes. During this famine he knew that if his people eat the potatoes then he would be able to save them so even though at the time no one eat the potatoes he came up with a plan and he decided to serve them at meals in the royal household and distributed free seed potatoes so he could get even the royal family’s to eat potatoes. Another theory that the king did was that he that the king developed a smart plan to gain interest in the potatoes. He kept a heavy guard around his potato fields in Berlin during the day, but at night the guard would leave the potatoes unprotected. By doing this he wanted people to think that the potatoes were quite precious and important, which might lead the civilians to sneak some of the valuable vegetables when guards weren’t around. Even though this was a huge risk it ended up working and the potato was finally accepted by this people as good food to consume and even now to this day it is a huge part of German food.

  541. PYOT from a peer: Check out this article regarding how Ivan the Terrible got his name. What stands out, and do you think Ivan deserved the nickname he got?

    Something that stood out to me was the fact that he did this brutal stuff to his own family and didn’t realize the how bad his actions were. I think he deserves the nickname even though he did have a rough childhood and grew up with alot of violence. His background does give him sort of an excuse for his anger issue like if he hurt someone because he was mad but him doing something as serious as he did and to his own family is not justified. Maybe if it was in battle or against someone that would make it seem right but it was someone he should love and never hurt.

    • It is so wrong that he was brutal to his family. First off it is rude and bad to be brutal to anyone but the fact that he did it to his family is another level of disrespect. I think that he deserves the name sort of but there is many people who are worse than him that should get ‘the terrible’ People like hitler should get ‘the terrible’ added to there name first in my opinion. I feel like even his background can sort of excuse him for doing what he did. It still does not really make it ok. I think that in battle his anger and background would help him a lot because the goal is not to be nice or love the opposing people.

      • I see why he gets the name if it’s to his family he did some of the stuff he did. Family is meant to have a sense of security, so breaking that bond of trust is emphasized, and makes sense. Just like Bloody Mary, who got the nickname “bloody” because of how she burned many protestants to death. The manner in which she killed them got her nickname. The manner and direction in which Ivan did his actions makes him deserve his name

        • Yeah, I still do not think that he should get the nickname “ivan the Terrible” but what he did to his family was not good and just cruel. For someone to do that they did to have a bad background like he had and probably some mental issues too.

  542. PYOT from a peer: Check out this article regarding how Ivan the Terrible got his name. What stands out, and do you think Ivan deserved the nickname he got?

    Something that stood out to me was the theory that he became so terrible because of the burden he was put upon during a child. Right away I found out one thing that could have given him his name. It says that the story goes that he would beat his pregnant daughter in law because she was dressed in a way he did not like. Apparently he beat her so badly she had a miscarriage. When the father of the woman found out and got upset, Ivan fatally hit him on the head with his cane. Obviously this alone is enough to explain why he would get the title of Ivan the Terrible. I am confused as to why they say “the story” and I wonder if this was a real person or a legend? Its also kind of interesting that the article blames his upbringing for some of hiss aggressive behavior because when he was a child both of his parents died and he had witnessed many of his family members being killed, as well as the fact that his mother and three of his wives were believed to have been fatally poisoned. This appeared as a terrible past and kind of explains why he might interpret the same behavior because he grew up around it, but it still serves him right that his name is Ivan the Terrible.

  543. In the continuing effort to make sure Her-stories don’t get lost in the teaching of History, check out these bad-ass ladies, and possibly talk about how and why her stories still get under emphasized today

    I think that Queen Tamar was cool because she motivated her army to defeat an enemy that had them outnumbered. She also did so much as a woman at that time such as expanding borders, and oversaw architectural projects. Another lady, who I think was more impressive, was Caterina Sforza. She learned about medicine and botany, she went to people during the plague, which was deadly, and she gave them medicines. She also prevented a new pope from being elected while pregnant and stopped all of Rome. I think that it was super impressive because of her circumstances. She also accomplished a lot despite the gender roles of women back then.

  544. A deeper dive into a very busy dude… what are your thoughts on the many jobs / rivalries / monumental issues and events that Charles V was involved in – which do you think kept him up nights the most? Is he a good or bad guy? Respond as inspired

    I think that he had so many jobs that I can’t imagine he would have done any of them that well. I also think that he was part of the reason that New Spain and Peru received widespread inflation. I don’t necessarily think he was a terrible person but he definitely was not a good one. Because he used lower countries that struggled more to use their economy to repay the loans he got from Germany and Italy. Overall just judged by the amount of things he did and the quarrels he got in Im guessing he was not the best.

    • I already found it cool that he was managing the Holy Roman Empire as well as Spain, and it makes me question if someone has ruled two completely separate political estates at the same time like him. This by itself I feel would keep him up, since running one state alone is stressful nowadays. I wonder if he favored one over the other, and therefore left one with worse living conditions.

      • Yeah, It is really cool that he was able to manage the HRE, Spain and other territories but that must have been very hard. I think that it would be hard to rule 2 different political estates because you have to be on top of what is happening at all times. I feel like since Charles V had two political estates it could have made it easier for people to plan and take over both. Like if some county invades Spain he was probably focused on Spain so a county that teamed up could invade the HRE and the would most likely be in a bad position. I feel like he probably favored one more than the other because of the people their, what he can get, how the political system was going and how it is their in general.

  545. In response to:

    PYOT from a peer: Check out this article regarding how Ivan the Terrible got his name. What stands out, and do you think Ivan deserved the nickname he got?

    I believe that it’s unfair to give “Ivan the terrible” such a derogatory nick name. I think this because of the fact that there are far more worst people than him that aren’t known as “the terrible.” Not that any of his violent actions were justified, but I think that he gets a slight pass because of his tragic past. He’s seen death all around him and it’s hard to say what that can do to someone.

    • I think that his actions did sort of give him his name but it is not right. He did bad things that he should not have done like harmed his family and killed people but like you said there is many more people that are worse. Instead of Ivan the Terrible it should be something like Hitler the Terrible before Ivan gets that name. In my opinion he does not deserve the name because he had a hard life and others are way worse than him.

      • I like Aiden’s reasoning. I don’t think that Ivan should be given a nickname when there are people that have done much worse. I thought that nicknames were given to people in order to emphasize the bad at they did, and clearly that is not so. But then again, maybe “Ivan The Terrible” was already given his name in his culture and people never really gave Hitler a nickname because they didn’t give people nicknames like that. What I’m saying is that Germany might have not had that same idea, regardless if what Hitler did was worse. Also, Ivan came before Hitler… almost 2 centuries before, although I understand what you mean Sloane when you say before in terms of the level of influence they had and not the year they reigned. I still believe that Ivan didn’t do the best things, but giving him an emphasizing nickname doesn’t make the most sense.

        • Yeah, he should not be giving the name but he did sort of deserve it due to his actions he did and how those actions are though of currently. Like killing your son in current times in unexeptible but it is more “normal” back then because of more wars happening and the environment/how people grew up. But I am pretty sure he wanted people to call him that, so if that is true it make it a little different.

  546. PYOT from SM: Would you rather live life as a doctor, a banker or a pirate? Explain? How is life better? What are the pros and cons?

    I would rather become a banker because they get the highest amount of money. I do think that while the amount of work would be tiring and stressful, I also think that it would be rewarding. The cons of being a doctor are high stress, lack of time with family and friends, depression, and getting burnt out. However there are also many pros of being a doctor such as satisfaction of helping others, good pay, and the connection you make with your patients. The pros of being a pirate was easy and low stress lifestyle, minimal work, lots of fun with crew. The cons are short lifespan, lack of cleanliness, and maintaining the ship. Overall I just think that being a banker is almost a balance between the two jobs and if I put in the effort it would the most successful out of the options.

    • I do agree with you but life as a banker seems really boring and not fun to do. You get a lot of money but really do not do that much. People like doctors and pirates have a more interactive and rewarding life. When I did this post it was really hard to chose what job because there is just so many pros and cons and it is hard to find which ones way out more than the others. I chose a pirate because you get to explore, have fun and be with your friends. There is a lot of diseases and mortalitys but that seems like the most fun job in my opinion. Like you said since there is so many pros and cons they are almost equal.

      • I agree with Sloane’s reasoning. I was originally going to pick something that is sustainable like a doctor or banker (since you get a lot of $$$), but jobs have to have all the factors weighed out and fitted to your personal needs. Banking is boring and being a doctor is stressful and requires a lot of previous knowledge (which we can see today is very expensive). Being a pirate would be an interesting job because you get to do stuff like see different parts of the world and interact with people that you wouldn’t see every day. Being a banker is middle-tier. You can still get money and influence and I don’t think that a lot of preparation is needed, but it’s the same thing over and over. I would say that being a banker is the best option in terms of morality and economical sustainability

        • I think that all of you make good reasons. I think it does however, depend on the time period that we are talking about. For example, because of security and technology life as a pirate right now would be a very difficult life to live. This is because you are a criminal and would be wanted. Overall, I think that a banker would be the best choice because of the overall income. However, certain doctors including surgeons, make a lot of money as well.

          • If this was a time period where pirates were just first starting to emerge and not illegal, do you think that would make a pirate better than a banker? What factors are you basing your decision on? I base my decision on happiness, mortality (dangerous?), sustainability (is $$ enough to live on), and social status. Because of this, I would also agree that being a banker is the overall best but being a pirate most likely provides more happiness and excitement than the other 2 options since new things happen out on the sea compared to doing the same thing over and over as a banker. And depending on how much a person values their excitement, being a pirate (as long as you can get $$) would be a good choice. Being a doctor is stressful by itself but does level out with the $$$ you can get from it.

          • There is so many pros and cons that it is hard to make a decision, like do you want to work long hours but get a good pay, work a boring job and get a ok pay or do you want to sale the sea and get a pay based on what you steal? I also think that a banker is the best for a long time with money you get and the over all work you have to but in.

        • I feel like for a job that you would want to do for a long time I would choose a pirate or doctor but for a job that gets a lot of money I would choose a doctor or banker. If you are a doctor you get a great pay and can have fun with the job. You do have long and weird hours but you have a good purpose in society. Being a pirate just seems like a lot of fun, you get to see many parts of the world and other societys but there are a lot of diseases and things that could go wrong. When I think of a job I could do for a long time it would be the most fun or the best paying and a banker does not fit that requirement for me. Being a banker is the best option for the less gruesome since you do not have to watch others die on a regular basis or work with sick people.

  547. Disagree (2)
    Agree (4)
    Not Sure (3)
    Not Sure (3)
    Not Sure (3)
    Strongly Agree (5)
    Not Sure (3)
    Agree (4)
    Not Sure (3)
    Disagree (2)
    Disagree (2)
    Agree (4)
    Agree (4)
    Agree (4)
    Disagree (2)
    Not Sure (3)

    29-22 Difference = 7

    • Ashley you seem to be very moderate, do you find that to be surprising or not? And why?!?

      • I am not sure, Aiden. Some of these questions I said not sure because I didn’t know what they were saying or what they were. I took one of the tests linked on the unit 9 slideshow, and it said I was a “Faith and Flag Conservative” on the chart. On the chart, this was the farthest right/republican option on there.

    • I’ve always been interested in Q15 because it’s not as controversial as others and debatable. I feel like billionaires should be taxed more so they are paying the same portion of their income as people who are less fortunate. I feel like the portion of which someone has to pay is a better unit of measurement than the amount someone has to pay, since the portion varies per person and the amount doesn’t. These proportions can either make or break. Why do you disagree?

      • Fennell, I can see how this makes sense however I do disagree. The reason that I disagree is because why should people that make a lot of money have to give more because others can’t? I feel that this is a little unfair to the people with more money. Yes, I understand that it is a kind thing to do and a feeling of I have more, I can give more but I feel if you have extra money, it should be your choice.

        • So do you think that the amount of money someone gives is a more fair unit of measurement than the portion of their entire money they have to give? I think portion.

          • Yes, I do. The reason for this is say someone has 100 dollars and another has one. This is a random example but I’ll explain. Say they have to give ten percent of their money for something. The person with $100 will have to give $10, while the person with $1 will have to give $0.10. I feel like it makes it easier for everyone to pay, and I understand that usually people with more money aren’t in financial binds, however, I just find it weird to take more from people that are more successful.

            • I see that you are thinking about it in a more global way, concerned with every single person. However, I think that we have to know that everyone has a special and individual financial situation, and it would only be fair if we taxed accordingly. In a more realistic situation of taxing, say one person has $10 and another person has $100. If the tax is $10, then that means that one person would leave with $0 and the other would leave with $90. One person would leave with no money to spend on the actual necessities of life. Tax is meant to be something that you just file and move on with, but in this situation it wouldn’t be for some. Tax shouldn’t be as big of a deal it should be, however it can hit some people hard compared to others. The person leaving with $90 would feel almost no change. Changing to this system technically is “more fair for poorer people”, but that technically isn’t even the case. This should’ve been the starting solution for taxation, and people who have experienced this system would find the current system unfair because there would be a much heavier emphasis on people who are going bankrupt due to tax and exponentially higher levels of tax fraud. This is one of the only options.

              • Fennell, I understand your reasoning and it is a great argument, it is better for people. I feel like it would just take a lot from people with a lot of money, however, it probably wouldn’t hurt them that much. Maybe there could be a compromise where there is a max amount people pay for taxes so richer people don’t have to give so so much while still giving a good portion.

  548. History and numbers of the slave trade – what stands out to you regarding the impact and growth of slavery in the Americas / the future US

    Something that surprised me was how fast the population of slaves grew in such little time. Before reading this article I knew that slavery grew very fast but after they demonstrated how fast it grew in a short period of time I was very surprised. Nowadays you don’t see as many slaves but there is still a great amount that are still around. I think it has taken so long to get rid of slavery and that is something that the entire world has to work on.

    • It’s kinda surprising but expected that the rate of slavery skyrocketed because slaves clearly could get so much more work done than before, and it’s obvious that people would want more of something that is working well, regardless of the means that they have to take. Nowadays people are recognizing that the means are much more heavily weighted than the benefits, thus the much lower levels of slavery. But, as we know, there will always remain some bad in the world regardless of how many laws are enforced.

  549. Unit 9 Slide 11

    1. Not sure (3)
    2. disagree (2)
    3. agree (4)
    4. strongly disagree (1)
    5. strongly agree (5)
    6. strongly agree (5)
    7. disagree (2)
    8. Strongly disagree (5)
    9. strongly disagree (5)
    10. strongly disagree (5)
    11. strongly agree (5)
    12. agree (4)
    13. strongly disagree (5)
    14. Strongly disagree (5)
    15. strongly disagree (5)
    16. disagree (4)

    Score: 33

    • For #2 concerning dedicated prayer time during school hours, I used to think that it would be beneficial but now I am starting to change my mind. I thought that it would be beneficial because all people of all religious backgrounds would have time to do what they need during the day, but when I take it into the context of our school, I don’t really think that many people would pray. There would only be a few people who probably pray, and these people would be easily distinguishable. Then again, wouldn’t there by time to pray before you go to school? I don’t see why you would have to be in a public school environment in order to pray. In some cultures they do meditation and prayers in public, but I don’t know if it’s best to do it around developing teenagers who may not think before they speak.

      • I had a similar experience to you, as I grew up in a religious family and also thought that prayer would be a good thing, but now that I think about it it really doesn’t make sense at all. One of the main points of America is freedom of religion and separating church and the state, and having prayer in school would kind of be forcing religion upon people. Also, there are so many different types of prayers it would be impossible to decide how to do it and what type. Not very logical at all and seems more like a personal thing not something to be taught at school.

    • One of the questions that stood out to me was Question #15, which revolves around if billionaires should have to be taxed more, or people in a certain tax bracket. When I was young I thought that billionaires shouldn’t be taxed more since they have to pay more money, however I feel like the percent of their income is more important than how much money they are giving away. If all people are taxed the same, then that means that lower income people are paying a much greater portion of their money compared to billionaires, and this is unfair. To model it, if you were at a mall, it wouldn’t be bad to buy gum for $5 if you have a budget of $100. However, it would be much worse to buy gym for $5 if you have a budget of $20. You would have much less money left compared to a person who only has to spend 5% compared to 25%. I believe that billionaires should have to pay the same portion of their income as someone who is of lower income, because this would be more fair than comparing how much physical money each person pays.

    • Questions #12 and #13 talk about punishments for doing things, specifically the selling of illegal substances and saying discriminatory things. All I need to say is that clearly the punishments are enough if many people are still doing these things every day. More Fear (FT) is needed to keep people in line, even in a school setting.

  550. Yeah, it is crazy in my opinion to think about how the US and the Americas would be different without Europe exploring. There could have been many different tribal groups, a lot of fighting and disagreements due to land and territories. When Europe came to the Americas it changed so many things and the whole course of history. I just causes an appreciation for Europe because where we are living now could have been much different.

  551. I agree, the world and history was shaped by mainly technology, geography and ideology. They all can go hand in hand at some point. Like how in places like Africa, there geography makes it so there is more climate zones and separation of groups which can cause different religions and beliefs. Then places that are located more in the forest or where there are trees they might build things differently or have to have different tools. Then like Martin Luther, and his 95 these, the invention of the printing press helped Martin Luther post his 95 these and he did this because of the church and not liking what they were doing. Honestly every focus theme is important because they all tie to each other some how.

  552. My opinions and positions about the slide 11.
    1- not sure(3)
    2-disagree(2)
    3-disagree(2)
    4-Strongly agree(5)
    5-disagree(2)
    6-not sure(3)
    7-not sure(3)
    8-Strongly agree(5)
    9-Strongly disagree(1)
    10-agree(4)
    11-agree(4)
    12-agree(4)
    13-agree(4)
    14-not sure(3)
    15-Strongly disagree(1)
    16-disagree(2)

  553. I love Jake

  554. Check out this article on lady pirates in history – what stands out to you?

    The first thing that stood out to me is that pirates came from just about everywhere. They came from so many different countries, ie. China and America. A pirate named Cheng SaoⅠamassed a pirate fleet 60 times larger than Blackbeard’s. I find this crazy because I feel like Blackbeard is one of the most well known pirates ever, if not the most. I find this weird because you would think if Blackbeard is so significant that we have books and articles about him, you’d think somebody that did more would have that impact too. This was probably because back then, they didn’t care at all about what the women did, the men were too important. I just think even though these women might not have been celebrated back then, they’d still have more stories and become a little better known at this point in time.

    • I am also very surprised that Cheng Sao had a fleet 60 times larger than Blackbeards because female pirates are not as well known. Also Blackbeard is one of the most well known pirates ever which makes it even more surprising. I think the reason why female pirates are less known compared to male pirates because being a pirate is a job where you have to be strong, a good leader and have a lot of courage and that might be something men did not women to be known for. They wanted women to be known for cleaning and cooking not fighting and being brutal to others. It is sad to see/hear about how women were not as celebrated when they did the same thing or even more compared to men.

      • I find it interesting that you touch on the stereotypes of the common pirate, and since Cheng Sao didn’t fit them, she wasn’t acknowledged. I kinda thinked about this on the flip side, and wouldn’t it be even more impressive for someone who doesn’t meet the requirements do the example same work and BETTER than someone who does?

  555. PYOT from ZM: Search up your birthday and write about any important events or holiday that happened on that day. How much importance did that event have on modern society? Is it a well known event/holiday or not? Why do you think that might be?

    My birthday is July 12th, and I think that this day had an impact on society, not a super important day, but a lot of stuff did happen on it. Then again, the same could be said to most days in the year. I think that everyone’s birthday has something important that happened on it. But basically, no, I don’t think my birthday is a well known event at all and not a super important date in history.

    So first to connect to History, Desiderus Erasmus, a humanist that we talked about in Unit 7, died on my birthday. Not very impactful at all, I would say, but it’s a fun fact.
    Some events that definitely impacted a lot of people are:
    1. Prince Albert II becoming King of Monaco
    2. Family Feud with Steve Harvey first airs
    3. The island nation of Sao Tome and Principe was granted independence from Portugal
    4. The Rolling Stones perform at their first show
    And then I already knew that Malala shared a birthday with me, but so does Bill Crosby and Henry David Thoreau, who lived in Concord.

    • That is cool! It is interesting and very cool in my opinion that someone we talked about a few units ago died on your birthday. I would also say that there is little effects because he did a lot in his lifetime and what he was trying to do mostly happened.

  556. Share your thoughts on the “Potato King” – what are your thoughts, Tots? (…sorry)

    I thought it was really interesting how hard the king had to work to get the people to accept potatoes. Basically, people back then thought they were really poisonous and afraid to try the new food from the Americas, but when there was a famine the only way to save the people was to convince them to eat potatoes. The king couldn’t force them, so he came up with an ingenious plan. I think this shows how good of a king he was, because he was smart enough to solve the problem in a unique way and also it shows he cares a lot about his subjects. Personally, if my subjects were too stubborn to eat this food right in front of them when they were starving I would have gotten pretty frustrated and waited until they were desperate enough to eat the potatoes. But King Fredrick was a better person then me and very smart too to come up with that solution.

    • What you said was very interesting the whole history, it being very popular now, people thinking it was poisonous, then eating it because of a famine. Now a- days most people eat something made out of a potato every day I would say and I would not have thought people would think it was poison. It is interesting that a potato could be considered poisonous back then and is so popular now. People though if you think a potato is poisonous I do not think anyone would want to try it and test it out. I think that the “potato king” was very smart because he wanted people to eat them but the people did not, so when a famine came he gave them potatoes and they ate them. He was a good problem solver and determined.

  557. In their defense, custodians do a bunch of maintenance / infrastructural work beyond their cleaning up messes duties (and there be a lot of messes around 800+ teenagers…)

    If the building isn’t safe and clean, any teaching and learning going on would always be negatively impacted

    #1 rule of education – make the school as safe, clean, and as pleasant as possible; custodians do all 3, on a daily basis – not sure that can always be said of all teachers… just sayin…

    nice thread here All!

  558. Hey – she’s on a classroom wall, see if you can spot her…

    Such a good dog!!! Humans, not always so much… 😦

  559. Check out this article regarding how Ivan the Terrible got his name. What stands out, and do you think Ivan deserved the nickname he got?

    It stands out that he is very conservative considering that he spanked his daughter in law just for using bad clothes, I think that he deserves this nickname to be honest, because he caused a lot of deaths and much suffering for his family.

    • I agree, his actions did contribute to his name and make since. What he did was in general wrong but probably not wrong to him. Because of his political beliefs that could have tied to him hitting his daughter and causing a lot of deaths. I think that anyone who is really conservative or liberal does not totally have their mind in the right place. He could be an example of it.

      • I agree, to him it was not considered wrong because of his mindset or possibly how he was brought up. I think that people’s upbringing deeply influence their self-awareness and moral spectrum. When individuals grow up in environments where certain behaviors are normalized, they may not recognize those behaviors as negative or harmful. This could be possible because the sense of right and wrong is largely shaped by the practices they are exposed to. If someone is raised where aggressive behavior is the norm and maybe even rewarded, they may not view it as bad. They might lack the self awareness to see the impact of their actions on others because they’ve deemed that type of behavior as acceptable. I think that Ivan may be an example of this type of situation.


Leave a comment